Loading…

Age-period-cohort analysis of lung cancer mortality in China and Australia from 1990 to 2019

Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer death in China and Australia, the countries with different socioenvironmental contexts in the Western Pacific Region. Comparing the age-period-cohort effect on LC mortality (LCM) between the two countries can help plan interventions and draw lessons fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific reports 2022-05, Vol.12 (1), p.8410-8410, Article 8410
Main Authors: Wang, Ning, Xu, Zhiwei, Lui, Chi-Wai, Wang, Baohua, Hu, Wenbiao, Wu, Jing
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-8ac066b4a1c7509b202b2cd676091d6bfb83582effa1429bdbf86121a39271ec3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-8ac066b4a1c7509b202b2cd676091d6bfb83582effa1429bdbf86121a39271ec3
container_end_page 8410
container_issue 1
container_start_page 8410
container_title Scientific reports
container_volume 12
creator Wang, Ning
Xu, Zhiwei
Lui, Chi-Wai
Wang, Baohua
Hu, Wenbiao
Wu, Jing
description Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer death in China and Australia, the countries with different socioenvironmental contexts in the Western Pacific Region. Comparing the age-period-cohort effect on LC mortality (LCM) between the two countries can help plan interventions and draw lessons for countries in the region. We collected LCM estimates between 1990 and 2019 from the GBD 2019. Age-period-cohort modelling was applied to compute the net drift, local drift, cross-sectional age curve, longitudinal age curve, and the rate ratios (RRs) of period and cohort. China had a higher LC age-standardized mortality rate than Australia in 2019 (men: 58.10 [95% uncertainty interval (UI): 46.53, 70.89] vs. 30.13 [95% UI: 27.88, 32.31]/100,000 population; women: 22.86 [95% UI: 18.52, 27.52] vs. 17.80 [95% UI: 15.93, 19.34]/100,000 population). Period and cohort effects on LCM improved more markedly among Australian men (RR for period effect, from 1.47 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41, 1.53] to 0.79 [95% CI 0.75, 0.84]; RR for cohort effect, from 2.56 [95% CI 2.44, 2.68] to 0.36 [95% CI 0.11, 1.18]) and Chinese women (RR for period effect, from 1.06 [95% CI 1.01, 1.11] to 0.85 [95% CI 0.82, 0.89]; RR for cohort effect, from 0.71 [95% CI 0.65, 0.78] to 0.51 [95% CI 0.26, 1.03]) during the study period and birth cohort. The LCM in Chinese population aged 65 to 79 and Australian women aged 75 to 79 increased. Smoking and particulate matter (PM) contributed most to LCM in China, while smoking and occupational carcinogens contributed most in Australia. Decreasing period and cohort risks for LCM attributable to smoking and PM were more remarkable in Australia than in China. The LCM attributable to occupational carcinogens was higher in Australia than in China, particularly for those aged 60 to 79. Vigorous tobacco and PM control, which brought a substantial decline in LCM in Australia, may help reduce LCM in China. Australia should highlight LC prevention among people with occupational exposure. Chinese aged ≥ 65 and Australian women aged ≥ 75 should be the priorities for LC interventions.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41598-022-12483-z
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6f7584a1dd2c40f8afdb599434b7335a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6f7584a1dd2c40f8afdb599434b7335a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2667790146</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-8ac066b4a1c7509b202b2cd676091d6bfb83582effa1429bdbf86121a39271ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks9rFDEUxwdRbKn9BzxIwIuXqfk9yUVYlqqFghe9CSE_Z7PMTtZkRtj-9WZ32tp6MJeE9z75vryXb9O8RfAKQSI-FoqYFC3EuEWYCtLevWjOMaSsxQTjl0_OZ81lKVtYF8OSIvm6OSOMCSkZO29-rnrf7n2OybU2bVKegB71cCixgBTAMI89sHq0PoNdTeohTgcQR7DexFFX1IHVXKZc4xqEnHYASQnBlACGSL5pXgU9FH95v180Pz5ff19_bW-_fblZr25byyicWqEt5NxQjWzHoDQYYoOt4x2HEjlughGECexD0IhiaZwJgiOMNJG4Q96Si-Zm0XVJb9U-x53OB5V0VKdAyr3SeYp28IqHjolayTlsKQxCB2eYlJRQ0xHCdNX6tGjtZ7Pzzvrx2N0z0eeZMW5Un34riY4Th1Xgw71ATr9mXya1i8X6YdCjT3NRmPOukxBRXtH3_6DbNOc6_hPFOyQ4oZXCC2VzKiX78PgYBNXRC2rxgqpeUCcvqLt66d3TNh6vPPx8BcgClJoae5__1v6P7B9qUr3-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2666718634</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Age-period-cohort analysis of lung cancer mortality in China and Australia from 1990 to 2019</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Wang, Ning ; Xu, Zhiwei ; Lui, Chi-Wai ; Wang, Baohua ; Hu, Wenbiao ; Wu, Jing</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ning ; Xu, Zhiwei ; Lui, Chi-Wai ; Wang, Baohua ; Hu, Wenbiao ; Wu, Jing</creatorcontrib><description>Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer death in China and Australia, the countries with different socioenvironmental contexts in the Western Pacific Region. Comparing the age-period-cohort effect on LC mortality (LCM) between the two countries can help plan interventions and draw lessons for countries in the region. We collected LCM estimates between 1990 and 2019 from the GBD 2019. Age-period-cohort modelling was applied to compute the net drift, local drift, cross-sectional age curve, longitudinal age curve, and the rate ratios (RRs) of period and cohort. China had a higher LC age-standardized mortality rate than Australia in 2019 (men: 58.10 [95% uncertainty interval (UI): 46.53, 70.89] vs. 30.13 [95% UI: 27.88, 32.31]/100,000 population; women: 22.86 [95% UI: 18.52, 27.52] vs. 17.80 [95% UI: 15.93, 19.34]/100,000 population). Period and cohort effects on LCM improved more markedly among Australian men (RR for period effect, from 1.47 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41, 1.53] to 0.79 [95% CI 0.75, 0.84]; RR for cohort effect, from 2.56 [95% CI 2.44, 2.68] to 0.36 [95% CI 0.11, 1.18]) and Chinese women (RR for period effect, from 1.06 [95% CI 1.01, 1.11] to 0.85 [95% CI 0.82, 0.89]; RR for cohort effect, from 0.71 [95% CI 0.65, 0.78] to 0.51 [95% CI 0.26, 1.03]) during the study period and birth cohort. The LCM in Chinese population aged 65 to 79 and Australian women aged 75 to 79 increased. Smoking and particulate matter (PM) contributed most to LCM in China, while smoking and occupational carcinogens contributed most in Australia. Decreasing period and cohort risks for LCM attributable to smoking and PM were more remarkable in Australia than in China. The LCM attributable to occupational carcinogens was higher in Australia than in China, particularly for those aged 60 to 79. Vigorous tobacco and PM control, which brought a substantial decline in LCM in Australia, may help reduce LCM in China. Australia should highlight LC prevention among people with occupational exposure. Chinese aged ≥ 65 and Australian women aged ≥ 75 should be the priorities for LC interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12483-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35589955</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/67/1612 ; 631/67/2324 ; 692/699/67 ; Age ; Carcinogens ; Cohort analysis ; Drift ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Lung cancer ; Mortality ; multidisciplinary ; Occupational exposure ; Particulate matter ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Smoking</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2022-05, Vol.12 (1), p.8410-8410, Article 8410</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-8ac066b4a1c7509b202b2cd676091d6bfb83582effa1429bdbf86121a39271ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-8ac066b4a1c7509b202b2cd676091d6bfb83582effa1429bdbf86121a39271ec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2666718634/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2666718634?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,25734,27905,27906,36993,36994,44571,53772,53774,74875</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35589955$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Zhiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lui, Chi-Wai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Baohua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Wenbiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jing</creatorcontrib><title>Age-period-cohort analysis of lung cancer mortality in China and Australia from 1990 to 2019</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer death in China and Australia, the countries with different socioenvironmental contexts in the Western Pacific Region. Comparing the age-period-cohort effect on LC mortality (LCM) between the two countries can help plan interventions and draw lessons for countries in the region. We collected LCM estimates between 1990 and 2019 from the GBD 2019. Age-period-cohort modelling was applied to compute the net drift, local drift, cross-sectional age curve, longitudinal age curve, and the rate ratios (RRs) of period and cohort. China had a higher LC age-standardized mortality rate than Australia in 2019 (men: 58.10 [95% uncertainty interval (UI): 46.53, 70.89] vs. 30.13 [95% UI: 27.88, 32.31]/100,000 population; women: 22.86 [95% UI: 18.52, 27.52] vs. 17.80 [95% UI: 15.93, 19.34]/100,000 population). Period and cohort effects on LCM improved more markedly among Australian men (RR for period effect, from 1.47 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41, 1.53] to 0.79 [95% CI 0.75, 0.84]; RR for cohort effect, from 2.56 [95% CI 2.44, 2.68] to 0.36 [95% CI 0.11, 1.18]) and Chinese women (RR for period effect, from 1.06 [95% CI 1.01, 1.11] to 0.85 [95% CI 0.82, 0.89]; RR for cohort effect, from 0.71 [95% CI 0.65, 0.78] to 0.51 [95% CI 0.26, 1.03]) during the study period and birth cohort. The LCM in Chinese population aged 65 to 79 and Australian women aged 75 to 79 increased. Smoking and particulate matter (PM) contributed most to LCM in China, while smoking and occupational carcinogens contributed most in Australia. Decreasing period and cohort risks for LCM attributable to smoking and PM were more remarkable in Australia than in China. The LCM attributable to occupational carcinogens was higher in Australia than in China, particularly for those aged 60 to 79. Vigorous tobacco and PM control, which brought a substantial decline in LCM in Australia, may help reduce LCM in China. Australia should highlight LC prevention among people with occupational exposure. Chinese aged ≥ 65 and Australian women aged ≥ 75 should be the priorities for LC interventions.</description><subject>631/67/1612</subject><subject>631/67/2324</subject><subject>692/699/67</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Carcinogens</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Drift</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Occupational exposure</subject><subject>Particulate matter</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks9rFDEUxwdRbKn9BzxIwIuXqfk9yUVYlqqFghe9CSE_Z7PMTtZkRtj-9WZ32tp6MJeE9z75vryXb9O8RfAKQSI-FoqYFC3EuEWYCtLevWjOMaSsxQTjl0_OZ81lKVtYF8OSIvm6OSOMCSkZO29-rnrf7n2OybU2bVKegB71cCixgBTAMI89sHq0PoNdTeohTgcQR7DexFFX1IHVXKZc4xqEnHYASQnBlACGSL5pXgU9FH95v180Pz5ff19_bW-_fblZr25byyicWqEt5NxQjWzHoDQYYoOt4x2HEjlughGECexD0IhiaZwJgiOMNJG4Q96Si-Zm0XVJb9U-x53OB5V0VKdAyr3SeYp28IqHjolayTlsKQxCB2eYlJRQ0xHCdNX6tGjtZ7Pzzvrx2N0z0eeZMW5Un34riY4Th1Xgw71ATr9mXya1i8X6YdCjT3NRmPOukxBRXtH3_6DbNOc6_hPFOyQ4oZXCC2VzKiX78PgYBNXRC2rxgqpeUCcvqLt66d3TNh6vPPx8BcgClJoae5__1v6P7B9qUr3-</recordid><startdate>20220519</startdate><enddate>20220519</enddate><creator>Wang, Ning</creator><creator>Xu, Zhiwei</creator><creator>Lui, Chi-Wai</creator><creator>Wang, Baohua</creator><creator>Hu, Wenbiao</creator><creator>Wu, Jing</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><general>Nature Portfolio</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220519</creationdate><title>Age-period-cohort analysis of lung cancer mortality in China and Australia from 1990 to 2019</title><author>Wang, Ning ; Xu, Zhiwei ; Lui, Chi-Wai ; Wang, Baohua ; Hu, Wenbiao ; Wu, Jing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-8ac066b4a1c7509b202b2cd676091d6bfb83582effa1429bdbf86121a39271ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>631/67/1612</topic><topic>631/67/2324</topic><topic>692/699/67</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Carcinogens</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Drift</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Occupational exposure</topic><topic>Particulate matter</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Zhiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lui, Chi-Wai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Baohua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Wenbiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jing</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Ning</au><au>Xu, Zhiwei</au><au>Lui, Chi-Wai</au><au>Wang, Baohua</au><au>Hu, Wenbiao</au><au>Wu, Jing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Age-period-cohort analysis of lung cancer mortality in China and Australia from 1990 to 2019</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2022-05-19</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>8410</spage><epage>8410</epage><pages>8410-8410</pages><artnum>8410</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer death in China and Australia, the countries with different socioenvironmental contexts in the Western Pacific Region. Comparing the age-period-cohort effect on LC mortality (LCM) between the two countries can help plan interventions and draw lessons for countries in the region. We collected LCM estimates between 1990 and 2019 from the GBD 2019. Age-period-cohort modelling was applied to compute the net drift, local drift, cross-sectional age curve, longitudinal age curve, and the rate ratios (RRs) of period and cohort. China had a higher LC age-standardized mortality rate than Australia in 2019 (men: 58.10 [95% uncertainty interval (UI): 46.53, 70.89] vs. 30.13 [95% UI: 27.88, 32.31]/100,000 population; women: 22.86 [95% UI: 18.52, 27.52] vs. 17.80 [95% UI: 15.93, 19.34]/100,000 population). Period and cohort effects on LCM improved more markedly among Australian men (RR for period effect, from 1.47 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41, 1.53] to 0.79 [95% CI 0.75, 0.84]; RR for cohort effect, from 2.56 [95% CI 2.44, 2.68] to 0.36 [95% CI 0.11, 1.18]) and Chinese women (RR for period effect, from 1.06 [95% CI 1.01, 1.11] to 0.85 [95% CI 0.82, 0.89]; RR for cohort effect, from 0.71 [95% CI 0.65, 0.78] to 0.51 [95% CI 0.26, 1.03]) during the study period and birth cohort. The LCM in Chinese population aged 65 to 79 and Australian women aged 75 to 79 increased. Smoking and particulate matter (PM) contributed most to LCM in China, while smoking and occupational carcinogens contributed most in Australia. Decreasing period and cohort risks for LCM attributable to smoking and PM were more remarkable in Australia than in China. The LCM attributable to occupational carcinogens was higher in Australia than in China, particularly for those aged 60 to 79. Vigorous tobacco and PM control, which brought a substantial decline in LCM in Australia, may help reduce LCM in China. Australia should highlight LC prevention among people with occupational exposure. Chinese aged ≥ 65 and Australian women aged ≥ 75 should be the priorities for LC interventions.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>35589955</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-022-12483-z</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-2322
ispartof Scientific reports, 2022-05, Vol.12 (1), p.8410-8410, Article 8410
issn 2045-2322
2045-2322
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6f7584a1dd2c40f8afdb599434b7335a
source Publicly Available Content Database; Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access); PubMed Central; Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access
subjects 631/67/1612
631/67/2324
692/699/67
Age
Carcinogens
Cohort analysis
Drift
Humanities and Social Sciences
Lung cancer
Mortality
multidisciplinary
Occupational exposure
Particulate matter
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
Smoking
title Age-period-cohort analysis of lung cancer mortality in China and Australia from 1990 to 2019
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T19%3A56%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Age-period-cohort%20analysis%20of%20lung%20cancer%20mortality%20in%20China%20and%20Australia%20from%201990%20to%202019&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Wang,%20Ning&rft.date=2022-05-19&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=8410&rft.epage=8410&rft.pages=8410-8410&rft.artnum=8410&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-022-12483-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2667790146%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-8ac066b4a1c7509b202b2cd676091d6bfb83582effa1429bdbf86121a39271ec3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2666718634&rft_id=info:pmid/35589955&rfr_iscdi=true