Voices of the Future: Junior Physicians’ Experiences of Discussing Life-Sustaining Treatments With Hospitalized Patients

• Published in: Journal of medical education and curricular development 2024-01, Vol.11, p.23821205241277334
• Main Authors: Müller, Michael Andreas, Gamondi, Claudia, Truchard, Eve Rubli, Sterie, Anca-Cristina
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Decision making; English for Science and Technology; Learning Strategies; Patients; Physicians
• ISSN: 2382-1205; 2382-1205
• DOI: 10.1177/23821205241277334

OBJECTIVES Life-sustaining treatments (LST) aim to prolong life without reversing the underlying medical condition. Being associated with a high risk of developing unwanted adverse outcomes, decisions about LST are routinely discussed with patients at hospital admission, particularly when it comes to cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Physicians may encounter many challenges when enforcing shared decision-making in this domain. In this study, we map out how junior physicians in Southern Switzerland refer to their experiences when conducting LST discussions with hospitalized patients and their learning strategies related to this. METHODS In this qualitative exploratory study, we conducted semi-directive interviews with junior physicians working at the regional public hospital in Southern Switzerland and analyzed them with an inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS Nine physicians participated. We identified 3 themes: emotional burden, learning strategies and practices for conducting discussions. Participants reported feeling unprepared and often distressed when discussing LST with patients. Factors associated with emotional burden were related to the context and to how physicians developed and managed their emotions. Participants signaled having received insufficient education to prepare for discussing LST. They reported learning to discuss LST essentially through trial and error but particularly appreciated the possibility of mentoring and experiential training. Explanations that physicians gave about LST took into account patients’ frequent misconceptions. Physicians reported feeling under pressure to ensure that decisions documented were medically indicated and being more at ease when patients decided by themselves to limit treatments. Communication was deemed as an important skill. CONCLUSIONS Junior physicians experienced conducting LST discussions as challenging and felt caught between advocating for medically relevant decisions and respecting patients’ autonomy. Participants reported a substantive emotional burden and feeling unprepared for this task, essentially because of a lack of adequate training. Interventions aiming to ameliorate junior physicians’ competency in discussing LST can positively affect their personal experiences and decisional outcomes.