A field investigation on rill development and flow hydrodynamics under different upslope inflow and slope gradient conditions

• Published in: Hydrology Research 2020-10, Vol.51 (5), p.1201-1220
• Main Authors: Tian, Pei, Pan, Chengzhong, Xu, Xinyi, Wu, Tieniu, Yang, Tiantian, Zhang, Lujun
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Erosion processes; Field investigations; flow hydrodynamics; Flow velocity; Fluid dynamics; Fluid flow; Fluid mechanics; Gradients; Gravity; Hydraulics; Hydrodynamics; Inflow; Morphology; Reynolds number; rill development; Rill erosion; rill morphology; Rills; Runoff; Sediment transport; Shear stress; slope gradient; Slope gradients; Slopes; Soil; Soil erosion; Soil loss; Temporal variability; Temporal variations; Topography; upslope inflow rate
• ISSN: 0029-1277; 1998-9563; 2224-7955
• DOI: 10.2166/nh.2020.168

Few studies focus on the quantitative impact of upslope inflow rate and slope gradient on rill development and erosion processes. Field plot experiments under varying inflow rates (6–36 L min−1m−1) and slope gradients (26, 42 and 57%) were conducted to address this issue. The results showed soil loss rates significantly demonstrated temporal variability in relevance to the rill developing process. Rill erosion and its contribution to soil loss increased with increasing inflow rates and slope gradients by power functions. There was a threshold inflow discharge (12–24 L min−1m−1), under which, rill erosion became the dominant erosion pattern. At the initial stage, downcutting of rill bottom and headward erosion were obvious, whereas rill broadening was significant at the actively rill developing period. Rill density increased with slope gradient increasing from 26% to 42%, and then decreased. For the 57% slope under high inflow rates (24–36 L min−1m−1), gravity caused an increase in the collapse of rills. Mean rill width increased with increasing inflow rates but decreased as slope gradients increased, while mean rill depth increased with increasing inflow rates and slope gradients. Stream power and rill flow velocity were the best hydrodynamic parameter to simulate rill erosion and rill morphology, respectively.