Loading…
Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Salvage with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation: An Evaluation of Outcomes
Implant infection is problematic in breast reconstruction. Traditionally, infected tissue expanders (TE)/implants are removed for several months before replacement, resulting in breast reconstruction delay. Salvage involving device removal, negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell...
Saved in:
Published in: | Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open 2024-09, Vol.12 (9), p.e6116 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-7a22a7ac174eae304fd6892b5de0ac0094bd470db75ef1fd13252e59740c41e3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | e6116 |
container_title | Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Ahmed, Shahnur Hulsman, Luci Imeokparia, Folasade Ludwig, Kandice Fisher, Carla Bamba, Ravinder Danforth, Rachel VonDerHaar, R Jason Lester, Mary E Hassanein, Aladdin H |
description | Implant infection is problematic in breast reconstruction. Traditionally, infected tissue expanders (TE)/implants are removed for several months before replacement, resulting in breast reconstruction delay. Salvage involving device removal, negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell (NPWTi-d) placement, and early staged TE/implant replacement within a few days has been described. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of the NPWTi-d salvage pathway with traditional implant removal.
A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent implant-based reconstruction and developed TE/implant infection/exposure requiring removal. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 had TE/implant removal, NPWTi-d placement, and TE/implant replacement 1-4 days later. Group 2 (control) underwent standard TE/implant removal and no NPWTi-d. Reinfection after TE/implant salvage, TE/implant-free days, and time to final reconstruction were assessed.
The study included 47 patients (76 TE/implants) in group 1 (13 patients, 16 TE/implants) and group 2 (34 patients, 60 TE/implants). The success rate (no surgical-site infection within 90 days) of implant salvage was 81.3% in group 1. No group 1 patients abandoned completing reconstruction after TE/implant loss versus 38.2% (13 of 34) in group 2 (
= 0.0094). Mean implant-free days was 2.5 ± 1.2 in group 1 versus 134.6 ± 78.5 in group 2 (
= 0.0001). The interval to final implant-based reconstruction was 69.0 ± 69.7 days in group 1 versus 225.6 ± 93.6 days in group 2 (
= 0.0001).
A breast implant salvage pathway with infected device removal, NPWTi-d placement, and early TE/implant replacement was successful in 81.3%. Patients experienced 132 less implant-free days and faster time to final reconstruction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006116 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6c030c1549554983b651e5b52db2f8ab</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6c030c1549554983b651e5b52db2f8ab</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3100563018</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-7a22a7ac174eae304fd6892b5de0ac0094bd470db75ef1fd13252e59740c41e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkl9P2zAUxaNp00CMbzBNftxLmP_GyV4mhhhUQhRtlbY368a-aYOSuLOdTjzsu5NSQAVLlq_tc3627JNlHxk9YbTSXy7mf07oXisYK95kh5wVVa6Vlm_36oPsOMbbraosJdPqfXYgKs5Lyelh9n_WrzsYUl5DREe-B4SYyE-0fogpjDa1fiC_oNvAEsm_Nq3INS4htRskNwFjHAOS334cHFmsMMD6bieaTe6262Br_0pOB3K-gW58mBLfkPmYrO8xfsjeNdBFPH4cj7LFj_PF2WV-Nb-YnZ1e5VYomXINnIMGy7REQEFl44qy4rVySMFSWsnaSU1drRU2rHFMcMVRVVpSKxmKo2y2wzoPt2Yd2h7CnfHQmocFH5YGQmpth6awVFDLlKzU1EtRF4qhqhV3NW9KqCfWtx1rPdY9OotDCtC9gL7cGdqVWfqNYUwUJWfVRPj8SAj-74gxmb6NFqfXGtCP0QhGqSoEZeUklTupDT7GgM3zOYyabRDMFATzOgiT7dP-HZ9NT98u7gGZtbBy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3100563018</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Salvage with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation: An Evaluation of Outcomes</title><source>LWW_医学期刊</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ahmed, Shahnur ; Hulsman, Luci ; Imeokparia, Folasade ; Ludwig, Kandice ; Fisher, Carla ; Bamba, Ravinder ; Danforth, Rachel ; VonDerHaar, R Jason ; Lester, Mary E ; Hassanein, Aladdin H</creator><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Shahnur ; Hulsman, Luci ; Imeokparia, Folasade ; Ludwig, Kandice ; Fisher, Carla ; Bamba, Ravinder ; Danforth, Rachel ; VonDerHaar, R Jason ; Lester, Mary E ; Hassanein, Aladdin H</creatorcontrib><description>Implant infection is problematic in breast reconstruction. Traditionally, infected tissue expanders (TE)/implants are removed for several months before replacement, resulting in breast reconstruction delay. Salvage involving device removal, negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell (NPWTi-d) placement, and early staged TE/implant replacement within a few days has been described. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of the NPWTi-d salvage pathway with traditional implant removal.
A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent implant-based reconstruction and developed TE/implant infection/exposure requiring removal. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 had TE/implant removal, NPWTi-d placement, and TE/implant replacement 1-4 days later. Group 2 (control) underwent standard TE/implant removal and no NPWTi-d. Reinfection after TE/implant salvage, TE/implant-free days, and time to final reconstruction were assessed.
The study included 47 patients (76 TE/implants) in group 1 (13 patients, 16 TE/implants) and group 2 (34 patients, 60 TE/implants). The success rate (no surgical-site infection within 90 days) of implant salvage was 81.3% in group 1. No group 1 patients abandoned completing reconstruction after TE/implant loss versus 38.2% (13 of 34) in group 2 (
= 0.0094). Mean implant-free days was 2.5 ± 1.2 in group 1 versus 134.6 ± 78.5 in group 2 (
= 0.0001). The interval to final implant-based reconstruction was 69.0 ± 69.7 days in group 1 versus 225.6 ± 93.6 days in group 2 (
= 0.0001).
A breast implant salvage pathway with infected device removal, NPWTi-d placement, and early TE/implant replacement was successful in 81.3%. Patients experienced 132 less implant-free days and faster time to final reconstruction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-7574</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-7574</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006116</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39228420</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Breast ; Original</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024-09, Vol.12 (9), p.e6116</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-7a22a7ac174eae304fd6892b5de0ac0094bd470db75ef1fd13252e59740c41e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368219/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368219/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39228420$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Shahnur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulsman, Luci</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imeokparia, Folasade</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, Kandice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bamba, Ravinder</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danforth, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VonDerHaar, R Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lester, Mary E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassanein, Aladdin H</creatorcontrib><title>Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Salvage with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation: An Evaluation of Outcomes</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open</addtitle><description>Implant infection is problematic in breast reconstruction. Traditionally, infected tissue expanders (TE)/implants are removed for several months before replacement, resulting in breast reconstruction delay. Salvage involving device removal, negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell (NPWTi-d) placement, and early staged TE/implant replacement within a few days has been described. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of the NPWTi-d salvage pathway with traditional implant removal.
A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent implant-based reconstruction and developed TE/implant infection/exposure requiring removal. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 had TE/implant removal, NPWTi-d placement, and TE/implant replacement 1-4 days later. Group 2 (control) underwent standard TE/implant removal and no NPWTi-d. Reinfection after TE/implant salvage, TE/implant-free days, and time to final reconstruction were assessed.
The study included 47 patients (76 TE/implants) in group 1 (13 patients, 16 TE/implants) and group 2 (34 patients, 60 TE/implants). The success rate (no surgical-site infection within 90 days) of implant salvage was 81.3% in group 1. No group 1 patients abandoned completing reconstruction after TE/implant loss versus 38.2% (13 of 34) in group 2 (
= 0.0094). Mean implant-free days was 2.5 ± 1.2 in group 1 versus 134.6 ± 78.5 in group 2 (
= 0.0001). The interval to final implant-based reconstruction was 69.0 ± 69.7 days in group 1 versus 225.6 ± 93.6 days in group 2 (
= 0.0001).
A breast implant salvage pathway with infected device removal, NPWTi-d placement, and early TE/implant replacement was successful in 81.3%. Patients experienced 132 less implant-free days and faster time to final reconstruction.</description><subject>Breast</subject><subject>Original</subject><issn>2169-7574</issn><issn>2169-7574</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkl9P2zAUxaNp00CMbzBNftxLmP_GyV4mhhhUQhRtlbY368a-aYOSuLOdTjzsu5NSQAVLlq_tc3627JNlHxk9YbTSXy7mf07oXisYK95kh5wVVa6Vlm_36oPsOMbbraosJdPqfXYgKs5Lyelh9n_WrzsYUl5DREe-B4SYyE-0fogpjDa1fiC_oNvAEsm_Nq3INS4htRskNwFjHAOS334cHFmsMMD6bieaTe6262Br_0pOB3K-gW58mBLfkPmYrO8xfsjeNdBFPH4cj7LFj_PF2WV-Nb-YnZ1e5VYomXINnIMGy7REQEFl44qy4rVySMFSWsnaSU1drRU2rHFMcMVRVVpSKxmKo2y2wzoPt2Yd2h7CnfHQmocFH5YGQmpth6awVFDLlKzU1EtRF4qhqhV3NW9KqCfWtx1rPdY9OotDCtC9gL7cGdqVWfqNYUwUJWfVRPj8SAj-74gxmb6NFqfXGtCP0QhGqSoEZeUklTupDT7GgM3zOYyabRDMFATzOgiT7dP-HZ9NT98u7gGZtbBy</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Ahmed, Shahnur</creator><creator>Hulsman, Luci</creator><creator>Imeokparia, Folasade</creator><creator>Ludwig, Kandice</creator><creator>Fisher, Carla</creator><creator>Bamba, Ravinder</creator><creator>Danforth, Rachel</creator><creator>VonDerHaar, R Jason</creator><creator>Lester, Mary E</creator><creator>Hassanein, Aladdin H</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><general>Wolters Kluwer</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Salvage with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation: An Evaluation of Outcomes</title><author>Ahmed, Shahnur ; Hulsman, Luci ; Imeokparia, Folasade ; Ludwig, Kandice ; Fisher, Carla ; Bamba, Ravinder ; Danforth, Rachel ; VonDerHaar, R Jason ; Lester, Mary E ; Hassanein, Aladdin H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-7a22a7ac174eae304fd6892b5de0ac0094bd470db75ef1fd13252e59740c41e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Breast</topic><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Shahnur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulsman, Luci</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imeokparia, Folasade</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, Kandice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bamba, Ravinder</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danforth, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VonDerHaar, R Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lester, Mary E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassanein, Aladdin H</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ahmed, Shahnur</au><au>Hulsman, Luci</au><au>Imeokparia, Folasade</au><au>Ludwig, Kandice</au><au>Fisher, Carla</au><au>Bamba, Ravinder</au><au>Danforth, Rachel</au><au>VonDerHaar, R Jason</au><au>Lester, Mary E</au><au>Hassanein, Aladdin H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Salvage with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation: An Evaluation of Outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open</addtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e6116</spage><pages>e6116-</pages><issn>2169-7574</issn><eissn>2169-7574</eissn><abstract>Implant infection is problematic in breast reconstruction. Traditionally, infected tissue expanders (TE)/implants are removed for several months before replacement, resulting in breast reconstruction delay. Salvage involving device removal, negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell (NPWTi-d) placement, and early staged TE/implant replacement within a few days has been described. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of the NPWTi-d salvage pathway with traditional implant removal.
A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent implant-based reconstruction and developed TE/implant infection/exposure requiring removal. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 had TE/implant removal, NPWTi-d placement, and TE/implant replacement 1-4 days later. Group 2 (control) underwent standard TE/implant removal and no NPWTi-d. Reinfection after TE/implant salvage, TE/implant-free days, and time to final reconstruction were assessed.
The study included 47 patients (76 TE/implants) in group 1 (13 patients, 16 TE/implants) and group 2 (34 patients, 60 TE/implants). The success rate (no surgical-site infection within 90 days) of implant salvage was 81.3% in group 1. No group 1 patients abandoned completing reconstruction after TE/implant loss versus 38.2% (13 of 34) in group 2 (
= 0.0094). Mean implant-free days was 2.5 ± 1.2 in group 1 versus 134.6 ± 78.5 in group 2 (
= 0.0001). The interval to final implant-based reconstruction was 69.0 ± 69.7 days in group 1 versus 225.6 ± 93.6 days in group 2 (
= 0.0001).
A breast implant salvage pathway with infected device removal, NPWTi-d placement, and early TE/implant replacement was successful in 81.3%. Patients experienced 132 less implant-free days and faster time to final reconstruction.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>39228420</pmid><doi>10.1097/GOX.0000000000006116</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-7574 |
ispartof | Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024-09, Vol.12 (9), p.e6116 |
issn | 2169-7574 2169-7574 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6c030c1549554983b651e5b52db2f8ab |
source | LWW_医学期刊; PubMed Central |
subjects | Breast Original |
title | Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Salvage with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation: An Evaluation of Outcomes |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T14%3A47%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implant-based%20Breast%20Reconstruction%20Salvage%20with%20Negative%20Pressure%20Wound%20Therapy%20with%20Instillation:%20An%20Evaluation%20of%20Outcomes&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery.%20Global%20open&rft.au=Ahmed,%20Shahnur&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e6116&rft.pages=e6116-&rft.issn=2169-7574&rft.eissn=2169-7574&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006116&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3100563018%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-7a22a7ac174eae304fd6892b5de0ac0094bd470db75ef1fd13252e59740c41e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3100563018&rft_id=info:pmid/39228420&rfr_iscdi=true |