Loading…

A variant of sparse partial least squares for variable selection and data exploration

When data are sparse and/or predictors multicollinear, current implementation of sparse partial least squares (SPLS) does not give estimates for non-selected predictors nor provide a measure of inference. In response, an approach termed "all-possible" SPLS is proposed, which fits a SPLS mo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in neuroinformatics 2014-03, Vol.8, p.18-18
Main Authors: Olson Hunt, Megan J, Weissfeld, Lisa, Boudreau, Robert M, Aizenstein, Howard, Newman, Anne B, Simonsick, Eleanor M, Van Domelen, Dane R, Thomas, Fridtjof, Yaffe, Kristine, Rosano, Caterina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-a361ba3da6107b3e931bedf980c40305ffe17aa059657e886128fc12acb1fad13
cites
container_end_page 18
container_issue
container_start_page 18
container_title Frontiers in neuroinformatics
container_volume 8
creator Olson Hunt, Megan J
Weissfeld, Lisa
Boudreau, Robert M
Aizenstein, Howard
Newman, Anne B
Simonsick, Eleanor M
Van Domelen, Dane R
Thomas, Fridtjof
Yaffe, Kristine
Rosano, Caterina
description When data are sparse and/or predictors multicollinear, current implementation of sparse partial least squares (SPLS) does not give estimates for non-selected predictors nor provide a measure of inference. In response, an approach termed "all-possible" SPLS is proposed, which fits a SPLS model for all tuning parameter values across a set grid. Noted is the percentage of time a given predictor is chosen, as well as the average non-zero parameter estimate. Using a "large" number of multicollinear predictors, simulation confirmed variables not associated with the outcome were least likely to be chosen as sparsity increased across the grid of tuning parameters, while the opposite was true for those strongly associated. Lastly, variables with a weak association were chosen more often than those with no association, but less often than those with a strong relationship to the outcome. Similarly, predictors most strongly related to the outcome had the largest average parameter estimate magnitude, followed by those with a weak relationship, followed by those with no relationship. Across two independent studies regarding the relationship between volumetric MRI measures and a cognitive test score, this method confirmed a priori hypotheses about which brain regions would be selected most often and have the largest average parameter estimates. In conclusion, the percentage of time a predictor is chosen is a useful measure for ordering the strength of the relationship between the independent and dependent variables, serving as a form of inference. The average parameter estimates give further insight regarding the direction and strength of association. As a result, all-possible SPLS gives more information than the dichotomous output of traditional SPLS, making it useful when undertaking data exploration and hypothesis generation for a large number of potential predictors.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fninf.2014.00018
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6a64c621e8ef4da7bc1409cb39c58b12</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6a64c621e8ef4da7bc1409cb39c58b12</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1507799169</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-a361ba3da6107b3e931bedf980c40305ffe17aa059657e886128fc12acb1fad13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1P3DAQxaOqqFDg3lNlqZdeduuxHSe-VEKoH0hIvcDZmjhjmpXXXuwE0f--yS5F0Ittjd_89GZeVX0AvpayNV98HKJfCw5qzTmH9k11AlqLVQ1Gv33xPq7el7LhXAtdN--qY6G0ULwxJ9XtBXvAPGAcWfKs7DAXYvM5DhhYICwjK_cTZirMp3zQdoFYoUBuHFJkGHvW44iMHnchZVyKZ9WRx1Do_Ok-rW6_f7u5_Lm6_vXj6vLieuWU4eMKpYYOZY8aeNNJMhI66r1puVNc8tp7ggaR12a2TW2rQbTegUDXgcce5Gl1deD2CTd2l4ct5j824WD3hZTv7DKKC2Q1auW0AGrJqx6bzoHixnXSuLrtQMysrwfWbuq21DuKY8bwCvr6Jw6_7V16sNJIo1UzAz4_AXK6n6iMdjsURyFgpDQVCzVvGmNAm1n66T_pJk05zquyQphaKaXN4ogfVC6nUjL5ZzPA7ZK_3edvl_ztPv-55ePLIZ4b_gUu_wLlca2q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2295444692</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A variant of sparse partial least squares for variable selection and data exploration</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Olson Hunt, Megan J ; Weissfeld, Lisa ; Boudreau, Robert M ; Aizenstein, Howard ; Newman, Anne B ; Simonsick, Eleanor M ; Van Domelen, Dane R ; Thomas, Fridtjof ; Yaffe, Kristine ; Rosano, Caterina</creator><creatorcontrib>Olson Hunt, Megan J ; Weissfeld, Lisa ; Boudreau, Robert M ; Aizenstein, Howard ; Newman, Anne B ; Simonsick, Eleanor M ; Van Domelen, Dane R ; Thomas, Fridtjof ; Yaffe, Kristine ; Rosano, Caterina</creatorcontrib><description>When data are sparse and/or predictors multicollinear, current implementation of sparse partial least squares (SPLS) does not give estimates for non-selected predictors nor provide a measure of inference. In response, an approach termed "all-possible" SPLS is proposed, which fits a SPLS model for all tuning parameter values across a set grid. Noted is the percentage of time a given predictor is chosen, as well as the average non-zero parameter estimate. Using a "large" number of multicollinear predictors, simulation confirmed variables not associated with the outcome were least likely to be chosen as sparsity increased across the grid of tuning parameters, while the opposite was true for those strongly associated. Lastly, variables with a weak association were chosen more often than those with no association, but less often than those with a strong relationship to the outcome. Similarly, predictors most strongly related to the outcome had the largest average parameter estimate magnitude, followed by those with a weak relationship, followed by those with no relationship. Across two independent studies regarding the relationship between volumetric MRI measures and a cognitive test score, this method confirmed a priori hypotheses about which brain regions would be selected most often and have the largest average parameter estimates. In conclusion, the percentage of time a predictor is chosen is a useful measure for ordering the strength of the relationship between the independent and dependent variables, serving as a form of inference. The average parameter estimates give further insight regarding the direction and strength of association. As a result, all-possible SPLS gives more information than the dichotomous output of traditional SPLS, making it useful when undertaking data exploration and hypothesis generation for a large number of potential predictors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1662-5196</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1662-5196</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2014.00018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24624079</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Research Foundation</publisher><subject>Aging ; Algorithms ; Cognitive ability ; Economic models ; Epidemiology ; Exploration ; Health care ; high-dimensional ; inference ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; MRI ; multicollinearity ; network ; Neuroscience ; Neurosciences ; Psychiatry ; Seeds ; Sparsity ; variable selection</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2014-03, Vol.8, p.18-18</ispartof><rights>2014. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Olson Hunt, Weissfeld, Boudreau, Aizenstein, Newman, Simonsick, Van Domelen, Thomas, Yaffe and Rosano. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-a361ba3da6107b3e931bedf980c40305ffe17aa059657e886128fc12acb1fad13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2295444692/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2295444692?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,75096</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24624079$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olson Hunt, Megan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weissfeld, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boudreau, Robert M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aizenstein, Howard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newman, Anne B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonsick, Eleanor M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Domelen, Dane R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Fridtjof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaffe, Kristine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosano, Caterina</creatorcontrib><title>A variant of sparse partial least squares for variable selection and data exploration</title><title>Frontiers in neuroinformatics</title><addtitle>Front Neuroinform</addtitle><description>When data are sparse and/or predictors multicollinear, current implementation of sparse partial least squares (SPLS) does not give estimates for non-selected predictors nor provide a measure of inference. In response, an approach termed "all-possible" SPLS is proposed, which fits a SPLS model for all tuning parameter values across a set grid. Noted is the percentage of time a given predictor is chosen, as well as the average non-zero parameter estimate. Using a "large" number of multicollinear predictors, simulation confirmed variables not associated with the outcome were least likely to be chosen as sparsity increased across the grid of tuning parameters, while the opposite was true for those strongly associated. Lastly, variables with a weak association were chosen more often than those with no association, but less often than those with a strong relationship to the outcome. Similarly, predictors most strongly related to the outcome had the largest average parameter estimate magnitude, followed by those with a weak relationship, followed by those with no relationship. Across two independent studies regarding the relationship between volumetric MRI measures and a cognitive test score, this method confirmed a priori hypotheses about which brain regions would be selected most often and have the largest average parameter estimates. In conclusion, the percentage of time a predictor is chosen is a useful measure for ordering the strength of the relationship between the independent and dependent variables, serving as a form of inference. The average parameter estimates give further insight regarding the direction and strength of association. As a result, all-possible SPLS gives more information than the dichotomous output of traditional SPLS, making it useful when undertaking data exploration and hypothesis generation for a large number of potential predictors.</description><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Exploration</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>high-dimensional</subject><subject>inference</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>MRI</subject><subject>multicollinearity</subject><subject>network</subject><subject>Neuroscience</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Sparsity</subject><subject>variable selection</subject><issn>1662-5196</issn><issn>1662-5196</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1P3DAQxaOqqFDg3lNlqZdeduuxHSe-VEKoH0hIvcDZmjhjmpXXXuwE0f--yS5F0Ittjd_89GZeVX0AvpayNV98HKJfCw5qzTmH9k11AlqLVQ1Gv33xPq7el7LhXAtdN--qY6G0ULwxJ9XtBXvAPGAcWfKs7DAXYvM5DhhYICwjK_cTZirMp3zQdoFYoUBuHFJkGHvW44iMHnchZVyKZ9WRx1Do_Ok-rW6_f7u5_Lm6_vXj6vLieuWU4eMKpYYOZY8aeNNJMhI66r1puVNc8tp7ggaR12a2TW2rQbTegUDXgcce5Gl1deD2CTd2l4ct5j824WD3hZTv7DKKC2Q1auW0AGrJqx6bzoHixnXSuLrtQMysrwfWbuq21DuKY8bwCvr6Jw6_7V16sNJIo1UzAz4_AXK6n6iMdjsURyFgpDQVCzVvGmNAm1n66T_pJk05zquyQphaKaXN4ogfVC6nUjL5ZzPA7ZK_3edvl_ztPv-55ePLIZ4b_gUu_wLlca2q</recordid><startdate>20140303</startdate><enddate>20140303</enddate><creator>Olson Hunt, Megan J</creator><creator>Weissfeld, Lisa</creator><creator>Boudreau, Robert M</creator><creator>Aizenstein, Howard</creator><creator>Newman, Anne B</creator><creator>Simonsick, Eleanor M</creator><creator>Van Domelen, Dane R</creator><creator>Thomas, Fridtjof</creator><creator>Yaffe, Kristine</creator><creator>Rosano, Caterina</creator><general>Frontiers Research Foundation</general><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140303</creationdate><title>A variant of sparse partial least squares for variable selection and data exploration</title><author>Olson Hunt, Megan J ; Weissfeld, Lisa ; Boudreau, Robert M ; Aizenstein, Howard ; Newman, Anne B ; Simonsick, Eleanor M ; Van Domelen, Dane R ; Thomas, Fridtjof ; Yaffe, Kristine ; Rosano, Caterina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-a361ba3da6107b3e931bedf980c40305ffe17aa059657e886128fc12acb1fad13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Exploration</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>high-dimensional</topic><topic>inference</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>MRI</topic><topic>multicollinearity</topic><topic>network</topic><topic>Neuroscience</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Sparsity</topic><topic>variable selection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olson Hunt, Megan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weissfeld, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boudreau, Robert M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aizenstein, Howard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newman, Anne B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonsick, Eleanor M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Domelen, Dane R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Fridtjof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaffe, Kristine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosano, Caterina</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in neuroinformatics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olson Hunt, Megan J</au><au>Weissfeld, Lisa</au><au>Boudreau, Robert M</au><au>Aizenstein, Howard</au><au>Newman, Anne B</au><au>Simonsick, Eleanor M</au><au>Van Domelen, Dane R</au><au>Thomas, Fridtjof</au><au>Yaffe, Kristine</au><au>Rosano, Caterina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A variant of sparse partial least squares for variable selection and data exploration</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in neuroinformatics</jtitle><addtitle>Front Neuroinform</addtitle><date>2014-03-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>8</volume><spage>18</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>18-18</pages><issn>1662-5196</issn><eissn>1662-5196</eissn><abstract>When data are sparse and/or predictors multicollinear, current implementation of sparse partial least squares (SPLS) does not give estimates for non-selected predictors nor provide a measure of inference. In response, an approach termed "all-possible" SPLS is proposed, which fits a SPLS model for all tuning parameter values across a set grid. Noted is the percentage of time a given predictor is chosen, as well as the average non-zero parameter estimate. Using a "large" number of multicollinear predictors, simulation confirmed variables not associated with the outcome were least likely to be chosen as sparsity increased across the grid of tuning parameters, while the opposite was true for those strongly associated. Lastly, variables with a weak association were chosen more often than those with no association, but less often than those with a strong relationship to the outcome. Similarly, predictors most strongly related to the outcome had the largest average parameter estimate magnitude, followed by those with a weak relationship, followed by those with no relationship. Across two independent studies regarding the relationship between volumetric MRI measures and a cognitive test score, this method confirmed a priori hypotheses about which brain regions would be selected most often and have the largest average parameter estimates. In conclusion, the percentage of time a predictor is chosen is a useful measure for ordering the strength of the relationship between the independent and dependent variables, serving as a form of inference. The average parameter estimates give further insight regarding the direction and strength of association. As a result, all-possible SPLS gives more information than the dichotomous output of traditional SPLS, making it useful when undertaking data exploration and hypothesis generation for a large number of potential predictors.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Research Foundation</pub><pmid>24624079</pmid><doi>10.3389/fninf.2014.00018</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1662-5196
ispartof Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2014-03, Vol.8, p.18-18
issn 1662-5196
1662-5196
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6a64c621e8ef4da7bc1409cb39c58b12
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Aging
Algorithms
Cognitive ability
Economic models
Epidemiology
Exploration
Health care
high-dimensional
inference
Magnetic resonance imaging
MRI
multicollinearity
network
Neuroscience
Neurosciences
Psychiatry
Seeds
Sparsity
variable selection
title A variant of sparse partial least squares for variable selection and data exploration
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T17%3A33%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20variant%20of%20sparse%20partial%20least%20squares%20for%20variable%20selection%20and%20data%20exploration&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20neuroinformatics&rft.au=Olson%20Hunt,%20Megan%20J&rft.date=2014-03-03&rft.volume=8&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=18-18&rft.issn=1662-5196&rft.eissn=1662-5196&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fninf.2014.00018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E1507799169%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-a361ba3da6107b3e931bedf980c40305ffe17aa059657e886128fc12acb1fad13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2295444692&rft_id=info:pmid/24624079&rfr_iscdi=true