Loading…

The current state on usage of image mosaic algorithms

Intensive research has been done on image mosaic algorithms to improve the field of view through generated image mosaics. However, their usage varies from one field to another due to the challenges faced by image acquisition platforms. Moreover, the current imagery software packages used are computa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific African 2022-11, Vol.18, p.e01419, Article e01419
Main Authors: Lungisani, Bose Alex, Lebekwe, Caspar K., Zungeru, Adamu Murtala, Yahya, Abid
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-99abe51398b034bbc60cd4bc5c76645beea1c0db2b88d167ade8e6758e29d5bd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-99abe51398b034bbc60cd4bc5c76645beea1c0db2b88d167ade8e6758e29d5bd3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page e01419
container_title Scientific African
container_volume 18
creator Lungisani, Bose Alex
Lebekwe, Caspar K.
Zungeru, Adamu Murtala
Yahya, Abid
description Intensive research has been done on image mosaic algorithms to improve the field of view through generated image mosaics. However, their usage varies from one field to another due to the challenges faced by image acquisition platforms. Moreover, the current imagery software packages used are computationally intensive to be used in real-time applications and are not economically affordable. Those that are open-source are limited due to the less amount of data used to test their mosaicing algorithms’ performance. Therefore, detailed knowledge of appropriate mosaic algorithms suitable for real-time applications is needed to produce mosaics with less computational time and efficient feature point detection. A comprehensive survey that categorizes existing mosaic algorithms’ adoption in various fields has not been done to the best of our knowledge. Firstly, we provide a comparison of the strengths, weaknesses, and uniqueness of the image mosaic algorithms across different fields, with emphasis on challenging issues, limitations, performance criteria, and mechanisms. Furthermore, this paper provides an up-to-date review of image mosaic algorithms in various domains as used in different fields. We further classify the usage of image mosaic algorithms based on the following domains: spatial, frequency, and combined spatial and frequency as used in agriculture, environmental monitoring, and medical imaging. In addition, an analysis was carried out on one of the promising algorithms based on improved SIFT with the aim of improvement. We then proposed an improved SIFT algorithm, which was then evaluated with an open-source algorithm and commercial software using structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and mosaicing computational times for mosaic accuracy and processing efficiency, respectively. Our approach demonstrated a significant improvement of more than 10% average on the mosaicing computational times for the five datasets used. Its mosaicing accuracy was found to be relatively within an acceptable range of above 90% averagely.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01419
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6aa7ca512005422292213e4597f673b9</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2468227622003258</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6aa7ca512005422292213e4597f673b9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>S2468227622003258</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-99abe51398b034bbc60cd4bc5c76645beea1c0db2b88d167ade8e6758e29d5bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRsNT-Ajf5A4kzN_PILFxI8VEouKnrYR437YS2kZko-O9NWhFXru7hcs_HuYeQW0YrRpm866rso20roAAVUsaZviAz4LIpAZS8_KOvySLnjlIKnIFWfEbEZoeF_0gJj0ORBztg0R-Lj2y3o2iLeJjEoc82-sLut32Kw-6Qb8hVa_cZFz9zTt6eHjfLl3L9-rxaPqxLX3M-lFpbh4LVunG05s55SX3gzguvpOTCIVrmaXDgmiYwqWzABqUSDYIOwoV6TlZnbuhtZ97TGCd9md5Gc1r0aWtsGqLfo5HWKm8FA0oFBwANwGrkQqtWqtrpkVWfWT71OSdsf3mMmqlI05lTkWYq0pyLHF33ZxeOb35GTNMNHj2GmNAPY474r_8bejt73w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The current state on usage of image mosaic algorithms</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lungisani, Bose Alex ; Lebekwe, Caspar K. ; Zungeru, Adamu Murtala ; Yahya, Abid</creator><creatorcontrib>Lungisani, Bose Alex ; Lebekwe, Caspar K. ; Zungeru, Adamu Murtala ; Yahya, Abid</creatorcontrib><description>Intensive research has been done on image mosaic algorithms to improve the field of view through generated image mosaics. However, their usage varies from one field to another due to the challenges faced by image acquisition platforms. Moreover, the current imagery software packages used are computationally intensive to be used in real-time applications and are not economically affordable. Those that are open-source are limited due to the less amount of data used to test their mosaicing algorithms’ performance. Therefore, detailed knowledge of appropriate mosaic algorithms suitable for real-time applications is needed to produce mosaics with less computational time and efficient feature point detection. A comprehensive survey that categorizes existing mosaic algorithms’ adoption in various fields has not been done to the best of our knowledge. Firstly, we provide a comparison of the strengths, weaknesses, and uniqueness of the image mosaic algorithms across different fields, with emphasis on challenging issues, limitations, performance criteria, and mechanisms. Furthermore, this paper provides an up-to-date review of image mosaic algorithms in various domains as used in different fields. We further classify the usage of image mosaic algorithms based on the following domains: spatial, frequency, and combined spatial and frequency as used in agriculture, environmental monitoring, and medical imaging. In addition, an analysis was carried out on one of the promising algorithms based on improved SIFT with the aim of improvement. We then proposed an improved SIFT algorithm, which was then evaluated with an open-source algorithm and commercial software using structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and mosaicing computational times for mosaic accuracy and processing efficiency, respectively. Our approach demonstrated a significant improvement of more than 10% average on the mosaicing computational times for the five datasets used. Its mosaicing accuracy was found to be relatively within an acceptable range of above 90% averagely.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2468-2276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2468-2276</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01419</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Frequency domain-based ; Image mosaic ; RANSAC ; SIFT ; Spatial domain-based ; SURF</subject><ispartof>Scientific African, 2022-11, Vol.18, p.e01419, Article e01419</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-99abe51398b034bbc60cd4bc5c76645beea1c0db2b88d167ade8e6758e29d5bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-99abe51398b034bbc60cd4bc5c76645beea1c0db2b88d167ade8e6758e29d5bd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2412-6559 ; 0000-0002-3025-6766</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227622003258$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27924,27925,45780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lungisani, Bose Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebekwe, Caspar K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zungeru, Adamu Murtala</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yahya, Abid</creatorcontrib><title>The current state on usage of image mosaic algorithms</title><title>Scientific African</title><description>Intensive research has been done on image mosaic algorithms to improve the field of view through generated image mosaics. However, their usage varies from one field to another due to the challenges faced by image acquisition platforms. Moreover, the current imagery software packages used are computationally intensive to be used in real-time applications and are not economically affordable. Those that are open-source are limited due to the less amount of data used to test their mosaicing algorithms’ performance. Therefore, detailed knowledge of appropriate mosaic algorithms suitable for real-time applications is needed to produce mosaics with less computational time and efficient feature point detection. A comprehensive survey that categorizes existing mosaic algorithms’ adoption in various fields has not been done to the best of our knowledge. Firstly, we provide a comparison of the strengths, weaknesses, and uniqueness of the image mosaic algorithms across different fields, with emphasis on challenging issues, limitations, performance criteria, and mechanisms. Furthermore, this paper provides an up-to-date review of image mosaic algorithms in various domains as used in different fields. We further classify the usage of image mosaic algorithms based on the following domains: spatial, frequency, and combined spatial and frequency as used in agriculture, environmental monitoring, and medical imaging. In addition, an analysis was carried out on one of the promising algorithms based on improved SIFT with the aim of improvement. We then proposed an improved SIFT algorithm, which was then evaluated with an open-source algorithm and commercial software using structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and mosaicing computational times for mosaic accuracy and processing efficiency, respectively. Our approach demonstrated a significant improvement of more than 10% average on the mosaicing computational times for the five datasets used. Its mosaicing accuracy was found to be relatively within an acceptable range of above 90% averagely.</description><subject>Frequency domain-based</subject><subject>Image mosaic</subject><subject>RANSAC</subject><subject>SIFT</subject><subject>Spatial domain-based</subject><subject>SURF</subject><issn>2468-2276</issn><issn>2468-2276</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRsNT-Ajf5A4kzN_PILFxI8VEouKnrYR437YS2kZko-O9NWhFXru7hcs_HuYeQW0YrRpm866rso20roAAVUsaZviAz4LIpAZS8_KOvySLnjlIKnIFWfEbEZoeF_0gJj0ORBztg0R-Lj2y3o2iLeJjEoc82-sLut32Kw-6Qb8hVa_cZFz9zTt6eHjfLl3L9-rxaPqxLX3M-lFpbh4LVunG05s55SX3gzguvpOTCIVrmaXDgmiYwqWzABqUSDYIOwoV6TlZnbuhtZ97TGCd9md5Gc1r0aWtsGqLfo5HWKm8FA0oFBwANwGrkQqtWqtrpkVWfWT71OSdsf3mMmqlI05lTkWYq0pyLHF33ZxeOb35GTNMNHj2GmNAPY474r_8bejt73w</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Lungisani, Bose Alex</creator><creator>Lebekwe, Caspar K.</creator><creator>Zungeru, Adamu Murtala</creator><creator>Yahya, Abid</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2412-6559</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3025-6766</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>The current state on usage of image mosaic algorithms</title><author>Lungisani, Bose Alex ; Lebekwe, Caspar K. ; Zungeru, Adamu Murtala ; Yahya, Abid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-99abe51398b034bbc60cd4bc5c76645beea1c0db2b88d167ade8e6758e29d5bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Frequency domain-based</topic><topic>Image mosaic</topic><topic>RANSAC</topic><topic>SIFT</topic><topic>Spatial domain-based</topic><topic>SURF</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lungisani, Bose Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebekwe, Caspar K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zungeru, Adamu Murtala</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yahya, Abid</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Scientific African</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lungisani, Bose Alex</au><au>Lebekwe, Caspar K.</au><au>Zungeru, Adamu Murtala</au><au>Yahya, Abid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The current state on usage of image mosaic algorithms</atitle><jtitle>Scientific African</jtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>18</volume><spage>e01419</spage><pages>e01419-</pages><artnum>e01419</artnum><issn>2468-2276</issn><eissn>2468-2276</eissn><abstract>Intensive research has been done on image mosaic algorithms to improve the field of view through generated image mosaics. However, their usage varies from one field to another due to the challenges faced by image acquisition platforms. Moreover, the current imagery software packages used are computationally intensive to be used in real-time applications and are not economically affordable. Those that are open-source are limited due to the less amount of data used to test their mosaicing algorithms’ performance. Therefore, detailed knowledge of appropriate mosaic algorithms suitable for real-time applications is needed to produce mosaics with less computational time and efficient feature point detection. A comprehensive survey that categorizes existing mosaic algorithms’ adoption in various fields has not been done to the best of our knowledge. Firstly, we provide a comparison of the strengths, weaknesses, and uniqueness of the image mosaic algorithms across different fields, with emphasis on challenging issues, limitations, performance criteria, and mechanisms. Furthermore, this paper provides an up-to-date review of image mosaic algorithms in various domains as used in different fields. We further classify the usage of image mosaic algorithms based on the following domains: spatial, frequency, and combined spatial and frequency as used in agriculture, environmental monitoring, and medical imaging. In addition, an analysis was carried out on one of the promising algorithms based on improved SIFT with the aim of improvement. We then proposed an improved SIFT algorithm, which was then evaluated with an open-source algorithm and commercial software using structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and mosaicing computational times for mosaic accuracy and processing efficiency, respectively. Our approach demonstrated a significant improvement of more than 10% average on the mosaicing computational times for the five datasets used. Its mosaicing accuracy was found to be relatively within an acceptable range of above 90% averagely.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01419</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2412-6559</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3025-6766</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2468-2276
ispartof Scientific African, 2022-11, Vol.18, p.e01419, Article e01419
issn 2468-2276
2468-2276
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6aa7ca512005422292213e4597f673b9
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Frequency domain-based
Image mosaic
RANSAC
SIFT
Spatial domain-based
SURF
title The current state on usage of image mosaic algorithms
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A53%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20current%20state%20on%20usage%20of%20image%20mosaic%20algorithms&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20African&rft.au=Lungisani,%20Bose%20Alex&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=18&rft.spage=e01419&rft.pages=e01419-&rft.artnum=e01419&rft.issn=2468-2276&rft.eissn=2468-2276&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01419&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_doaj_%3ES2468227622003258%3C/elsevier_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-99abe51398b034bbc60cd4bc5c76645beea1c0db2b88d167ade8e6758e29d5bd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true