On the robust drivers of cryptocurrency liquidity: the case of Bitcoin

This study aims to identify the factors that robustly contribute to Bitcoin liquidity, employing a rich range of potential determinants that represent unique characteristics of the cryptocurrency industry, investor attention, macroeconomic fundamentals, and global stress and uncertainty. To construc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Financial innovation (Heidelberg) 2024-12, Vol.10 (1), p.69-32, Article 69
Main Author: Ahmed, Walid M. A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bitcoin
Digital currencies
Economics
Economics and Finance
Extreme bounds analysis
Liquidity
Liquidity determinants
Macroeconomics
Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics
Market microstructure
Political Economy/Economic Systems
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study aims to identify the factors that robustly contribute to Bitcoin liquidity, employing a rich range of potential determinants that represent unique characteristics of the cryptocurrency industry, investor attention, macroeconomic fundamentals, and global stress and uncertainty. To construct liquidity metrics, we compile 60-min high-frequency data on the low, high, opening, and closing exchange rates of Bitcoin against the US dollar. Our empirical investigation is based on the extreme bounds analysis (EBA), which can resolve model uncertainty issues. The results of Leamer’s version of the EBA suggest that the realized volatility of Bitcoin is the sole variable relevant to explaining liquidity. With the Sala-i-Martin’s variant of EBA, however, four more variables, (viz. Bitcoin’s negative returns, trading volume, hash rates, and Google search volume) are also labeled as robust determinants. Accordingly, our evidence confirms that Bitcoin-specific factors and developments, rather than global macroeconomic and financial variables, matter for explaining its liquidity. The findings are largely insensitive to our proxy of liquidity and to the estimation method used.
ISSN:2199-4730
2199-4730
DOI:10.1186/s40854-023-00598-9