Experimental Study of the Random Wave-Induced Hydrodynamics and Soil Response in a Porous Seabed Around Double Piles

• Published in: Journal of marine science and engineering 2024-10, Vol.12 (10), p.1715
• Main Authors: Wang, Mingqing, Si, Wenqi, Gao, Yaru, Cui, Lin, Jeng, Dong-Sheng, Sun, Ke, Chen, Bing, Zhao, Hongyi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Coastal engineering; Comparative analysis; Comparative studies; double piles; Experiments; Fluid dynamics; Fluid mechanics; Flumes; Hydrodynamics; Incidence angle; Influence; Marine engineering; marine infrastructure; Nonlinear systems; Nonlinearity; Ocean bottom; Ocean floor; Offshore; Offshore engineering; oscillatory pore pressures; Permeability; Pile foundations; Piles; Pore pressure; Pore water pressure; Pressure effects; Random waves; Sandy soils; Shielding; Significant wave height; Soil depth; Soil layers; Soil porosity; Wave attenuation; Wave height; Wave parameters
• ISSN: 2077-1312; 2077-1312
• DOI: 10.3390/jmse12101715

The evaluation of the wave-induced pore pressures around the offshore piles has attracted great attentions among coastal engineers, because they have been commonly used as foundations of numerous marine infrastructures. This paper presents comparative studies of the random wave-induced transient seabed response around single and double piles in a sandy seabed through a series of wave flume experiments. The influences of relative spacing ratios, wave incidence angles, and front pile diameters under different random wave parameters on oscillatory pore pressures in the vicinity of double piles are examined. In addition, variations in wave profiles and dynamic wave pressures surrounding single and double piles are quantitatively analyzed. Based on the experimental results, the following conclusions can be drawn: (1) under the influence of random waves, the wave profiles around the double piles exhibit obvious irregularity and nonlinearity; (2) the shielding effect existing in the tandem piles results in lower dynamic wave pressures around the rear pile compared to the front pile; (3) the pore pressures on the front surface of the double piles decrease with increasing soil depth, with a decreasing attenuation rate at each layer; (4) when the relative spacing ratio G/D2=3, the group-pile effect weakens, leading to an increase in the pore pressures around the rear pile, approaching the results of a single pile under conditions of lower significant wave heights or periods; (5) the intense disturbance effect caused by large wave incidence angles exacerbates the pore pressure response around the double piles; (6) when the diameter of the front pile in the tandem piles increases, it enhances the shielding effect, thus suppressing the seabed response around the rear pile. In contrast, it causes an increase in the wave surface around the double piles, exacerbating the pore pressure response in the seabed. The latter effect becomes more pronounced when the significant wave height is larger.