Loading…
A Hybrid Metaheuristic for Multi-Objective Scientific Workflow Scheduling in a Cloud Environment
[...]each metaheuristic algorithm has its own merits and demerits. [...]hybrid approaches have shown to produce better results [6,7] as they combine heuristic rules with metaheuristic algorithms and have attracted much attention in recent years to solve multi-objective workflow scheduling problems i...
Saved in:
Published in: | Applied sciences 2018-04, Vol.8 (4), p.538 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | [...]each metaheuristic algorithm has its own merits and demerits. [...]hybrid approaches have shown to produce better results [6,7] as they combine heuristic rules with metaheuristic algorithms and have attracted much attention in recent years to solve multi-objective workflow scheduling problems in the cloud. The two conflicting objectives of the proposed scheme Hybrid Bio-inspired Metaheuristic for Multi-objective Optimization (HBMMO) are to minimize makespan and to reduce cost along with the efficient utilization of the VMs. [...]the proposed multi-objective approach based on a Pareto optimal non-dominated solution considers the users’ as well as providers’ requirements for workflow scheduling in the cloud. [...]they are only locally optimal and infeasible for large and complex workflow scheduling problems in the cloud. A MOP problem can be formulated as: min f(x)=(f1(x),f2(x),…,fd(x)) subject to x∈ω wherein ω represents the decision space. f(x) consist of d objective functions. Since multi-objective optimization usually involve conflicting objectives, so there is no single solution which can optimize all objectives simultaneously. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2076-3417 2076-3417 |
DOI: | 10.3390/app8040538 |