Loading…

Return to work factors and vocational rehabilitation interventions for long-term, partially disabled workers: a modified Delphi study among vocational rehabilitation professionals

Long-term disability has a great impact on both society and workers with disabilities. Little is known about the barriers which prohibit workers with long-term disabilities from returning to work and which interventions are best suited to counteract these barriers. The main purpose of this study was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC public health 2022-05, Vol.22 (1), p.875-875, Article 875
Main Authors: de Geus, Christa J C, Huysmans, Maaike A, van Rijssen, H Jolanda, Anema, Johannes R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4086-85ad35061034c8e3f5961a702bdd9a1db9ffbe48a7b696b7066fa9816a833d8b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4086-85ad35061034c8e3f5961a702bdd9a1db9ffbe48a7b696b7066fa9816a833d8b3
container_end_page 875
container_issue 1
container_start_page 875
container_title BMC public health
container_volume 22
creator de Geus, Christa J C
Huysmans, Maaike A
van Rijssen, H Jolanda
Anema, Johannes R
description Long-term disability has a great impact on both society and workers with disabilities. Little is known about the barriers which prohibit workers with long-term disabilities from returning to work and which interventions are best suited to counteract these barriers. The main purpose of this study was to obtain consensus among professionals on important return to work (RTW) factors and effective vocational rehabilitation (VR) interventions for long-term (> 2 years), partially disabled workers. Our three research questions were: (1) which factors are associated with RTW for long-term disabled workers?; (2) which factors associated with RTW can be targeted by VR interventions?; and (3) which VR interventions are the most effective to target these factors? A modified Delphi Study was conducted using a panel of 22 labour experts, caseworkers, and insurance physicians. The study consisted of several rounds of questionnaires and one online meeting. The multidisciplinary panel reached consensus that 58 out of 67 factors were important for RTW and that 35 of these factors could be targeted using VR interventions. In five rounds, the expert panel reached consensus that 11 out of 22 VR interventions were effective for at least one of the eight most important RTW factors. Consensus was reached among the expert panel that many factors that are important for the RTW of short-term disabled workers are also important for the RTW of long-term partially disabled workers and that a substantial number of these factors could effectively be targeted using VR interventions. The results of this study will be used to develop a decision aid that supports vocational rehabilitation professionals in profiling clients and in choosing suitable VR interventions.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12889-022-13295-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6f6eb0b9302a4bd38ee6646ba86df266</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A702345566</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6f6eb0b9302a4bd38ee6646ba86df266</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A702345566</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4086-85ad35061034c8e3f5961a702bdd9a1db9ffbe48a7b696b7066fa9816a833d8b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Ustu1DAUjRCIlsIPsECW2LAgxY_YcVggVeVVqRISgrV1HdszHpJ4sJNB8138IE6mlA5COAs7x-cc-16fonhK8DkhUrxKhErZlJjSkjDa8FLcK05JVZOSVlzev7M-KR6ltMGY1JLTh8UJ4zyvWX1a_PxsxykOaAzoR4jfkIN2DDEhGAzahRZGHwboULRr0L7z4wIgP4w27uww_yTkQkRdGFZlBvuXaAtx9NB1e2R8At1Zs1jbmF4jQH0w3vmMvbXddu1RGiezR9Bn_X8O3MbgbErLXnpcPHB5sk9u5rPi6_t3Xy4_ltefPlxdXlyXbYWlKCUHwzgWBLOqlZY53ggCNabamAaI0Y1z2lYSai0aoWsshINGEgGSMSM1OyuuDr4mwEZto-8h7lUArxYgxJWaS207q4QTVmPdMEyh0oZJa4WohAYpjKNCZK83B6_tpHtr2ty7CN2R6fHO4NdqFXaqwYLlp8oGL24MYvg-2TSq3qfWdh0MNkxJUcEbSiXnMlOf_0XdhPzGuVWZNQ-JGf7DWkEuwA8u5HPb2VRd5CaxivPl3uf_YOXP2N63YbDOZ_xIQA-CNoaUonW3NRKs5tiqQ2xVjq1aYqtm0bO73bmV_M4p-wVh7uy0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2666668030</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Return to work factors and vocational rehabilitation interventions for long-term, partially disabled workers: a modified Delphi study among vocational rehabilitation professionals</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>de Geus, Christa J C ; Huysmans, Maaike A ; van Rijssen, H Jolanda ; Anema, Johannes R</creator><creatorcontrib>de Geus, Christa J C ; Huysmans, Maaike A ; van Rijssen, H Jolanda ; Anema, Johannes R</creatorcontrib><description>Long-term disability has a great impact on both society and workers with disabilities. Little is known about the barriers which prohibit workers with long-term disabilities from returning to work and which interventions are best suited to counteract these barriers. The main purpose of this study was to obtain consensus among professionals on important return to work (RTW) factors and effective vocational rehabilitation (VR) interventions for long-term (&gt; 2 years), partially disabled workers. Our three research questions were: (1) which factors are associated with RTW for long-term disabled workers?; (2) which factors associated with RTW can be targeted by VR interventions?; and (3) which VR interventions are the most effective to target these factors? A modified Delphi Study was conducted using a panel of 22 labour experts, caseworkers, and insurance physicians. The study consisted of several rounds of questionnaires and one online meeting. The multidisciplinary panel reached consensus that 58 out of 67 factors were important for RTW and that 35 of these factors could be targeted using VR interventions. In five rounds, the expert panel reached consensus that 11 out of 22 VR interventions were effective for at least one of the eight most important RTW factors. Consensus was reached among the expert panel that many factors that are important for the RTW of short-term disabled workers are also important for the RTW of long-term partially disabled workers and that a substantial number of these factors could effectively be targeted using VR interventions. The results of this study will be used to develop a decision aid that supports vocational rehabilitation professionals in profiling clients and in choosing suitable VR interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2458</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2458</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13295-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35501737</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Care and treatment ; Decision aid ; Delphi method ; Delphi Technique ; Disabilities ; Disability pension ; Disability pensions ; Disabled persons ; Disabled Persons - rehabilitation ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Insurance physicians ; Labour experts ; Long-term sick leave ; Patient outcomes ; Physicians ; Professionals ; Public health ; Questionnaires ; Rehabilitation ; Rehabilitation, Vocational - methods ; Return to Work ; Sick leave ; Social aspects ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Vocational rehabilitation ; Workers ; Workers with disabilities</subject><ispartof>BMC public health, 2022-05, Vol.22 (1), p.875-875, Article 875</ispartof><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4086-85ad35061034c8e3f5961a702bdd9a1db9ffbe48a7b696b7066fa9816a833d8b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4086-85ad35061034c8e3f5961a702bdd9a1db9ffbe48a7b696b7066fa9816a833d8b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9063173/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2666668030?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35501737$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Geus, Christa J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huysmans, Maaike A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Rijssen, H Jolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anema, Johannes R</creatorcontrib><title>Return to work factors and vocational rehabilitation interventions for long-term, partially disabled workers: a modified Delphi study among vocational rehabilitation professionals</title><title>BMC public health</title><addtitle>BMC Public Health</addtitle><description>Long-term disability has a great impact on both society and workers with disabilities. Little is known about the barriers which prohibit workers with long-term disabilities from returning to work and which interventions are best suited to counteract these barriers. The main purpose of this study was to obtain consensus among professionals on important return to work (RTW) factors and effective vocational rehabilitation (VR) interventions for long-term (&gt; 2 years), partially disabled workers. Our three research questions were: (1) which factors are associated with RTW for long-term disabled workers?; (2) which factors associated with RTW can be targeted by VR interventions?; and (3) which VR interventions are the most effective to target these factors? A modified Delphi Study was conducted using a panel of 22 labour experts, caseworkers, and insurance physicians. The study consisted of several rounds of questionnaires and one online meeting. The multidisciplinary panel reached consensus that 58 out of 67 factors were important for RTW and that 35 of these factors could be targeted using VR interventions. In five rounds, the expert panel reached consensus that 11 out of 22 VR interventions were effective for at least one of the eight most important RTW factors. Consensus was reached among the expert panel that many factors that are important for the RTW of short-term disabled workers are also important for the RTW of long-term partially disabled workers and that a substantial number of these factors could effectively be targeted using VR interventions. The results of this study will be used to develop a decision aid that supports vocational rehabilitation professionals in profiling clients and in choosing suitable VR interventions.</description><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Decision aid</subject><subject>Delphi method</subject><subject>Delphi Technique</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Disability pension</subject><subject>Disability pensions</subject><subject>Disabled persons</subject><subject>Disabled Persons - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance physicians</subject><subject>Labour experts</subject><subject>Long-term sick leave</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Rehabilitation, Vocational - methods</subject><subject>Return to Work</subject><subject>Sick leave</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Vocational rehabilitation</subject><subject>Workers</subject><subject>Workers with disabilities</subject><issn>1471-2458</issn><issn>1471-2458</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Ustu1DAUjRCIlsIPsECW2LAgxY_YcVggVeVVqRISgrV1HdszHpJ4sJNB8138IE6mlA5COAs7x-cc-16fonhK8DkhUrxKhErZlJjSkjDa8FLcK05JVZOSVlzev7M-KR6ltMGY1JLTh8UJ4zyvWX1a_PxsxykOaAzoR4jfkIN2DDEhGAzahRZGHwboULRr0L7z4wIgP4w27uww_yTkQkRdGFZlBvuXaAtx9NB1e2R8At1Zs1jbmF4jQH0w3vmMvbXddu1RGiezR9Bn_X8O3MbgbErLXnpcPHB5sk9u5rPi6_t3Xy4_ltefPlxdXlyXbYWlKCUHwzgWBLOqlZY53ggCNabamAaI0Y1z2lYSai0aoWsshINGEgGSMSM1OyuuDr4mwEZto-8h7lUArxYgxJWaS207q4QTVmPdMEyh0oZJa4WohAYpjKNCZK83B6_tpHtr2ty7CN2R6fHO4NdqFXaqwYLlp8oGL24MYvg-2TSq3qfWdh0MNkxJUcEbSiXnMlOf_0XdhPzGuVWZNQ-JGf7DWkEuwA8u5HPb2VRd5CaxivPl3uf_YOXP2N63YbDOZ_xIQA-CNoaUonW3NRKs5tiqQ2xVjq1aYqtm0bO73bmV_M4p-wVh7uy0</recordid><startdate>20220502</startdate><enddate>20220502</enddate><creator>de Geus, Christa J C</creator><creator>Huysmans, Maaike A</creator><creator>van Rijssen, H Jolanda</creator><creator>Anema, Johannes R</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220502</creationdate><title>Return to work factors and vocational rehabilitation interventions for long-term, partially disabled workers: a modified Delphi study among vocational rehabilitation professionals</title><author>de Geus, Christa J C ; Huysmans, Maaike A ; van Rijssen, H Jolanda ; Anema, Johannes R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4086-85ad35061034c8e3f5961a702bdd9a1db9ffbe48a7b696b7066fa9816a833d8b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Decision aid</topic><topic>Delphi method</topic><topic>Delphi Technique</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Disability pension</topic><topic>Disability pensions</topic><topic>Disabled persons</topic><topic>Disabled Persons - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance physicians</topic><topic>Labour experts</topic><topic>Long-term sick leave</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Rehabilitation, Vocational - methods</topic><topic>Return to Work</topic><topic>Sick leave</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Vocational rehabilitation</topic><topic>Workers</topic><topic>Workers with disabilities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Geus, Christa J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huysmans, Maaike A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Rijssen, H Jolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anema, Johannes R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Geus, Christa J C</au><au>Huysmans, Maaike A</au><au>van Rijssen, H Jolanda</au><au>Anema, Johannes R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Return to work factors and vocational rehabilitation interventions for long-term, partially disabled workers: a modified Delphi study among vocational rehabilitation professionals</atitle><jtitle>BMC public health</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Public Health</addtitle><date>2022-05-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>875</spage><epage>875</epage><pages>875-875</pages><artnum>875</artnum><issn>1471-2458</issn><eissn>1471-2458</eissn><abstract>Long-term disability has a great impact on both society and workers with disabilities. Little is known about the barriers which prohibit workers with long-term disabilities from returning to work and which interventions are best suited to counteract these barriers. The main purpose of this study was to obtain consensus among professionals on important return to work (RTW) factors and effective vocational rehabilitation (VR) interventions for long-term (&gt; 2 years), partially disabled workers. Our three research questions were: (1) which factors are associated with RTW for long-term disabled workers?; (2) which factors associated with RTW can be targeted by VR interventions?; and (3) which VR interventions are the most effective to target these factors? A modified Delphi Study was conducted using a panel of 22 labour experts, caseworkers, and insurance physicians. The study consisted of several rounds of questionnaires and one online meeting. The multidisciplinary panel reached consensus that 58 out of 67 factors were important for RTW and that 35 of these factors could be targeted using VR interventions. In five rounds, the expert panel reached consensus that 11 out of 22 VR interventions were effective for at least one of the eight most important RTW factors. Consensus was reached among the expert panel that many factors that are important for the RTW of short-term disabled workers are also important for the RTW of long-term partially disabled workers and that a substantial number of these factors could effectively be targeted using VR interventions. The results of this study will be used to develop a decision aid that supports vocational rehabilitation professionals in profiling clients and in choosing suitable VR interventions.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>35501737</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12889-022-13295-6</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2458
ispartof BMC public health, 2022-05, Vol.22 (1), p.875-875, Article 875
issn 1471-2458
1471-2458
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6f6eb0b9302a4bd38ee6646ba86df266
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Care and treatment
Decision aid
Delphi method
Delphi Technique
Disabilities
Disability pension
Disability pensions
Disabled persons
Disabled Persons - rehabilitation
Health aspects
Humans
Insurance physicians
Labour experts
Long-term sick leave
Patient outcomes
Physicians
Professionals
Public health
Questionnaires
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation, Vocational - methods
Return to Work
Sick leave
Social aspects
Surveys and Questionnaires
Vocational rehabilitation
Workers
Workers with disabilities
title Return to work factors and vocational rehabilitation interventions for long-term, partially disabled workers: a modified Delphi study among vocational rehabilitation professionals
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A15%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Return%20to%20work%20factors%20and%20vocational%20rehabilitation%20interventions%20for%20long-term,%20partially%20disabled%20workers:%20a%20modified%20Delphi%20study%20among%20vocational%20rehabilitation%20professionals&rft.jtitle=BMC%20public%20health&rft.au=de%20Geus,%20Christa%20J%20C&rft.date=2022-05-02&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=875&rft.epage=875&rft.pages=875-875&rft.artnum=875&rft.issn=1471-2458&rft.eissn=1471-2458&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12889-022-13295-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA702345566%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4086-85ad35061034c8e3f5961a702bdd9a1db9ffbe48a7b696b7066fa9816a833d8b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2666668030&rft_id=info:pmid/35501737&rft_galeid=A702345566&rfr_iscdi=true