Loading…

Uncertainty analysis of discharge coefficient of circular crested weirs

The circular crested weir (CCW) has been introduced as weirs having a high discharge coefficient (Cd). The ratio of flow head to the radius of the crest ( H / R ) is the most important parameter affecting the Cd, that the Cd ≈ a H / R b can mathematical model their relation. In this study, the param...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied water science 2021-02, Vol.11 (2), p.1-6, Article 26
Main Authors: Parsaie, Abbas, Haghiabi, Amir Hamzeh
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-8ff159bbaae884dae60d9a106321631578fdf1ca716699b1efeaa32036accab33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-8ff159bbaae884dae60d9a106321631578fdf1ca716699b1efeaa32036accab33
container_end_page 6
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1
container_title Applied water science
container_volume 11
creator Parsaie, Abbas
Haghiabi, Amir Hamzeh
description The circular crested weir (CCW) has been introduced as weirs having a high discharge coefficient (Cd). The ratio of flow head to the radius of the crest ( H / R ) is the most important parameter affecting the Cd, that the Cd ≈ a H / R b can mathematical model their relation. In this study, the parameters of the Cd formula (i.e., a and b ) were uncertainty analyzed using Monte Carlo (MC) and Bootstrap methods (BM). To perform these methods, some of the built-in functions of Excel software were utilized. The results declared that the average values of a and b were 1.187 and 0.140. The outcome of the MC method showed that the range of a and b at 95% confidence interval changed between 1.179 to 1.194 and 0.134 to 0.146, respectively, while at the same confidence interval the BM ranged from 1.187 to 1.200 and 0.133 to 0.147.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13201-020-01329-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6469bc84aaed41dfaa111b18c4a1106f</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6469bc84aaed41dfaa111b18c4a1106f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2479186959</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-8ff159bbaae884dae60d9a106321631578fdf1ca716699b1efeaa32036accab33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaJgqf0DnhY8r2Z2s9nkKEWrUPBiz2E2HzWlbmqyRfrvTbtSb85lHsn7YB4ht0DvgdL2IUFdUShpRUuaoSz5BZlUIGnZMNlcnrFor8kspQ3N00AjKzEhi1WvbRzQ98OhwB63h-RTEVxhfNIfGNe20ME657W3_XD80D7q_RZjoaNNgzXFt_Ux3ZArh9tkZ797SlbPT-_zl3L5tnidPy5LzbgYSuFcDu46RCsEM2g5NRKB8roCXkPTCmccaGyBcyk7sM4i5utqjlpjV9dT8jr6moAbtYv-E-NBBfTq9BDiWmEcvN5axRmXnRYsZxkGxiECQAdCswwod9nrbvTaxfC1z8eoTdjH3EFSFWslCC4bmVnVyNIxpBStO6cCVcf-1di_yv2rU_-KZ1E9ilIm92sb_6z_Uf0AwUSIZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2479186959</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Uncertainty analysis of discharge coefficient of circular crested weirs</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access </source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Parsaie, Abbas ; Haghiabi, Amir Hamzeh</creator><creatorcontrib>Parsaie, Abbas ; Haghiabi, Amir Hamzeh</creatorcontrib><description>The circular crested weir (CCW) has been introduced as weirs having a high discharge coefficient (Cd). The ratio of flow head to the radius of the crest ( H / R ) is the most important parameter affecting the Cd, that the Cd ≈ a H / R b can mathematical model their relation. In this study, the parameters of the Cd formula (i.e., a and b ) were uncertainty analyzed using Monte Carlo (MC) and Bootstrap methods (BM). To perform these methods, some of the built-in functions of Excel software were utilized. The results declared that the average values of a and b were 1.187 and 0.140. The outcome of the MC method showed that the range of a and b at 95% confidence interval changed between 1.179 to 1.194 and 0.134 to 0.146, respectively, while at the same confidence interval the BM ranged from 1.187 to 1.200 and 0.133 to 0.147.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2190-5487</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2190-5495</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13201-020-01329-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Aquatic Pollution ; Bootstrap method ; Cadmium ; Comparative Law ; Confidence intervals ; Discharge coefficient ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Excel’s solver ; Flow measurement ; Hydrogeology ; Industrial and Production Engineering ; International &amp; Foreign Law ; Mathematical models ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Nanotechnology ; Original Article ; Parameter uncertainty ; Private International Law ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Uncertainty ; Uncertainty analysis ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Industry/Water Technologies ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control ; Weirs</subject><ispartof>Applied water science, 2021-02, Vol.11 (2), p.1-6, Article 26</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-8ff159bbaae884dae60d9a106321631578fdf1ca716699b1efeaa32036accab33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-8ff159bbaae884dae60d9a106321631578fdf1ca716699b1efeaa32036accab33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7312-0634</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2479186959/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2479186959?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parsaie, Abbas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haghiabi, Amir Hamzeh</creatorcontrib><title>Uncertainty analysis of discharge coefficient of circular crested weirs</title><title>Applied water science</title><addtitle>Appl Water Sci</addtitle><description>The circular crested weir (CCW) has been introduced as weirs having a high discharge coefficient (Cd). The ratio of flow head to the radius of the crest ( H / R ) is the most important parameter affecting the Cd, that the Cd ≈ a H / R b can mathematical model their relation. In this study, the parameters of the Cd formula (i.e., a and b ) were uncertainty analyzed using Monte Carlo (MC) and Bootstrap methods (BM). To perform these methods, some of the built-in functions of Excel software were utilized. The results declared that the average values of a and b were 1.187 and 0.140. The outcome of the MC method showed that the range of a and b at 95% confidence interval changed between 1.179 to 1.194 and 0.134 to 0.146, respectively, while at the same confidence interval the BM ranged from 1.187 to 1.200 and 0.133 to 0.147.</description><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Bootstrap method</subject><subject>Cadmium</subject><subject>Comparative Law</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Discharge coefficient</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Excel’s solver</subject><subject>Flow measurement</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Industrial and Production Engineering</subject><subject>International &amp; Foreign Law</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Nanotechnology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Parameter uncertainty</subject><subject>Private International Law</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Uncertainty analysis</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Industry/Water Technologies</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>Weirs</subject><issn>2190-5487</issn><issn>2190-5495</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaJgqf0DnhY8r2Z2s9nkKEWrUPBiz2E2HzWlbmqyRfrvTbtSb85lHsn7YB4ht0DvgdL2IUFdUShpRUuaoSz5BZlUIGnZMNlcnrFor8kspQ3N00AjKzEhi1WvbRzQ98OhwB63h-RTEVxhfNIfGNe20ME657W3_XD80D7q_RZjoaNNgzXFt_Ux3ZArh9tkZ797SlbPT-_zl3L5tnidPy5LzbgYSuFcDu46RCsEM2g5NRKB8roCXkPTCmccaGyBcyk7sM4i5utqjlpjV9dT8jr6moAbtYv-E-NBBfTq9BDiWmEcvN5axRmXnRYsZxkGxiECQAdCswwod9nrbvTaxfC1z8eoTdjH3EFSFWslCC4bmVnVyNIxpBStO6cCVcf-1di_yv2rU_-KZ1E9ilIm92sb_6z_Uf0AwUSIZA</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Parsaie, Abbas</creator><creator>Haghiabi, Amir Hamzeh</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>SpringerOpen</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7312-0634</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Uncertainty analysis of discharge coefficient of circular crested weirs</title><author>Parsaie, Abbas ; Haghiabi, Amir Hamzeh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-8ff159bbaae884dae60d9a106321631578fdf1ca716699b1efeaa32036accab33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Bootstrap method</topic><topic>Cadmium</topic><topic>Comparative Law</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Discharge coefficient</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Excel’s solver</topic><topic>Flow measurement</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Industrial and Production Engineering</topic><topic>International &amp; Foreign Law</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Nanotechnology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Parameter uncertainty</topic><topic>Private International Law</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Uncertainty analysis</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Industry/Water Technologies</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>Weirs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parsaie, Abbas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haghiabi, Amir Hamzeh</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Applied water science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parsaie, Abbas</au><au>Haghiabi, Amir Hamzeh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Uncertainty analysis of discharge coefficient of circular crested weirs</atitle><jtitle>Applied water science</jtitle><stitle>Appl Water Sci</stitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>6</epage><pages>1-6</pages><artnum>26</artnum><issn>2190-5487</issn><eissn>2190-5495</eissn><abstract>The circular crested weir (CCW) has been introduced as weirs having a high discharge coefficient (Cd). The ratio of flow head to the radius of the crest ( H / R ) is the most important parameter affecting the Cd, that the Cd ≈ a H / R b can mathematical model their relation. In this study, the parameters of the Cd formula (i.e., a and b ) were uncertainty analyzed using Monte Carlo (MC) and Bootstrap methods (BM). To perform these methods, some of the built-in functions of Excel software were utilized. The results declared that the average values of a and b were 1.187 and 0.140. The outcome of the MC method showed that the range of a and b at 95% confidence interval changed between 1.179 to 1.194 and 0.134 to 0.146, respectively, while at the same confidence interval the BM ranged from 1.187 to 1.200 and 0.133 to 0.147.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s13201-020-01329-6</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7312-0634</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2190-5487
ispartof Applied water science, 2021-02, Vol.11 (2), p.1-6, Article 26
issn 2190-5487
2190-5495
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6469bc84aaed41dfaa111b18c4a1106f
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access ; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Aquatic Pollution
Bootstrap method
Cadmium
Comparative Law
Confidence intervals
Discharge coefficient
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Excel’s solver
Flow measurement
Hydrogeology
Industrial and Production Engineering
International & Foreign Law
Mathematical models
Monte Carlo simulation
Nanotechnology
Original Article
Parameter uncertainty
Private International Law
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
Uncertainty
Uncertainty analysis
Waste Water Technology
Water Industry/Water Technologies
Water Management
Water Pollution Control
Weirs
title Uncertainty analysis of discharge coefficient of circular crested weirs
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T18%3A11%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Uncertainty%20analysis%20of%20discharge%20coefficient%20of%20circular%20crested%20weirs&rft.jtitle=Applied%20water%20science&rft.au=Parsaie,%20Abbas&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=6&rft.pages=1-6&rft.artnum=26&rft.issn=2190-5487&rft.eissn=2190-5495&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13201-020-01329-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2479186959%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-8ff159bbaae884dae60d9a106321631578fdf1ca716699b1efeaa32036accab33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2479186959&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true