Bioinspired Nanofiber Scaffold for Differentiating Bone Marrow-Derived Neural Stem Cells to Oligodendrocyte-Like Cells: Design, Fabrication, and Characterization [Corrigendum]

• Published in: International journal of nanomedicine 2020-08, Vol.15, p.6085-6088
• Main Authors: Rasti Boroojeni, Fatemeh, Mashayekhan, Shohreh, Abbaszadeh, Hojjat-Allah, Ansarizadeh, Mohamadhasan, Khoramgah, Maryam-Sadat, Rahimi Movaghar, Vafa
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: central nervous system; controlled triiodothyronine release; Corrigendum; nanofibers scaffold; oligodendrocyte cells; polyaniline graphene; Stem cells
• ISSN: 1178-2013; 1176-9114; 1178-2013
• DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S271954

Rasti Boroojeni F, Mashayekhan S, Abbaszadeh HA,Ansarizadeh M, Khoramgah MS, Rahimi Movaghar V.Int J Nanomedicine. 2020;15:3903-3920. Page 3908, left column, Isolation and Characterization ofBMSCs section, the text "Afterward, PBS was used towash the fixed cells twice and the cells were incubated at4°C with antibodies specific for the following antigens:CD34, CD45, CD90, CD44, Nestin, NF68, GFAP for 30mins" should read "Afterward, PBS was used to wash thefixed cells twice and the cells were incubated at 4°C withantibodies specific for the following antigens: CD45,CD29, CD73, CD105, Nestin, NF68, GFAP for 30 mins". Page 3909, right column, the section heading "StaticAnalysis" should read "Statistical Analysis". Figure 2 on page 3910, the scale bar in part E shows"2 ìM" it should read "10 ìm". The text "(the conditionand concentration of PCL nanofibers was exactly the samefor all four groups, thus the same SEM image was used toshow the PCL nanofibers for all groups)" has also beenadded to the figure caption. The correct Figure 2 is shown. Page 3911, BMSCs Characterization section, the text "Inthis analysis, CD44, CD90, and CD 106 markers asmesenchymal stem cell markers and CD45 as hematopoieticstem cells marker were used" should read "In thisanalysis, CD29, CD73, and CD 105 markers as mesenchymalstem cell markers and CD45 as hematopoietic stemcells marker were used". Figure 3 on page 3912, the scale bar in part C shows"20 μM" it should read "20 μm". The correct Figure 3 is shown. Figure 5 on page 3914, the scale bar in part A shows "10μM" it should read "10 μm". The text "(the condition andconcentration of gelatin nanofibers was exactly the samefor PG/PAG 2, PG/PAG 2/1% NP, PG/PAG 2/2% NP, andPG/PAG 2/3% NP %, thus the same SEM image was usedto show the gelatin nanofibers for all groups)" has alsobeen added to the figure caption. The correct Figure 5 is shown. The authors have advised there is an error in the caption ofFigure 7 on page 3916. The text "scale bar = 20 μM"should read "scale bar = 20 μm". Figure 8 on page 3917, the scale bars in part B shows"μM" they should read "μm". The correct Figure 8 is shown. The authors apologize for these errors. Read the original article