Loading…
A New Measure for Serious Games Evaluation: Gaming Educational Balanced (GEB) Model
Serious games have to meet certain characteristics relating to gameplay and educational content to be effective as educational tools. There are some models that evaluate these aspects, but they usually lack a good balance between both ludic and learning requirements, and provide no guide for the des...
Saved in:
Published in: | Applied sciences 2022-11, Vol.12 (22), p.11757 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-f713b6e93daae371c772712228f7414f561bee797ad4e5d3396eb81175e8b543 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-f713b6e93daae371c772712228f7414f561bee797ad4e5d3396eb81175e8b543 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 22 |
container_start_page | 11757 |
container_title | Applied sciences |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Martinez, Kim Menéndez-Menéndez, María Isabel Bustillo, Andres |
description | Serious games have to meet certain characteristics relating to gameplay and educational content to be effective as educational tools. There are some models that evaluate these aspects, but they usually lack a good balance between both ludic and learning requirements, and provide no guide for the design of new games. This study develops the Gaming Educational Balanced (GEB) Model which addresses these two limitations. GEB is based on the Mechanics, Dynamics and Aesthetics framework and the Four Pillars of Educational Games theory. This model defines a metric to evaluate serious games, which can also be followed to guide their subsequent development. This rubric is tested with three indie serious games developed using different genres to raise awareness of mental illnesses. This evaluation revealed two main issues: the three games returned good results for gameplay, but the application of educational content was deficient, due in all likelihood to the lack of expert educators participating in their development. A statistical and machine learning validation of the results is also performed to ensure that the GEB metric features are clearly explained and the players are able to evaluate them correctly. These results underline the usefulness of the new metric tool for identifying game design strengths and weaknesses. Future works will apply this metric to more serious games to further test its effectiveness and to guide the design of new serious games. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/app122211757 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_659afb60a236416fa615f3225a9c12e9</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_659afb60a236416fa615f3225a9c12e9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2739420984</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-f713b6e93daae371c772712228f7414f561bee797ad4e5d3396eb81175e8b543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkUFLw0AQhRdRsNTe_AELXhSMZneT3cRbW2IttHpo78skmS0paTfuNor_3qQV6VxmeAzvzccQcsvCJyHS8BmahnHOGVOxuiADHioZiIipy7P5moy834ZdpUwkLByQ1Zi-4zddIvjWITXW0RW6yraezmCHnmZfULdwqOz-pVeq_YZmZVscFajpBGrYF1jS-1k2eaBLW2J9Q64M1B5Hf31I1q_ZevoWLD5m8-l4ERRCqkNgFBO5xFSUACgUK5TiqkdIjIpYZGLJckSVKigjjMsOUmKe9HyY5HEkhmR-si0tbHXjqh24H22h0kfBuo0Gd6iKGrWMUzC5DIELGTFpQLLYCM5jSAvGuxOG5O7k1Tj72aI_6K1tXQfoNVcijXiYJn3i42mrcNZ7h-Y_lYW6f4I-f4L4BU6DdjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2739420984</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A New Measure for Serious Games Evaluation: Gaming Educational Balanced (GEB) Model</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Martinez, Kim ; Menéndez-Menéndez, María Isabel ; Bustillo, Andres</creator><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Kim ; Menéndez-Menéndez, María Isabel ; Bustillo, Andres</creatorcontrib><description>Serious games have to meet certain characteristics relating to gameplay and educational content to be effective as educational tools. There are some models that evaluate these aspects, but they usually lack a good balance between both ludic and learning requirements, and provide no guide for the design of new games. This study develops the Gaming Educational Balanced (GEB) Model which addresses these two limitations. GEB is based on the Mechanics, Dynamics and Aesthetics framework and the Four Pillars of Educational Games theory. This model defines a metric to evaluate serious games, which can also be followed to guide their subsequent development. This rubric is tested with three indie serious games developed using different genres to raise awareness of mental illnesses. This evaluation revealed two main issues: the three games returned good results for gameplay, but the application of educational content was deficient, due in all likelihood to the lack of expert educators participating in their development. A statistical and machine learning validation of the results is also performed to ensure that the GEB metric features are clearly explained and the players are able to evaluate them correctly. These results underline the usefulness of the new metric tool for identifying game design strengths and weaknesses. Future works will apply this metric to more serious games to further test its effectiveness and to guide the design of new serious games.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2076-3417</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2076-3417</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/app122211757</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Computer & video games ; Design ; Education ; Educational software ; Evaluation ; game design ; game evaluation ; Games ; Genre ; metrics ; serious games</subject><ispartof>Applied sciences, 2022-11, Vol.12 (22), p.11757</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-f713b6e93daae371c772712228f7414f561bee797ad4e5d3396eb81175e8b543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-f713b6e93daae371c772712228f7414f561bee797ad4e5d3396eb81175e8b543</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2855-7532 ; 0000-0003-2681-454X ; 0000-0001-7373-6885</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2739420984/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2739420984?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,74998</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menéndez-Menéndez, María Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bustillo, Andres</creatorcontrib><title>A New Measure for Serious Games Evaluation: Gaming Educational Balanced (GEB) Model</title><title>Applied sciences</title><description>Serious games have to meet certain characteristics relating to gameplay and educational content to be effective as educational tools. There are some models that evaluate these aspects, but they usually lack a good balance between both ludic and learning requirements, and provide no guide for the design of new games. This study develops the Gaming Educational Balanced (GEB) Model which addresses these two limitations. GEB is based on the Mechanics, Dynamics and Aesthetics framework and the Four Pillars of Educational Games theory. This model defines a metric to evaluate serious games, which can also be followed to guide their subsequent development. This rubric is tested with three indie serious games developed using different genres to raise awareness of mental illnesses. This evaluation revealed two main issues: the three games returned good results for gameplay, but the application of educational content was deficient, due in all likelihood to the lack of expert educators participating in their development. A statistical and machine learning validation of the results is also performed to ensure that the GEB metric features are clearly explained and the players are able to evaluate them correctly. These results underline the usefulness of the new metric tool for identifying game design strengths and weaknesses. Future works will apply this metric to more serious games to further test its effectiveness and to guide the design of new serious games.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Computer & video games</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational software</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>game design</subject><subject>game evaluation</subject><subject>Games</subject><subject>Genre</subject><subject>metrics</subject><subject>serious games</subject><issn>2076-3417</issn><issn>2076-3417</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkUFLw0AQhRdRsNTe_AELXhSMZneT3cRbW2IttHpo78skmS0paTfuNor_3qQV6VxmeAzvzccQcsvCJyHS8BmahnHOGVOxuiADHioZiIipy7P5moy834ZdpUwkLByQ1Zi-4zddIvjWITXW0RW6yraezmCHnmZfULdwqOz-pVeq_YZmZVscFajpBGrYF1jS-1k2eaBLW2J9Q64M1B5Hf31I1q_ZevoWLD5m8-l4ERRCqkNgFBO5xFSUACgUK5TiqkdIjIpYZGLJckSVKigjjMsOUmKe9HyY5HEkhmR-si0tbHXjqh24H22h0kfBuo0Gd6iKGrWMUzC5DIELGTFpQLLYCM5jSAvGuxOG5O7k1Tj72aI_6K1tXQfoNVcijXiYJn3i42mrcNZ7h-Y_lYW6f4I-f4L4BU6DdjA</recordid><startdate>20221101</startdate><enddate>20221101</enddate><creator>Martinez, Kim</creator><creator>Menéndez-Menéndez, María Isabel</creator><creator>Bustillo, Andres</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2855-7532</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2681-454X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7373-6885</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221101</creationdate><title>A New Measure for Serious Games Evaluation: Gaming Educational Balanced (GEB) Model</title><author>Martinez, Kim ; Menéndez-Menéndez, María Isabel ; Bustillo, Andres</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-f713b6e93daae371c772712228f7414f561bee797ad4e5d3396eb81175e8b543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Computer & video games</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational software</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>game design</topic><topic>game evaluation</topic><topic>Games</topic><topic>Genre</topic><topic>metrics</topic><topic>serious games</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menéndez-Menéndez, María Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bustillo, Andres</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Applied sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martinez, Kim</au><au>Menéndez-Menéndez, María Isabel</au><au>Bustillo, Andres</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A New Measure for Serious Games Evaluation: Gaming Educational Balanced (GEB) Model</atitle><jtitle>Applied sciences</jtitle><date>2022-11-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>11757</spage><pages>11757-</pages><issn>2076-3417</issn><eissn>2076-3417</eissn><abstract>Serious games have to meet certain characteristics relating to gameplay and educational content to be effective as educational tools. There are some models that evaluate these aspects, but they usually lack a good balance between both ludic and learning requirements, and provide no guide for the design of new games. This study develops the Gaming Educational Balanced (GEB) Model which addresses these two limitations. GEB is based on the Mechanics, Dynamics and Aesthetics framework and the Four Pillars of Educational Games theory. This model defines a metric to evaluate serious games, which can also be followed to guide their subsequent development. This rubric is tested with three indie serious games developed using different genres to raise awareness of mental illnesses. This evaluation revealed two main issues: the three games returned good results for gameplay, but the application of educational content was deficient, due in all likelihood to the lack of expert educators participating in their development. A statistical and machine learning validation of the results is also performed to ensure that the GEB metric features are clearly explained and the players are able to evaluate them correctly. These results underline the usefulness of the new metric tool for identifying game design strengths and weaknesses. Future works will apply this metric to more serious games to further test its effectiveness and to guide the design of new serious games.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/app122211757</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2855-7532</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2681-454X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7373-6885</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2076-3417 |
ispartof | Applied sciences, 2022-11, Vol.12 (22), p.11757 |
issn | 2076-3417 2076-3417 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_659afb60a236416fa615f3225a9c12e9 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Adaptation Computer & video games Design Education Educational software Evaluation game design game evaluation Games Genre metrics serious games |
title | A New Measure for Serious Games Evaluation: Gaming Educational Balanced (GEB) Model |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A40%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20New%20Measure%20for%20Serious%20Games%20Evaluation:%20Gaming%20Educational%20Balanced%20(GEB)%20Model&rft.jtitle=Applied%20sciences&rft.au=Martinez,%20Kim&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=11757&rft.pages=11757-&rft.issn=2076-3417&rft.eissn=2076-3417&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/app122211757&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2739420984%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-f713b6e93daae371c772712228f7414f561bee797ad4e5d3396eb81175e8b543%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2739420984&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |