Comparative characteristics of liberal and restrictive fluid resuscitation in multiple trauma

The aim of the study was a comparative analysis of components in liberal and restrictive fluid resuscitation and their effectiveness. 90 patients with multiple trauma divided into two groups, depending on the fluid resuscitation type (liberal or restrictive) were studied. Infusion components in 1st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medychni perspektyvy 2018-01, Vol.23 (2), p.60-66
Main Authors: Krishtafor, D. A., Klygunenko, O. M.
Format: Article
Language:eng ; ukr
Subjects:
bleeding
bleeding management
liberal fluid resuscitation
multiple trauma
restrictive fluid resuscitation
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The aim of the study was a comparative analysis of components in liberal and restrictive fluid resuscitation and their effectiveness. 90 patients with multiple trauma divided into two groups, depending on the fluid resuscitation type (liberal or restrictive) were studied. Infusion components in 1st day, intraoperative blood loss, ICU and hospital stay length, number of complications and lethality were investigated. Restrictive fluid resuscitation type in multiple trauma was characterized by a decrease of total infusion volume in ml/kg in 1st day by 34.8%, including crystalloids – by 34.2%, colloids – by 71.4% with a constant volume of FFP and erythrocytes. Balanced crystalloid solutions were used more often, and solutions of potassium and magnesium asparaginate and glucose, high-molecular HES and dextranes were not used at all. Blood components were introduced earlier. Volume of intraoperative blood loss decreased by 34.0%, the frequency of complications – by 1.6 times, the mortality rate – by 2 times.
ISSN:2307-0404
DOI:10.26641/2307-0404.2018.2.133939