Loading…
Zinc–Air Hearing Aid Batteries: An Analysis of Functional Performance
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of three disposable hearing aid battery brands available in Wales. Hearing-impaired individuals who utilise hearing aids rely on the functionality of their devices, which is often contingent upon the quality and longevity of disposabl...
Saved in:
Published in: | Audiology research (Pavia, Italy) Italy), 2024-07, Vol.14 (4), p.659-673 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-5fe49b5f6e3625bc65394fb9855c89d3c1a539e9aead65ff681f9c42ec886fc83 |
container_end_page | 673 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 659 |
container_title | Audiology research (Pavia, Italy) |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Thomas, James Bardsley, Barry Wild, Jane Penman, Michael William Owen |
description | Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of three disposable hearing aid battery brands available in Wales. Hearing-impaired individuals who utilise hearing aids rely on the functionality of their devices, which is often contingent upon the quality and longevity of disposable batteries. Materials and Methods: A grey literature review foregrounded the battery standards. The “real-life” use of batteries was supplemented through laboratory testing. Parameters relating to performance quality were used to quantify an overall service life of five PR44- and four PR48-size batteries per manufacturer. Results: The literature review signalled a large gap in hearing aid battery consumption research. All battery brands underperformed compared to their specifications but met IEC standards. Conclusions: Revisions to battery consumption test conditions should reflect new technological features and refine expectations of real-life use. It was possible to statistically identify the best performing hearing aid battery brand. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/audiolres14040056 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_68fda340306e4aa0991b6091081f8da0</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_68fda340306e4aa0991b6091081f8da0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3097817711</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-5fe49b5f6e3625bc65394fb9855c89d3c1a539e9aead65ff681f9c42ec886fc83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkc1qHDEMx01paUKaB-htIOdtrPHH2rmUbWg-IJAe2ksvRuORt15mx6k9E8it75A37JPUyYbQECGQ-Ev8JCTGPgL_JITlxzj3MQ2ZCkguOVf6DdtvubALKaR9-1--xw5L2fBqSwDZ6vdsT1iwUkK7z85_xtH__XO_irm5IMxxXDer2DdfcJooRyonzWqsjsNdiaVJoTmbRz_FVJXmG-WQ8hZHTx_Yu4BDocOneMB-nH39fnqxuLo-vzxdXS28BDUtVCBpOxU0Cd2qzmslrAydNUp5Y3vhAatCFgl7rULQBoL1siVvjA7eiAN2ueP2CTfuJsct5juXMLpHIeW1wzxFP5DTJvQoJBdck0Tk1kKnuQVemaZHXlmfd6ybudtS72mcMg4voC8rY_zl1unWAQgFZvmwzdETIaffM5XJbdKc62mKE9wuDSzryWsX7Lp8TqVkCs8jgLuHX7pXvxT_AFJykvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3097817711</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Zinc–Air Hearing Aid Batteries: An Analysis of Functional Performance</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Thomas, James ; Bardsley, Barry ; Wild, Jane ; Penman, Michael William Owen</creator><creatorcontrib>Thomas, James ; Bardsley, Barry ; Wild, Jane ; Penman, Michael William Owen</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of three disposable hearing aid battery brands available in Wales. Hearing-impaired individuals who utilise hearing aids rely on the functionality of their devices, which is often contingent upon the quality and longevity of disposable batteries. Materials and Methods: A grey literature review foregrounded the battery standards. The “real-life” use of batteries was supplemented through laboratory testing. Parameters relating to performance quality were used to quantify an overall service life of five PR44- and four PR48-size batteries per manufacturer. Results: The literature review signalled a large gap in hearing aid battery consumption research. All battery brands underperformed compared to their specifications but met IEC standards. Conclusions: Revisions to battery consumption test conditions should reflect new technological features and refine expectations of real-life use. It was possible to statistically identify the best performing hearing aid battery brand.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2039-4349</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2039-4330</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2039-4349</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/audiolres14040056</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39194412</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>battery consumption ; Consumers ; disposable battery ; Electrolytes ; hearing aid battery ; Hearing aids ; ISO standards ; Manufacturers ; Manufacturing ; Process controls ; Quality standards ; Smartphones ; zinc–air battery</subject><ispartof>Audiology research (Pavia, Italy), 2024-07, Vol.14 (4), p.659-673</ispartof><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-5fe49b5f6e3625bc65394fb9855c89d3c1a539e9aead65ff681f9c42ec886fc83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6409-7775</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3097817711/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3097817711?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25751,27922,27923,37010,44588,53789,53791,74896</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thomas, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardsley, Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wild, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penman, Michael William Owen</creatorcontrib><title>Zinc–Air Hearing Aid Batteries: An Analysis of Functional Performance</title><title>Audiology research (Pavia, Italy)</title><description>Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of three disposable hearing aid battery brands available in Wales. Hearing-impaired individuals who utilise hearing aids rely on the functionality of their devices, which is often contingent upon the quality and longevity of disposable batteries. Materials and Methods: A grey literature review foregrounded the battery standards. The “real-life” use of batteries was supplemented through laboratory testing. Parameters relating to performance quality were used to quantify an overall service life of five PR44- and four PR48-size batteries per manufacturer. Results: The literature review signalled a large gap in hearing aid battery consumption research. All battery brands underperformed compared to their specifications but met IEC standards. Conclusions: Revisions to battery consumption test conditions should reflect new technological features and refine expectations of real-life use. It was possible to statistically identify the best performing hearing aid battery brand.</description><subject>battery consumption</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>disposable battery</subject><subject>Electrolytes</subject><subject>hearing aid battery</subject><subject>Hearing aids</subject><subject>ISO standards</subject><subject>Manufacturers</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Process controls</subject><subject>Quality standards</subject><subject>Smartphones</subject><subject>zinc–air battery</subject><issn>2039-4349</issn><issn>2039-4330</issn><issn>2039-4349</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNplkc1qHDEMx01paUKaB-htIOdtrPHH2rmUbWg-IJAe2ksvRuORt15mx6k9E8it75A37JPUyYbQECGQ-Ev8JCTGPgL_JITlxzj3MQ2ZCkguOVf6DdtvubALKaR9-1--xw5L2fBqSwDZ6vdsT1iwUkK7z85_xtH__XO_irm5IMxxXDer2DdfcJooRyonzWqsjsNdiaVJoTmbRz_FVJXmG-WQ8hZHTx_Yu4BDocOneMB-nH39fnqxuLo-vzxdXS28BDUtVCBpOxU0Cd2qzmslrAydNUp5Y3vhAatCFgl7rULQBoL1siVvjA7eiAN2ueP2CTfuJsct5juXMLpHIeW1wzxFP5DTJvQoJBdck0Tk1kKnuQVemaZHXlmfd6ybudtS72mcMg4voC8rY_zl1unWAQgFZvmwzdETIaffM5XJbdKc62mKE9wuDSzryWsX7Lp8TqVkCs8jgLuHX7pXvxT_AFJykvg</recordid><startdate>20240723</startdate><enddate>20240723</enddate><creator>Thomas, James</creator><creator>Bardsley, Barry</creator><creator>Wild, Jane</creator><creator>Penman, Michael William Owen</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6409-7775</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240723</creationdate><title>Zinc–Air Hearing Aid Batteries: An Analysis of Functional Performance</title><author>Thomas, James ; Bardsley, Barry ; Wild, Jane ; Penman, Michael William Owen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-5fe49b5f6e3625bc65394fb9855c89d3c1a539e9aead65ff681f9c42ec886fc83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>battery consumption</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>disposable battery</topic><topic>Electrolytes</topic><topic>hearing aid battery</topic><topic>Hearing aids</topic><topic>ISO standards</topic><topic>Manufacturers</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Process controls</topic><topic>Quality standards</topic><topic>Smartphones</topic><topic>zinc–air battery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thomas, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardsley, Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wild, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penman, Michael William Owen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Audiology research (Pavia, Italy)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thomas, James</au><au>Bardsley, Barry</au><au>Wild, Jane</au><au>Penman, Michael William Owen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Zinc–Air Hearing Aid Batteries: An Analysis of Functional Performance</atitle><jtitle>Audiology research (Pavia, Italy)</jtitle><date>2024-07-23</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>659</spage><epage>673</epage><pages>659-673</pages><issn>2039-4349</issn><issn>2039-4330</issn><eissn>2039-4349</eissn><abstract>Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of three disposable hearing aid battery brands available in Wales. Hearing-impaired individuals who utilise hearing aids rely on the functionality of their devices, which is often contingent upon the quality and longevity of disposable batteries. Materials and Methods: A grey literature review foregrounded the battery standards. The “real-life” use of batteries was supplemented through laboratory testing. Parameters relating to performance quality were used to quantify an overall service life of five PR44- and four PR48-size batteries per manufacturer. Results: The literature review signalled a large gap in hearing aid battery consumption research. All battery brands underperformed compared to their specifications but met IEC standards. Conclusions: Revisions to battery consumption test conditions should reflect new technological features and refine expectations of real-life use. It was possible to statistically identify the best performing hearing aid battery brand.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>39194412</pmid><doi>10.3390/audiolres14040056</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6409-7775</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2039-4349 |
ispartof | Audiology research (Pavia, Italy), 2024-07, Vol.14 (4), p.659-673 |
issn | 2039-4349 2039-4330 2039-4349 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_68fda340306e4aa0991b6091081f8da0 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | battery consumption Consumers disposable battery Electrolytes hearing aid battery Hearing aids ISO standards Manufacturers Manufacturing Process controls Quality standards Smartphones zinc–air battery |
title | Zinc–Air Hearing Aid Batteries: An Analysis of Functional Performance |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T20%3A43%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Zinc%E2%80%93Air%20Hearing%20Aid%20Batteries:%20An%20Analysis%20of%20Functional%20Performance&rft.jtitle=Audiology%20research%20(Pavia,%20Italy)&rft.au=Thomas,%20James&rft.date=2024-07-23&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=659&rft.epage=673&rft.pages=659-673&rft.issn=2039-4349&rft.eissn=2039-4349&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/audiolres14040056&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3097817711%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-5fe49b5f6e3625bc65394fb9855c89d3c1a539e9aead65ff681f9c42ec886fc83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3097817711&rft_id=info:pmid/39194412&rfr_iscdi=true |