Loading…
From applause to disappointment - appreciation among healthcare providers that provided end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on well-being - a longitudinal mixed methods study (the CO-LIVE study)
The healthcare sector is facing increasing work pressure, making a healthy workforce essential. Appreciation is a factor influencing well-being, and the COVID-19 pandemic offers valuable insights into this. This study aims to: 1) describe to what extent end-of-life care providers felt appreciated an...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC health services research 2024-12, Vol.24 (1), p.1613-12, Article 1613 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-a443ae1acc21bc8eeef4108fa9ca818f862d8430b7c69a966e8ff236835edba53 |
container_end_page | 12 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1613 |
container_title | BMC health services research |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Zee, Masha S Philipsen, Bregje D Onwuteaka Witkamp, Erica Becqué, Yvonne N Goossensen, Anne Pasman, H Roeline |
description | The healthcare sector is facing increasing work pressure, making a healthy workforce essential. Appreciation is a factor influencing well-being, and the COVID-19 pandemic offers valuable insights into this. This study aims to: 1) describe to what extent end-of-life care providers felt appreciated and understood during the first 18 months of the pandemic, 2) examine the impact of appreciation on their well-being, and 3) explore their perceptions of what appreciation should look like.
A longitudinal mixed methods study among healthcare providers in the Netherlands delivering end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Surveys were conducted at four timepoints (n = 302), and interviews were conducted at three timepoints (n = 17) during the first 18 months of the pandemic. Generalized Estimating Equations analysis was performed on the quantitative data and thematic analysis was conducted on the interview data.
This study shows that feeling of appreciation among healthcare providers peaked in the first wave of the pandemic, but significantly dropped in the second wave, with only about half of the healthcare providers feeling appreciated. This slightly improved afterwards. Furthermore, nearly half of healthcare providers felt misunderstood during the first 18 months of the pandemic. Additionally, this study shows that between September 2020 and September 2021 about 1 in 3 healthcare providers had a score on the Well-Being Index indicating higher risk for burnout. Feeling appreciated and not feeling understood were both significantly associated with worse well-being. Interviews revealed that nurses did not always feel understood and appreciated by society, employers, patients and their families, as well as their own friends and family, leading to feelings of sadness, anger, and frustration. Three major themes emerged: 'recognizing real needs, 'we are not in this together' and 'short-lived appreciation that failed to lead to structural changes'.
This study shows that during the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare providers often felt neither appreciated nor understood, which is associated with lower scores of well-being. The expressed appreciation often did meet their needs or expectations, from both employers and society. With healthcare provider well-being still under strain, sustained attention to appreciation and understanding is important for retaining the workforce. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12913-024-11999-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6248b52c87224bf0a26b697d119dc2ad</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A820526115</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6248b52c87224bf0a26b697d119dc2ad</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A820526115</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-a443ae1acc21bc8eeef4108fa9ca818f862d8430b7c69a966e8ff236835edba53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUsFu3CAQtapWTZr2B3qokHpJD6QGbAynKtom7UqRcmlzRWPAu0S2cQEnzbf2Z4p3kyipKg4ww3tvYOYVxXtSnhAi-OdIqCQMl7TChEgpMX9RHJKqoZhLzl4-OR8Ub2K8LkvSCNq8Lg6Y5LJuWHlY_DkPfkAwTT3M0aLkkXExh96NabBjQni5DFY7SM6PCAY_btDWQp-2GoJFU_A3ztgQUdpCeggNsqPBvsO96yzaAc0cXKamrUWry6v1V0wkmmA0dnAa5R25FJEbJtAJ5UK3tu9xaxdKfgLqc1mXZuNG6NHgfucKg01bbyKKOX2HjvfC-GJ9dbZPfXpbvOqgj_bd_X5U_Dw_-7H6ji8uv61XpxdYV1WdMFQVA0tAa0paLay1XUVK0YHUIIjoBKdGVKxsG80lSM6t6DrKuGC1NS3U7KhY73WNh2s1BTdAuFMenNolfNgoCMnp3ipOK9HWVIuG0qrtSqC85bIxeX5GUzBZ68tea5rbwRqdRxCgfyb6_GZ0W7XxN4oQXrO6kVnh-F4h-F-zjUkNLurcTRitn6Ni2RWEUVYtD__4D_TazyF3eEHVlAvJ-BPUBvIP3Nj5XFgvoupU0DLjCFlQJ_9B5bUbsB9t53L-GYHuCTr4GIPtHj9JSrX4W-39rbK_1c7fimfSh6fteaQ8GJr9Bf4K9_M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3152689365</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>From applause to disappointment - appreciation among healthcare providers that provided end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on well-being - a longitudinal mixed methods study (the CO-LIVE study)</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Zee, Masha S ; Philipsen, Bregje D Onwuteaka ; Witkamp, Erica ; Becqué, Yvonne N ; Goossensen, Anne ; Pasman, H Roeline</creator><creatorcontrib>Zee, Masha S ; Philipsen, Bregje D Onwuteaka ; Witkamp, Erica ; Becqué, Yvonne N ; Goossensen, Anne ; Pasman, H Roeline</creatorcontrib><description>The healthcare sector is facing increasing work pressure, making a healthy workforce essential. Appreciation is a factor influencing well-being, and the COVID-19 pandemic offers valuable insights into this. This study aims to: 1) describe to what extent end-of-life care providers felt appreciated and understood during the first 18 months of the pandemic, 2) examine the impact of appreciation on their well-being, and 3) explore their perceptions of what appreciation should look like.
A longitudinal mixed methods study among healthcare providers in the Netherlands delivering end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Surveys were conducted at four timepoints (n = 302), and interviews were conducted at three timepoints (n = 17) during the first 18 months of the pandemic. Generalized Estimating Equations analysis was performed on the quantitative data and thematic analysis was conducted on the interview data.
This study shows that feeling of appreciation among healthcare providers peaked in the first wave of the pandemic, but significantly dropped in the second wave, with only about half of the healthcare providers feeling appreciated. This slightly improved afterwards. Furthermore, nearly half of healthcare providers felt misunderstood during the first 18 months of the pandemic. Additionally, this study shows that between September 2020 and September 2021 about 1 in 3 healthcare providers had a score on the Well-Being Index indicating higher risk for burnout. Feeling appreciated and not feeling understood were both significantly associated with worse well-being. Interviews revealed that nurses did not always feel understood and appreciated by society, employers, patients and their families, as well as their own friends and family, leading to feelings of sadness, anger, and frustration. Three major themes emerged: 'recognizing real needs, 'we are not in this together' and 'short-lived appreciation that failed to lead to structural changes'.
This study shows that during the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare providers often felt neither appreciated nor understood, which is associated with lower scores of well-being. The expressed appreciation often did meet their needs or expectations, from both employers and society. With healthcare provider well-being still under strain, sustained attention to appreciation and understanding is important for retaining the workforce.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-6963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-6963</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11999-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39695730</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Apprecation ; Appreciation ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Burnout, Professional - epidemiology ; Burnout, Professional - psychology ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; COVID-19 - psychology ; Data collection ; Employers ; End-of-life care ; Epidemics ; Evaluation ; Female ; Health Personnel - psychology ; Healthcare providers ; Humans ; Influence ; Interviews ; Job Satisfaction ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Medical personnel ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Mixed methods research ; Netherlands ; Nurses ; Palliative care ; Pandemics ; Polls & surveys ; Psychological aspects ; Quality of life ; Questionnaires ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Services ; Social aspects ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Terminal care ; Terminal Care - psychology ; Well being</subject><ispartof>BMC health services research, 2024-12, Vol.24 (1), p.1613-12, Article 1613</ispartof><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-a443ae1acc21bc8eeef4108fa9ca818f862d8430b7c69a966e8ff236835edba53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11653579/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3152689365?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,11668,25732,27903,27904,36039,36040,36991,36992,38495,43874,44342,44569,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39695730$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zee, Masha S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philipsen, Bregje D Onwuteaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witkamp, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becqué, Yvonne N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goossensen, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasman, H Roeline</creatorcontrib><title>From applause to disappointment - appreciation among healthcare providers that provided end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on well-being - a longitudinal mixed methods study (the CO-LIVE study)</title><title>BMC health services research</title><addtitle>BMC Health Serv Res</addtitle><description>The healthcare sector is facing increasing work pressure, making a healthy workforce essential. Appreciation is a factor influencing well-being, and the COVID-19 pandemic offers valuable insights into this. This study aims to: 1) describe to what extent end-of-life care providers felt appreciated and understood during the first 18 months of the pandemic, 2) examine the impact of appreciation on their well-being, and 3) explore their perceptions of what appreciation should look like.
A longitudinal mixed methods study among healthcare providers in the Netherlands delivering end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Surveys were conducted at four timepoints (n = 302), and interviews were conducted at three timepoints (n = 17) during the first 18 months of the pandemic. Generalized Estimating Equations analysis was performed on the quantitative data and thematic analysis was conducted on the interview data.
This study shows that feeling of appreciation among healthcare providers peaked in the first wave of the pandemic, but significantly dropped in the second wave, with only about half of the healthcare providers feeling appreciated. This slightly improved afterwards. Furthermore, nearly half of healthcare providers felt misunderstood during the first 18 months of the pandemic. Additionally, this study shows that between September 2020 and September 2021 about 1 in 3 healthcare providers had a score on the Well-Being Index indicating higher risk for burnout. Feeling appreciated and not feeling understood were both significantly associated with worse well-being. Interviews revealed that nurses did not always feel understood and appreciated by society, employers, patients and their families, as well as their own friends and family, leading to feelings of sadness, anger, and frustration. Three major themes emerged: 'recognizing real needs, 'we are not in this together' and 'short-lived appreciation that failed to lead to structural changes'.
This study shows that during the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare providers often felt neither appreciated nor understood, which is associated with lower scores of well-being. The expressed appreciation often did meet their needs or expectations, from both employers and society. With healthcare provider well-being still under strain, sustained attention to appreciation and understanding is important for retaining the workforce.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Apprecation</subject><subject>Appreciation</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Burnout, Professional - epidemiology</subject><subject>Burnout, Professional - psychology</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - psychology</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Employers</subject><subject>End-of-life care</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Personnel - psychology</subject><subject>Healthcare providers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Job Satisfaction</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mixed methods research</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Services</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Terminal care</subject><subject>Terminal Care - psychology</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>1472-6963</issn><issn>1472-6963</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUsFu3CAQtapWTZr2B3qokHpJD6QGbAynKtom7UqRcmlzRWPAu0S2cQEnzbf2Z4p3kyipKg4ww3tvYOYVxXtSnhAi-OdIqCQMl7TChEgpMX9RHJKqoZhLzl4-OR8Ub2K8LkvSCNq8Lg6Y5LJuWHlY_DkPfkAwTT3M0aLkkXExh96NabBjQni5DFY7SM6PCAY_btDWQp-2GoJFU_A3ztgQUdpCeggNsqPBvsO96yzaAc0cXKamrUWry6v1V0wkmmA0dnAa5R25FJEbJtAJ5UK3tu9xaxdKfgLqc1mXZuNG6NHgfucKg01bbyKKOX2HjvfC-GJ9dbZPfXpbvOqgj_bd_X5U_Dw_-7H6ji8uv61XpxdYV1WdMFQVA0tAa0paLay1XUVK0YHUIIjoBKdGVKxsG80lSM6t6DrKuGC1NS3U7KhY73WNh2s1BTdAuFMenNolfNgoCMnp3ipOK9HWVIuG0qrtSqC85bIxeX5GUzBZ68tea5rbwRqdRxCgfyb6_GZ0W7XxN4oQXrO6kVnh-F4h-F-zjUkNLurcTRitn6Ni2RWEUVYtD__4D_TazyF3eEHVlAvJ-BPUBvIP3Nj5XFgvoupU0DLjCFlQJ_9B5bUbsB9t53L-GYHuCTr4GIPtHj9JSrX4W-39rbK_1c7fimfSh6fteaQ8GJr9Bf4K9_M</recordid><startdate>20241218</startdate><enddate>20241218</enddate><creator>Zee, Masha S</creator><creator>Philipsen, Bregje D Onwuteaka</creator><creator>Witkamp, Erica</creator><creator>Becqué, Yvonne N</creator><creator>Goossensen, Anne</creator><creator>Pasman, H Roeline</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241218</creationdate><title>From applause to disappointment - appreciation among healthcare providers that provided end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on well-being - a longitudinal mixed methods study (the CO-LIVE study)</title><author>Zee, Masha S ; Philipsen, Bregje D Onwuteaka ; Witkamp, Erica ; Becqué, Yvonne N ; Goossensen, Anne ; Pasman, H Roeline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-a443ae1acc21bc8eeef4108fa9ca818f862d8430b7c69a966e8ff236835edba53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Apprecation</topic><topic>Appreciation</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Burnout, Professional - epidemiology</topic><topic>Burnout, Professional - psychology</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - psychology</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Employers</topic><topic>End-of-life care</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Personnel - psychology</topic><topic>Healthcare providers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Job Satisfaction</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mixed methods research</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Services</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Terminal care</topic><topic>Terminal Care - psychology</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zee, Masha S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philipsen, Bregje D Onwuteaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witkamp, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becqué, Yvonne N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goossensen, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasman, H Roeline</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC health services research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zee, Masha S</au><au>Philipsen, Bregje D Onwuteaka</au><au>Witkamp, Erica</au><au>Becqué, Yvonne N</au><au>Goossensen, Anne</au><au>Pasman, H Roeline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>From applause to disappointment - appreciation among healthcare providers that provided end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on well-being - a longitudinal mixed methods study (the CO-LIVE study)</atitle><jtitle>BMC health services research</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Health Serv Res</addtitle><date>2024-12-18</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1613</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>1613-12</pages><artnum>1613</artnum><issn>1472-6963</issn><eissn>1472-6963</eissn><abstract>The healthcare sector is facing increasing work pressure, making a healthy workforce essential. Appreciation is a factor influencing well-being, and the COVID-19 pandemic offers valuable insights into this. This study aims to: 1) describe to what extent end-of-life care providers felt appreciated and understood during the first 18 months of the pandemic, 2) examine the impact of appreciation on their well-being, and 3) explore their perceptions of what appreciation should look like.
A longitudinal mixed methods study among healthcare providers in the Netherlands delivering end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Surveys were conducted at four timepoints (n = 302), and interviews were conducted at three timepoints (n = 17) during the first 18 months of the pandemic. Generalized Estimating Equations analysis was performed on the quantitative data and thematic analysis was conducted on the interview data.
This study shows that feeling of appreciation among healthcare providers peaked in the first wave of the pandemic, but significantly dropped in the second wave, with only about half of the healthcare providers feeling appreciated. This slightly improved afterwards. Furthermore, nearly half of healthcare providers felt misunderstood during the first 18 months of the pandemic. Additionally, this study shows that between September 2020 and September 2021 about 1 in 3 healthcare providers had a score on the Well-Being Index indicating higher risk for burnout. Feeling appreciated and not feeling understood were both significantly associated with worse well-being. Interviews revealed that nurses did not always feel understood and appreciated by society, employers, patients and their families, as well as their own friends and family, leading to feelings of sadness, anger, and frustration. Three major themes emerged: 'recognizing real needs, 'we are not in this together' and 'short-lived appreciation that failed to lead to structural changes'.
This study shows that during the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare providers often felt neither appreciated nor understood, which is associated with lower scores of well-being. The expressed appreciation often did meet their needs or expectations, from both employers and society. With healthcare provider well-being still under strain, sustained attention to appreciation and understanding is important for retaining the workforce.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>39695730</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12913-024-11999-6</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1472-6963 |
ispartof | BMC health services research, 2024-12, Vol.24 (1), p.1613-12, Article 1613 |
issn | 1472-6963 1472-6963 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6248b52c87224bf0a26b697d119dc2ad |
source | PubMed (Medline); ABI/INFORM global; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Adult Apprecation Appreciation Attitude of Health Personnel Burnout, Professional - epidemiology Burnout, Professional - psychology COVID-19 COVID-19 - epidemiology COVID-19 - psychology Data collection Employers End-of-life care Epidemics Evaluation Female Health Personnel - psychology Healthcare providers Humans Influence Interviews Job Satisfaction Longitudinal Studies Male Medical personnel Methods Middle Aged Mixed methods research Netherlands Nurses Palliative care Pandemics Polls & surveys Psychological aspects Quality of life Questionnaires SARS-CoV-2 Services Social aspects Surveys and Questionnaires Terminal care Terminal Care - psychology Well being |
title | From applause to disappointment - appreciation among healthcare providers that provided end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on well-being - a longitudinal mixed methods study (the CO-LIVE study) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T01%3A30%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=From%20applause%20to%20disappointment%20-%20appreciation%20among%20healthcare%20providers%20that%20provided%20end-of-life%20care%20during%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic%20and%20its%20impact%20on%20well-being%20-%20a%20longitudinal%20mixed%20methods%20study%20(the%20CO-LIVE%20study)&rft.jtitle=BMC%20health%20services%20research&rft.au=Zee,%20Masha%20S&rft.date=2024-12-18&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1613&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=1613-12&rft.artnum=1613&rft.issn=1472-6963&rft.eissn=1472-6963&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12913-024-11999-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA820526115%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-a443ae1acc21bc8eeef4108fa9ca818f862d8430b7c69a966e8ff236835edba53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3152689365&rft_id=info:pmid/39695730&rft_galeid=A820526115&rfr_iscdi=true |