Loading…

A comparison of spatial clustering and cluster detection techniques for childhood leukemia incidence in Ohio, 1996-2003

Spatial cluster detection is an important tool in cancer surveillance to identify areas of elevated risk and to generate hypotheses about cancer etiology. There are many cluster detection methods used in spatial epidemiology to investigate suspicious groupings of cancer occurrences in regional count...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of health geographics 2007-03, Vol.6 (1), p.13-13
Main Author: Wheeler, David C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b613t-d21f6648494c49f7c62b0b81f4e057fb6ef348981858bf71a3dd9a458165f6953
cites
container_end_page 13
container_issue 1
container_start_page 13
container_title International journal of health geographics
container_volume 6
creator Wheeler, David C
description Spatial cluster detection is an important tool in cancer surveillance to identify areas of elevated risk and to generate hypotheses about cancer etiology. There are many cluster detection methods used in spatial epidemiology to investigate suspicious groupings of cancer occurrences in regional count data and case-control data, where controls are sampled from the at-risk population. Numerous studies in the literature have focused on childhood leukemia because of its relatively large incidence among children compared with other malignant diseases and substantial public concern over elevated leukemia incidence. The main focus of this paper is an analysis of the spatial distribution of leukemia incidence among children from 0 to 14 years of age in Ohio from 1996-2003 using individual case data from the Ohio Cancer Incidence Surveillance System (OCISS).Specifically, we explore whether there is statistically significant global clustering and if there are statistically significant local clusters of individual leukemia cases in Ohio using numerous published methods of spatial cluster detection, including spatial point process summary methods, a nearest neighbor method, and a local rate scanning method. We use the K function, Cuzick and Edward's method, and the kernel intensity function to test for significant global clustering and the kernel intensity function and Kulldorff's spatial scan statistic in SaTScan to test for significant local clusters. We found some evidence, although inconclusive, of significant local clusters in childhood leukemia in Ohio, but no significant overall clustering. The findings from the local cluster detection analyses are not consistent for the different cluster detection techniques, where the spatial scan method in SaTScan does not find statistically significant local clusters, while the kernel intensity function method suggests statistically significant clusters in areas of central, southern, and eastern Ohio. The findings are consistent for the different tests of global clustering, where no significant clustering is demonstrated with any of the techniques when all age cases are considered together. This comparative study for childhood leukemia clustering and clusters in Ohio revealed several research issues in practical spatial cluster detection. Among them, flexibility in cluster shape detection should be an issue for consideration.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/1476-072X-6-13
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_69075b14cb09444cb79becaf63c50e4e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A161868661</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_69075b14cb09444cb79becaf63c50e4e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A161868661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b613t-d21f6648494c49f7c62b0b81f4e057fb6ef348981858bf71a3dd9a458165f6953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ktuL1TAQxoso7nr01UcJCIJg16RN0-ZFOCxeDiwseAHfQppM2qxtckxaL_-9qee4bnGlD5NMvvyamW-y7DHBZ4Q07CWhNctxXXzOWU7KO9npdeLujfVJ9iDGK4yLglB2PzshddlwTKvT7PsWKT_uZbDRO-QNins5WTkgNcxxgmBdh6TTf7ZIwwRqskmbYu_s1xkiMj4g1dtB995rNMD8BUYrkXXKanAK0gpd9ta_QIRzlhcYlw-ze0YOER4d4yb79Ob1x_N3-cXl29359iJvGSmnXBfEMEYbyqmi3NSKFS1uG2Io4Ko2LQNT0oY3pKma1tREllpzSauGsMowXpWbbHfgai-vxD7YUYafwksrfid86IQMk1UDCMZxXbWEqhZzSlOoeQtKGlaqCgOFxHp1YO3ndgStwE1BDivo-sTZXnT-m0ivIzUuE2B7ALTW_wewPknWiMVEsZgomCAL49nxEcEvzZ_EaKOCYZAO_BxF-k8yl_AkfHoQdjIVZ53xCakWsdgSlmanYanFm-zsFlX6dLJQeQfGpvzqwvPVhaSZ4MfUyTlGsfvw_la4Cj7GAOa6VILFMr7_FvfkZof_yo_zWv4CNafp7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70373819</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of spatial clustering and cluster detection techniques for childhood leukemia incidence in Ohio, 1996-2003</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Wheeler, David C</creator><creatorcontrib>Wheeler, David C</creatorcontrib><description>Spatial cluster detection is an important tool in cancer surveillance to identify areas of elevated risk and to generate hypotheses about cancer etiology. There are many cluster detection methods used in spatial epidemiology to investigate suspicious groupings of cancer occurrences in regional count data and case-control data, where controls are sampled from the at-risk population. Numerous studies in the literature have focused on childhood leukemia because of its relatively large incidence among children compared with other malignant diseases and substantial public concern over elevated leukemia incidence. The main focus of this paper is an analysis of the spatial distribution of leukemia incidence among children from 0 to 14 years of age in Ohio from 1996-2003 using individual case data from the Ohio Cancer Incidence Surveillance System (OCISS).Specifically, we explore whether there is statistically significant global clustering and if there are statistically significant local clusters of individual leukemia cases in Ohio using numerous published methods of spatial cluster detection, including spatial point process summary methods, a nearest neighbor method, and a local rate scanning method. We use the K function, Cuzick and Edward's method, and the kernel intensity function to test for significant global clustering and the kernel intensity function and Kulldorff's spatial scan statistic in SaTScan to test for significant local clusters. We found some evidence, although inconclusive, of significant local clusters in childhood leukemia in Ohio, but no significant overall clustering. The findings from the local cluster detection analyses are not consistent for the different cluster detection techniques, where the spatial scan method in SaTScan does not find statistically significant local clusters, while the kernel intensity function method suggests statistically significant clusters in areas of central, southern, and eastern Ohio. The findings are consistent for the different tests of global clustering, where no significant clustering is demonstrated with any of the techniques when all age cases are considered together. This comparative study for childhood leukemia clustering and clusters in Ohio revealed several research issues in practical spatial cluster detection. Among them, flexibility in cluster shape detection should be an issue for consideration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1476-072X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-072X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1476-072X-6-13</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17389045</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Birth Certificates ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Cluster Analysis ; Comparative analysis ; Distribution ; Geographic Information Systems - organization &amp; administration ; Humans ; Incidence ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Leukemia - epidemiology ; Leukemia in children ; Medical statistics ; Monte Carlo Method ; Ohio - epidemiology ; Registries ; Statistics</subject><ispartof>International journal of health geographics, 2007-03, Vol.6 (1), p.13-13</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2007 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2007 Wheeler; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007 Wheeler; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b613t-d21f6648494c49f7c62b0b81f4e057fb6ef348981858bf71a3dd9a458165f6953</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1851703/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1851703/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17389045$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wheeler, David C</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of spatial clustering and cluster detection techniques for childhood leukemia incidence in Ohio, 1996-2003</title><title>International journal of health geographics</title><addtitle>Int J Health Geogr</addtitle><description>Spatial cluster detection is an important tool in cancer surveillance to identify areas of elevated risk and to generate hypotheses about cancer etiology. There are many cluster detection methods used in spatial epidemiology to investigate suspicious groupings of cancer occurrences in regional count data and case-control data, where controls are sampled from the at-risk population. Numerous studies in the literature have focused on childhood leukemia because of its relatively large incidence among children compared with other malignant diseases and substantial public concern over elevated leukemia incidence. The main focus of this paper is an analysis of the spatial distribution of leukemia incidence among children from 0 to 14 years of age in Ohio from 1996-2003 using individual case data from the Ohio Cancer Incidence Surveillance System (OCISS).Specifically, we explore whether there is statistically significant global clustering and if there are statistically significant local clusters of individual leukemia cases in Ohio using numerous published methods of spatial cluster detection, including spatial point process summary methods, a nearest neighbor method, and a local rate scanning method. We use the K function, Cuzick and Edward's method, and the kernel intensity function to test for significant global clustering and the kernel intensity function and Kulldorff's spatial scan statistic in SaTScan to test for significant local clusters. We found some evidence, although inconclusive, of significant local clusters in childhood leukemia in Ohio, but no significant overall clustering. The findings from the local cluster detection analyses are not consistent for the different cluster detection techniques, where the spatial scan method in SaTScan does not find statistically significant local clusters, while the kernel intensity function method suggests statistically significant clusters in areas of central, southern, and eastern Ohio. The findings are consistent for the different tests of global clustering, where no significant clustering is demonstrated with any of the techniques when all age cases are considered together. This comparative study for childhood leukemia clustering and clusters in Ohio revealed several research issues in practical spatial cluster detection. Among them, flexibility in cluster shape detection should be an issue for consideration.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Birth Certificates</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cluster Analysis</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Geographic Information Systems - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Leukemia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Leukemia in children</subject><subject>Medical statistics</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Ohio - epidemiology</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><issn>1476-072X</issn><issn>1476-072X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ktuL1TAQxoso7nr01UcJCIJg16RN0-ZFOCxeDiwseAHfQppM2qxtckxaL_-9qee4bnGlD5NMvvyamW-y7DHBZ4Q07CWhNctxXXzOWU7KO9npdeLujfVJ9iDGK4yLglB2PzshddlwTKvT7PsWKT_uZbDRO-QNins5WTkgNcxxgmBdh6TTf7ZIwwRqskmbYu_s1xkiMj4g1dtB995rNMD8BUYrkXXKanAK0gpd9ta_QIRzlhcYlw-ze0YOER4d4yb79Ob1x_N3-cXl29359iJvGSmnXBfEMEYbyqmi3NSKFS1uG2Io4Ko2LQNT0oY3pKma1tREllpzSauGsMowXpWbbHfgai-vxD7YUYafwksrfid86IQMk1UDCMZxXbWEqhZzSlOoeQtKGlaqCgOFxHp1YO3ndgStwE1BDivo-sTZXnT-m0ivIzUuE2B7ALTW_wewPknWiMVEsZgomCAL49nxEcEvzZ_EaKOCYZAO_BxF-k8yl_AkfHoQdjIVZ53xCakWsdgSlmanYanFm-zsFlX6dLJQeQfGpvzqwvPVhaSZ4MfUyTlGsfvw_la4Cj7GAOa6VILFMr7_FvfkZof_yo_zWv4CNafp7w</recordid><startdate>20070327</startdate><enddate>20070327</enddate><creator>Wheeler, David C</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070327</creationdate><title>A comparison of spatial clustering and cluster detection techniques for childhood leukemia incidence in Ohio, 1996-2003</title><author>Wheeler, David C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b613t-d21f6648494c49f7c62b0b81f4e057fb6ef348981858bf71a3dd9a458165f6953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Birth Certificates</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cluster Analysis</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Geographic Information Systems - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Leukemia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Leukemia in children</topic><topic>Medical statistics</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Ohio - epidemiology</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wheeler, David C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>International journal of health geographics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wheeler, David C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of spatial clustering and cluster detection techniques for childhood leukemia incidence in Ohio, 1996-2003</atitle><jtitle>International journal of health geographics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Health Geogr</addtitle><date>2007-03-27</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>13-13</pages><issn>1476-072X</issn><eissn>1476-072X</eissn><abstract>Spatial cluster detection is an important tool in cancer surveillance to identify areas of elevated risk and to generate hypotheses about cancer etiology. There are many cluster detection methods used in spatial epidemiology to investigate suspicious groupings of cancer occurrences in regional count data and case-control data, where controls are sampled from the at-risk population. Numerous studies in the literature have focused on childhood leukemia because of its relatively large incidence among children compared with other malignant diseases and substantial public concern over elevated leukemia incidence. The main focus of this paper is an analysis of the spatial distribution of leukemia incidence among children from 0 to 14 years of age in Ohio from 1996-2003 using individual case data from the Ohio Cancer Incidence Surveillance System (OCISS).Specifically, we explore whether there is statistically significant global clustering and if there are statistically significant local clusters of individual leukemia cases in Ohio using numerous published methods of spatial cluster detection, including spatial point process summary methods, a nearest neighbor method, and a local rate scanning method. We use the K function, Cuzick and Edward's method, and the kernel intensity function to test for significant global clustering and the kernel intensity function and Kulldorff's spatial scan statistic in SaTScan to test for significant local clusters. We found some evidence, although inconclusive, of significant local clusters in childhood leukemia in Ohio, but no significant overall clustering. The findings from the local cluster detection analyses are not consistent for the different cluster detection techniques, where the spatial scan method in SaTScan does not find statistically significant local clusters, while the kernel intensity function method suggests statistically significant clusters in areas of central, southern, and eastern Ohio. The findings are consistent for the different tests of global clustering, where no significant clustering is demonstrated with any of the techniques when all age cases are considered together. This comparative study for childhood leukemia clustering and clusters in Ohio revealed several research issues in practical spatial cluster detection. Among them, flexibility in cluster shape detection should be an issue for consideration.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>17389045</pmid><doi>10.1186/1476-072X-6-13</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1476-072X
ispartof International journal of health geographics, 2007-03, Vol.6 (1), p.13-13
issn 1476-072X
1476-072X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_69075b14cb09444cb79becaf63c50e4e
source PubMed Central
subjects Adolescent
Birth Certificates
Child
Child, Preschool
Cluster Analysis
Comparative analysis
Distribution
Geographic Information Systems - organization & administration
Humans
Incidence
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Leukemia - epidemiology
Leukemia in children
Medical statistics
Monte Carlo Method
Ohio - epidemiology
Registries
Statistics
title A comparison of spatial clustering and cluster detection techniques for childhood leukemia incidence in Ohio, 1996-2003
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T21%3A51%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20spatial%20clustering%20and%20cluster%20detection%20techniques%20for%20childhood%20leukemia%20incidence%20in%20Ohio,%201996-2003&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20health%20geographics&rft.au=Wheeler,%20David%20C&rft.date=2007-03-27&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=13-13&rft.issn=1476-072X&rft.eissn=1476-072X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1476-072X-6-13&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA161868661%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b613t-d21f6648494c49f7c62b0b81f4e057fb6ef348981858bf71a3dd9a458165f6953%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70373819&rft_id=info:pmid/17389045&rft_galeid=A161868661&rfr_iscdi=true