Loading…
Switching losses minimization and performance improvement of PCC and PTC methods of model predictive direct torque control drives with 15-level inverter
In power electronics, Predictive Current control (PCC) and Predictive Torque control (PTC) methods are advanced control strategy. To control an induction machine (IM), the Predictive Torque control (PTC) method evaluates the stator flux and electromagnetic torque in the cost function and Predictive...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology 2018-12, Vol.5 (3), p.759-776 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2599-4b6740bf28131328486b21a99c2b3fe835710096b5dd90a4908ca4822cee9f4e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2599-4b6740bf28131328486b21a99c2b3fe835710096b5dd90a4908ca4822cee9f4e3 |
container_end_page | 776 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 759 |
container_title | Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Karpe, Suraj Rajesh Deokar, Sanjay A. Dixit, Arati M. |
description | In power electronics, Predictive Current control (PCC) and Predictive Torque control (PTC) methods are advanced control strategy. To control an induction machine (IM), the Predictive Torque control (PTC) method evaluates the stator flux and electromagnetic torque in the cost function and Predictive Current control (PCC) (Cortés et al., 2008) considers the errors between the current reference and the measured current in the cost function. The switching vector selected for the use in IGBTs minimizes the error between the references and the predicted values. The system constraints can be easily included (Burtscher and Geyer, 2013; Geyer, 2013). The weighting factor is not necessary. The PCC and PTC method with 15-level H-bridge inverter using IM reduce 19% more THD in torque, speed, and stator current compared to the PTC and PCC methods with 2-level voltage source inverter compared to Wang et al. (2015). In this paper, switching losses minimization technique through THD minimization. Switching losses are minimized because the transistors are only switched when it is needed to keep torque and flux within their bounds. The switching pattern of semiconductor switches used to get better performance of multilevel inverter. This scheme decreases the switching loss and also increases the efficiency. In this paper, the PTC and PCC methods with 15-level H-bridge inverter using IM are carried out and gives excellent torque and flux responses, robust, and stable operation achieved compared to the PTC and PCC methods with 2-level voltage source inverter compared to Wang et al. (2015). This novel method attracted the researchers very quickly due to its straightforward algorithm and good performances both in steady and transient states (Wang et al., 2014). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jesit.2017.01.009 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_69acbfce20984cd4be06243688c333e1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2314717217300144</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_69acbfce20984cd4be06243688c333e1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>S2314717217300144</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2599-4b6740bf28131328486b21a99c2b3fe835710096b5dd90a4908ca4822cee9f4e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcuO1DAQjBBIrJb9Ai7-gQS_ktgHDijisdJKrMRythy7s9NREg-2CYIv2c_FM4MQJ07d6u4qVVdV1WtGG0ZZ92ZuZkiYG05Z31DWUKqfVVdcMFn3rOfP_-lfVjcpzZRSpnnbCnZVPX35gdkdcHskS0gJEllxwxV_2YxhI3bz5AhxCnG1mwOC6zGGHVbYMgkTuR-G88n9w0BWyIfg02m8Bg8LOUbw6DLuQDxGcJnkEL99B-LClmNYiI9ll0gRcCCsrRfYCwq3HWKG-Kp6Mdklwc2fel19_fD-YfhU333-eDu8u6sdb7Wu5dj1ko4TV0wwwZVU3ciZ1drxUUygRNuzYkg3tt5raqWmylmpOHcAepIgrqvbC68PdjbHiKuNP02waM6DEB-NjRndAqbT1o2TA061ks7LEWjHpeiUckIIYIVLXLhcLF5GmP7yMWpOWZnZnLMyp6wMZaZIK6i3FxSUN3eEaJJDKG5fXCs68L_43_X9oCQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Switching losses minimization and performance improvement of PCC and PTC methods of model predictive direct torque control drives with 15-level inverter</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Karpe, Suraj Rajesh ; Deokar, Sanjay A. ; Dixit, Arati M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Karpe, Suraj Rajesh ; Deokar, Sanjay A. ; Dixit, Arati M.</creatorcontrib><description>In power electronics, Predictive Current control (PCC) and Predictive Torque control (PTC) methods are advanced control strategy. To control an induction machine (IM), the Predictive Torque control (PTC) method evaluates the stator flux and electromagnetic torque in the cost function and Predictive Current control (PCC) (Cortés et al., 2008) considers the errors between the current reference and the measured current in the cost function. The switching vector selected for the use in IGBTs minimizes the error between the references and the predicted values. The system constraints can be easily included (Burtscher and Geyer, 2013; Geyer, 2013). The weighting factor is not necessary. The PCC and PTC method with 15-level H-bridge inverter using IM reduce 19% more THD in torque, speed, and stator current compared to the PTC and PCC methods with 2-level voltage source inverter compared to Wang et al. (2015). In this paper, switching losses minimization technique through THD minimization. Switching losses are minimized because the transistors are only switched when it is needed to keep torque and flux within their bounds. The switching pattern of semiconductor switches used to get better performance of multilevel inverter. This scheme decreases the switching loss and also increases the efficiency. In this paper, the PTC and PCC methods with 15-level H-bridge inverter using IM are carried out and gives excellent torque and flux responses, robust, and stable operation achieved compared to the PTC and PCC methods with 2-level voltage source inverter compared to Wang et al. (2015). This novel method attracted the researchers very quickly due to its straightforward algorithm and good performances both in steady and transient states (Wang et al., 2014).</description><identifier>ISSN: 2314-7172</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2314-7172</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jesit.2017.01.009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>15-level H-bridge inverter ; Electrical drives ; Induction motor ; Predictive Current control (PCC) ; Predictive Torque control (PTC) ; Voltage source inverter (VSI)</subject><ispartof>Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology, 2018-12, Vol.5 (3), p.759-776</ispartof><rights>2017 Electronics Research Institute (ERI)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2599-4b6740bf28131328486b21a99c2b3fe835710096b5dd90a4908ca4822cee9f4e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2599-4b6740bf28131328486b21a99c2b3fe835710096b5dd90a4908ca4822cee9f4e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2812-8757</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2314717217300144$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45779</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karpe, Suraj Rajesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deokar, Sanjay A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixit, Arati M.</creatorcontrib><title>Switching losses minimization and performance improvement of PCC and PTC methods of model predictive direct torque control drives with 15-level inverter</title><title>Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology</title><description>In power electronics, Predictive Current control (PCC) and Predictive Torque control (PTC) methods are advanced control strategy. To control an induction machine (IM), the Predictive Torque control (PTC) method evaluates the stator flux and electromagnetic torque in the cost function and Predictive Current control (PCC) (Cortés et al., 2008) considers the errors between the current reference and the measured current in the cost function. The switching vector selected for the use in IGBTs minimizes the error between the references and the predicted values. The system constraints can be easily included (Burtscher and Geyer, 2013; Geyer, 2013). The weighting factor is not necessary. The PCC and PTC method with 15-level H-bridge inverter using IM reduce 19% more THD in torque, speed, and stator current compared to the PTC and PCC methods with 2-level voltage source inverter compared to Wang et al. (2015). In this paper, switching losses minimization technique through THD minimization. Switching losses are minimized because the transistors are only switched when it is needed to keep torque and flux within their bounds. The switching pattern of semiconductor switches used to get better performance of multilevel inverter. This scheme decreases the switching loss and also increases the efficiency. In this paper, the PTC and PCC methods with 15-level H-bridge inverter using IM are carried out and gives excellent torque and flux responses, robust, and stable operation achieved compared to the PTC and PCC methods with 2-level voltage source inverter compared to Wang et al. (2015). This novel method attracted the researchers very quickly due to its straightforward algorithm and good performances both in steady and transient states (Wang et al., 2014).</description><subject>15-level H-bridge inverter</subject><subject>Electrical drives</subject><subject>Induction motor</subject><subject>Predictive Current control (PCC)</subject><subject>Predictive Torque control (PTC)</subject><subject>Voltage source inverter (VSI)</subject><issn>2314-7172</issn><issn>2314-7172</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UcuO1DAQjBBIrJb9Ai7-gQS_ktgHDijisdJKrMRythy7s9NREg-2CYIv2c_FM4MQJ07d6u4qVVdV1WtGG0ZZ92ZuZkiYG05Z31DWUKqfVVdcMFn3rOfP_-lfVjcpzZRSpnnbCnZVPX35gdkdcHskS0gJEllxwxV_2YxhI3bz5AhxCnG1mwOC6zGGHVbYMgkTuR-G88n9w0BWyIfg02m8Bg8LOUbw6DLuQDxGcJnkEL99B-LClmNYiI9ll0gRcCCsrRfYCwq3HWKG-Kp6Mdklwc2fel19_fD-YfhU333-eDu8u6sdb7Wu5dj1ko4TV0wwwZVU3ciZ1drxUUygRNuzYkg3tt5raqWmylmpOHcAepIgrqvbC68PdjbHiKuNP02waM6DEB-NjRndAqbT1o2TA061ks7LEWjHpeiUckIIYIVLXLhcLF5GmP7yMWpOWZnZnLMyp6wMZaZIK6i3FxSUN3eEaJJDKG5fXCs68L_43_X9oCQ</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Karpe, Suraj Rajesh</creator><creator>Deokar, Sanjay A.</creator><creator>Dixit, Arati M.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>SpringerOpen</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2812-8757</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>Switching losses minimization and performance improvement of PCC and PTC methods of model predictive direct torque control drives with 15-level inverter</title><author>Karpe, Suraj Rajesh ; Deokar, Sanjay A. ; Dixit, Arati M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2599-4b6740bf28131328486b21a99c2b3fe835710096b5dd90a4908ca4822cee9f4e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>15-level H-bridge inverter</topic><topic>Electrical drives</topic><topic>Induction motor</topic><topic>Predictive Current control (PCC)</topic><topic>Predictive Torque control (PTC)</topic><topic>Voltage source inverter (VSI)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karpe, Suraj Rajesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deokar, Sanjay A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixit, Arati M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karpe, Suraj Rajesh</au><au>Deokar, Sanjay A.</au><au>Dixit, Arati M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Switching losses minimization and performance improvement of PCC and PTC methods of model predictive direct torque control drives with 15-level inverter</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology</jtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>759</spage><epage>776</epage><pages>759-776</pages><issn>2314-7172</issn><eissn>2314-7172</eissn><abstract>In power electronics, Predictive Current control (PCC) and Predictive Torque control (PTC) methods are advanced control strategy. To control an induction machine (IM), the Predictive Torque control (PTC) method evaluates the stator flux and electromagnetic torque in the cost function and Predictive Current control (PCC) (Cortés et al., 2008) considers the errors between the current reference and the measured current in the cost function. The switching vector selected for the use in IGBTs minimizes the error between the references and the predicted values. The system constraints can be easily included (Burtscher and Geyer, 2013; Geyer, 2013). The weighting factor is not necessary. The PCC and PTC method with 15-level H-bridge inverter using IM reduce 19% more THD in torque, speed, and stator current compared to the PTC and PCC methods with 2-level voltage source inverter compared to Wang et al. (2015). In this paper, switching losses minimization technique through THD minimization. Switching losses are minimized because the transistors are only switched when it is needed to keep torque and flux within their bounds. The switching pattern of semiconductor switches used to get better performance of multilevel inverter. This scheme decreases the switching loss and also increases the efficiency. In this paper, the PTC and PCC methods with 15-level H-bridge inverter using IM are carried out and gives excellent torque and flux responses, robust, and stable operation achieved compared to the PTC and PCC methods with 2-level voltage source inverter compared to Wang et al. (2015). This novel method attracted the researchers very quickly due to its straightforward algorithm and good performances both in steady and transient states (Wang et al., 2014).</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jesit.2017.01.009</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2812-8757</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2314-7172 |
ispartof | Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology, 2018-12, Vol.5 (3), p.759-776 |
issn | 2314-7172 2314-7172 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_69acbfce20984cd4be06243688c333e1 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | 15-level H-bridge inverter Electrical drives Induction motor Predictive Current control (PCC) Predictive Torque control (PTC) Voltage source inverter (VSI) |
title | Switching losses minimization and performance improvement of PCC and PTC methods of model predictive direct torque control drives with 15-level inverter |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T19%3A16%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Switching%20losses%20minimization%20and%20performance%20improvement%20of%20PCC%20and%20PTC%20methods%20of%20model%20predictive%20direct%20torque%20control%20drives%20with%2015-level%20inverter&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Electrical%20Systems%20and%20Information%20Technology&rft.au=Karpe,%20Suraj%20Rajesh&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=759&rft.epage=776&rft.pages=759-776&rft.issn=2314-7172&rft.eissn=2314-7172&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jesit.2017.01.009&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_doaj_%3ES2314717217300144%3C/elsevier_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2599-4b6740bf28131328486b21a99c2b3fe835710096b5dd90a4908ca4822cee9f4e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |