Loading…
Evaluation of Unknown Tube Well Depth Using Electrical Resistivity Method
Electrical resistivity method has increasingly adopted in engineering, environmental, mining and archaeological studies. Systematic and proper studies of unknown civil engineering structure evaluation particularly on tube well depth was rarely being established. Conventionally, camera test or string...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference Proceeding |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-1b1f4230a29f8eff64e1cf706d052d38f6d0ff7b9f56ed1fae94cb108b421ae43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-1b1f4230a29f8eff64e1cf706d052d38f6d0ff7b9f56ed1fae94cb108b421ae43 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 7002 |
container_title | |
container_volume | 103 |
creator | Zainal Abidin, Mohd Hazreek Madun, Aziman Ahmad Tajudin, Saiful Azhar Tajul Baharuddin, Mohamad Faizal Yusof, Mohd Fairus Zakaria, Muhammad Nizam Rahmat, Siti Nazahiyah |
description | Electrical resistivity method has increasingly adopted in engineering, environmental, mining and archaeological studies. Systematic and proper studies of unknown civil engineering structure evaluation particularly on tube well depth was rarely being established. Conventionally, camera test or string with weight approach has been used to evaluate unknown tube well depth thus exposed to several restriction due to its expensive and time consuming. Hence, this study focused on evaluation of unknown tube well depth using indirect test with particular reference to electrical resistivity method (ERM).A single spread line of electrical resistivity survey was performed using ABEM SAS 4000 equipment set based on Wenner and Pole-dipole array in line with the tube well position. Electrical resistivity raw data was processed using RES2DINV software producing electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) of the subsurface profile studied. Then, electrical resistivity value (ERV) obtained from RES2DINV analyses (ERT) was extracted and analysed using plotted graph (depth versus ERV) specifically at tube well position based on electrical resistivity spread line performed. It was found that both array have shown some good similarity results in term of tube well depth (20 m) thus able to verify the result interpreted. Both array have shown some good similarity of ERV representing groundwater (ERV = 10 – 100 Ωm) and soil with water (ERV > 100 Ωm) at depth of 0 – 20 m and >20 m respectively. All those interpretation have shown good agreement based on verification thru established ERV of earth materials references, geological map and nearest available boreholes data. Hence, this study has shown that the application of ERM was applicable in evaluation of unknown tube well depth which efficient in term of cost, time and environmental sustainable. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1051/matecconf/201710307002 |
format | conference_proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6190b780d7e444e3b11ffc7aec8452eb</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6190b780d7e444e3b11ffc7aec8452eb</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2057191289</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-1b1f4230a29f8eff64e1cf706d052d38f6d0ff7b9f56ed1fae94cb108b421ae43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkVFLwzAUhYsoOHR_QQI-T-9N06Z9lDl1oAji0LeQpjea2TUzySb-e6sT8ekeLodzDnxZdoJwhlDg-UonMsb39pwDSoQcJADfy0aclzjhefm8_08fZuMYlwCAeS2hlqNsPtvqbqOT8z3zli36t95_9Oxx0xB7oq5jl7ROr2wRXf_CZh2ZFJzRHXug6GJyW5c-2R2lV98eZwdWd5HGv_coW1zNHqc3k9v76_n04nZihs40wQat4DloXtuKrC0FobESyhYK3uaVHYS1sqltUVKLVlMtTINQNYKjJpEfZfNdbuv1Uq2DW-nwqbx26ufhw4vSITnTkSqxhkZW0EoSQlDeIFprpCZTiYJTM2Sd7rLWwb9vKCa19JvQD_MVh0JijbyqB1e5c5ngYwxk_1oR1DcF9UdB_aeQfwHnqH08</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>2057191289</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Evaluation of Unknown Tube Well Depth Using Electrical Resistivity Method</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Zainal Abidin, Mohd Hazreek ; Madun, Aziman ; Ahmad Tajudin, Saiful Azhar ; Tajul Baharuddin, Mohamad Faizal ; Yusof, Mohd Fairus ; Zakaria, Muhammad Nizam ; Rahmat, Siti Nazahiyah</creator><contributor>Yee Yong, L. ; Mohd Shalahuddin, A. ; Alvin John Meng Siang, L. ; Mohamad Hanifi, O. ; Zainorizuan, M.J. ; Siti Nazahiyah, R.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Zainal Abidin, Mohd Hazreek ; Madun, Aziman ; Ahmad Tajudin, Saiful Azhar ; Tajul Baharuddin, Mohamad Faizal ; Yusof, Mohd Fairus ; Zakaria, Muhammad Nizam ; Rahmat, Siti Nazahiyah ; Yee Yong, L. ; Mohd Shalahuddin, A. ; Alvin John Meng Siang, L. ; Mohamad Hanifi, O. ; Zainorizuan, M.J. ; Siti Nazahiyah, R.</creatorcontrib><description>Electrical resistivity method has increasingly adopted in engineering, environmental, mining and archaeological studies. Systematic and proper studies of unknown civil engineering structure evaluation particularly on tube well depth was rarely being established. Conventionally, camera test or string with weight approach has been used to evaluate unknown tube well depth thus exposed to several restriction due to its expensive and time consuming. Hence, this study focused on evaluation of unknown tube well depth using indirect test with particular reference to electrical resistivity method (ERM).A single spread line of electrical resistivity survey was performed using ABEM SAS 4000 equipment set based on Wenner and Pole-dipole array in line with the tube well position. Electrical resistivity raw data was processed using RES2DINV software producing electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) of the subsurface profile studied. Then, electrical resistivity value (ERV) obtained from RES2DINV analyses (ERT) was extracted and analysed using plotted graph (depth versus ERV) specifically at tube well position based on electrical resistivity spread line performed. It was found that both array have shown some good similarity results in term of tube well depth (20 m) thus able to verify the result interpreted. Both array have shown some good similarity of ERV representing groundwater (ERV = 10 – 100 Ωm) and soil with water (ERV > 100 Ωm) at depth of 0 – 20 m and >20 m respectively. All those interpretation have shown good agreement based on verification thru established ERV of earth materials references, geological map and nearest available boreholes data. Hence, this study has shown that the application of ERM was applicable in evaluation of unknown tube well depth which efficient in term of cost, time and environmental sustainable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2261-236X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2274-7214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2261-236X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201710307002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Les Ulis: EDP Sciences</publisher><subject>Archaeology ; Arrays ; Boreholes ; Conductivity ; Electrical resistivity ; Geological mapping ; Glass & glassware industry ; Groundwater ; Similarity ; Soil water</subject><ispartof>MATEC web of conferences, 2017, Vol.103, p.7002</ispartof><rights>2017. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-1b1f4230a29f8eff64e1cf706d052d38f6d0ff7b9f56ed1fae94cb108b421ae43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-1b1f4230a29f8eff64e1cf706d052d38f6d0ff7b9f56ed1fae94cb108b421ae43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2057191289?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23929,23930,25139,25752,27923,27924,37011,44589</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Yee Yong, L.</contributor><contributor>Mohd Shalahuddin, A.</contributor><contributor>Alvin John Meng Siang, L.</contributor><contributor>Mohamad Hanifi, O.</contributor><contributor>Zainorizuan, M.J.</contributor><contributor>Siti Nazahiyah, R.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Zainal Abidin, Mohd Hazreek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madun, Aziman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad Tajudin, Saiful Azhar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tajul Baharuddin, Mohamad Faizal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yusof, Mohd Fairus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakaria, Muhammad Nizam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahmat, Siti Nazahiyah</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Unknown Tube Well Depth Using Electrical Resistivity Method</title><title>MATEC web of conferences</title><description>Electrical resistivity method has increasingly adopted in engineering, environmental, mining and archaeological studies. Systematic and proper studies of unknown civil engineering structure evaluation particularly on tube well depth was rarely being established. Conventionally, camera test or string with weight approach has been used to evaluate unknown tube well depth thus exposed to several restriction due to its expensive and time consuming. Hence, this study focused on evaluation of unknown tube well depth using indirect test with particular reference to electrical resistivity method (ERM).A single spread line of electrical resistivity survey was performed using ABEM SAS 4000 equipment set based on Wenner and Pole-dipole array in line with the tube well position. Electrical resistivity raw data was processed using RES2DINV software producing electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) of the subsurface profile studied. Then, electrical resistivity value (ERV) obtained from RES2DINV analyses (ERT) was extracted and analysed using plotted graph (depth versus ERV) specifically at tube well position based on electrical resistivity spread line performed. It was found that both array have shown some good similarity results in term of tube well depth (20 m) thus able to verify the result interpreted. Both array have shown some good similarity of ERV representing groundwater (ERV = 10 – 100 Ωm) and soil with water (ERV > 100 Ωm) at depth of 0 – 20 m and >20 m respectively. All those interpretation have shown good agreement based on verification thru established ERV of earth materials references, geological map and nearest available boreholes data. Hence, this study has shown that the application of ERM was applicable in evaluation of unknown tube well depth which efficient in term of cost, time and environmental sustainable.</description><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Arrays</subject><subject>Boreholes</subject><subject>Conductivity</subject><subject>Electrical resistivity</subject><subject>Geological mapping</subject><subject>Glass & glassware industry</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Similarity</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><issn>2261-236X</issn><issn>2274-7214</issn><issn>2261-236X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkVFLwzAUhYsoOHR_QQI-T-9N06Z9lDl1oAji0LeQpjea2TUzySb-e6sT8ekeLodzDnxZdoJwhlDg-UonMsb39pwDSoQcJADfy0aclzjhefm8_08fZuMYlwCAeS2hlqNsPtvqbqOT8z3zli36t95_9Oxx0xB7oq5jl7ROr2wRXf_CZh2ZFJzRHXug6GJyW5c-2R2lV98eZwdWd5HGv_coW1zNHqc3k9v76_n04nZihs40wQat4DloXtuKrC0FobESyhYK3uaVHYS1sqltUVKLVlMtTINQNYKjJpEfZfNdbuv1Uq2DW-nwqbx26ufhw4vSITnTkSqxhkZW0EoSQlDeIFprpCZTiYJTM2Sd7rLWwb9vKCa19JvQD_MVh0JijbyqB1e5c5ngYwxk_1oR1DcF9UdB_aeQfwHnqH08</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Zainal Abidin, Mohd Hazreek</creator><creator>Madun, Aziman</creator><creator>Ahmad Tajudin, Saiful Azhar</creator><creator>Tajul Baharuddin, Mohamad Faizal</creator><creator>Yusof, Mohd Fairus</creator><creator>Zakaria, Muhammad Nizam</creator><creator>Rahmat, Siti Nazahiyah</creator><general>EDP Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Unknown Tube Well Depth Using Electrical Resistivity Method</title><author>Zainal Abidin, Mohd Hazreek ; Madun, Aziman ; Ahmad Tajudin, Saiful Azhar ; Tajul Baharuddin, Mohamad Faizal ; Yusof, Mohd Fairus ; Zakaria, Muhammad Nizam ; Rahmat, Siti Nazahiyah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-1b1f4230a29f8eff64e1cf706d052d38f6d0ff7b9f56ed1fae94cb108b421ae43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Arrays</topic><topic>Boreholes</topic><topic>Conductivity</topic><topic>Electrical resistivity</topic><topic>Geological mapping</topic><topic>Glass & glassware industry</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Similarity</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zainal Abidin, Mohd Hazreek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madun, Aziman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad Tajudin, Saiful Azhar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tajul Baharuddin, Mohamad Faizal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yusof, Mohd Fairus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakaria, Muhammad Nizam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahmat, Siti Nazahiyah</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zainal Abidin, Mohd Hazreek</au><au>Madun, Aziman</au><au>Ahmad Tajudin, Saiful Azhar</au><au>Tajul Baharuddin, Mohamad Faizal</au><au>Yusof, Mohd Fairus</au><au>Zakaria, Muhammad Nizam</au><au>Rahmat, Siti Nazahiyah</au><au>Yee Yong, L.</au><au>Mohd Shalahuddin, A.</au><au>Alvin John Meng Siang, L.</au><au>Mohamad Hanifi, O.</au><au>Zainorizuan, M.J.</au><au>Siti Nazahiyah, R.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Unknown Tube Well Depth Using Electrical Resistivity Method</atitle><btitle>MATEC web of conferences</btitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>103</volume><spage>7002</spage><pages>7002-</pages><issn>2261-236X</issn><issn>2274-7214</issn><eissn>2261-236X</eissn><abstract>Electrical resistivity method has increasingly adopted in engineering, environmental, mining and archaeological studies. Systematic and proper studies of unknown civil engineering structure evaluation particularly on tube well depth was rarely being established. Conventionally, camera test or string with weight approach has been used to evaluate unknown tube well depth thus exposed to several restriction due to its expensive and time consuming. Hence, this study focused on evaluation of unknown tube well depth using indirect test with particular reference to electrical resistivity method (ERM).A single spread line of electrical resistivity survey was performed using ABEM SAS 4000 equipment set based on Wenner and Pole-dipole array in line with the tube well position. Electrical resistivity raw data was processed using RES2DINV software producing electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) of the subsurface profile studied. Then, electrical resistivity value (ERV) obtained from RES2DINV analyses (ERT) was extracted and analysed using plotted graph (depth versus ERV) specifically at tube well position based on electrical resistivity spread line performed. It was found that both array have shown some good similarity results in term of tube well depth (20 m) thus able to verify the result interpreted. Both array have shown some good similarity of ERV representing groundwater (ERV = 10 – 100 Ωm) and soil with water (ERV > 100 Ωm) at depth of 0 – 20 m and >20 m respectively. All those interpretation have shown good agreement based on verification thru established ERV of earth materials references, geological map and nearest available boreholes data. Hence, this study has shown that the application of ERM was applicable in evaluation of unknown tube well depth which efficient in term of cost, time and environmental sustainable.</abstract><cop>Les Ulis</cop><pub>EDP Sciences</pub><doi>10.1051/matecconf/201710307002</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2261-236X |
ispartof | MATEC web of conferences, 2017, Vol.103, p.7002 |
issn | 2261-236X 2274-7214 2261-236X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6190b780d7e444e3b11ffc7aec8452eb |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Archaeology Arrays Boreholes Conductivity Electrical resistivity Geological mapping Glass & glassware industry Groundwater Similarity Soil water |
title | Evaluation of Unknown Tube Well Depth Using Electrical Resistivity Method |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T19%3A54%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Unknown%20Tube%20Well%20Depth%20Using%20Electrical%20Resistivity%20Method&rft.btitle=MATEC%20web%20of%20conferences&rft.au=Zainal%20Abidin,%20Mohd%20Hazreek&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=103&rft.spage=7002&rft.pages=7002-&rft.issn=2261-236X&rft.eissn=2261-236X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1051/matecconf/201710307002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2057191289%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-1b1f4230a29f8eff64e1cf706d052d38f6d0ff7b9f56ed1fae94cb108b421ae43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2057191289&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |