Loading…

Switching losses minimization and performance improvement of PCC and PTC methods of model predictive direct torque control drives with 15-level inverter

In power electronics, Predictive Current control (PCC) and Predictive Torque control (PTC) methods are advanced control strategy. To control an induction machine (IM), the Predictive Torque control (PTC) method evaluates the stator flux and electromagnetic torque in the cost function and Predictive...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology 2018-12, Vol.5 (3), p.759-776
Main Authors: Karpe, Suraj Rajesh, Deokar, Sanjay A., Dixit, Arati M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2599-4b6740bf28131328486b21a99c2b3fe835710096b5dd90a4908ca4822cee9f4e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2599-4b6740bf28131328486b21a99c2b3fe835710096b5dd90a4908ca4822cee9f4e3
container_end_page 776
container_issue 3
container_start_page 759
container_title Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology
container_volume 5
creator Karpe, Suraj Rajesh
Deokar, Sanjay A.
Dixit, Arati M.
description In power electronics, Predictive Current control (PCC) and Predictive Torque control (PTC) methods are advanced control strategy. To control an induction machine (IM), the Predictive Torque control (PTC) method evaluates the stator flux and electromagnetic torque in the cost function and Predictive Current control (PCC) (Cortés et al., 2008) considers the errors between the current reference and the measured current in the cost function. The switching vector selected for the use in IGBTs minimizes the error between the references and the predicted values. The system constraints can be easily included (Burtscher and Geyer, 2013; Geyer, 2013). The weighting factor is not necessary. The PCC and PTC method with 15-level H-bridge inverter using IM reduce 19% more THD in torque, speed, and stator current compared to the PTC and PCC methods with 2-level voltage source inverter compared to Wang et al. (2015). In this paper, switching losses minimization technique through THD minimization. Switching losses are minimized because the transistors are only switched when it is needed to keep torque and flux within their bounds. The switching pattern of semiconductor switches used to get better performance of multilevel inverter. This scheme decreases the switching loss and also increases the efficiency. In this paper, the PTC and PCC methods with 15-level H-bridge inverter using IM are carried out and gives excellent torque and flux responses, robust, and stable operation achieved compared to the PTC and PCC methods with 2-level voltage source inverter compared to Wang et al. (2015). This novel method attracted the researchers very quickly due to its straightforward algorithm and good performances both in steady and transient states (Wang et al., 2014).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jesit.2017.01.009
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_69acbfce20984cd4be06243688c333e1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2314717217300144</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_69acbfce20984cd4be06243688c333e1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>S2314717217300144</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2599-4b6740bf28131328486b21a99c2b3fe835710096b5dd90a4908ca4822cee9f4e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcuO1DAQjBBIrJb9Ai7-gQS_ktgHDijisdJKrMRythy7s9NREg-2CYIv2c_FM4MQJ07d6u4qVVdV1WtGG0ZZ92ZuZkiYG05Z31DWUKqfVVdcMFn3rOfP_-lfVjcpzZRSpnnbCnZVPX35gdkdcHskS0gJEllxwxV_2YxhI3bz5AhxCnG1mwOC6zGGHVbYMgkTuR-G88n9w0BWyIfg02m8Bg8LOUbw6DLuQDxGcJnkEL99B-LClmNYiI9ll0gRcCCsrRfYCwq3HWKG-Kp6Mdklwc2fel19_fD-YfhU333-eDu8u6sdb7Wu5dj1ko4TV0wwwZVU3ciZ1drxUUygRNuzYkg3tt5raqWmylmpOHcAepIgrqvbC68PdjbHiKuNP02waM6DEB-NjRndAqbT1o2TA061ks7LEWjHpeiUckIIYIVLXLhcLF5GmP7yMWpOWZnZnLMyp6wMZaZIK6i3FxSUN3eEaJJDKG5fXCs68L_43_X9oCQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Switching losses minimization and performance improvement of PCC and PTC methods of model predictive direct torque control drives with 15-level inverter</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Karpe, Suraj Rajesh ; Deokar, Sanjay A. ; Dixit, Arati M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Karpe, Suraj Rajesh ; Deokar, Sanjay A. ; Dixit, Arati M.</creatorcontrib><description>In power electronics, Predictive Current control (PCC) and Predictive Torque control (PTC) methods are advanced control strategy. To control an induction machine (IM), the Predictive Torque control (PTC) method evaluates the stator flux and electromagnetic torque in the cost function and Predictive Current control (PCC) (Cortés et al., 2008) considers the errors between the current reference and the measured current in the cost function. The switching vector selected for the use in IGBTs minimizes the error between the references and the predicted values. The system constraints can be easily included (Burtscher and Geyer, 2013; Geyer, 2013). The weighting factor is not necessary. The PCC and PTC method with 15-level H-bridge inverter using IM reduce 19% more THD in torque, speed, and stator current compared to the PTC and PCC methods with 2-level voltage source inverter compared to Wang et al. (2015). In this paper, switching losses minimization technique through THD minimization. Switching losses are minimized because the transistors are only switched when it is needed to keep torque and flux within their bounds. The switching pattern of semiconductor switches used to get better performance of multilevel inverter. This scheme decreases the switching loss and also increases the efficiency. In this paper, the PTC and PCC methods with 15-level H-bridge inverter using IM are carried out and gives excellent torque and flux responses, robust, and stable operation achieved compared to the PTC and PCC methods with 2-level voltage source inverter compared to Wang et al. (2015). This novel method attracted the researchers very quickly due to its straightforward algorithm and good performances both in steady and transient states (Wang et al., 2014).</description><identifier>ISSN: 2314-7172</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2314-7172</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jesit.2017.01.009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>15-level H-bridge inverter ; Electrical drives ; Induction motor ; Predictive Current control (PCC) ; Predictive Torque control (PTC) ; Voltage source inverter (VSI)</subject><ispartof>Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology, 2018-12, Vol.5 (3), p.759-776</ispartof><rights>2017 Electronics Research Institute (ERI)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2599-4b6740bf28131328486b21a99c2b3fe835710096b5dd90a4908ca4822cee9f4e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2599-4b6740bf28131328486b21a99c2b3fe835710096b5dd90a4908ca4822cee9f4e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2812-8757</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2314717217300144$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45779</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karpe, Suraj Rajesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deokar, Sanjay A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixit, Arati M.</creatorcontrib><title>Switching losses minimization and performance improvement of PCC and PTC methods of model predictive direct torque control drives with 15-level inverter</title><title>Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology</title><description>In power electronics, Predictive Current control (PCC) and Predictive Torque control (PTC) methods are advanced control strategy. To control an induction machine (IM), the Predictive Torque control (PTC) method evaluates the stator flux and electromagnetic torque in the cost function and Predictive Current control (PCC) (Cortés et al., 2008) considers the errors between the current reference and the measured current in the cost function. The switching vector selected for the use in IGBTs minimizes the error between the references and the predicted values. The system constraints can be easily included (Burtscher and Geyer, 2013; Geyer, 2013). The weighting factor is not necessary. The PCC and PTC method with 15-level H-bridge inverter using IM reduce 19% more THD in torque, speed, and stator current compared to the PTC and PCC methods with 2-level voltage source inverter compared to Wang et al. (2015). In this paper, switching losses minimization technique through THD minimization. Switching losses are minimized because the transistors are only switched when it is needed to keep torque and flux within their bounds. The switching pattern of semiconductor switches used to get better performance of multilevel inverter. This scheme decreases the switching loss and also increases the efficiency. In this paper, the PTC and PCC methods with 15-level H-bridge inverter using IM are carried out and gives excellent torque and flux responses, robust, and stable operation achieved compared to the PTC and PCC methods with 2-level voltage source inverter compared to Wang et al. (2015). This novel method attracted the researchers very quickly due to its straightforward algorithm and good performances both in steady and transient states (Wang et al., 2014).</description><subject>15-level H-bridge inverter</subject><subject>Electrical drives</subject><subject>Induction motor</subject><subject>Predictive Current control (PCC)</subject><subject>Predictive Torque control (PTC)</subject><subject>Voltage source inverter (VSI)</subject><issn>2314-7172</issn><issn>2314-7172</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UcuO1DAQjBBIrJb9Ai7-gQS_ktgHDijisdJKrMRythy7s9NREg-2CYIv2c_FM4MQJ07d6u4qVVdV1WtGG0ZZ92ZuZkiYG05Z31DWUKqfVVdcMFn3rOfP_-lfVjcpzZRSpnnbCnZVPX35gdkdcHskS0gJEllxwxV_2YxhI3bz5AhxCnG1mwOC6zGGHVbYMgkTuR-G88n9w0BWyIfg02m8Bg8LOUbw6DLuQDxGcJnkEL99B-LClmNYiI9ll0gRcCCsrRfYCwq3HWKG-Kp6Mdklwc2fel19_fD-YfhU333-eDu8u6sdb7Wu5dj1ko4TV0wwwZVU3ciZ1drxUUygRNuzYkg3tt5raqWmylmpOHcAepIgrqvbC68PdjbHiKuNP02waM6DEB-NjRndAqbT1o2TA061ks7LEWjHpeiUckIIYIVLXLhcLF5GmP7yMWpOWZnZnLMyp6wMZaZIK6i3FxSUN3eEaJJDKG5fXCs68L_43_X9oCQ</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Karpe, Suraj Rajesh</creator><creator>Deokar, Sanjay A.</creator><creator>Dixit, Arati M.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>SpringerOpen</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2812-8757</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>Switching losses minimization and performance improvement of PCC and PTC methods of model predictive direct torque control drives with 15-level inverter</title><author>Karpe, Suraj Rajesh ; Deokar, Sanjay A. ; Dixit, Arati M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2599-4b6740bf28131328486b21a99c2b3fe835710096b5dd90a4908ca4822cee9f4e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>15-level H-bridge inverter</topic><topic>Electrical drives</topic><topic>Induction motor</topic><topic>Predictive Current control (PCC)</topic><topic>Predictive Torque control (PTC)</topic><topic>Voltage source inverter (VSI)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karpe, Suraj Rajesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deokar, Sanjay A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixit, Arati M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karpe, Suraj Rajesh</au><au>Deokar, Sanjay A.</au><au>Dixit, Arati M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Switching losses minimization and performance improvement of PCC and PTC methods of model predictive direct torque control drives with 15-level inverter</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology</jtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>759</spage><epage>776</epage><pages>759-776</pages><issn>2314-7172</issn><eissn>2314-7172</eissn><abstract>In power electronics, Predictive Current control (PCC) and Predictive Torque control (PTC) methods are advanced control strategy. To control an induction machine (IM), the Predictive Torque control (PTC) method evaluates the stator flux and electromagnetic torque in the cost function and Predictive Current control (PCC) (Cortés et al., 2008) considers the errors between the current reference and the measured current in the cost function. The switching vector selected for the use in IGBTs minimizes the error between the references and the predicted values. The system constraints can be easily included (Burtscher and Geyer, 2013; Geyer, 2013). The weighting factor is not necessary. The PCC and PTC method with 15-level H-bridge inverter using IM reduce 19% more THD in torque, speed, and stator current compared to the PTC and PCC methods with 2-level voltage source inverter compared to Wang et al. (2015). In this paper, switching losses minimization technique through THD minimization. Switching losses are minimized because the transistors are only switched when it is needed to keep torque and flux within their bounds. The switching pattern of semiconductor switches used to get better performance of multilevel inverter. This scheme decreases the switching loss and also increases the efficiency. In this paper, the PTC and PCC methods with 15-level H-bridge inverter using IM are carried out and gives excellent torque and flux responses, robust, and stable operation achieved compared to the PTC and PCC methods with 2-level voltage source inverter compared to Wang et al. (2015). This novel method attracted the researchers very quickly due to its straightforward algorithm and good performances both in steady and transient states (Wang et al., 2014).</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jesit.2017.01.009</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2812-8757</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2314-7172
ispartof Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology, 2018-12, Vol.5 (3), p.759-776
issn 2314-7172
2314-7172
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_69acbfce20984cd4be06243688c333e1
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects 15-level H-bridge inverter
Electrical drives
Induction motor
Predictive Current control (PCC)
Predictive Torque control (PTC)
Voltage source inverter (VSI)
title Switching losses minimization and performance improvement of PCC and PTC methods of model predictive direct torque control drives with 15-level inverter
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T19%3A16%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Switching%20losses%20minimization%20and%20performance%20improvement%20of%20PCC%20and%20PTC%20methods%20of%20model%20predictive%20direct%20torque%20control%20drives%20with%2015-level%20inverter&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Electrical%20Systems%20and%20Information%20Technology&rft.au=Karpe,%20Suraj%20Rajesh&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=759&rft.epage=776&rft.pages=759-776&rft.issn=2314-7172&rft.eissn=2314-7172&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jesit.2017.01.009&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_doaj_%3ES2314717217300144%3C/elsevier_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2599-4b6740bf28131328486b21a99c2b3fe835710096b5dd90a4908ca4822cee9f4e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true