The Crop Succession Systems Under No-Tillage Alters the Surface Layer Soil Carbon Stock and Stability

• Published in: Agriculture (Basel) 2024-11, Vol.14 (11), p.2085
• Main Authors: de Souza, Paloma Pimentel, Machado, Deivid Lopes, de Freitas, Micael Silva, Bezerra, Aracy Camilla Tardin Pinheiro, Guimarães, Tiara Moraes, da Silva, Eder Marcos, do Nascimento, Natanael Moreira, Borges, Rafael da Silva, Costa, Vladimir Eliodoro, Costa, Claudio Hideo Martins da, Cruz, Simério Carlos Silva
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agricultural practices; Autumn; Biomass; Carbon; Carbon 13; Carbon content; Carbon sequestration; Cereal crops; Composite materials; Corn; Cover crops; crop diversification; Crop residues; Crops; Decomposition; Density; Ecological succession; Experiments; Fractionation; Grain size; Harvest; Microorganisms; Millet; Nitrogen; No-till cropping; No-tillage; Organic carbon; Organic matter; Organic soils; pearl millet; Pennisetum glaucum; physical fractionation; Porosity; Productivity; soil carbon pool; Soil density; Soil layers; Soil organic matter; Soil porosity; Soil stability; Soil stabilization; Soil structure; Soil testing; Soils; Soybean; Soybeans; Stocks; Summer; Surface layers; Surface stability; Tillage; Total organic carbon; Tropical environment; Tropical environments; Urochloa ruziziensis; Vegetables; Winter; Zea mays
• ISSN: 2077-0472; 2077-0472
• DOI: 10.3390/agriculture14112085

The main challenge of the no-tillage system (NTS) is to reconcile productivity, the maintenance of surface residues, and the stabilization of soil organic matter (SOM). To address this challenge, particularly in tropical regions, various cover crops have been tested. The objective of this study was to test the effects of agricultural crop succession systems on the stock and stability of soil organic carbon in different surface layers of the soils. The research was carried out in the state of Goiás, Brazil, in an experiment set up in 2016, designed in randomized blocks with a split-plot scheme (treatments and soil layers), comprising four repetitions (blocks). The treatments (plots) consisted of crops grown in succession to soybean, which were as follows: T1—soybean/corn (Zea mays); T2—soybean/pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum); T3—soybean/Urochloa ruziziensis (brachiaria); and T4—corn + Urochloa ruziziensis. The subplots represented the following soil layers: 0–5, 5–10, 10–20, and 20–40 cm. We evaluated the biomass dry mass and the soil parameters such as soil density, total porosity, and light organic matter across all layers. The organic carbon, grain size fractionation (mineral-associated organic carbon—MOC; sand-sized carbon—POC), and isotopic composition (δ13C) were determined in the 0–5 and 5–10 cm layers. The highest biomass dry production was observed in the soybean/pearl millet succession, which reduced the soil density and increased the total porosity in the surface layer. The soybean/pearl millet treatment produced high amounts of light organic matter, particularly in the 0–5 cm layer, a result also found for the soybean/brachiaria and soybean/corn + brachiaria systems. The crop successions did not alter the soil carbon stock or stability; however, the surface layer stored the highest amount of carbon, with elevated total organic carbon values and carbon stocks and stability (MOC and POC). Overall, in this study, replacing corn with other crops in succession with soybean did not affect the stock or stability of soil organic carbon. The species grown in succession with soybean contributed to the higher surface carbon stock and stability, promoting the formation of more stable and recalcitrant carbon.