Total and high molecular weight adiponectin have similar utility for the identification of insulin resistance

• Published in: Cardiovascular diabetology 2010-06, Vol.9 (1), p.26-26, Article 26
• Main Authors: Almeda-Valdes, Paloma, Cuevas-Ramos, Daniel, Mehta, Roopa, Gomez-Perez, Francisco J, Cruz-Bautista, Ivette, Arellano-Campos, Olimpia, Navarrete-Lopez, Mariana, Aguilar-Salinas, Carlos A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adiponectin - blood; Adult; Aged; Biomarkers - blood; Blood pressure; Body fat; Cardiovascular disease; Chronic illnesses; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes; Endocrinology; Family medical history; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Hypertriglyceridemia - blood; Hypertriglyceridemia - physiopathology; Hypoalphalipoproteinemias - blood; Hypoalphalipoproteinemias - physiopathology; Insulin; Insulin Resistance; Laboratories; Male; Metabolism; Mexico; Middle Aged; Molecular Weight; Obesity; Obesity - blood; Obesity - physiopathology; Original investigation; Plasma; Population; Predictive Value of Tests; ROC Curve; Rodents; Sensitivity and Specificity; Studies; Womens health; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1475-2840; 1475-2840
• DOI: 10.1186/1475-2840-9-26

Insulin resistance (IR) and related metabolic disturbances are characterized by low levels of adiponectin. High molecular weight adiponectin (HMWA) is considered the active form of adiponectin and a better marker of IR than total adiponectin. The objective of this study is to compare the utility of total adiponectin, HMWA and the HMWA/total adiponectin index (SA index) for the identification of IR and related metabolic conditions. A cross-sectional analysis was performed in a group of ambulatory subjects, aged 20 to 70 years, in Mexico City. Areas under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve for total, HMWA and the SA index were plotted for the identification of metabolic disturbances. Sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy for the identification of IR were calculated. The study included 101 men and 168 women. The areas under the ROC curve for total and HMWA for the identification of IR (0.664 vs. 0.669, P = 0.74), obesity (0.592 vs. 0.610, P = 0.32), hypertriglyceridemia (0.661 vs. 0.671, P = 0.50) and hypoalphalipoproteinemia (0.624 vs. 0.633, P = 0.58) were similar. A total adiponectin level of 8.03 mug/ml was associated with a sensitivity of 57.6%, a specificity of 65.9%, a positive predictive value of 50.0%, a negative predictive value of 72.4%, and an accuracy of 62.7% for the diagnosis of IR. The corresponding figures for a HMWA value of 4.25 mug/dl were 59.6%, 67.1%, 51.8%, 73.7% and 64.2%.The area under the ROC curve of the SA index for the identification of IR was 0.622 [95% CI 0.554-0.691], obesity 0.613 [95% CI 0.536-0.689], hypertriglyceridemia 0.616 [95% CI 0.549-0.683], and hypoalphalipoproteinemia 0.606 [95% CI 0.535-0.677]. Total adiponectin, HMWA and the SA index had similar utility for the identification of IR and metabolic disturbances.