Loading…
Return to work factors and vocational rehabilitation interventions for long-term, partially disabled workers: a modified Delphi study among vocational rehabilitation professionals
Long-term disability has a great impact on both society and workers with disabilities. Little is known about the barriers which prohibit workers with long-term disabilities from returning to work and which interventions are best suited to counteract these barriers. The main purpose of this study was...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC public health 2022-05, Vol.22 (1), p.875-875, Article 875 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4086-85ad35061034c8e3f5961a702bdd9a1db9ffbe48a7b696b7066fa9816a833d8b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4086-85ad35061034c8e3f5961a702bdd9a1db9ffbe48a7b696b7066fa9816a833d8b3 |
container_end_page | 875 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 875 |
container_title | BMC public health |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | de Geus, Christa J C Huysmans, Maaike A van Rijssen, H Jolanda Anema, Johannes R |
description | Long-term disability has a great impact on both society and workers with disabilities. Little is known about the barriers which prohibit workers with long-term disabilities from returning to work and which interventions are best suited to counteract these barriers. The main purpose of this study was to obtain consensus among professionals on important return to work (RTW) factors and effective vocational rehabilitation (VR) interventions for long-term (> 2 years), partially disabled workers. Our three research questions were: (1) which factors are associated with RTW for long-term disabled workers?; (2) which factors associated with RTW can be targeted by VR interventions?; and (3) which VR interventions are the most effective to target these factors?
A modified Delphi Study was conducted using a panel of 22 labour experts, caseworkers, and insurance physicians. The study consisted of several rounds of questionnaires and one online meeting.
The multidisciplinary panel reached consensus that 58 out of 67 factors were important for RTW and that 35 of these factors could be targeted using VR interventions. In five rounds, the expert panel reached consensus that 11 out of 22 VR interventions were effective for at least one of the eight most important RTW factors.
Consensus was reached among the expert panel that many factors that are important for the RTW of short-term disabled workers are also important for the RTW of long-term partially disabled workers and that a substantial number of these factors could effectively be targeted using VR interventions. The results of this study will be used to develop a decision aid that supports vocational rehabilitation professionals in profiling clients and in choosing suitable VR interventions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12889-022-13295-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6f6eb0b9302a4bd38ee6646ba86df266</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A702345566</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6f6eb0b9302a4bd38ee6646ba86df266</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A702345566</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4086-85ad35061034c8e3f5961a702bdd9a1db9ffbe48a7b696b7066fa9816a833d8b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Ustu1DAUjRCIlsIPsECW2LAgxY_YcVggVeVVqRISgrV1HdszHpJ4sJNB8138IE6mlA5COAs7x-cc-16fonhK8DkhUrxKhErZlJjSkjDa8FLcK05JVZOSVlzev7M-KR6ltMGY1JLTh8UJ4zyvWX1a_PxsxykOaAzoR4jfkIN2DDEhGAzahRZGHwboULRr0L7z4wIgP4w27uww_yTkQkRdGFZlBvuXaAtx9NB1e2R8At1Zs1jbmF4jQH0w3vmMvbXddu1RGiezR9Bn_X8O3MbgbErLXnpcPHB5sk9u5rPi6_t3Xy4_ltefPlxdXlyXbYWlKCUHwzgWBLOqlZY53ggCNabamAaI0Y1z2lYSai0aoWsshINGEgGSMSM1OyuuDr4mwEZto-8h7lUArxYgxJWaS207q4QTVmPdMEyh0oZJa4WohAYpjKNCZK83B6_tpHtr2ty7CN2R6fHO4NdqFXaqwYLlp8oGL24MYvg-2TSq3qfWdh0MNkxJUcEbSiXnMlOf_0XdhPzGuVWZNQ-JGf7DWkEuwA8u5HPb2VRd5CaxivPl3uf_YOXP2N63YbDOZ_xIQA-CNoaUonW3NRKs5tiqQ2xVjq1aYqtm0bO73bmV_M4p-wVh7uy0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2666668030</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Return to work factors and vocational rehabilitation interventions for long-term, partially disabled workers: a modified Delphi study among vocational rehabilitation professionals</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>de Geus, Christa J C ; Huysmans, Maaike A ; van Rijssen, H Jolanda ; Anema, Johannes R</creator><creatorcontrib>de Geus, Christa J C ; Huysmans, Maaike A ; van Rijssen, H Jolanda ; Anema, Johannes R</creatorcontrib><description>Long-term disability has a great impact on both society and workers with disabilities. Little is known about the barriers which prohibit workers with long-term disabilities from returning to work and which interventions are best suited to counteract these barriers. The main purpose of this study was to obtain consensus among professionals on important return to work (RTW) factors and effective vocational rehabilitation (VR) interventions for long-term (> 2 years), partially disabled workers. Our three research questions were: (1) which factors are associated with RTW for long-term disabled workers?; (2) which factors associated with RTW can be targeted by VR interventions?; and (3) which VR interventions are the most effective to target these factors?
A modified Delphi Study was conducted using a panel of 22 labour experts, caseworkers, and insurance physicians. The study consisted of several rounds of questionnaires and one online meeting.
The multidisciplinary panel reached consensus that 58 out of 67 factors were important for RTW and that 35 of these factors could be targeted using VR interventions. In five rounds, the expert panel reached consensus that 11 out of 22 VR interventions were effective for at least one of the eight most important RTW factors.
Consensus was reached among the expert panel that many factors that are important for the RTW of short-term disabled workers are also important for the RTW of long-term partially disabled workers and that a substantial number of these factors could effectively be targeted using VR interventions. The results of this study will be used to develop a decision aid that supports vocational rehabilitation professionals in profiling clients and in choosing suitable VR interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2458</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2458</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13295-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35501737</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Care and treatment ; Decision aid ; Delphi method ; Delphi Technique ; Disabilities ; Disability pension ; Disability pensions ; Disabled persons ; Disabled Persons - rehabilitation ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Insurance physicians ; Labour experts ; Long-term sick leave ; Patient outcomes ; Physicians ; Professionals ; Public health ; Questionnaires ; Rehabilitation ; Rehabilitation, Vocational - methods ; Return to Work ; Sick leave ; Social aspects ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Vocational rehabilitation ; Workers ; Workers with disabilities</subject><ispartof>BMC public health, 2022-05, Vol.22 (1), p.875-875, Article 875</ispartof><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4086-85ad35061034c8e3f5961a702bdd9a1db9ffbe48a7b696b7066fa9816a833d8b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4086-85ad35061034c8e3f5961a702bdd9a1db9ffbe48a7b696b7066fa9816a833d8b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9063173/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2666668030?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35501737$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Geus, Christa J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huysmans, Maaike A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Rijssen, H Jolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anema, Johannes R</creatorcontrib><title>Return to work factors and vocational rehabilitation interventions for long-term, partially disabled workers: a modified Delphi study among vocational rehabilitation professionals</title><title>BMC public health</title><addtitle>BMC Public Health</addtitle><description>Long-term disability has a great impact on both society and workers with disabilities. Little is known about the barriers which prohibit workers with long-term disabilities from returning to work and which interventions are best suited to counteract these barriers. The main purpose of this study was to obtain consensus among professionals on important return to work (RTW) factors and effective vocational rehabilitation (VR) interventions for long-term (> 2 years), partially disabled workers. Our three research questions were: (1) which factors are associated with RTW for long-term disabled workers?; (2) which factors associated with RTW can be targeted by VR interventions?; and (3) which VR interventions are the most effective to target these factors?
A modified Delphi Study was conducted using a panel of 22 labour experts, caseworkers, and insurance physicians. The study consisted of several rounds of questionnaires and one online meeting.
The multidisciplinary panel reached consensus that 58 out of 67 factors were important for RTW and that 35 of these factors could be targeted using VR interventions. In five rounds, the expert panel reached consensus that 11 out of 22 VR interventions were effective for at least one of the eight most important RTW factors.
Consensus was reached among the expert panel that many factors that are important for the RTW of short-term disabled workers are also important for the RTW of long-term partially disabled workers and that a substantial number of these factors could effectively be targeted using VR interventions. The results of this study will be used to develop a decision aid that supports vocational rehabilitation professionals in profiling clients and in choosing suitable VR interventions.</description><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Decision aid</subject><subject>Delphi method</subject><subject>Delphi Technique</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Disability pension</subject><subject>Disability pensions</subject><subject>Disabled persons</subject><subject>Disabled Persons - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance physicians</subject><subject>Labour experts</subject><subject>Long-term sick leave</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Rehabilitation, Vocational - methods</subject><subject>Return to Work</subject><subject>Sick leave</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Vocational rehabilitation</subject><subject>Workers</subject><subject>Workers with disabilities</subject><issn>1471-2458</issn><issn>1471-2458</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Ustu1DAUjRCIlsIPsECW2LAgxY_YcVggVeVVqRISgrV1HdszHpJ4sJNB8138IE6mlA5COAs7x-cc-16fonhK8DkhUrxKhErZlJjSkjDa8FLcK05JVZOSVlzev7M-KR6ltMGY1JLTh8UJ4zyvWX1a_PxsxykOaAzoR4jfkIN2DDEhGAzahRZGHwboULRr0L7z4wIgP4w27uww_yTkQkRdGFZlBvuXaAtx9NB1e2R8At1Zs1jbmF4jQH0w3vmMvbXddu1RGiezR9Bn_X8O3MbgbErLXnpcPHB5sk9u5rPi6_t3Xy4_ltefPlxdXlyXbYWlKCUHwzgWBLOqlZY53ggCNabamAaI0Y1z2lYSai0aoWsshINGEgGSMSM1OyuuDr4mwEZto-8h7lUArxYgxJWaS207q4QTVmPdMEyh0oZJa4WohAYpjKNCZK83B6_tpHtr2ty7CN2R6fHO4NdqFXaqwYLlp8oGL24MYvg-2TSq3qfWdh0MNkxJUcEbSiXnMlOf_0XdhPzGuVWZNQ-JGf7DWkEuwA8u5HPb2VRd5CaxivPl3uf_YOXP2N63YbDOZ_xIQA-CNoaUonW3NRKs5tiqQ2xVjq1aYqtm0bO73bmV_M4p-wVh7uy0</recordid><startdate>20220502</startdate><enddate>20220502</enddate><creator>de Geus, Christa J C</creator><creator>Huysmans, Maaike A</creator><creator>van Rijssen, H Jolanda</creator><creator>Anema, Johannes R</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220502</creationdate><title>Return to work factors and vocational rehabilitation interventions for long-term, partially disabled workers: a modified Delphi study among vocational rehabilitation professionals</title><author>de Geus, Christa J C ; Huysmans, Maaike A ; van Rijssen, H Jolanda ; Anema, Johannes R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4086-85ad35061034c8e3f5961a702bdd9a1db9ffbe48a7b696b7066fa9816a833d8b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Decision aid</topic><topic>Delphi method</topic><topic>Delphi Technique</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Disability pension</topic><topic>Disability pensions</topic><topic>Disabled persons</topic><topic>Disabled Persons - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance physicians</topic><topic>Labour experts</topic><topic>Long-term sick leave</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Rehabilitation, Vocational - methods</topic><topic>Return to Work</topic><topic>Sick leave</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Vocational rehabilitation</topic><topic>Workers</topic><topic>Workers with disabilities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Geus, Christa J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huysmans, Maaike A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Rijssen, H Jolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anema, Johannes R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Geus, Christa J C</au><au>Huysmans, Maaike A</au><au>van Rijssen, H Jolanda</au><au>Anema, Johannes R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Return to work factors and vocational rehabilitation interventions for long-term, partially disabled workers: a modified Delphi study among vocational rehabilitation professionals</atitle><jtitle>BMC public health</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Public Health</addtitle><date>2022-05-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>875</spage><epage>875</epage><pages>875-875</pages><artnum>875</artnum><issn>1471-2458</issn><eissn>1471-2458</eissn><abstract>Long-term disability has a great impact on both society and workers with disabilities. Little is known about the barriers which prohibit workers with long-term disabilities from returning to work and which interventions are best suited to counteract these barriers. The main purpose of this study was to obtain consensus among professionals on important return to work (RTW) factors and effective vocational rehabilitation (VR) interventions for long-term (> 2 years), partially disabled workers. Our three research questions were: (1) which factors are associated with RTW for long-term disabled workers?; (2) which factors associated with RTW can be targeted by VR interventions?; and (3) which VR interventions are the most effective to target these factors?
A modified Delphi Study was conducted using a panel of 22 labour experts, caseworkers, and insurance physicians. The study consisted of several rounds of questionnaires and one online meeting.
The multidisciplinary panel reached consensus that 58 out of 67 factors were important for RTW and that 35 of these factors could be targeted using VR interventions. In five rounds, the expert panel reached consensus that 11 out of 22 VR interventions were effective for at least one of the eight most important RTW factors.
Consensus was reached among the expert panel that many factors that are important for the RTW of short-term disabled workers are also important for the RTW of long-term partially disabled workers and that a substantial number of these factors could effectively be targeted using VR interventions. The results of this study will be used to develop a decision aid that supports vocational rehabilitation professionals in profiling clients and in choosing suitable VR interventions.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>35501737</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12889-022-13295-6</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-2458 |
ispartof | BMC public health, 2022-05, Vol.22 (1), p.875-875, Article 875 |
issn | 1471-2458 1471-2458 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6f6eb0b9302a4bd38ee6646ba86df266 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Care and treatment Decision aid Delphi method Delphi Technique Disabilities Disability pension Disability pensions Disabled persons Disabled Persons - rehabilitation Health aspects Humans Insurance physicians Labour experts Long-term sick leave Patient outcomes Physicians Professionals Public health Questionnaires Rehabilitation Rehabilitation, Vocational - methods Return to Work Sick leave Social aspects Surveys and Questionnaires Vocational rehabilitation Workers Workers with disabilities |
title | Return to work factors and vocational rehabilitation interventions for long-term, partially disabled workers: a modified Delphi study among vocational rehabilitation professionals |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A15%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Return%20to%20work%20factors%20and%20vocational%20rehabilitation%20interventions%20for%20long-term,%20partially%20disabled%20workers:%20a%20modified%20Delphi%20study%20among%20vocational%20rehabilitation%20professionals&rft.jtitle=BMC%20public%20health&rft.au=de%20Geus,%20Christa%20J%20C&rft.date=2022-05-02&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=875&rft.epage=875&rft.pages=875-875&rft.artnum=875&rft.issn=1471-2458&rft.eissn=1471-2458&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12889-022-13295-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA702345566%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4086-85ad35061034c8e3f5961a702bdd9a1db9ffbe48a7b696b7066fa9816a833d8b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2666668030&rft_id=info:pmid/35501737&rft_galeid=A702345566&rfr_iscdi=true |