Loading…

Analysis of the impact of various finish line designs and occlusal morphologies on the accuracy of digital impressions

Recent advancements in dental technology has led clinicians to convert from traditional methods to digital workflows. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of various finish line designs and occlusal morphologies on the accuracy of digital impressions. Six maxillary molar crown prepara...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of dental sciences 2023-07, Vol.18 (3), p.1264-1271
Main Authors: Gunel, Aylin, Guncu, Mustafa Baris, Uzel, Sema Merve, Aktas, Guliz, Arikan, Hale, Reiss, Natalia, Turkyilmaz, Ilser
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Recent advancements in dental technology has led clinicians to convert from traditional methods to digital workflows. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of various finish line designs and occlusal morphologies on the accuracy of digital impressions. Six maxillary molar crown preparations were designed by using a digital sculpting software program. The samples differed in finish line design and occlusal surface morphology. Three different finish line designs (shoulder, chamfer, and shoulder with internal round angle) and two different occlusal morphologies (sharp and rounded) were used, giving six groups. Using three different intraoral scanners, each group was scanned and compared with a reference scan obtained from an industrial scanner. The accuracy of each scan was studied, and the data were statistically analyzed. A total of 180 scans were acquired by utilizing three different intraoral scanners. The reference scan was compared with the scans from each group and overall differences (marginal, axial, and occlusal) were assessed. A crown preparation with a chamfer finish line showed the lowest marginal discrepancy of 13.2 ± 4.18 μm while preparation with a shoulder finish line reported the highest discrepancy of 34.8 ± 7.9 μm (P 
ISSN:1991-7902
2213-8862
DOI:10.1016/j.jds.2023.02.017