Hidden Markov models identify major movement modes in accelerometer and magnetometer data from four albatross species

• Published in: Movement ecology 2021-02, Vol.9 (1), p.7-7, Article 7
• Main Authors: Conners, Melinda G, Michelot, Théo, Heywood, Eleanor I, Orben, Rachael A, Phillips, Richard A, Vyssotski, Alexei L, Shaffer, Scott A, Thorne, Lesley H
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accelerometer; Accelerometers; Albatross; Albatrosses; Animal behavior; Animal movement; Behavioral classification; Classification; Datasets; Dynamic soaring; Flapping; Flight; Flight behavior; Foraging behavior; Foraging habitats; Hidden Markov models; Inertial platforms; Life history; Magnetic fields; Magnetometers; Marine animals; Markov chains; Markov processes; Measuring instruments; Model accuracy; Sensors; Soaring; Terrestrial environments; Time series
• ISSN: 2051-3933; 2051-3933
• DOI: 10.1186/s40462-021-00243-z

Inertial measurement units (IMUs) with high-resolution sensors such as accelerometers are now used extensively to study fine-scale behavior in a wide range of marine and terrestrial animals. Robust and practical methods are required for the computationally-demanding analysis of the resulting large datasets, particularly for automating classification routines that construct behavioral time series and time-activity budgets. Magnetometers are used increasingly to study behavior, but it is not clear how these sensors contribute to the accuracy of behavioral classification methods. Development of effective  classification methodology is key to understanding energetic and life-history implications of foraging and other behaviors. We deployed accelerometers and magnetometers on four species of free-ranging albatrosses and evaluated the ability of unsupervised hidden Markov models (HMMs) to identify three major modalities in their behavior: 'flapping flight', 'soaring flight', and 'on-water'. The relative contribution of each sensor to classification accuracy was measured by comparing HMM-inferred states with expert classifications identified from stereotypic patterns observed in sensor data. HMMs provided a flexible and easily interpretable means of classifying behavior from sensor data. Model accuracy was high overall (92%), but varied across behavioral states (87.6, 93.1 and 91.7% for 'flapping flight', 'soaring flight' and 'on-water', respectively). Models built on accelerometer data alone were as accurate as those that also included magnetometer data; however, the latter were useful for investigating slow and periodic behaviors such as dynamic soaring at a fine scale. The use of IMUs in behavioral studies produces large data sets, necessitating the development of computationally-efficient methods to automate behavioral classification in order to synthesize and interpret underlying patterns. HMMs provide an accessible and robust framework for analyzing complex IMU datasets and comparing behavioral variation among taxa across habitats, time and space.