Loading…

The association between liking, learning and creativity in music

Aesthetic preference is intricately linked to learning and creativity. Previous studies have largely examined the perception of novelty in terms of pleasantness and the generation of novelty via creativity separately. The current study examines the connection between perception and generation of nov...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific reports 2024-08, Vol.14 (1), p.19048-14
Main Authors: Zioga, Ioanna, Harrison, Peter M. C., Pearce, Marcus, Bhattacharya, Joydeep, Di Bernardi Luft, Caroline
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d323t-c458bd0e80dca8b3ebdc5b61b450b157d888ac17b89fe2549abf1764383df0c3
container_end_page 14
container_issue 1
container_start_page 19048
container_title Scientific reports
container_volume 14
creator Zioga, Ioanna
Harrison, Peter M. C.
Pearce, Marcus
Bhattacharya, Joydeep
Di Bernardi Luft, Caroline
description Aesthetic preference is intricately linked to learning and creativity. Previous studies have largely examined the perception of novelty in terms of pleasantness and the generation of novelty via creativity separately. The current study examines the connection between perception and generation of novelty in music; specifically, we investigated how pleasantness judgements and brain responses to musical notes of varying probability (estimated by a computational model of auditory expectation) are linked to learning and creativity. To facilitate learning de novo, 40 non-musicians were trained on an unfamiliar artificial music grammar. After learning, participants evaluated the pleasantness of the final notes of melodies, which varied in probability, while their EEG was recorded. They also composed their own musical pieces using the learned grammar which were subsequently assessed by experts. As expected, there was an inverted U-shaped relationship between liking and probability: participants were more likely to rate the notes with intermediate probabilities as pleasant. Further, intermediate probability notes elicited larger N100 and P200 at posterior and frontal sites, respectively, associated with prediction error processing. Crucially, individuals who produced less creative compositions preferred higher probability notes, whereas individuals who composed more creative pieces preferred notes with intermediate probability. Finally, evoked brain responses to note probability were relatively independent of learning and creativity, suggesting that these higher-level processes are not mediated by brain responses related to performance monitoring. Overall, our findings shed light on the relationship between perception and generation of novelty, offering new insights into aesthetic preference and its neural correlates.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41598-024-70027-z
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_649dbefa9fe841f783cf7c21d1358000</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_649dbefa9fe841f783cf7c21d1358000</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3093694436</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d323t-c458bd0e80dca8b3ebdc5b61b450b157d888ac17b89fe2549abf1764383df0c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU9P3DAQxa2qFSDKF-BQReLSQ9PaHjuxb0WItkhIvezd8p_J1tusA3ZSBJ8ewwJF-OLRzE9PM-8RcszoV0ZBfSuCSa1aykXbU8r79u4dOeBUyJYD5-9f1fvkqJQNrU9yLZjeI_ugmeScwgH5vvqDjS1l8tHOcUqNw_kGMTVj_BvT-kszos2pVo1NofEZK_UvzrdNTM12KdF_JB8GOxY8evoPyerH-ersV3v5--fF2ellG4DD3HohlQsUFQ3eKgfogpeuY05I6pjsg1LKetY7pQfkUmjrBtZ3AhSEgXo4JBc72TDZjbnKcWvzrZlsNI-NKa-NzXP0I5pO6OBwsFVICTb0CvzQe84CA6mqC1Xr807rKk_XC5bZbGPxOI424bQUA1SLal7du6Inb9DNtORUD32goNNCQFepT0_U4rYYXtZ7trkCsANKHaU15v8yjJqHPM0uT1PzNI95mju4B2iwjvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3093694436</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The association between liking, learning and creativity in music</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Zioga, Ioanna ; Harrison, Peter M. C. ; Pearce, Marcus ; Bhattacharya, Joydeep ; Di Bernardi Luft, Caroline</creator><creatorcontrib>Zioga, Ioanna ; Harrison, Peter M. C. ; Pearce, Marcus ; Bhattacharya, Joydeep ; Di Bernardi Luft, Caroline</creatorcontrib><description>Aesthetic preference is intricately linked to learning and creativity. Previous studies have largely examined the perception of novelty in terms of pleasantness and the generation of novelty via creativity separately. The current study examines the connection between perception and generation of novelty in music; specifically, we investigated how pleasantness judgements and brain responses to musical notes of varying probability (estimated by a computational model of auditory expectation) are linked to learning and creativity. To facilitate learning de novo, 40 non-musicians were trained on an unfamiliar artificial music grammar. After learning, participants evaluated the pleasantness of the final notes of melodies, which varied in probability, while their EEG was recorded. They also composed their own musical pieces using the learned grammar which were subsequently assessed by experts. As expected, there was an inverted U-shaped relationship between liking and probability: participants were more likely to rate the notes with intermediate probabilities as pleasant. Further, intermediate probability notes elicited larger N100 and P200 at posterior and frontal sites, respectively, associated with prediction error processing. Crucially, individuals who produced less creative compositions preferred higher probability notes, whereas individuals who composed more creative pieces preferred notes with intermediate probability. Finally, evoked brain responses to note probability were relatively independent of learning and creativity, suggesting that these higher-level processes are not mediated by brain responses related to performance monitoring. Overall, our findings shed light on the relationship between perception and generation of novelty, offering new insights into aesthetic preference and its neural correlates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-70027-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39152203</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/378/2649 ; 631/477/2811 ; Acoustic Stimulation ; Adult ; Auditory discrimination learning ; Auditory Perception - physiology ; Brain - physiology ; Computational neuroscience ; Creativity ; Electroencephalography ; Female ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; Language ; Learning - physiology ; Male ; multidisciplinary ; Music - psychology ; Novelty ; Perception ; Probability ; Probability learning ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2024-08, Vol.14 (1), p.19048-14</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-d323t-c458bd0e80dca8b3ebdc5b61b450b157d888ac17b89fe2549abf1764383df0c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3293-3898</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3093694436/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3093694436?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39152203$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zioga, Ioanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Peter M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearce, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhattacharya, Joydeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Bernardi Luft, Caroline</creatorcontrib><title>The association between liking, learning and creativity in music</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Aesthetic preference is intricately linked to learning and creativity. Previous studies have largely examined the perception of novelty in terms of pleasantness and the generation of novelty via creativity separately. The current study examines the connection between perception and generation of novelty in music; specifically, we investigated how pleasantness judgements and brain responses to musical notes of varying probability (estimated by a computational model of auditory expectation) are linked to learning and creativity. To facilitate learning de novo, 40 non-musicians were trained on an unfamiliar artificial music grammar. After learning, participants evaluated the pleasantness of the final notes of melodies, which varied in probability, while their EEG was recorded. They also composed their own musical pieces using the learned grammar which were subsequently assessed by experts. As expected, there was an inverted U-shaped relationship between liking and probability: participants were more likely to rate the notes with intermediate probabilities as pleasant. Further, intermediate probability notes elicited larger N100 and P200 at posterior and frontal sites, respectively, associated with prediction error processing. Crucially, individuals who produced less creative compositions preferred higher probability notes, whereas individuals who composed more creative pieces preferred notes with intermediate probability. Finally, evoked brain responses to note probability were relatively independent of learning and creativity, suggesting that these higher-level processes are not mediated by brain responses related to performance monitoring. Overall, our findings shed light on the relationship between perception and generation of novelty, offering new insights into aesthetic preference and its neural correlates.</description><subject>631/378/2649</subject><subject>631/477/2811</subject><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Auditory discrimination learning</subject><subject>Auditory Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Computational neuroscience</subject><subject>Creativity</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Learning - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Music - psychology</subject><subject>Novelty</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Probability learning</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU9P3DAQxa2qFSDKF-BQReLSQ9PaHjuxb0WItkhIvezd8p_J1tusA3ZSBJ8ewwJF-OLRzE9PM-8RcszoV0ZBfSuCSa1aykXbU8r79u4dOeBUyJYD5-9f1fvkqJQNrU9yLZjeI_ugmeScwgH5vvqDjS1l8tHOcUqNw_kGMTVj_BvT-kszos2pVo1NofEZK_UvzrdNTM12KdF_JB8GOxY8evoPyerH-ersV3v5--fF2ellG4DD3HohlQsUFQ3eKgfogpeuY05I6pjsg1LKetY7pQfkUmjrBtZ3AhSEgXo4JBc72TDZjbnKcWvzrZlsNI-NKa-NzXP0I5pO6OBwsFVICTb0CvzQe84CA6mqC1Xr807rKk_XC5bZbGPxOI424bQUA1SLal7du6Inb9DNtORUD32goNNCQFepT0_U4rYYXtZ7trkCsANKHaU15v8yjJqHPM0uT1PzNI95mju4B2iwjvA</recordid><startdate>20240816</startdate><enddate>20240816</enddate><creator>Zioga, Ioanna</creator><creator>Harrison, Peter M. C.</creator><creator>Pearce, Marcus</creator><creator>Bhattacharya, Joydeep</creator><creator>Di Bernardi Luft, Caroline</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><general>Nature Portfolio</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3293-3898</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240816</creationdate><title>The association between liking, learning and creativity in music</title><author>Zioga, Ioanna ; Harrison, Peter M. C. ; Pearce, Marcus ; Bhattacharya, Joydeep ; Di Bernardi Luft, Caroline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d323t-c458bd0e80dca8b3ebdc5b61b450b157d888ac17b89fe2549abf1764383df0c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>631/378/2649</topic><topic>631/477/2811</topic><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Auditory discrimination learning</topic><topic>Auditory Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Computational neuroscience</topic><topic>Creativity</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Learning - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Music - psychology</topic><topic>Novelty</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Probability learning</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zioga, Ioanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Peter M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearce, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhattacharya, Joydeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Bernardi Luft, Caroline</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zioga, Ioanna</au><au>Harrison, Peter M. C.</au><au>Pearce, Marcus</au><au>Bhattacharya, Joydeep</au><au>Di Bernardi Luft, Caroline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The association between liking, learning and creativity in music</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2024-08-16</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19048</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>19048-14</pages><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Aesthetic preference is intricately linked to learning and creativity. Previous studies have largely examined the perception of novelty in terms of pleasantness and the generation of novelty via creativity separately. The current study examines the connection between perception and generation of novelty in music; specifically, we investigated how pleasantness judgements and brain responses to musical notes of varying probability (estimated by a computational model of auditory expectation) are linked to learning and creativity. To facilitate learning de novo, 40 non-musicians were trained on an unfamiliar artificial music grammar. After learning, participants evaluated the pleasantness of the final notes of melodies, which varied in probability, while their EEG was recorded. They also composed their own musical pieces using the learned grammar which were subsequently assessed by experts. As expected, there was an inverted U-shaped relationship between liking and probability: participants were more likely to rate the notes with intermediate probabilities as pleasant. Further, intermediate probability notes elicited larger N100 and P200 at posterior and frontal sites, respectively, associated with prediction error processing. Crucially, individuals who produced less creative compositions preferred higher probability notes, whereas individuals who composed more creative pieces preferred notes with intermediate probability. Finally, evoked brain responses to note probability were relatively independent of learning and creativity, suggesting that these higher-level processes are not mediated by brain responses related to performance monitoring. Overall, our findings shed light on the relationship between perception and generation of novelty, offering new insights into aesthetic preference and its neural correlates.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>39152203</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-024-70027-z</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3293-3898</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-2322
ispartof Scientific reports, 2024-08, Vol.14 (1), p.19048-14
issn 2045-2322
2045-2322
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_649dbefa9fe841f783cf7c21d1358000
source PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access
subjects 631/378/2649
631/477/2811
Acoustic Stimulation
Adult
Auditory discrimination learning
Auditory Perception - physiology
Brain - physiology
Computational neuroscience
Creativity
Electroencephalography
Female
Humanities and Social Sciences
Humans
Language
Learning - physiology
Male
multidisciplinary
Music - psychology
Novelty
Perception
Probability
Probability learning
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
Young Adult
title The association between liking, learning and creativity in music
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T13%3A42%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20association%20between%20liking,%20learning%20and%20creativity%20in%20music&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Zioga,%20Ioanna&rft.date=2024-08-16&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19048&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=19048-14&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-024-70027-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3093694436%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d323t-c458bd0e80dca8b3ebdc5b61b450b157d888ac17b89fe2549abf1764383df0c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3093694436&rft_id=info:pmid/39152203&rfr_iscdi=true