A Review of the Effects of Valenced Odors on Face Perception and Evaluation

How do valenced odors affect the perception and evaluation of facial expressions? We reviewed 25 studies published from 1989 to 2020 on cross-modal behavioral effects of odors on the perception of faces. The results indicate that odors may influence facial evaluations and classifications in several...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:i-Perception (London) 2021-03, Vol.12 (2), p.20416695211009552-20416695211009552
Main Authors: Syrjänen, Elmeri, Fischer, Håkan, Liuzza, Marco Tullio, Lindholm, Torun, Olofsson, Jonas K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Face
face perception
multisensory/cross-modal processing
odor
Psychology
psykologi
review
Sensory perception
Smell
Special Issue: Our Unique Sense of Smell
Visual perception
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:How do valenced odors affect the perception and evaluation of facial expressions? We reviewed 25 studies published from 1989 to 2020 on cross-modal behavioral effects of odors on the perception of faces. The results indicate that odors may influence facial evaluations and classifications in several ways. Faces are rated as more arousing during simultaneous odor exposure, and the rated valence of faces is affected in the direction of the odor valence. For facial classification tasks, in general, valenced odors, whether pleasant or unpleasant, decrease facial emotion classification speed. The evidence for valence congruency effects was inconsistent. Some studies found that exposure to a valenced odor facilitates the processing of a similarly valenced facial expression. The results for facial evaluation were mirrored in classical conditioning studies, as faces conditioned with valenced odors were rated in the direction of the odor valence. However, the evidence of odor effects was inconsistent when the task was to classify faces. Furthermore, using a z-curve analysis, we found clear evidence for publication bias. Our recommendations for future research include greater consideration of individual differences in sensation and cognition, individual differences (e.g., differences in odor sensitivity related to age, gender, or culture), establishing standardized experimental assessments and stimuli, larger study samples, and embracing open research practices.
ISSN:2041-6695
2041-6695
DOI:10.1177/20416695211009552