Loading…

Variability among Sites and Climate Models Contribute to Uncertain Spruce Growth Projections in Denmark

Projecting trees species growth into future climate is subject to large uncertainties and it is of importance to quantify the different sources (e.g., site, climate model) to prioritize research efforts. This study quantifies and compares sites and climate model-induced uncertainties in projected No...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Forests 2021-01, Vol.12 (1), p.36
Main Authors: Huang, Weiwei, Fonti, Patrick, Ræbild, Anders, Larsen, Jørgen Bo, Wellendorf, Hubert, Hansen, Jon Kehlet
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-75450b3539e559ecd955aea73cdaa22f8a093cf656d79ebf2a1c61413a1167423
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-75450b3539e559ecd955aea73cdaa22f8a093cf656d79ebf2a1c61413a1167423
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 36
container_title Forests
container_volume 12
creator Huang, Weiwei
Fonti, Patrick
Ræbild, Anders
Larsen, Jørgen Bo
Wellendorf, Hubert
Hansen, Jon Kehlet
description Projecting trees species growth into future climate is subject to large uncertainties and it is of importance to quantify the different sources (e.g., site, climate model) to prioritize research efforts. This study quantifies and compares sites and climate model-induced uncertainties in projected Norway spruce growth from Denmark. We analyzed tree-rings from 340 Norway spruce trees sampled in 14 planted stands (1. Plantation; period 1950–1987) and additionally 36 trees from six trials in a common garden experiment (2. Common garden; period 1972–2012). Growth-climate correlations were estimated and multiple linear and nonlinear regression models relating growth with climate were tested. Tree growth was projected up to 2100 applying multiple linear or quadratic regression models based on the 15 Atmosphere-Ocean General Circulation Models (AOGCMs) of the Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5). The climate-growth models showed that summer drought and warm previous-year late-summer and early-autumn constrain growth. In some stands, warm springs affected growth positively. The projections of growth under future climates on average showed from no to slightly negative changes in growth compared to present growth rates. However, projections showed a very large variation, ranging from highly positive to highly negative growth changes. The uncertainties due to variation in site responses and in climate models were substantial. A lesser degree of uncertainty was related to the emission scenarios. Even though our projections on average suggest that Norway spruce may experience a growth reduction in the future, the tremendous variation in growth predictions due to differences between stands and climate models calls for further research and caution when projections are interpreted. These results also suggest that forest managers in general should avoid the use of Norway spruce on exposed and drought prone sites and as an additional resilience measure primarily use it in mixtures with other more climate tolerant species.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/f12010036
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_64f273590aac4f16a066003fda3d66e7</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_64f273590aac4f16a066003fda3d66e7</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2474771174</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-75450b3539e559ecd955aea73cdaa22f8a093cf656d79ebf2a1c61413a1167423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUU1LAzEQXUTBUnvwHwQ8eagmm6_mKFWrUFGo9Rpms0nNut3UJEX6712tFOcyw5vHm49XFOcEX1Gq8LUjJSYYU3FUDIhSaswUlsf_6tNilFKD--Byoko2KFZvED1UvvV5h2AduhVa-GwTgq5G09avIVv0FGrbJjQNXY6-2vZIDmjZGRsz-A4tNnFrLJrF8JXf0UsMjTXZhy6hvnlruzXEj7PixEGb7OgvD4vl_d3r9GE8f549Tm_mY0P5JI8lZxxXlFNlOVfW1IpzsCCpqQHK0k0AK2qc4KKWylauBGIEYYQCIUKykg6Lx71uHaDRm9gfEHc6gNe_QIgrDTF701otmCsl5QoDGOaIACxE_zxXA62FsLLXuthrbWL43NqUdRO2sevX1yWTTEpCJOtZl3uWiSGlaN1hKsH6xxZ9sIV-A7KFflA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2474771174</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variability among Sites and Climate Models Contribute to Uncertain Spruce Growth Projections in Denmark</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Huang, Weiwei ; Fonti, Patrick ; Ræbild, Anders ; Larsen, Jørgen Bo ; Wellendorf, Hubert ; Hansen, Jon Kehlet</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, Weiwei ; Fonti, Patrick ; Ræbild, Anders ; Larsen, Jørgen Bo ; Wellendorf, Hubert ; Hansen, Jon Kehlet</creatorcontrib><description>Projecting trees species growth into future climate is subject to large uncertainties and it is of importance to quantify the different sources (e.g., site, climate model) to prioritize research efforts. This study quantifies and compares sites and climate model-induced uncertainties in projected Norway spruce growth from Denmark. We analyzed tree-rings from 340 Norway spruce trees sampled in 14 planted stands (1. Plantation; period 1950–1987) and additionally 36 trees from six trials in a common garden experiment (2. Common garden; period 1972–2012). Growth-climate correlations were estimated and multiple linear and nonlinear regression models relating growth with climate were tested. Tree growth was projected up to 2100 applying multiple linear or quadratic regression models based on the 15 Atmosphere-Ocean General Circulation Models (AOGCMs) of the Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5). The climate-growth models showed that summer drought and warm previous-year late-summer and early-autumn constrain growth. In some stands, warm springs affected growth positively. The projections of growth under future climates on average showed from no to slightly negative changes in growth compared to present growth rates. However, projections showed a very large variation, ranging from highly positive to highly negative growth changes. The uncertainties due to variation in site responses and in climate models were substantial. A lesser degree of uncertainty was related to the emission scenarios. Even though our projections on average suggest that Norway spruce may experience a growth reduction in the future, the tremendous variation in growth predictions due to differences between stands and climate models calls for further research and caution when projections are interpreted. These results also suggest that forest managers in general should avoid the use of Norway spruce on exposed and drought prone sites and as an additional resilience measure primarily use it in mixtures with other more climate tolerant species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1999-4907</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1999-4907</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/f12010036</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Atmospheric circulation ; Atmospheric models ; Climate ; Climate change ; Climate models ; Drought ; Estimates ; Forest management ; Forests ; Gardens &amp; gardening ; growth projections ; Growth rate ; Norway spruce ; Oceanic general circulation model ; Picea abies ; Pine trees ; Plantations ; Precipitation ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Summer ; summer drought ; tree ring ; Tree rings ; Trees ; Uncertainty ; Variation ; warm autumn</subject><ispartof>Forests, 2021-01, Vol.12 (1), p.36</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-75450b3539e559ecd955aea73cdaa22f8a093cf656d79ebf2a1c61413a1167423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-75450b3539e559ecd955aea73cdaa22f8a093cf656d79ebf2a1c61413a1167423</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7070-3292 ; 0000-0002-1260-3509 ; 0000-0002-5682-1989</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2474771174/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2474771174?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, Weiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonti, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ræbild, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Jørgen Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wellendorf, Hubert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Jon Kehlet</creatorcontrib><title>Variability among Sites and Climate Models Contribute to Uncertain Spruce Growth Projections in Denmark</title><title>Forests</title><description>Projecting trees species growth into future climate is subject to large uncertainties and it is of importance to quantify the different sources (e.g., site, climate model) to prioritize research efforts. This study quantifies and compares sites and climate model-induced uncertainties in projected Norway spruce growth from Denmark. We analyzed tree-rings from 340 Norway spruce trees sampled in 14 planted stands (1. Plantation; period 1950–1987) and additionally 36 trees from six trials in a common garden experiment (2. Common garden; period 1972–2012). Growth-climate correlations were estimated and multiple linear and nonlinear regression models relating growth with climate were tested. Tree growth was projected up to 2100 applying multiple linear or quadratic regression models based on the 15 Atmosphere-Ocean General Circulation Models (AOGCMs) of the Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5). The climate-growth models showed that summer drought and warm previous-year late-summer and early-autumn constrain growth. In some stands, warm springs affected growth positively. The projections of growth under future climates on average showed from no to slightly negative changes in growth compared to present growth rates. However, projections showed a very large variation, ranging from highly positive to highly negative growth changes. The uncertainties due to variation in site responses and in climate models were substantial. A lesser degree of uncertainty was related to the emission scenarios. Even though our projections on average suggest that Norway spruce may experience a growth reduction in the future, the tremendous variation in growth predictions due to differences between stands and climate models calls for further research and caution when projections are interpreted. These results also suggest that forest managers in general should avoid the use of Norway spruce on exposed and drought prone sites and as an additional resilience measure primarily use it in mixtures with other more climate tolerant species.</description><subject>Atmospheric circulation</subject><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Gardens &amp; gardening</subject><subject>growth projections</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Norway spruce</subject><subject>Oceanic general circulation model</subject><subject>Picea abies</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Plantations</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>summer drought</subject><subject>tree ring</subject><subject>Tree rings</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Variation</subject><subject>warm autumn</subject><issn>1999-4907</issn><issn>1999-4907</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUU1LAzEQXUTBUnvwHwQ8eagmm6_mKFWrUFGo9Rpms0nNut3UJEX6712tFOcyw5vHm49XFOcEX1Gq8LUjJSYYU3FUDIhSaswUlsf_6tNilFKD--Byoko2KFZvED1UvvV5h2AduhVa-GwTgq5G09avIVv0FGrbJjQNXY6-2vZIDmjZGRsz-A4tNnFrLJrF8JXf0UsMjTXZhy6hvnlruzXEj7PixEGb7OgvD4vl_d3r9GE8f549Tm_mY0P5JI8lZxxXlFNlOVfW1IpzsCCpqQHK0k0AK2qc4KKWylauBGIEYYQCIUKykg6Lx71uHaDRm9gfEHc6gNe_QIgrDTF701otmCsl5QoDGOaIACxE_zxXA62FsLLXuthrbWL43NqUdRO2sevX1yWTTEpCJOtZl3uWiSGlaN1hKsH6xxZ9sIV-A7KFflA</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Huang, Weiwei</creator><creator>Fonti, Patrick</creator><creator>Ræbild, Anders</creator><creator>Larsen, Jørgen Bo</creator><creator>Wellendorf, Hubert</creator><creator>Hansen, Jon Kehlet</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7070-3292</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1260-3509</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5682-1989</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Variability among Sites and Climate Models Contribute to Uncertain Spruce Growth Projections in Denmark</title><author>Huang, Weiwei ; Fonti, Patrick ; Ræbild, Anders ; Larsen, Jørgen Bo ; Wellendorf, Hubert ; Hansen, Jon Kehlet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-75450b3539e559ecd955aea73cdaa22f8a093cf656d79ebf2a1c61413a1167423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric circulation</topic><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Gardens &amp; gardening</topic><topic>growth projections</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Norway spruce</topic><topic>Oceanic general circulation model</topic><topic>Picea abies</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Plantations</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>summer drought</topic><topic>tree ring</topic><topic>Tree rings</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Variation</topic><topic>warm autumn</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, Weiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonti, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ræbild, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Jørgen Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wellendorf, Hubert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Jon Kehlet</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Forests</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, Weiwei</au><au>Fonti, Patrick</au><au>Ræbild, Anders</au><au>Larsen, Jørgen Bo</au><au>Wellendorf, Hubert</au><au>Hansen, Jon Kehlet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variability among Sites and Climate Models Contribute to Uncertain Spruce Growth Projections in Denmark</atitle><jtitle>Forests</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>36</spage><pages>36-</pages><issn>1999-4907</issn><eissn>1999-4907</eissn><abstract>Projecting trees species growth into future climate is subject to large uncertainties and it is of importance to quantify the different sources (e.g., site, climate model) to prioritize research efforts. This study quantifies and compares sites and climate model-induced uncertainties in projected Norway spruce growth from Denmark. We analyzed tree-rings from 340 Norway spruce trees sampled in 14 planted stands (1. Plantation; period 1950–1987) and additionally 36 trees from six trials in a common garden experiment (2. Common garden; period 1972–2012). Growth-climate correlations were estimated and multiple linear and nonlinear regression models relating growth with climate were tested. Tree growth was projected up to 2100 applying multiple linear or quadratic regression models based on the 15 Atmosphere-Ocean General Circulation Models (AOGCMs) of the Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5). The climate-growth models showed that summer drought and warm previous-year late-summer and early-autumn constrain growth. In some stands, warm springs affected growth positively. The projections of growth under future climates on average showed from no to slightly negative changes in growth compared to present growth rates. However, projections showed a very large variation, ranging from highly positive to highly negative growth changes. The uncertainties due to variation in site responses and in climate models were substantial. A lesser degree of uncertainty was related to the emission scenarios. Even though our projections on average suggest that Norway spruce may experience a growth reduction in the future, the tremendous variation in growth predictions due to differences between stands and climate models calls for further research and caution when projections are interpreted. These results also suggest that forest managers in general should avoid the use of Norway spruce on exposed and drought prone sites and as an additional resilience measure primarily use it in mixtures with other more climate tolerant species.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/f12010036</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7070-3292</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1260-3509</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5682-1989</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1999-4907
ispartof Forests, 2021-01, Vol.12 (1), p.36
issn 1999-4907
1999-4907
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_64f273590aac4f16a066003fda3d66e7
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Atmospheric circulation
Atmospheric models
Climate
Climate change
Climate models
Drought
Estimates
Forest management
Forests
Gardens & gardening
growth projections
Growth rate
Norway spruce
Oceanic general circulation model
Picea abies
Pine trees
Plantations
Precipitation
Regression analysis
Regression models
Summer
summer drought
tree ring
Tree rings
Trees
Uncertainty
Variation
warm autumn
title Variability among Sites and Climate Models Contribute to Uncertain Spruce Growth Projections in Denmark
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T00%3A45%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variability%20among%20Sites%20and%20Climate%20Models%20Contribute%20to%20Uncertain%20Spruce%20Growth%20Projections%20in%20Denmark&rft.jtitle=Forests&rft.au=Huang,%20Weiwei&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=36&rft.pages=36-&rft.issn=1999-4907&rft.eissn=1999-4907&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/f12010036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2474771174%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-75450b3539e559ecd955aea73cdaa22f8a093cf656d79ebf2a1c61413a1167423%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2474771174&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true