Loading…

Comparison of alignment and spondylolysis fracture angle in bilateral and unilateral spondylolysis

Objectives Spondylolysis occurs bilaterally or unilaterally and bilateral spondylolysis increases the risk of developing isthmic spondylolisthesis. The characteristics of the lumbar lordosis angle (LLA), sacral slope angle (SSA), and spondylolysis fracture angle (SFA) in bilateral spondylolysis comp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2022-10, Vol.17 (10)
Main Authors: Kanta Matsuzawa, Tomoyuki Matsui, Yoshikazu Azuma, Tetsuya Miyazaki, Machiko Hiramoto, Ruo Hashimoto, Noriyuki Kida, Toru Morihara
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page
container_title PloS one
container_volume 17
creator Kanta Matsuzawa
Tomoyuki Matsui
Yoshikazu Azuma
Tetsuya Miyazaki
Machiko Hiramoto
Ruo Hashimoto
Noriyuki Kida
Toru Morihara
description Objectives Spondylolysis occurs bilaterally or unilaterally and bilateral spondylolysis increases the risk of developing isthmic spondylolisthesis. The characteristics of the lumbar lordosis angle (LLA), sacral slope angle (SSA), and spondylolysis fracture angle (SFA) in bilateral spondylolysis compared with those in unilateral spondylolysis have not been clarified. The purpose of this study was to compare the LLA, SSA, and SFA of bilateral and unilateral spondylolysis. Materials and methods Thirty-eight patients with lumbar spondylolysis who visited our clinic for an initial visit and 15 age-matched patients with a chief complaint of low back pain were included as controls. Computed tomography films were used to classify all spondylolysis patients into two groups: those with bilateral fractures (bilateral) and those with unilateral fractures (unilateral). The LLA and SSA were measured using lateral X-ray films and the SFA was measured using computed tomography films. Results The LLA was significantly higher in all spondylolysis patients than in the control group (p = .026). There was no significant difference in SSA between the spondylolysis and control groups (p = .28). The LLA was significantly higher in the bilateral group than in the unilateral group (p = .018). There was no significant difference in SSA between the bilateral and unilateral groups (p = .15). The SFA was significantly lower in the bilateral group than in the unilateral group (p = .024). Conclusions This study suggests that physical therapy for spondylolysis may be considered bilaterally and unilaterally.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0276337
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_681dec83271f49e5a4f9100e8dfd5917</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_681dec83271f49e5a4f9100e8dfd5917</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_681dec83271f49e5a4f9100e8dfd5917</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d1025-ffc587652387c713cbc49ed8903e4761663c794f55f394a35e645765f40828963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVTclKAzEYDoJgrb6Bh7zA1CR_1qMUNyh40fOQZikpaVKS6aFv71BF8PTx7Qg9ULKioOjjvp5asXl1rCWsCFMSQF2hBTXABskI3KDb3veECNBSLtB2XQ9H21KvBdeIbU67cghlwrZ43OcRf841n3vqODbrplMLs7XLAaeCtynbKTSbL-lT-aP_infoOtrcw_0vLtHXy_Pn-m3YfLy-r582g6eEiSFGJ7SSgoFWTlFwW8dN8NoQCFxJKiU4ZXgUIoLhFkSQXMz5yIlm2khYovefXV_tfjy2dLDtPFabxotQ2260bUouh1Fq6oPTwBSN84mwPBpKSNA-emGogm_X-2XS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of alignment and spondylolysis fracture angle in bilateral and unilateral spondylolysis</title><source>PubMed Central (Open Access)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Kanta Matsuzawa ; Tomoyuki Matsui ; Yoshikazu Azuma ; Tetsuya Miyazaki ; Machiko Hiramoto ; Ruo Hashimoto ; Noriyuki Kida ; Toru Morihara</creator><creatorcontrib>Kanta Matsuzawa ; Tomoyuki Matsui ; Yoshikazu Azuma ; Tetsuya Miyazaki ; Machiko Hiramoto ; Ruo Hashimoto ; Noriyuki Kida ; Toru Morihara</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Spondylolysis occurs bilaterally or unilaterally and bilateral spondylolysis increases the risk of developing isthmic spondylolisthesis. The characteristics of the lumbar lordosis angle (LLA), sacral slope angle (SSA), and spondylolysis fracture angle (SFA) in bilateral spondylolysis compared with those in unilateral spondylolysis have not been clarified. The purpose of this study was to compare the LLA, SSA, and SFA of bilateral and unilateral spondylolysis. Materials and methods Thirty-eight patients with lumbar spondylolysis who visited our clinic for an initial visit and 15 age-matched patients with a chief complaint of low back pain were included as controls. Computed tomography films were used to classify all spondylolysis patients into two groups: those with bilateral fractures (bilateral) and those with unilateral fractures (unilateral). The LLA and SSA were measured using lateral X-ray films and the SFA was measured using computed tomography films. Results The LLA was significantly higher in all spondylolysis patients than in the control group (p = .026). There was no significant difference in SSA between the spondylolysis and control groups (p = .28). The LLA was significantly higher in the bilateral group than in the unilateral group (p = .018). There was no significant difference in SSA between the bilateral and unilateral groups (p = .15). The SFA was significantly lower in the bilateral group than in the unilateral group (p = .024). Conclusions This study suggests that physical therapy for spondylolysis may be considered bilaterally and unilaterally.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276337</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</publisher><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-10, Vol.17 (10)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kanta Matsuzawa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomoyuki Matsui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshikazu Azuma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tetsuya Miyazaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machiko Hiramoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruo Hashimoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noriyuki Kida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toru Morihara</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of alignment and spondylolysis fracture angle in bilateral and unilateral spondylolysis</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Objectives Spondylolysis occurs bilaterally or unilaterally and bilateral spondylolysis increases the risk of developing isthmic spondylolisthesis. The characteristics of the lumbar lordosis angle (LLA), sacral slope angle (SSA), and spondylolysis fracture angle (SFA) in bilateral spondylolysis compared with those in unilateral spondylolysis have not been clarified. The purpose of this study was to compare the LLA, SSA, and SFA of bilateral and unilateral spondylolysis. Materials and methods Thirty-eight patients with lumbar spondylolysis who visited our clinic for an initial visit and 15 age-matched patients with a chief complaint of low back pain were included as controls. Computed tomography films were used to classify all spondylolysis patients into two groups: those with bilateral fractures (bilateral) and those with unilateral fractures (unilateral). The LLA and SSA were measured using lateral X-ray films and the SFA was measured using computed tomography films. Results The LLA was significantly higher in all spondylolysis patients than in the control group (p = .026). There was no significant difference in SSA between the spondylolysis and control groups (p = .28). The LLA was significantly higher in the bilateral group than in the unilateral group (p = .018). There was no significant difference in SSA between the bilateral and unilateral groups (p = .15). The SFA was significantly lower in the bilateral group than in the unilateral group (p = .024). Conclusions This study suggests that physical therapy for spondylolysis may be considered bilaterally and unilaterally.</description><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVTclKAzEYDoJgrb6Bh7zA1CR_1qMUNyh40fOQZikpaVKS6aFv71BF8PTx7Qg9ULKioOjjvp5asXl1rCWsCFMSQF2hBTXABskI3KDb3veECNBSLtB2XQ9H21KvBdeIbU67cghlwrZ43OcRf841n3vqODbrplMLs7XLAaeCtynbKTSbL-lT-aP_infoOtrcw_0vLtHXy_Pn-m3YfLy-r582g6eEiSFGJ7SSgoFWTlFwW8dN8NoQCFxJKiU4ZXgUIoLhFkSQXMz5yIlm2khYovefXV_tfjy2dLDtPFabxotQ2260bUouh1Fq6oPTwBSN84mwPBpKSNA-emGogm_X-2XS</recordid><startdate>20221018</startdate><enddate>20221018</enddate><creator>Kanta Matsuzawa</creator><creator>Tomoyuki Matsui</creator><creator>Yoshikazu Azuma</creator><creator>Tetsuya Miyazaki</creator><creator>Machiko Hiramoto</creator><creator>Ruo Hashimoto</creator><creator>Noriyuki Kida</creator><creator>Toru Morihara</creator><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221018</creationdate><title>Comparison of alignment and spondylolysis fracture angle in bilateral and unilateral spondylolysis</title><author>Kanta Matsuzawa ; Tomoyuki Matsui ; Yoshikazu Azuma ; Tetsuya Miyazaki ; Machiko Hiramoto ; Ruo Hashimoto ; Noriyuki Kida ; Toru Morihara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d1025-ffc587652387c713cbc49ed8903e4761663c794f55f394a35e645765f40828963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kanta Matsuzawa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomoyuki Matsui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshikazu Azuma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tetsuya Miyazaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machiko Hiramoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruo Hashimoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noriyuki Kida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toru Morihara</creatorcontrib><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kanta Matsuzawa</au><au>Tomoyuki Matsui</au><au>Yoshikazu Azuma</au><au>Tetsuya Miyazaki</au><au>Machiko Hiramoto</au><au>Ruo Hashimoto</au><au>Noriyuki Kida</au><au>Toru Morihara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of alignment and spondylolysis fracture angle in bilateral and unilateral spondylolysis</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2022-10-18</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>10</issue><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Objectives Spondylolysis occurs bilaterally or unilaterally and bilateral spondylolysis increases the risk of developing isthmic spondylolisthesis. The characteristics of the lumbar lordosis angle (LLA), sacral slope angle (SSA), and spondylolysis fracture angle (SFA) in bilateral spondylolysis compared with those in unilateral spondylolysis have not been clarified. The purpose of this study was to compare the LLA, SSA, and SFA of bilateral and unilateral spondylolysis. Materials and methods Thirty-eight patients with lumbar spondylolysis who visited our clinic for an initial visit and 15 age-matched patients with a chief complaint of low back pain were included as controls. Computed tomography films were used to classify all spondylolysis patients into two groups: those with bilateral fractures (bilateral) and those with unilateral fractures (unilateral). The LLA and SSA were measured using lateral X-ray films and the SFA was measured using computed tomography films. Results The LLA was significantly higher in all spondylolysis patients than in the control group (p = .026). There was no significant difference in SSA between the spondylolysis and control groups (p = .28). The LLA was significantly higher in the bilateral group than in the unilateral group (p = .018). There was no significant difference in SSA between the bilateral and unilateral groups (p = .15). The SFA was significantly lower in the bilateral group than in the unilateral group (p = .024). Conclusions This study suggests that physical therapy for spondylolysis may be considered bilaterally and unilaterally.</abstract><pub>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0276337</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2022-10, Vol.17 (10)
issn 1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_681dec83271f49e5a4f9100e8dfd5917
source PubMed Central (Open Access); Publicly Available Content Database
title Comparison of alignment and spondylolysis fracture angle in bilateral and unilateral spondylolysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T20%3A56%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20alignment%20and%20spondylolysis%20fracture%20angle%20in%20bilateral%20and%20unilateral%20spondylolysis&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Kanta%20Matsuzawa&rft.date=2022-10-18&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=10&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0276337&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_681dec83271f49e5a4f9100e8dfd5917%3C/doaj%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d1025-ffc587652387c713cbc49ed8903e4761663c794f55f394a35e645765f40828963%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true