A randomized controlled trial to verify the irrigation of salivary glands in relieving xerostomia in patients with Sjögren’s syndrome

• Published in: Frontiers in immunology 2022-11, Vol.13, p.1039599-1039599
• Main Authors: Du, Hongming, Fu, Zhen, Zhong, Yi, Yuan, Yi, Zhao, Jing, Ding, Xu, Li, Sheng, Gao, Shiyu, Zhu, Yuchi, Song, Haiyang, Wu, Heming
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Immunology; irrigation; saliva; salivary glands; Sjögren’s syndrome; xerostomia
• ISSN: 1664-3224; 1664-3224
• DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1039599

ObjectiveTo verify the effect of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) and major salivary glands saline irrigation on relieving xerostomia in Sjögren's syndrome (SS) patients. MethodsThe enrolled 49 SS patients were randomly assigned to the control group (no irrigation, n=16), saline group (irrigation with saline, n=17) and TA group (irrigation with TA, n=16). Fourteen cases of each group were treated differently but received the same examinations. The examinations include unstimulated whole saliva flow (UWS), chewing-stimulated whole saliva flow (SWS), citric acid-stimulated parotid flow (SPF), Clinical Oral Dryness Score (CODS), Xerostomia Inventory (XI) and EULAR SS Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) of 1 week before irrigation (T0) and 1 week(T1), 8 weeks (T8), 16 weeks (T16) and 24 weeks (T24) after major salivary irrigation. ResultsEach group had 14 cases with completed follow-ups. Both TA and saline irrigation of major salivary glands resulted in higher SWS and SPF of T8, T16 and than those at T0. ESSPRI (oral dryness domain) of T8, T16 and T24 were significantly lower than that at T0, respectively (P < 0.05). SWS and SPF of T8, T16 and T24 in the saline group were significantly higher than in the control group (P< 0.05). XI and ESSPRI (oral dress domain) of T8, T16 and T24 in the saline group were significantly lower than those in the control group, respectively (P< 0.05). SWS and SPF of T16 and T24 in the TA group were significantly higher than in the control group (P< 0.05). All cases with completed follow-up in TA and saline groups were divided into responders and non-responders. Compared with responders, the UWS, SWS, SPF and CODS of T0 in non-responders were significantly increased (P