Loading…

Comparative effectiveness of bisphosphonate treatments for the prevention of re-fracture in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundLong-term usage of glucocorticoids results in a loss of bone mass and a higher risk of fracture, and the most common cause of secondary osteoporosis is glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP). For preventing GIOP, bisphosphonate (BP) is widely used. However, analysis on BP’s effect on t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMJ open 2022-09, Vol.12 (9), p.e062537-e062537
Main Authors: Chu, Hongmin, Jang, Bo-Hyoung, Kim, GaYoon, Bae, Seowoo, Lee, Hyeju, Nam, Seonghee, Ahn, Jeonghoon
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b516t-506ea476a70e6154bbf4ba689d3134a10366689dacc2486c27c473d3e117cf993
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b516t-506ea476a70e6154bbf4ba689d3134a10366689dacc2486c27c473d3e117cf993
container_end_page e062537
container_issue 9
container_start_page e062537
container_title BMJ open
container_volume 12
creator Chu, Hongmin
Jang, Bo-Hyoung
Kim, GaYoon
Bae, Seowoo
Lee, Hyeju
Nam, Seonghee
Ahn, Jeonghoon
description BackgroundLong-term usage of glucocorticoids results in a loss of bone mass and a higher risk of fracture, and the most common cause of secondary osteoporosis is glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP). For preventing GIOP, bisphosphonate (BP) is widely used. However, analysis on BP’s effect on the prevention of re-fracture is insufficient. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the comparative treatment effect and prevention of re-fracture according to the type of BP in GIOP as the basis for a reliable clinical strategy for patients.Methods and analysisWe will search electronic databases of the PubMed, Cochrane Library and EMBASE using a comprehensive search strategy in December 2021 with no language restriction. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, controlled trials and cohort studies evaluating the effectiveness of BP to the patients with GIOP will be included in this study. The primary outcome will be the incidence of hip, vertebral and other fractures. The secondary outcome will include percentage changes on the bone mineral density and incidence of re-fracture. Assessing risk of bias for included studies is done using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies–of Intervention tool. If quantitative synthesis is possible, a meta-analysis will be performed. A subgroup analysis will be conducted to compare re-fracture rate on the patients with GIOP who experience previous fractures. This study’s result will provide evidence for the effectiveness of BP in the prevention of re-fracture on patients with GIOP.Ethics and disseminationThe results will be disseminated through publishing in a peer-reviewed journal or public presentations. Ethical approval is not required as this is a systematic review of publicly available data.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022343787.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062537
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6c6ed0225cbb49f683eae330eb0da9b5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6c6ed0225cbb49f683eae330eb0da9b5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2723724706</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b516t-506ea476a70e6154bbf4ba689d3134a10366689dacc2486c27c473d3e117cf993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks1u1DAQxyMEolXpE3CxxIVLqD9iZ8MBCVV8VKrEBc7W2JnsepXYwXYW7XPxgjjdFVAOWLI89vznpxnPVNVLRt8wJtSNmfZhRl9zynlNFZeifVJdcto0taJSPv3LvqiuU9rTshrZScmfVxdCMdWKTl5WP2_DNEOE7A5IcBjQrpbHlEgYiHFp3oV1e8hIckTIE_qcyBAiyTskc8Qizy74VR-xHiLYvEQkzpPtuNhgQ8zOBtfXzveLxZ6ElDHMIYbk0ttCCLmIxgckkHQs3qnkYwvt4PAHAd-TCTPU4GE8lpgX1bMBxoTX5_Oq-vbxw9fbz_X9l093t-_vayOZyrWkCqFpFbQUFZONMUNjQG26XjDRAKNCqfUG1vJmoyxvbdOKXiBjrR26TlxVdyduH2Cv5-gmiEcdwOmHhxC3GtbaRtTKKuxLK6Q1pukGtREIKARFQ3vojCysdyfWvJgJe1v-LML4CPrY491Ob8NBd6UWzkQBvD4DYvi-YMp6csniOILHsCTNW7bp1NrjIn31j3Qfllg-b1Vx0fKmpaqoxEllSyNSxOF3Mozqdcb0ecb0OmP6NGMl6uYUVZx_sP-L-AVYd9oX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2723724706</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative effectiveness of bisphosphonate treatments for the prevention of re-fracture in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>BMJ Open Access Journals</source><source>BMJ</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Chu, Hongmin ; Jang, Bo-Hyoung ; Kim, GaYoon ; Bae, Seowoo ; Lee, Hyeju ; Nam, Seonghee ; Ahn, Jeonghoon</creator><creatorcontrib>Chu, Hongmin ; Jang, Bo-Hyoung ; Kim, GaYoon ; Bae, Seowoo ; Lee, Hyeju ; Nam, Seonghee ; Ahn, Jeonghoon</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundLong-term usage of glucocorticoids results in a loss of bone mass and a higher risk of fracture, and the most common cause of secondary osteoporosis is glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP). For preventing GIOP, bisphosphonate (BP) is widely used. However, analysis on BP’s effect on the prevention of re-fracture is insufficient. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the comparative treatment effect and prevention of re-fracture according to the type of BP in GIOP as the basis for a reliable clinical strategy for patients.Methods and analysisWe will search electronic databases of the PubMed, Cochrane Library and EMBASE using a comprehensive search strategy in December 2021 with no language restriction. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, controlled trials and cohort studies evaluating the effectiveness of BP to the patients with GIOP will be included in this study. The primary outcome will be the incidence of hip, vertebral and other fractures. The secondary outcome will include percentage changes on the bone mineral density and incidence of re-fracture. Assessing risk of bias for included studies is done using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies–of Intervention tool. If quantitative synthesis is possible, a meta-analysis will be performed. A subgroup analysis will be conducted to compare re-fracture rate on the patients with GIOP who experience previous fractures. This study’s result will provide evidence for the effectiveness of BP in the prevention of re-fracture on patients with GIOP.Ethics and disseminationThe results will be disseminated through publishing in a peer-reviewed journal or public presentations. Ethical approval is not required as this is a systematic review of publicly available data.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022343787.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062537</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36167395</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Bias ; Bisphosphonates ; Bone diseases ; CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY ; Collaboration ; Drug dosages ; Fractures ; Medical Management ; Meta-analysis ; Missing data ; Observational studies ; Osteoporosis ; Protocols &amp; guidelines ; Steroids ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>BMJ open, 2022-09, Vol.12 (9), p.e062537-e062537</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2022 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b516t-506ea476a70e6154bbf4ba689d3134a10366689dacc2486c27c473d3e117cf993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b516t-506ea476a70e6154bbf4ba689d3134a10366689dacc2486c27c473d3e117cf993</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3058-7300 ; 0000-0002-9392-5699 ; 0000-0002-2141-3483 ; 0000-0003-3354-2802 ; 0000-0003-0171-0234 ; 0000-0002-0177-0192 ; 0000-0002-8123-388X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2723724706/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2723724706?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3181,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,55316,55325,75096,77565,77566,77629,77655</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chu, Hongmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Bo-Hyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, GaYoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bae, Seowoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyeju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Seonghee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Jeonghoon</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative effectiveness of bisphosphonate treatments for the prevention of re-fracture in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>BMJ open</title><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><description>BackgroundLong-term usage of glucocorticoids results in a loss of bone mass and a higher risk of fracture, and the most common cause of secondary osteoporosis is glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP). For preventing GIOP, bisphosphonate (BP) is widely used. However, analysis on BP’s effect on the prevention of re-fracture is insufficient. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the comparative treatment effect and prevention of re-fracture according to the type of BP in GIOP as the basis for a reliable clinical strategy for patients.Methods and analysisWe will search electronic databases of the PubMed, Cochrane Library and EMBASE using a comprehensive search strategy in December 2021 with no language restriction. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, controlled trials and cohort studies evaluating the effectiveness of BP to the patients with GIOP will be included in this study. The primary outcome will be the incidence of hip, vertebral and other fractures. The secondary outcome will include percentage changes on the bone mineral density and incidence of re-fracture. Assessing risk of bias for included studies is done using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies–of Intervention tool. If quantitative synthesis is possible, a meta-analysis will be performed. A subgroup analysis will be conducted to compare re-fracture rate on the patients with GIOP who experience previous fractures. This study’s result will provide evidence for the effectiveness of BP in the prevention of re-fracture on patients with GIOP.Ethics and disseminationThe results will be disseminated through publishing in a peer-reviewed journal or public presentations. Ethical approval is not required as this is a systematic review of publicly available data.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022343787.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Bisphosphonates</subject><subject>Bone diseases</subject><subject>CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Medical Management</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Missing data</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Protocols &amp; guidelines</subject><subject>Steroids</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>2044-6055</issn><issn>2044-6055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks1u1DAQxyMEolXpE3CxxIVLqD9iZ8MBCVV8VKrEBc7W2JnsepXYwXYW7XPxgjjdFVAOWLI89vznpxnPVNVLRt8wJtSNmfZhRl9zynlNFZeifVJdcto0taJSPv3LvqiuU9rTshrZScmfVxdCMdWKTl5WP2_DNEOE7A5IcBjQrpbHlEgYiHFp3oV1e8hIckTIE_qcyBAiyTskc8Qizy74VR-xHiLYvEQkzpPtuNhgQ8zOBtfXzveLxZ6ElDHMIYbk0ttCCLmIxgckkHQs3qnkYwvt4PAHAd-TCTPU4GE8lpgX1bMBxoTX5_Oq-vbxw9fbz_X9l093t-_vayOZyrWkCqFpFbQUFZONMUNjQG26XjDRAKNCqfUG1vJmoyxvbdOKXiBjrR26TlxVdyduH2Cv5-gmiEcdwOmHhxC3GtbaRtTKKuxLK6Q1pukGtREIKARFQ3vojCysdyfWvJgJe1v-LML4CPrY491Ob8NBd6UWzkQBvD4DYvi-YMp6csniOILHsCTNW7bp1NrjIn31j3Qfllg-b1Vx0fKmpaqoxEllSyNSxOF3Mozqdcb0ecb0OmP6NGMl6uYUVZx_sP-L-AVYd9oX</recordid><startdate>20220926</startdate><enddate>20220926</enddate><creator>Chu, Hongmin</creator><creator>Jang, Bo-Hyoung</creator><creator>Kim, GaYoon</creator><creator>Bae, Seowoo</creator><creator>Lee, Hyeju</creator><creator>Nam, Seonghee</creator><creator>Ahn, Jeonghoon</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3058-7300</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9392-5699</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2141-3483</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3354-2802</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0171-0234</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0177-0192</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8123-388X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220926</creationdate><title>Comparative effectiveness of bisphosphonate treatments for the prevention of re-fracture in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Chu, Hongmin ; Jang, Bo-Hyoung ; Kim, GaYoon ; Bae, Seowoo ; Lee, Hyeju ; Nam, Seonghee ; Ahn, Jeonghoon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b516t-506ea476a70e6154bbf4ba689d3134a10366689dacc2486c27c473d3e117cf993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Bisphosphonates</topic><topic>Bone diseases</topic><topic>CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Medical Management</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Missing data</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Protocols &amp; guidelines</topic><topic>Steroids</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chu, Hongmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Bo-Hyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, GaYoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bae, Seowoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyeju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Seonghee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Jeonghoon</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chu, Hongmin</au><au>Jang, Bo-Hyoung</au><au>Kim, GaYoon</au><au>Bae, Seowoo</au><au>Lee, Hyeju</au><au>Nam, Seonghee</au><au>Ahn, Jeonghoon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative effectiveness of bisphosphonate treatments for the prevention of re-fracture in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle><stitle>BMJ Open</stitle><date>2022-09-26</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e062537</spage><epage>e062537</epage><pages>e062537-e062537</pages><issn>2044-6055</issn><eissn>2044-6055</eissn><abstract>BackgroundLong-term usage of glucocorticoids results in a loss of bone mass and a higher risk of fracture, and the most common cause of secondary osteoporosis is glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP). For preventing GIOP, bisphosphonate (BP) is widely used. However, analysis on BP’s effect on the prevention of re-fracture is insufficient. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the comparative treatment effect and prevention of re-fracture according to the type of BP in GIOP as the basis for a reliable clinical strategy for patients.Methods and analysisWe will search electronic databases of the PubMed, Cochrane Library and EMBASE using a comprehensive search strategy in December 2021 with no language restriction. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, controlled trials and cohort studies evaluating the effectiveness of BP to the patients with GIOP will be included in this study. The primary outcome will be the incidence of hip, vertebral and other fractures. The secondary outcome will include percentage changes on the bone mineral density and incidence of re-fracture. Assessing risk of bias for included studies is done using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies–of Intervention tool. If quantitative synthesis is possible, a meta-analysis will be performed. A subgroup analysis will be conducted to compare re-fracture rate on the patients with GIOP who experience previous fractures. This study’s result will provide evidence for the effectiveness of BP in the prevention of re-fracture on patients with GIOP.Ethics and disseminationThe results will be disseminated through publishing in a peer-reviewed journal or public presentations. Ethical approval is not required as this is a systematic review of publicly available data.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022343787.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><pmid>36167395</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062537</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3058-7300</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9392-5699</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2141-3483</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3354-2802</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0171-0234</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0177-0192</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8123-388X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2044-6055
ispartof BMJ open, 2022-09, Vol.12 (9), p.e062537-e062537
issn 2044-6055
2044-6055
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6c6ed0225cbb49f683eae330eb0da9b5
source BMJ Open Access Journals; BMJ; Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Bias
Bisphosphonates
Bone diseases
CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY
Collaboration
Drug dosages
Fractures
Medical Management
Meta-analysis
Missing data
Observational studies
Osteoporosis
Protocols & guidelines
Steroids
Systematic review
title Comparative effectiveness of bisphosphonate treatments for the prevention of re-fracture in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T08%3A46%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20effectiveness%20of%20bisphosphonate%20treatments%20for%20the%20prevention%20of%20re-fracture%20in%20glucocorticoid-induced%20osteoporosis:%20protocol%20for%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20open&rft.au=Chu,%20Hongmin&rft.date=2022-09-26&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e062537&rft.epage=e062537&rft.pages=e062537-e062537&rft.issn=2044-6055&rft.eissn=2044-6055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062537&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2723724706%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b516t-506ea476a70e6154bbf4ba689d3134a10366689dacc2486c27c473d3e117cf993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2723724706&rft_id=info:pmid/36167395&rfr_iscdi=true