Evaluation of methods used to improve grasslands as ring‐necked pheasant brood habitat

• Published in: Wildlife Society bulletin (2011) 2024-06, Vol.48 (2), p.n/a
• Main Authors: Orth, Mandy R., Solem, Alex, Runia, Travis, Jensen, Kent C.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: brood; Conservation Reserve Program; CRP; grassland management; habitat; mid‐contract management; Northern Great Plains; Phasianus colchicus; ring‐necked pheasant; South Dakota
• ISSN: 2328-5540; 2328-5540
• DOI: 10.1002/wsb.1521

Ring‐necked pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) demographic response is sensitive to chick survival and nest success. The establishment and management of grasslands within agricultural landscapes, often through cropland conversion programs (e.g., Conservation Reserve Program [CRP]), have positive impacts on survival and nest success. Newly established CRP and early successional habitat can provide vegetative structure selected by pheasant chicks. Ideal brood habitat provides an abundance of arthropods, an open understory promoting efficient chick movement, and a protective canopy cover. However, the natural succession of grasslands changes desired vegetative structure and challenges managers with providing adequate habitat for pheasant chicks. We investigated the efficacy of different methods of CRP management, including haying, burning, herbicide application, interseeding, and grazing, to provide adequate brood rearing habitat in cool‐ and warm‐season grasslands. We assessed chick body mass change using human‐imprinted ring‐necked pheasant chicks and investigated changes in vegetation composition and structure in relation to various habitat treatments in north‐central and north‐eastern South Dakota during mid‐June and mid‐July of 2013, 2014, and 2015. Generally, treatments that incorporated interseeding, herbicide application, or their combination had the greatest chick mass gain, reduced litter cover and depth, and increased bare ground and forb cover. Effective management for brood habitat may require more aggressive techniques than simple haying or prescribed fire techniques. Predicted body mass change per hour (g) of human imprinted pheasant chicks and 95% confidence intervals for warm‐season sites by treatment type and all treatments combined versus a control in north‐central and north‐eastern South Dakota, USA, 2013–2015. All other continuous variables were set to their observed means.