Calculating uncertainty for the RICE ice core continuous flow analysis water isotope record

We describe a systematic approach to the calibration and uncertainty estimation of a high-resolution continuous flow analysis (CFA) water isotope (δ2H, δ18O) record from the Roosevelt Island Climate Evolution (RICE) Antarctic ice core. Our method establishes robust uncertainty estimates for CFA δ2H...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric measurement techniques 2018-08, Vol.11 (8), p.4725-4736
Main Authors: Keller, Elizabeth D, Baisden, W. Troy, Bertler, Nancy A. N, Emanuelsson, B. Daniel, Canessa, Silvia, Phillips, Andy
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analysis
Antarctic ice
Calibration
Climatic evolution
Contamination
Continuous flow
Data
Data processing
Drills
Errors
High resolution
Ice
Ice cores
Isotopes
Mathematical analysis
Properties
Resolution
Uncertainty
Variance analysis
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We describe a systematic approach to the calibration and uncertainty estimation of a high-resolution continuous flow analysis (CFA) water isotope (δ2H, δ18O) record from the Roosevelt Island Climate Evolution (RICE) Antarctic ice core. Our method establishes robust uncertainty estimates for CFA δ2H and δ18O measurements, comparable to those reported for discrete sample δ2H and δ18O analysis. Data were calibrated using a time-weighted two-point linear calibration with two standards measured both before and after continuously melting 3 or 4 m of ice core. The error at each data point was calculated as the quadrature sum of three factors: Allan variance error, scatter over our averaging interval (error of the variance) and calibration error (error of the mean). Final mean total uncertainty for the entire record is δ2H=0.74 ‰ and δ18O=0.21 ‰. Uncertainties vary through the data set and were exacerbated by a range of factors, which typically could not be isolated due to the requirements of the multi-instrument CFA campaign. These factors likely occurred in combination and included ice quality, ice breaks, upstream equipment failure, contamination with drill fluid and leaks or valve degradation. We demonstrate that our methodology for documenting uncertainty was effective across periods of uneven system performance and delivered a significant achievement in the precision of high-resolution CFA water isotope measurements.
ISSN:1867-8548
1867-1381
1867-8548
DOI:10.5194/amt-11-4725-2018