The deviation of farmers' willingness and behavior of domestic waste separation: a study on neighborhood effects and policy interventions

• Published in: Frontiers in psychology 2024, Vol.15, p.1358903-1358903
• Main Authors: Chen, Xi, Xing, Lirong, Li, Bowei, Wang, Chongcai, Zhang, Yue
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: deviation of willingness and behavior; domestic waste separation; Jiangsu province; neighborhood effects; policy interventions
• ISSN: 1664-1078; 1664-1078
• DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1358903

Based on the perspective of combining informal and formal systems, this paper empirically explores the impact of neighborhood effects and policy interventions on the deviation of farmers' willingness and behavior of domestic waste separation (DWS) by using data from the China Land Economy Survey (CLES) and constructing a probit model. It should be explained that the neighborhood effect in this paper refers to the fact that the behavior of farmers is highly susceptible to the behavior of their neighbors in the process of production and living. The results of the study show that neighborhood effects and policy interventions have a significant negative impact on the deviation of farmers' willingness and behavior of DWS, respectively. Comparison of marginal effects shows that neighborhood effects > environmental advocacy > reward and punishment policies. From the interaction effects as a whole, neighborhood effects and policy interventions have complementary effects on the deviation of farmers' willingness and behavior of DWS, with the complementary effects of neighborhood effects and environmental advocacy being more significant. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that neighborhood effects completely replace the inhibitory effect of policy interventions on the deviation of high-income farmers' willingness and behavior of DWS, but have no effect on political elite farmers. The interaction between neighborhood effects and policy interventions has complementary effects on low-income farmers and ordinary farmers, with the complementary effects of neighborhood effects and environmental advocacy being more significant.