Loading…
Numerical Simulation of Formation Fluid Sampling with Three Different Probe-Type Wireline Formation Testers
Wireline formation fluid sampling is extensively utilized to acquire downhole fluid samples. Due to mud filtrate invasion, enough time is required to pump out the formation fluid so that an acceptable level of contaminant is reached. Excessive cleanup time would increase costs and the risk of the te...
Saved in:
Published in: | Energies (Basel) 2024-12, Vol.17 (24), p.6227 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1688-53c770857962969d3b60c656407d2b5af0f5dc4f8eca9fe00588b8f48d33776d3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 24 |
container_start_page | 6227 |
container_title | Energies (Basel) |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Yu, Enyi Di, Yuan |
description | Wireline formation fluid sampling is extensively utilized to acquire downhole fluid samples. Due to mud filtrate invasion, enough time is required to pump out the formation fluid so that an acceptable level of contaminant is reached. Excessive cleanup time would increase costs and the risk of the testing tool becoming stuck within the drilling mud. The challenge lies in deciding what type of formation-tester probe should be used to ensure minimally contaminated measurements for a specific tool configuration and when the withdrawal sample is sufficiently purged of contaminants. A numerical simulator to simulate the virgin formation fluid sampling was developed, and the accuracy of the simulator was validated based on the spherical flow theory. Through running 2515 simulation cases, the effects of various operational and formation conditions on the breakthrough and pumpout times with three different probes (i.e., the standard probe, the elliptical probe, the elongated probe, and their corresponding 3D radial probes) were compared and analyzed quantitatively. We numerically investigated the key factors influencing the breakthrough and pumpout times and delved into the impact of the formation anisotropy. This study reveals the parameters that encompass the first-order effect on the breakthrough and pumpout times, enabling the determination of the probe-type selection and the early predictions of pumpout time. By leveraging these insights, sampling operations can be optimized to enhance sample quality, reduce operational time, and mitigate the risks associated with tool entrapment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/en17246227 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_65cdcd182f7d4a949f5fd0a041a37b70</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A821765569</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_65cdcd182f7d4a949f5fd0a041a37b70</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A821765569</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1688-53c770857962969d3b60c656407d2b5af0f5dc4f8eca9fe00588b8f48d33776d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkU9r3DAQxU1poSHJpZ9A0FvBqeSx_h1D2k0DS1rIlh6FLI022tjWVrYJ-fZV69BEOmg0vPfjDVNVHxi9AND0M45MNq1oGvmmOmFai5pRCW9f1e-r82k60HIAGACcVA-3y4A5OtuTuzgsvZ1jGkkKZJPysH42_RI9ubPDsY_jnjzG-Z7s7jMi-RJDwIzjTH7k1GG9ezoi-RUzFiG-IuxwmjFPZ9W7YPsJz5_f0-rn5uvu6lu9_X59c3W5rR0TStUcnJRUcalFo4X20AnqBBctlb7puA00cO_aoNBZHZBSrlSnQqs8gJTCw2l1s3J9sgdzzHGw-ckkG82_Rsp7Y_McXY9GcOedZ6oJ0rdWtzrw4KmlLbMgO0kL6-PKOub0eylzmENa8ljiG2BtSdgAVUV1sar2tkDjGNKcrSvX4xBdGjHE0r9UDZOCc6GL4dNqcDlNU8bwPyaj5u8yzcsy4Q9SIZCB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3149622308</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Numerical Simulation of Formation Fluid Sampling with Three Different Probe-Type Wireline Formation Testers</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Yu, Enyi ; Di, Yuan</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu, Enyi ; Di, Yuan</creatorcontrib><description>Wireline formation fluid sampling is extensively utilized to acquire downhole fluid samples. Due to mud filtrate invasion, enough time is required to pump out the formation fluid so that an acceptable level of contaminant is reached. Excessive cleanup time would increase costs and the risk of the testing tool becoming stuck within the drilling mud. The challenge lies in deciding what type of formation-tester probe should be used to ensure minimally contaminated measurements for a specific tool configuration and when the withdrawal sample is sufficiently purged of contaminants. A numerical simulator to simulate the virgin formation fluid sampling was developed, and the accuracy of the simulator was validated based on the spherical flow theory. Through running 2515 simulation cases, the effects of various operational and formation conditions on the breakthrough and pumpout times with three different probes (i.e., the standard probe, the elliptical probe, the elongated probe, and their corresponding 3D radial probes) were compared and analyzed quantitatively. We numerically investigated the key factors influencing the breakthrough and pumpout times and delved into the impact of the formation anisotropy. This study reveals the parameters that encompass the first-order effect on the breakthrough and pumpout times, enabling the determination of the probe-type selection and the early predictions of pumpout time. By leveraging these insights, sampling operations can be optimized to enhance sample quality, reduce operational time, and mitigate the risks associated with tool entrapment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/en17246227</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Drilling ; filtrate cleanup ; formation fluid sampling ; Investigations ; Numerical analysis ; probe ; pumpout time ; Simulation methods ; virgin formation fluid ; wireline formation testing</subject><ispartof>Energies (Basel), 2024-12, Vol.17 (24), p.6227</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1688-53c770857962969d3b60c656407d2b5af0f5dc4f8eca9fe00588b8f48d33776d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6101-3476 ; 0000-0002-8286-1941</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3149622308/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3149622308?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,74998</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu, Enyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di, Yuan</creatorcontrib><title>Numerical Simulation of Formation Fluid Sampling with Three Different Probe-Type Wireline Formation Testers</title><title>Energies (Basel)</title><description>Wireline formation fluid sampling is extensively utilized to acquire downhole fluid samples. Due to mud filtrate invasion, enough time is required to pump out the formation fluid so that an acceptable level of contaminant is reached. Excessive cleanup time would increase costs and the risk of the testing tool becoming stuck within the drilling mud. The challenge lies in deciding what type of formation-tester probe should be used to ensure minimally contaminated measurements for a specific tool configuration and when the withdrawal sample is sufficiently purged of contaminants. A numerical simulator to simulate the virgin formation fluid sampling was developed, and the accuracy of the simulator was validated based on the spherical flow theory. Through running 2515 simulation cases, the effects of various operational and formation conditions on the breakthrough and pumpout times with three different probes (i.e., the standard probe, the elliptical probe, the elongated probe, and their corresponding 3D radial probes) were compared and analyzed quantitatively. We numerically investigated the key factors influencing the breakthrough and pumpout times and delved into the impact of the formation anisotropy. This study reveals the parameters that encompass the first-order effect on the breakthrough and pumpout times, enabling the determination of the probe-type selection and the early predictions of pumpout time. By leveraging these insights, sampling operations can be optimized to enhance sample quality, reduce operational time, and mitigate the risks associated with tool entrapment.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>filtrate cleanup</subject><subject>formation fluid sampling</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Numerical analysis</subject><subject>probe</subject><subject>pumpout time</subject><subject>Simulation methods</subject><subject>virgin formation fluid</subject><subject>wireline formation testing</subject><issn>1996-1073</issn><issn>1996-1073</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkU9r3DAQxU1poSHJpZ9A0FvBqeSx_h1D2k0DS1rIlh6FLI022tjWVrYJ-fZV69BEOmg0vPfjDVNVHxi9AND0M45MNq1oGvmmOmFai5pRCW9f1e-r82k60HIAGACcVA-3y4A5OtuTuzgsvZ1jGkkKZJPysH42_RI9ubPDsY_jnjzG-Z7s7jMi-RJDwIzjTH7k1GG9ezoi-RUzFiG-IuxwmjFPZ9W7YPsJz5_f0-rn5uvu6lu9_X59c3W5rR0TStUcnJRUcalFo4X20AnqBBctlb7puA00cO_aoNBZHZBSrlSnQqs8gJTCw2l1s3J9sgdzzHGw-ckkG82_Rsp7Y_McXY9GcOedZ6oJ0rdWtzrw4KmlLbMgO0kL6-PKOub0eylzmENa8ljiG2BtSdgAVUV1sar2tkDjGNKcrSvX4xBdGjHE0r9UDZOCc6GL4dNqcDlNU8bwPyaj5u8yzcsy4Q9SIZCB</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Yu, Enyi</creator><creator>Di, Yuan</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6101-3476</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8286-1941</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Numerical Simulation of Formation Fluid Sampling with Three Different Probe-Type Wireline Formation Testers</title><author>Yu, Enyi ; Di, Yuan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1688-53c770857962969d3b60c656407d2b5af0f5dc4f8eca9fe00588b8f48d33776d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>filtrate cleanup</topic><topic>formation fluid sampling</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Numerical analysis</topic><topic>probe</topic><topic>pumpout time</topic><topic>Simulation methods</topic><topic>virgin formation fluid</topic><topic>wireline formation testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Enyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di, Yuan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Enyi</au><au>Di, Yuan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Numerical Simulation of Formation Fluid Sampling with Three Different Probe-Type Wireline Formation Testers</atitle><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>6227</spage><pages>6227-</pages><issn>1996-1073</issn><eissn>1996-1073</eissn><abstract>Wireline formation fluid sampling is extensively utilized to acquire downhole fluid samples. Due to mud filtrate invasion, enough time is required to pump out the formation fluid so that an acceptable level of contaminant is reached. Excessive cleanup time would increase costs and the risk of the testing tool becoming stuck within the drilling mud. The challenge lies in deciding what type of formation-tester probe should be used to ensure minimally contaminated measurements for a specific tool configuration and when the withdrawal sample is sufficiently purged of contaminants. A numerical simulator to simulate the virgin formation fluid sampling was developed, and the accuracy of the simulator was validated based on the spherical flow theory. Through running 2515 simulation cases, the effects of various operational and formation conditions on the breakthrough and pumpout times with three different probes (i.e., the standard probe, the elliptical probe, the elongated probe, and their corresponding 3D radial probes) were compared and analyzed quantitatively. We numerically investigated the key factors influencing the breakthrough and pumpout times and delved into the impact of the formation anisotropy. This study reveals the parameters that encompass the first-order effect on the breakthrough and pumpout times, enabling the determination of the probe-type selection and the early predictions of pumpout time. By leveraging these insights, sampling operations can be optimized to enhance sample quality, reduce operational time, and mitigate the risks associated with tool entrapment.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/en17246227</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6101-3476</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8286-1941</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1996-1073 |
ispartof | Energies (Basel), 2024-12, Vol.17 (24), p.6227 |
issn | 1996-1073 1996-1073 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_65cdcd182f7d4a949f5fd0a041a37b70 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Analysis Drilling filtrate cleanup formation fluid sampling Investigations Numerical analysis probe pumpout time Simulation methods virgin formation fluid wireline formation testing |
title | Numerical Simulation of Formation Fluid Sampling with Three Different Probe-Type Wireline Formation Testers |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A24%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Numerical%20Simulation%20of%20Formation%20Fluid%20Sampling%20with%20Three%20Different%20Probe-Type%20Wireline%20Formation%20Testers&rft.jtitle=Energies%20(Basel)&rft.au=Yu,%20Enyi&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=6227&rft.pages=6227-&rft.issn=1996-1073&rft.eissn=1996-1073&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/en17246227&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA821765569%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1688-53c770857962969d3b60c656407d2b5af0f5dc4f8eca9fe00588b8f48d33776d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3149622308&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A821765569&rfr_iscdi=true |