Loading…

Improving wastewater treatment plant performance by applying CFD models for design and operation: selected case studies

Hydrodynamic simulation (CFD: computational fluid dynamics) is one of the major tools for planning the reconstruction and operation of the structures in wastewater treatment plants, and its routine use is commonplace because of the cost savings and efficiency gains that can be achieved. This paper p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water science and technology 2021-07, Vol.84 (2), p.323-332
Main Author: Patziger, M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-7b137daa4ee6bd0051d628d3a2b5729ad7e49491e3f772feeab3e9a92796cf023
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-7b137daa4ee6bd0051d628d3a2b5729ad7e49491e3f772feeab3e9a92796cf023
container_end_page 332
container_issue 2
container_start_page 323
container_title Water science and technology
container_volume 84
creator Patziger, M
description Hydrodynamic simulation (CFD: computational fluid dynamics) is one of the major tools for planning the reconstruction and operation of the structures in wastewater treatment plants, and its routine use is commonplace because of the cost savings and efficiency gains that can be achieved. This paper provides examples of how CFD can contribute to substantial improvements in the overall efficiency of wastewater treatment plants.The case studies presented in the paper include rarely investigated issues, such as the operation of aerated grit chambers, performance of primary settling tanks, mixing performance in oxidation ditches and return sludge control. The results show that: (1) air intake rate can be strongly decreased in most of the grit chambers, (2) optimization of the inlet geometry design of primary settling tanks is crucial, especially at high loads caused by storm events, (3) mixer performance design based on current design guidelines is often of an unnecessarily high capacity, (4) sludge recirculation rate should be optimized by CFD investigations based on secondary settling tank performance.
doi_str_mv 10.2166/wst.2021.019
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_651460231bb84d27ada4aca1a5eef0e0</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_651460231bb84d27ada4aca1a5eef0e0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2557673064</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-7b137daa4ee6bd0051d628d3a2b5729ad7e49491e3f772feeab3e9a92796cf023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc2O0zAUhS0EEmVgxwNYYsOCFP_FHrNDhYFKI7Fh1taNfVOlSuJgu1R9-3GmIxZsbMn-ztG95xDynrOt4Fp_PueyFUzwLeP2Bdlwa3VjjRQvyYYJIxsuhHxN3uR8ZIwZqdiGnPfTkuLfYT7QM-SCZyiYaEkIZcK50GWE9cTUxzTB7JF2FwrLMl5Wye7uG51iwDHT-k8D5uEwU5gDjVUCZYjzF5pxRF8wUA8ZaS6nMGB-S171MGZ893zfkIe77793P5v7Xz_2u6_3jVeMlcZ0XJoAoBB1FxhredDiNkgQXWuEhWBQWWU5yt4Y0SNCJ9GCFcZq3zMhb8j-6hsiHN2ShgnSxUUY3NNDTAcHqQx-RKdbrnSV8K67VUEYCKDAA4cWsWfIqtfHq1dN7M8Jc3HTkD2ONSKMp-xE27ZaCctsRT_8hx7jKc1105Uy2kimVaU-XSmfYs4J-38DcubWRl1t1K2NutqofAQY75Wj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2557673064</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving wastewater treatment plant performance by applying CFD models for design and operation: selected case studies</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Patziger, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Patziger, M</creatorcontrib><description>Hydrodynamic simulation (CFD: computational fluid dynamics) is one of the major tools for planning the reconstruction and operation of the structures in wastewater treatment plants, and its routine use is commonplace because of the cost savings and efficiency gains that can be achieved. This paper provides examples of how CFD can contribute to substantial improvements in the overall efficiency of wastewater treatment plants.The case studies presented in the paper include rarely investigated issues, such as the operation of aerated grit chambers, performance of primary settling tanks, mixing performance in oxidation ditches and return sludge control. The results show that: (1) air intake rate can be strongly decreased in most of the grit chambers, (2) optimization of the inlet geometry design of primary settling tanks is crucial, especially at high loads caused by storm events, (3) mixer performance design based on current design guidelines is often of an unnecessarily high capacity, (4) sludge recirculation rate should be optimized by CFD investigations based on secondary settling tank performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-1223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-9732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wst.2021.019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>aeration ; Aeration tanks ; Aerodynamics ; Air intakes ; Biogas ; Carbon ; Case studies ; Chambers ; Chemical oxygen demand ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Computer applications ; Design ; Design optimization ; Ditches ; Efficiency ; Energy ; Fluid dynamics ; Geometry ; grit chambers ; Hydrodynamics ; Mathematical models ; mixing ; Nutrient removal ; operation ; Oxidation ; Oxidation ditches ; Particle size ; return sludge control ; Sedimentation &amp; deposition ; Sedimentation tanks ; Settling tanks ; Sludge ; Storage tanks ; Storms ; Tanks ; Velocity ; Wastewater treatment ; Wastewater treatment plants ; water resources recovery ; Water treatment</subject><ispartof>Water science and technology, 2021-07, Vol.84 (2), p.323-332</ispartof><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing Jul 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-7b137daa4ee6bd0051d628d3a2b5729ad7e49491e3f772feeab3e9a92796cf023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-7b137daa4ee6bd0051d628d3a2b5729ad7e49491e3f772feeab3e9a92796cf023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Patziger, M</creatorcontrib><title>Improving wastewater treatment plant performance by applying CFD models for design and operation: selected case studies</title><title>Water science and technology</title><description>Hydrodynamic simulation (CFD: computational fluid dynamics) is one of the major tools for planning the reconstruction and operation of the structures in wastewater treatment plants, and its routine use is commonplace because of the cost savings and efficiency gains that can be achieved. This paper provides examples of how CFD can contribute to substantial improvements in the overall efficiency of wastewater treatment plants.The case studies presented in the paper include rarely investigated issues, such as the operation of aerated grit chambers, performance of primary settling tanks, mixing performance in oxidation ditches and return sludge control. The results show that: (1) air intake rate can be strongly decreased in most of the grit chambers, (2) optimization of the inlet geometry design of primary settling tanks is crucial, especially at high loads caused by storm events, (3) mixer performance design based on current design guidelines is often of an unnecessarily high capacity, (4) sludge recirculation rate should be optimized by CFD investigations based on secondary settling tank performance.</description><subject>aeration</subject><subject>Aeration tanks</subject><subject>Aerodynamics</subject><subject>Air intakes</subject><subject>Biogas</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Chambers</subject><subject>Chemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Ditches</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Geometry</subject><subject>grit chambers</subject><subject>Hydrodynamics</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>mixing</subject><subject>Nutrient removal</subject><subject>operation</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Oxidation ditches</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>return sludge control</subject><subject>Sedimentation &amp; deposition</subject><subject>Sedimentation tanks</subject><subject>Settling tanks</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Storage tanks</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Tanks</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment plants</subject><subject>water resources recovery</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><issn>0273-1223</issn><issn>1996-9732</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc2O0zAUhS0EEmVgxwNYYsOCFP_FHrNDhYFKI7Fh1taNfVOlSuJgu1R9-3GmIxZsbMn-ztG95xDynrOt4Fp_PueyFUzwLeP2Bdlwa3VjjRQvyYYJIxsuhHxN3uR8ZIwZqdiGnPfTkuLfYT7QM-SCZyiYaEkIZcK50GWE9cTUxzTB7JF2FwrLMl5Wye7uG51iwDHT-k8D5uEwU5gDjVUCZYjzF5pxRF8wUA8ZaS6nMGB-S171MGZ893zfkIe77793P5v7Xz_2u6_3jVeMlcZ0XJoAoBB1FxhredDiNkgQXWuEhWBQWWU5yt4Y0SNCJ9GCFcZq3zMhb8j-6hsiHN2ShgnSxUUY3NNDTAcHqQx-RKdbrnSV8K67VUEYCKDAA4cWsWfIqtfHq1dN7M8Jc3HTkD2ONSKMp-xE27ZaCctsRT_8hx7jKc1105Uy2kimVaU-XSmfYs4J-38DcubWRl1t1K2NutqofAQY75Wj</recordid><startdate>20210715</startdate><enddate>20210715</enddate><creator>Patziger, M</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210715</creationdate><title>Improving wastewater treatment plant performance by applying CFD models for design and operation: selected case studies</title><author>Patziger, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-7b137daa4ee6bd0051d628d3a2b5729ad7e49491e3f772feeab3e9a92796cf023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>aeration</topic><topic>Aeration tanks</topic><topic>Aerodynamics</topic><topic>Air intakes</topic><topic>Biogas</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Chambers</topic><topic>Chemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Ditches</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Geometry</topic><topic>grit chambers</topic><topic>Hydrodynamics</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>mixing</topic><topic>Nutrient removal</topic><topic>operation</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Oxidation ditches</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>return sludge control</topic><topic>Sedimentation &amp; deposition</topic><topic>Sedimentation tanks</topic><topic>Settling tanks</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Storage tanks</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Tanks</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment plants</topic><topic>water resources recovery</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Patziger, M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Complete (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Patziger, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving wastewater treatment plant performance by applying CFD models for design and operation: selected case studies</atitle><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle><date>2021-07-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>323</spage><epage>332</epage><pages>323-332</pages><issn>0273-1223</issn><eissn>1996-9732</eissn><abstract>Hydrodynamic simulation (CFD: computational fluid dynamics) is one of the major tools for planning the reconstruction and operation of the structures in wastewater treatment plants, and its routine use is commonplace because of the cost savings and efficiency gains that can be achieved. This paper provides examples of how CFD can contribute to substantial improvements in the overall efficiency of wastewater treatment plants.The case studies presented in the paper include rarely investigated issues, such as the operation of aerated grit chambers, performance of primary settling tanks, mixing performance in oxidation ditches and return sludge control. The results show that: (1) air intake rate can be strongly decreased in most of the grit chambers, (2) optimization of the inlet geometry design of primary settling tanks is crucial, especially at high loads caused by storm events, (3) mixer performance design based on current design guidelines is often of an unnecessarily high capacity, (4) sludge recirculation rate should be optimized by CFD investigations based on secondary settling tank performance.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><doi>10.2166/wst.2021.019</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0273-1223
ispartof Water science and technology, 2021-07, Vol.84 (2), p.323-332
issn 0273-1223
1996-9732
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_651460231bb84d27ada4aca1a5eef0e0
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects aeration
Aeration tanks
Aerodynamics
Air intakes
Biogas
Carbon
Case studies
Chambers
Chemical oxygen demand
Computational fluid dynamics
Computer applications
Design
Design optimization
Ditches
Efficiency
Energy
Fluid dynamics
Geometry
grit chambers
Hydrodynamics
Mathematical models
mixing
Nutrient removal
operation
Oxidation
Oxidation ditches
Particle size
return sludge control
Sedimentation & deposition
Sedimentation tanks
Settling tanks
Sludge
Storage tanks
Storms
Tanks
Velocity
Wastewater treatment
Wastewater treatment plants
water resources recovery
Water treatment
title Improving wastewater treatment plant performance by applying CFD models for design and operation: selected case studies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T10%3A27%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20wastewater%20treatment%20plant%20performance%20by%20applying%20CFD%20models%20for%20design%20and%20operation:%20selected%20case%20studies&rft.jtitle=Water%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Patziger,%20M&rft.date=2021-07-15&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=323&rft.epage=332&rft.pages=323-332&rft.issn=0273-1223&rft.eissn=1996-9732&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wst.2021.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2557673064%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-7b137daa4ee6bd0051d628d3a2b5729ad7e49491e3f772feeab3e9a92796cf023%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2557673064&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true