Loading…

Numerical Simulation of Formation Fluid Sampling with Three Different Probe-Type Wireline Formation Testers

Wireline formation fluid sampling is extensively utilized to acquire downhole fluid samples. Due to mud filtrate invasion, enough time is required to pump out the formation fluid so that an acceptable level of contaminant is reached. Excessive cleanup time would increase costs and the risk of the te...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energies (Basel) 2024-12, Vol.17 (24), p.6227
Main Authors: Yu, Enyi, Di, Yuan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1688-53c770857962969d3b60c656407d2b5af0f5dc4f8eca9fe00588b8f48d33776d3
container_end_page
container_issue 24
container_start_page 6227
container_title Energies (Basel)
container_volume 17
creator Yu, Enyi
Di, Yuan
description Wireline formation fluid sampling is extensively utilized to acquire downhole fluid samples. Due to mud filtrate invasion, enough time is required to pump out the formation fluid so that an acceptable level of contaminant is reached. Excessive cleanup time would increase costs and the risk of the testing tool becoming stuck within the drilling mud. The challenge lies in deciding what type of formation-tester probe should be used to ensure minimally contaminated measurements for a specific tool configuration and when the withdrawal sample is sufficiently purged of contaminants. A numerical simulator to simulate the virgin formation fluid sampling was developed, and the accuracy of the simulator was validated based on the spherical flow theory. Through running 2515 simulation cases, the effects of various operational and formation conditions on the breakthrough and pumpout times with three different probes (i.e., the standard probe, the elliptical probe, the elongated probe, and their corresponding 3D radial probes) were compared and analyzed quantitatively. We numerically investigated the key factors influencing the breakthrough and pumpout times and delved into the impact of the formation anisotropy. This study reveals the parameters that encompass the first-order effect on the breakthrough and pumpout times, enabling the determination of the probe-type selection and the early predictions of pumpout time. By leveraging these insights, sampling operations can be optimized to enhance sample quality, reduce operational time, and mitigate the risks associated with tool entrapment.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/en17246227
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_65cdcd182f7d4a949f5fd0a041a37b70</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A821765569</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_65cdcd182f7d4a949f5fd0a041a37b70</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A821765569</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1688-53c770857962969d3b60c656407d2b5af0f5dc4f8eca9fe00588b8f48d33776d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkU9r3DAQxU1poSHJpZ9A0FvBqeSx_h1D2k0DS1rIlh6FLI022tjWVrYJ-fZV69BEOmg0vPfjDVNVHxi9AND0M45MNq1oGvmmOmFai5pRCW9f1e-r82k60HIAGACcVA-3y4A5OtuTuzgsvZ1jGkkKZJPysH42_RI9ubPDsY_jnjzG-Z7s7jMi-RJDwIzjTH7k1GG9ezoi-RUzFiG-IuxwmjFPZ9W7YPsJz5_f0-rn5uvu6lu9_X59c3W5rR0TStUcnJRUcalFo4X20AnqBBctlb7puA00cO_aoNBZHZBSrlSnQqs8gJTCw2l1s3J9sgdzzHGw-ckkG82_Rsp7Y_McXY9GcOedZ6oJ0rdWtzrw4KmlLbMgO0kL6-PKOub0eylzmENa8ljiG2BtSdgAVUV1sar2tkDjGNKcrSvX4xBdGjHE0r9UDZOCc6GL4dNqcDlNU8bwPyaj5u8yzcsy4Q9SIZCB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3149622308</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Numerical Simulation of Formation Fluid Sampling with Three Different Probe-Type Wireline Formation Testers</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Yu, Enyi ; Di, Yuan</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu, Enyi ; Di, Yuan</creatorcontrib><description>Wireline formation fluid sampling is extensively utilized to acquire downhole fluid samples. Due to mud filtrate invasion, enough time is required to pump out the formation fluid so that an acceptable level of contaminant is reached. Excessive cleanup time would increase costs and the risk of the testing tool becoming stuck within the drilling mud. The challenge lies in deciding what type of formation-tester probe should be used to ensure minimally contaminated measurements for a specific tool configuration and when the withdrawal sample is sufficiently purged of contaminants. A numerical simulator to simulate the virgin formation fluid sampling was developed, and the accuracy of the simulator was validated based on the spherical flow theory. Through running 2515 simulation cases, the effects of various operational and formation conditions on the breakthrough and pumpout times with three different probes (i.e., the standard probe, the elliptical probe, the elongated probe, and their corresponding 3D radial probes) were compared and analyzed quantitatively. We numerically investigated the key factors influencing the breakthrough and pumpout times and delved into the impact of the formation anisotropy. This study reveals the parameters that encompass the first-order effect on the breakthrough and pumpout times, enabling the determination of the probe-type selection and the early predictions of pumpout time. By leveraging these insights, sampling operations can be optimized to enhance sample quality, reduce operational time, and mitigate the risks associated with tool entrapment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/en17246227</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Drilling ; filtrate cleanup ; formation fluid sampling ; Investigations ; Numerical analysis ; probe ; pumpout time ; Simulation methods ; virgin formation fluid ; wireline formation testing</subject><ispartof>Energies (Basel), 2024-12, Vol.17 (24), p.6227</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1688-53c770857962969d3b60c656407d2b5af0f5dc4f8eca9fe00588b8f48d33776d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6101-3476 ; 0000-0002-8286-1941</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3149622308/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3149622308?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,74998</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu, Enyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di, Yuan</creatorcontrib><title>Numerical Simulation of Formation Fluid Sampling with Three Different Probe-Type Wireline Formation Testers</title><title>Energies (Basel)</title><description>Wireline formation fluid sampling is extensively utilized to acquire downhole fluid samples. Due to mud filtrate invasion, enough time is required to pump out the formation fluid so that an acceptable level of contaminant is reached. Excessive cleanup time would increase costs and the risk of the testing tool becoming stuck within the drilling mud. The challenge lies in deciding what type of formation-tester probe should be used to ensure minimally contaminated measurements for a specific tool configuration and when the withdrawal sample is sufficiently purged of contaminants. A numerical simulator to simulate the virgin formation fluid sampling was developed, and the accuracy of the simulator was validated based on the spherical flow theory. Through running 2515 simulation cases, the effects of various operational and formation conditions on the breakthrough and pumpout times with three different probes (i.e., the standard probe, the elliptical probe, the elongated probe, and their corresponding 3D radial probes) were compared and analyzed quantitatively. We numerically investigated the key factors influencing the breakthrough and pumpout times and delved into the impact of the formation anisotropy. This study reveals the parameters that encompass the first-order effect on the breakthrough and pumpout times, enabling the determination of the probe-type selection and the early predictions of pumpout time. By leveraging these insights, sampling operations can be optimized to enhance sample quality, reduce operational time, and mitigate the risks associated with tool entrapment.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>filtrate cleanup</subject><subject>formation fluid sampling</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Numerical analysis</subject><subject>probe</subject><subject>pumpout time</subject><subject>Simulation methods</subject><subject>virgin formation fluid</subject><subject>wireline formation testing</subject><issn>1996-1073</issn><issn>1996-1073</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkU9r3DAQxU1poSHJpZ9A0FvBqeSx_h1D2k0DS1rIlh6FLI022tjWVrYJ-fZV69BEOmg0vPfjDVNVHxi9AND0M45MNq1oGvmmOmFai5pRCW9f1e-r82k60HIAGACcVA-3y4A5OtuTuzgsvZ1jGkkKZJPysH42_RI9ubPDsY_jnjzG-Z7s7jMi-RJDwIzjTH7k1GG9ezoi-RUzFiG-IuxwmjFPZ9W7YPsJz5_f0-rn5uvu6lu9_X59c3W5rR0TStUcnJRUcalFo4X20AnqBBctlb7puA00cO_aoNBZHZBSrlSnQqs8gJTCw2l1s3J9sgdzzHGw-ckkG82_Rsp7Y_McXY9GcOedZ6oJ0rdWtzrw4KmlLbMgO0kL6-PKOub0eylzmENa8ljiG2BtSdgAVUV1sar2tkDjGNKcrSvX4xBdGjHE0r9UDZOCc6GL4dNqcDlNU8bwPyaj5u8yzcsy4Q9SIZCB</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Yu, Enyi</creator><creator>Di, Yuan</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6101-3476</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8286-1941</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Numerical Simulation of Formation Fluid Sampling with Three Different Probe-Type Wireline Formation Testers</title><author>Yu, Enyi ; Di, Yuan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1688-53c770857962969d3b60c656407d2b5af0f5dc4f8eca9fe00588b8f48d33776d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>filtrate cleanup</topic><topic>formation fluid sampling</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Numerical analysis</topic><topic>probe</topic><topic>pumpout time</topic><topic>Simulation methods</topic><topic>virgin formation fluid</topic><topic>wireline formation testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Enyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di, Yuan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Enyi</au><au>Di, Yuan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Numerical Simulation of Formation Fluid Sampling with Three Different Probe-Type Wireline Formation Testers</atitle><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>6227</spage><pages>6227-</pages><issn>1996-1073</issn><eissn>1996-1073</eissn><abstract>Wireline formation fluid sampling is extensively utilized to acquire downhole fluid samples. Due to mud filtrate invasion, enough time is required to pump out the formation fluid so that an acceptable level of contaminant is reached. Excessive cleanup time would increase costs and the risk of the testing tool becoming stuck within the drilling mud. The challenge lies in deciding what type of formation-tester probe should be used to ensure minimally contaminated measurements for a specific tool configuration and when the withdrawal sample is sufficiently purged of contaminants. A numerical simulator to simulate the virgin formation fluid sampling was developed, and the accuracy of the simulator was validated based on the spherical flow theory. Through running 2515 simulation cases, the effects of various operational and formation conditions on the breakthrough and pumpout times with three different probes (i.e., the standard probe, the elliptical probe, the elongated probe, and their corresponding 3D radial probes) were compared and analyzed quantitatively. We numerically investigated the key factors influencing the breakthrough and pumpout times and delved into the impact of the formation anisotropy. This study reveals the parameters that encompass the first-order effect on the breakthrough and pumpout times, enabling the determination of the probe-type selection and the early predictions of pumpout time. By leveraging these insights, sampling operations can be optimized to enhance sample quality, reduce operational time, and mitigate the risks associated with tool entrapment.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/en17246227</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6101-3476</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8286-1941</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1996-1073
ispartof Energies (Basel), 2024-12, Vol.17 (24), p.6227
issn 1996-1073
1996-1073
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_65cdcd182f7d4a949f5fd0a041a37b70
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Analysis
Drilling
filtrate cleanup
formation fluid sampling
Investigations
Numerical analysis
probe
pumpout time
Simulation methods
virgin formation fluid
wireline formation testing
title Numerical Simulation of Formation Fluid Sampling with Three Different Probe-Type Wireline Formation Testers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A24%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Numerical%20Simulation%20of%20Formation%20Fluid%20Sampling%20with%20Three%20Different%20Probe-Type%20Wireline%20Formation%20Testers&rft.jtitle=Energies%20(Basel)&rft.au=Yu,%20Enyi&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=6227&rft.pages=6227-&rft.issn=1996-1073&rft.eissn=1996-1073&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/en17246227&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA821765569%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1688-53c770857962969d3b60c656407d2b5af0f5dc4f8eca9fe00588b8f48d33776d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3149622308&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A821765569&rfr_iscdi=true