Loading…

Actuopaleoichnology of a modern Bay of Fundy macro-tidal flat: analogy with a Mississippian tidal flat deposit (Hartselle Sandstone) from Alabama

Trace fossil zonation in the Hartselle Sandstone of Mississippian age (Chesterian: Visean-Serpukhovian) exposed on Fielder Ridge, Alabama is compared with modern macro-tidal flat ichnocoenoses on the Bay of Fundy at Lubec, Maine, and demonstrated to be analogous by sedimentologic and ichnotaxonomic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) CA), 2019-05, Vol.7, p.e6975-e6975, Article e6975
Main Authors: Zachos, Louis G, Platt, Brian F
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-54dc130485a00a5280402cd2e7c27b401f378bddf2db868d8a5cb032b877468d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-54dc130485a00a5280402cd2e7c27b401f378bddf2db868d8a5cb032b877468d3
container_end_page e6975
container_issue
container_start_page e6975
container_title PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)
container_volume 7
creator Zachos, Louis G
Platt, Brian F
description Trace fossil zonation in the Hartselle Sandstone of Mississippian age (Chesterian: Visean-Serpukhovian) exposed on Fielder Ridge, Alabama is compared with modern macro-tidal flat ichnocoenoses on the Bay of Fundy at Lubec, Maine, and demonstrated to be analogous by sedimentologic and ichnotaxonomic criteria. The modern flat has minimal influence from either waves or freshwater influx, and can be divided into five distinct ichnocoenoses, characterized by surface traces (epichnia) and four sedimentologic facies defined by gross grain texture or hydrodynamic characteristics, but lacking significant surface traces. Several characteristics of tidal flat deposits in a fetch-limited, marine (i.e., non-estuarine), meso- to macro-tidal regime can be used to recognize similar environments as old as the late Paleozoic. These criteria include (1) limited influence of wind and waves on the depositional environment, (2) lack of significant freshwater influence and therefore any persistent brackish environments, (3) a distinct spatial distribution of microenvironments defined by substrate and exposure period, (4) high diversity of epichnial traces directly associated with microenvironments across the tidal flat, (5) generally low degree of reworking of traces by bioturbation but high degree of reworking by tidal currents, and (6) preservation of traces of predation and scavenging behavior on an exposed surface. These features, together with the regional depositional pattern of the Hartselle Sandstone interpreted as tide-influenced bars and shoals, support a meso- to macro-tidal interpretation of the depositional environment.
doi_str_mv 10.7717/peerj.6975
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6425731598764312a4a1dd2887271b02</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A586251828</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6425731598764312a4a1dd2887271b02</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A586251828</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-54dc130485a00a5280402cd2e7c27b401f378bddf2db868d8a5cb032b877468d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl1rFDEUhgdRbKm98QdIQJAq7JrPScYLYS3WFipeqNfhTJLZzZKZjJMZZX-G_9jsbm13xSSQr-e8Cee8RfGc4LmURL7tnRvW87KS4lFxSkkpZ4qJ6vHB-qQ4T2mNc1O0xIo9LU4YIbziuDotfi_MOMUegoverLoY4nKDYoMAtdG6oUMfYLe_mjq7QS2YIc5GbyGgJsD4DkEHu5BfflzloM8-pe3oew8degCRdX1MfkQX1zCMyYXg0FfobBpj516jZogtWgSooYVnxZMGQnLnd_NZ8f3q47fL69ntl083l4vbmRESjzPBrSEMcyUAYxBUYY6psdRJQ2XNMWmYVLW1DbW1KpVVIEyNGa2VlDzv2Vlxs9e1Eda6H3wLw0ZH8Hp3EIelzl_1JjhdciokI6JSsuSMUOBArKVKSSpJjWnWer_X6qe6dda4bhwgHIke33R-pZfxpy4F44SwLHBxJzDEH5NLo259MjlN0Lk4JU0pY4pLpUhGX_6DruM05DJkimU1iamqHqhlLq32XRPzu2YrqhdClVQQRVWm5v-hcreu9SaXpvH5_Cjg1UHAykEYVymGafSxS8fgmz2YDZPS4Jr7ZBCst8bVO-PqrXEz_OIwfffoX5uyPz1l5x4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2334170289</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Actuopaleoichnology of a modern Bay of Fundy macro-tidal flat: analogy with a Mississippian tidal flat deposit (Hartselle Sandstone) from Alabama</title><source>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</source><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><creator>Zachos, Louis G ; Platt, Brian F</creator><creatorcontrib>Zachos, Louis G ; Platt, Brian F</creatorcontrib><description>Trace fossil zonation in the Hartselle Sandstone of Mississippian age (Chesterian: Visean-Serpukhovian) exposed on Fielder Ridge, Alabama is compared with modern macro-tidal flat ichnocoenoses on the Bay of Fundy at Lubec, Maine, and demonstrated to be analogous by sedimentologic and ichnotaxonomic criteria. The modern flat has minimal influence from either waves or freshwater influx, and can be divided into five distinct ichnocoenoses, characterized by surface traces (epichnia) and four sedimentologic facies defined by gross grain texture or hydrodynamic characteristics, but lacking significant surface traces. Several characteristics of tidal flat deposits in a fetch-limited, marine (i.e., non-estuarine), meso- to macro-tidal regime can be used to recognize similar environments as old as the late Paleozoic. These criteria include (1) limited influence of wind and waves on the depositional environment, (2) lack of significant freshwater influence and therefore any persistent brackish environments, (3) a distinct spatial distribution of microenvironments defined by substrate and exposure period, (4) high diversity of epichnial traces directly associated with microenvironments across the tidal flat, (5) generally low degree of reworking of traces by bioturbation but high degree of reworking by tidal currents, and (6) preservation of traces of predation and scavenging behavior on an exposed surface. These features, together with the regional depositional pattern of the Hartselle Sandstone interpreted as tide-influenced bars and shoals, support a meso- to macro-tidal interpretation of the depositional environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2167-8359</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2167-8359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6975</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31149409</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: PeerJ. Ltd</publisher><subject>Bioturbation ; Crustaceans ; Ecology ; Estuaries ; Fossils ; Grain size ; Ichnology ; Invertebrates ; Littoral deposits ; Microenvironments ; Paleoecology ; Paleontology ; Paleozoic Era ; Predation ; Predation (Biology) ; Preservation ; Sediments ; Spatial distribution ; Stone ; Studies ; Tidal currents ; Trace fossils ; Zonation</subject><ispartof>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 2019-05, Vol.7, p.e6975-e6975, Article e6975</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 PeerJ. Ltd.</rights><rights>2019 Zachos and Platt. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Zachos and Platt 2019 Zachos and Platt</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-54dc130485a00a5280402cd2e7c27b401f378bddf2db868d8a5cb032b877468d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-54dc130485a00a5280402cd2e7c27b401f378bddf2db868d8a5cb032b877468d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8084-0269 ; 0000-0001-7246-5008</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2334170289/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2334170289?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31149409$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zachos, Louis G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Platt, Brian F</creatorcontrib><title>Actuopaleoichnology of a modern Bay of Fundy macro-tidal flat: analogy with a Mississippian tidal flat deposit (Hartselle Sandstone) from Alabama</title><title>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</title><addtitle>PeerJ</addtitle><description>Trace fossil zonation in the Hartselle Sandstone of Mississippian age (Chesterian: Visean-Serpukhovian) exposed on Fielder Ridge, Alabama is compared with modern macro-tidal flat ichnocoenoses on the Bay of Fundy at Lubec, Maine, and demonstrated to be analogous by sedimentologic and ichnotaxonomic criteria. The modern flat has minimal influence from either waves or freshwater influx, and can be divided into five distinct ichnocoenoses, characterized by surface traces (epichnia) and four sedimentologic facies defined by gross grain texture or hydrodynamic characteristics, but lacking significant surface traces. Several characteristics of tidal flat deposits in a fetch-limited, marine (i.e., non-estuarine), meso- to macro-tidal regime can be used to recognize similar environments as old as the late Paleozoic. These criteria include (1) limited influence of wind and waves on the depositional environment, (2) lack of significant freshwater influence and therefore any persistent brackish environments, (3) a distinct spatial distribution of microenvironments defined by substrate and exposure period, (4) high diversity of epichnial traces directly associated with microenvironments across the tidal flat, (5) generally low degree of reworking of traces by bioturbation but high degree of reworking by tidal currents, and (6) preservation of traces of predation and scavenging behavior on an exposed surface. These features, together with the regional depositional pattern of the Hartselle Sandstone interpreted as tide-influenced bars and shoals, support a meso- to macro-tidal interpretation of the depositional environment.</description><subject>Bioturbation</subject><subject>Crustaceans</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Fossils</subject><subject>Grain size</subject><subject>Ichnology</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Littoral deposits</subject><subject>Microenvironments</subject><subject>Paleoecology</subject><subject>Paleontology</subject><subject>Paleozoic Era</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predation (Biology)</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Stone</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tidal currents</subject><subject>Trace fossils</subject><subject>Zonation</subject><issn>2167-8359</issn><issn>2167-8359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl1rFDEUhgdRbKm98QdIQJAq7JrPScYLYS3WFipeqNfhTJLZzZKZjJMZZX-G_9jsbm13xSSQr-e8Cee8RfGc4LmURL7tnRvW87KS4lFxSkkpZ4qJ6vHB-qQ4T2mNc1O0xIo9LU4YIbziuDotfi_MOMUegoverLoY4nKDYoMAtdG6oUMfYLe_mjq7QS2YIc5GbyGgJsD4DkEHu5BfflzloM8-pe3oew8degCRdX1MfkQX1zCMyYXg0FfobBpj516jZogtWgSooYVnxZMGQnLnd_NZ8f3q47fL69ntl083l4vbmRESjzPBrSEMcyUAYxBUYY6psdRJQ2XNMWmYVLW1DbW1KpVVIEyNGa2VlDzv2Vlxs9e1Eda6H3wLw0ZH8Hp3EIelzl_1JjhdciokI6JSsuSMUOBArKVKSSpJjWnWer_X6qe6dda4bhwgHIke33R-pZfxpy4F44SwLHBxJzDEH5NLo259MjlN0Lk4JU0pY4pLpUhGX_6DruM05DJkimU1iamqHqhlLq32XRPzu2YrqhdClVQQRVWm5v-hcreu9SaXpvH5_Cjg1UHAykEYVymGafSxS8fgmz2YDZPS4Jr7ZBCst8bVO-PqrXEz_OIwfffoX5uyPz1l5x4</recordid><startdate>20190521</startdate><enddate>20190521</enddate><creator>Zachos, Louis G</creator><creator>Platt, Brian F</creator><general>PeerJ. Ltd</general><general>PeerJ, Inc</general><general>PeerJ Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8084-0269</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7246-5008</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190521</creationdate><title>Actuopaleoichnology of a modern Bay of Fundy macro-tidal flat: analogy with a Mississippian tidal flat deposit (Hartselle Sandstone) from Alabama</title><author>Zachos, Louis G ; Platt, Brian F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-54dc130485a00a5280402cd2e7c27b401f378bddf2db868d8a5cb032b877468d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bioturbation</topic><topic>Crustaceans</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Fossils</topic><topic>Grain size</topic><topic>Ichnology</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Littoral deposits</topic><topic>Microenvironments</topic><topic>Paleoecology</topic><topic>Paleontology</topic><topic>Paleozoic Era</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predation (Biology)</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Stone</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tidal currents</topic><topic>Trace fossils</topic><topic>Zonation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zachos, Louis G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Platt, Brian F</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zachos, Louis G</au><au>Platt, Brian F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Actuopaleoichnology of a modern Bay of Fundy macro-tidal flat: analogy with a Mississippian tidal flat deposit (Hartselle Sandstone) from Alabama</atitle><jtitle>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>PeerJ</addtitle><date>2019-05-21</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>7</volume><spage>e6975</spage><epage>e6975</epage><pages>e6975-e6975</pages><artnum>e6975</artnum><issn>2167-8359</issn><eissn>2167-8359</eissn><abstract>Trace fossil zonation in the Hartselle Sandstone of Mississippian age (Chesterian: Visean-Serpukhovian) exposed on Fielder Ridge, Alabama is compared with modern macro-tidal flat ichnocoenoses on the Bay of Fundy at Lubec, Maine, and demonstrated to be analogous by sedimentologic and ichnotaxonomic criteria. The modern flat has minimal influence from either waves or freshwater influx, and can be divided into five distinct ichnocoenoses, characterized by surface traces (epichnia) and four sedimentologic facies defined by gross grain texture or hydrodynamic characteristics, but lacking significant surface traces. Several characteristics of tidal flat deposits in a fetch-limited, marine (i.e., non-estuarine), meso- to macro-tidal regime can be used to recognize similar environments as old as the late Paleozoic. These criteria include (1) limited influence of wind and waves on the depositional environment, (2) lack of significant freshwater influence and therefore any persistent brackish environments, (3) a distinct spatial distribution of microenvironments defined by substrate and exposure period, (4) high diversity of epichnial traces directly associated with microenvironments across the tidal flat, (5) generally low degree of reworking of traces by bioturbation but high degree of reworking by tidal currents, and (6) preservation of traces of predation and scavenging behavior on an exposed surface. These features, together with the regional depositional pattern of the Hartselle Sandstone interpreted as tide-influenced bars and shoals, support a meso- to macro-tidal interpretation of the depositional environment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>PeerJ. Ltd</pub><pmid>31149409</pmid><doi>10.7717/peerj.6975</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8084-0269</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7246-5008</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2167-8359
ispartof PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 2019-05, Vol.7, p.e6975-e6975, Article e6975
issn 2167-8359
2167-8359
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6425731598764312a4a1dd2887271b02
source Access via ProQuest (Open Access); PubMed Central(OpenAccess)
subjects Bioturbation
Crustaceans
Ecology
Estuaries
Fossils
Grain size
Ichnology
Invertebrates
Littoral deposits
Microenvironments
Paleoecology
Paleontology
Paleozoic Era
Predation
Predation (Biology)
Preservation
Sediments
Spatial distribution
Stone
Studies
Tidal currents
Trace fossils
Zonation
title Actuopaleoichnology of a modern Bay of Fundy macro-tidal flat: analogy with a Mississippian tidal flat deposit (Hartselle Sandstone) from Alabama
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T07%3A39%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Actuopaleoichnology%20of%20a%20modern%20Bay%20of%20Fundy%20macro-tidal%20flat:%20analogy%20with%20a%20Mississippian%20tidal%20flat%20deposit%20(Hartselle%20Sandstone)%20from%20Alabama&rft.jtitle=PeerJ%20(San%20Francisco,%20CA)&rft.au=Zachos,%20Louis%20G&rft.date=2019-05-21&rft.volume=7&rft.spage=e6975&rft.epage=e6975&rft.pages=e6975-e6975&rft.artnum=e6975&rft.issn=2167-8359&rft.eissn=2167-8359&rft_id=info:doi/10.7717/peerj.6975&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA586251828%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-54dc130485a00a5280402cd2e7c27b401f378bddf2db868d8a5cb032b877468d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2334170289&rft_id=info:pmid/31149409&rft_galeid=A586251828&rfr_iscdi=true