No difference in torque load to failure between split anconeus fascia transfer and autograft palmaris longus tendon for reconstruction of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament

• Published in: JSES international 2024-01, Vol.8 (1), p.232-235
• Main Authors: Wright, Melissa A., Deal, J. Banks, Schiffman, Brett A., Gould, Heath P., Forthman, Christopher L., Murthi, Anand M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anconeus graft; Biomechanics; Elbow; Lateral ulnar collateral ligament; LUCL reconstruction; Palmaris graft; Posterolateral rotatory instability
• ISSN: 2666-6383; 2666-6383
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.08.013

The split anconeus fascia transfer (SAFT) is an option for reconstruction of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) in chronic posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) of the elbow with potential advantages of using only local tissue within the surgical exposure and not requiring ulnar fixation. This study aimed to assess SAFT strength compared to a traditional free graft reconstruction in a PLRI biomechanical model. To measure biomechanical strength, eight cadaveric upper extremity pairs were utilized. Within each pair, one specimen was randomly assigned to LUCL reconstruction with autograft palmaris longus and the other to SAFT reconstruction. Torque load to failure was assessed on a load frame with the elbow in 30 degrees of flexion, 5 degrees of valgus, and 25 N axial load as the elbow was brought into external rotation. Torque load to failure was compared between the two reconstruction techniques. No difference was found in the torque load to failure between SAFT specimens compared to palmaris longus autograft specimens (mean 14.6 ± 4.4 Nm vs. mean 11.3 ± 3.9 Nm; P = .16). In this biomechanical study, the SAFT LUCL reconstruction provided torque load to failure similar to that of the traditional technique. These findings suggest that the SAFT technique warrants continued study as a biomechanically sound option for LUCL reconstruction in the setting of elbow PLRI.