Loading…
Improving wastewater treatment plant performance by applying CFD models for design and operation: selected case studies
Hydrodynamic simulation (CFD: computational fluid dynamics) is one of the major tools for planning the reconstruction and operation of the structures in wastewater treatment plants, and its routine use is commonplace because of the cost savings and efficiency gains that can be achieved. This paper p...
Saved in:
Published in: | Water science and technology 2021-07, Vol.84 (2), p.323-332 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-7b137daa4ee6bd0051d628d3a2b5729ad7e49491e3f772feeab3e9a92796cf023 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-7b137daa4ee6bd0051d628d3a2b5729ad7e49491e3f772feeab3e9a92796cf023 |
container_end_page | 332 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 323 |
container_title | Water science and technology |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | Patziger, M |
description | Hydrodynamic simulation (CFD: computational fluid dynamics) is one of the major tools for planning the reconstruction and operation of the structures in wastewater treatment plants, and its routine use is commonplace because of the cost savings and efficiency gains that can be achieved. This paper provides examples of how CFD can contribute to substantial improvements in the overall efficiency of wastewater treatment plants.The case studies presented in the paper include rarely investigated issues, such as the operation of aerated grit chambers, performance of primary settling tanks, mixing performance in oxidation ditches and return sludge control. The results show that: (1) air intake rate can be strongly decreased in most of the grit chambers, (2) optimization of the inlet geometry design of primary settling tanks is crucial, especially at high loads caused by storm events, (3) mixer performance design based on current design guidelines is often of an unnecessarily high capacity, (4) sludge recirculation rate should be optimized by CFD investigations based on secondary settling tank performance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2166/wst.2021.019 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_651460231bb84d27ada4aca1a5eef0e0</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_651460231bb84d27ada4aca1a5eef0e0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2557673064</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-7b137daa4ee6bd0051d628d3a2b5729ad7e49491e3f772feeab3e9a92796cf023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc2O0zAUhS0EEmVgxwNYYsOCFP_FHrNDhYFKI7Fh1taNfVOlSuJgu1R9-3GmIxZsbMn-ztG95xDynrOt4Fp_PueyFUzwLeP2Bdlwa3VjjRQvyYYJIxsuhHxN3uR8ZIwZqdiGnPfTkuLfYT7QM-SCZyiYaEkIZcK50GWE9cTUxzTB7JF2FwrLMl5Wye7uG51iwDHT-k8D5uEwU5gDjVUCZYjzF5pxRF8wUA8ZaS6nMGB-S171MGZ893zfkIe77793P5v7Xz_2u6_3jVeMlcZ0XJoAoBB1FxhredDiNkgQXWuEhWBQWWU5yt4Y0SNCJ9GCFcZq3zMhb8j-6hsiHN2ShgnSxUUY3NNDTAcHqQx-RKdbrnSV8K67VUEYCKDAA4cWsWfIqtfHq1dN7M8Jc3HTkD2ONSKMp-xE27ZaCctsRT_8hx7jKc1105Uy2kimVaU-XSmfYs4J-38DcubWRl1t1K2NutqofAQY75Wj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2557673064</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving wastewater treatment plant performance by applying CFD models for design and operation: selected case studies</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Patziger, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Patziger, M</creatorcontrib><description>Hydrodynamic simulation (CFD: computational fluid dynamics) is one of the major tools for planning the reconstruction and operation of the structures in wastewater treatment plants, and its routine use is commonplace because of the cost savings and efficiency gains that can be achieved. This paper provides examples of how CFD can contribute to substantial improvements in the overall efficiency of wastewater treatment plants.The case studies presented in the paper include rarely investigated issues, such as the operation of aerated grit chambers, performance of primary settling tanks, mixing performance in oxidation ditches and return sludge control. The results show that: (1) air intake rate can be strongly decreased in most of the grit chambers, (2) optimization of the inlet geometry design of primary settling tanks is crucial, especially at high loads caused by storm events, (3) mixer performance design based on current design guidelines is often of an unnecessarily high capacity, (4) sludge recirculation rate should be optimized by CFD investigations based on secondary settling tank performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-1223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-9732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wst.2021.019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>aeration ; Aeration tanks ; Aerodynamics ; Air intakes ; Biogas ; Carbon ; Case studies ; Chambers ; Chemical oxygen demand ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Computer applications ; Design ; Design optimization ; Ditches ; Efficiency ; Energy ; Fluid dynamics ; Geometry ; grit chambers ; Hydrodynamics ; Mathematical models ; mixing ; Nutrient removal ; operation ; Oxidation ; Oxidation ditches ; Particle size ; return sludge control ; Sedimentation & deposition ; Sedimentation tanks ; Settling tanks ; Sludge ; Storage tanks ; Storms ; Tanks ; Velocity ; Wastewater treatment ; Wastewater treatment plants ; water resources recovery ; Water treatment</subject><ispartof>Water science and technology, 2021-07, Vol.84 (2), p.323-332</ispartof><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing Jul 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-7b137daa4ee6bd0051d628d3a2b5729ad7e49491e3f772feeab3e9a92796cf023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-7b137daa4ee6bd0051d628d3a2b5729ad7e49491e3f772feeab3e9a92796cf023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Patziger, M</creatorcontrib><title>Improving wastewater treatment plant performance by applying CFD models for design and operation: selected case studies</title><title>Water science and technology</title><description>Hydrodynamic simulation (CFD: computational fluid dynamics) is one of the major tools for planning the reconstruction and operation of the structures in wastewater treatment plants, and its routine use is commonplace because of the cost savings and efficiency gains that can be achieved. This paper provides examples of how CFD can contribute to substantial improvements in the overall efficiency of wastewater treatment plants.The case studies presented in the paper include rarely investigated issues, such as the operation of aerated grit chambers, performance of primary settling tanks, mixing performance in oxidation ditches and return sludge control. The results show that: (1) air intake rate can be strongly decreased in most of the grit chambers, (2) optimization of the inlet geometry design of primary settling tanks is crucial, especially at high loads caused by storm events, (3) mixer performance design based on current design guidelines is often of an unnecessarily high capacity, (4) sludge recirculation rate should be optimized by CFD investigations based on secondary settling tank performance.</description><subject>aeration</subject><subject>Aeration tanks</subject><subject>Aerodynamics</subject><subject>Air intakes</subject><subject>Biogas</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Chambers</subject><subject>Chemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Ditches</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Geometry</subject><subject>grit chambers</subject><subject>Hydrodynamics</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>mixing</subject><subject>Nutrient removal</subject><subject>operation</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Oxidation ditches</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>return sludge control</subject><subject>Sedimentation & deposition</subject><subject>Sedimentation tanks</subject><subject>Settling tanks</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Storage tanks</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Tanks</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment plants</subject><subject>water resources recovery</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><issn>0273-1223</issn><issn>1996-9732</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc2O0zAUhS0EEmVgxwNYYsOCFP_FHrNDhYFKI7Fh1taNfVOlSuJgu1R9-3GmIxZsbMn-ztG95xDynrOt4Fp_PueyFUzwLeP2Bdlwa3VjjRQvyYYJIxsuhHxN3uR8ZIwZqdiGnPfTkuLfYT7QM-SCZyiYaEkIZcK50GWE9cTUxzTB7JF2FwrLMl5Wye7uG51iwDHT-k8D5uEwU5gDjVUCZYjzF5pxRF8wUA8ZaS6nMGB-S171MGZ893zfkIe77793P5v7Xz_2u6_3jVeMlcZ0XJoAoBB1FxhredDiNkgQXWuEhWBQWWU5yt4Y0SNCJ9GCFcZq3zMhb8j-6hsiHN2ShgnSxUUY3NNDTAcHqQx-RKdbrnSV8K67VUEYCKDAA4cWsWfIqtfHq1dN7M8Jc3HTkD2ONSKMp-xE27ZaCctsRT_8hx7jKc1105Uy2kimVaU-XSmfYs4J-38DcubWRl1t1K2NutqofAQY75Wj</recordid><startdate>20210715</startdate><enddate>20210715</enddate><creator>Patziger, M</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210715</creationdate><title>Improving wastewater treatment plant performance by applying CFD models for design and operation: selected case studies</title><author>Patziger, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-7b137daa4ee6bd0051d628d3a2b5729ad7e49491e3f772feeab3e9a92796cf023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>aeration</topic><topic>Aeration tanks</topic><topic>Aerodynamics</topic><topic>Air intakes</topic><topic>Biogas</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Chambers</topic><topic>Chemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Ditches</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Geometry</topic><topic>grit chambers</topic><topic>Hydrodynamics</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>mixing</topic><topic>Nutrient removal</topic><topic>operation</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Oxidation ditches</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>return sludge control</topic><topic>Sedimentation & deposition</topic><topic>Sedimentation tanks</topic><topic>Settling tanks</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Storage tanks</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Tanks</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment plants</topic><topic>water resources recovery</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Patziger, M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Complete (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Patziger, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving wastewater treatment plant performance by applying CFD models for design and operation: selected case studies</atitle><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle><date>2021-07-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>323</spage><epage>332</epage><pages>323-332</pages><issn>0273-1223</issn><eissn>1996-9732</eissn><abstract>Hydrodynamic simulation (CFD: computational fluid dynamics) is one of the major tools for planning the reconstruction and operation of the structures in wastewater treatment plants, and its routine use is commonplace because of the cost savings and efficiency gains that can be achieved. This paper provides examples of how CFD can contribute to substantial improvements in the overall efficiency of wastewater treatment plants.The case studies presented in the paper include rarely investigated issues, such as the operation of aerated grit chambers, performance of primary settling tanks, mixing performance in oxidation ditches and return sludge control. The results show that: (1) air intake rate can be strongly decreased in most of the grit chambers, (2) optimization of the inlet geometry design of primary settling tanks is crucial, especially at high loads caused by storm events, (3) mixer performance design based on current design guidelines is often of an unnecessarily high capacity, (4) sludge recirculation rate should be optimized by CFD investigations based on secondary settling tank performance.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><doi>10.2166/wst.2021.019</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0273-1223 |
ispartof | Water science and technology, 2021-07, Vol.84 (2), p.323-332 |
issn | 0273-1223 1996-9732 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_651460231bb84d27ada4aca1a5eef0e0 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | aeration Aeration tanks Aerodynamics Air intakes Biogas Carbon Case studies Chambers Chemical oxygen demand Computational fluid dynamics Computer applications Design Design optimization Ditches Efficiency Energy Fluid dynamics Geometry grit chambers Hydrodynamics Mathematical models mixing Nutrient removal operation Oxidation Oxidation ditches Particle size return sludge control Sedimentation & deposition Sedimentation tanks Settling tanks Sludge Storage tanks Storms Tanks Velocity Wastewater treatment Wastewater treatment plants water resources recovery Water treatment |
title | Improving wastewater treatment plant performance by applying CFD models for design and operation: selected case studies |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T10%3A27%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20wastewater%20treatment%20plant%20performance%20by%20applying%20CFD%20models%20for%20design%20and%20operation:%20selected%20case%20studies&rft.jtitle=Water%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Patziger,%20M&rft.date=2021-07-15&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=323&rft.epage=332&rft.pages=323-332&rft.issn=0273-1223&rft.eissn=1996-9732&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wst.2021.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2557673064%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-7b137daa4ee6bd0051d628d3a2b5729ad7e49491e3f772feeab3e9a92796cf023%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2557673064&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |