Loading…
Age-period-cohort analysis of lung cancer mortality in China and Australia from 1990 to 2019
Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer death in China and Australia, the countries with different socioenvironmental contexts in the Western Pacific Region. Comparing the age-period-cohort effect on LC mortality (LCM) between the two countries can help plan interventions and draw lessons fo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Scientific reports 2022-05, Vol.12 (1), p.8410-8410, Article 8410 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-8ac066b4a1c7509b202b2cd676091d6bfb83582effa1429bdbf86121a39271ec3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-8ac066b4a1c7509b202b2cd676091d6bfb83582effa1429bdbf86121a39271ec3 |
container_end_page | 8410 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 8410 |
container_title | Scientific reports |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Wang, Ning Xu, Zhiwei Lui, Chi-Wai Wang, Baohua Hu, Wenbiao Wu, Jing |
description | Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer death in China and Australia, the countries with different socioenvironmental contexts in the Western Pacific Region. Comparing the age-period-cohort effect on LC mortality (LCM) between the two countries can help plan interventions and draw lessons for countries in the region. We collected LCM estimates between 1990 and 2019 from the GBD 2019. Age-period-cohort modelling was applied to compute the net drift, local drift, cross-sectional age curve, longitudinal age curve, and the rate ratios (RRs) of period and cohort. China had a higher LC age-standardized mortality rate than Australia in 2019 (men: 58.10 [95% uncertainty interval (UI): 46.53, 70.89]
vs.
30.13 [95% UI: 27.88, 32.31]/100,000 population; women: 22.86 [95% UI: 18.52, 27.52]
vs.
17.80 [95% UI: 15.93, 19.34]/100,000 population). Period and cohort effects on LCM improved more markedly among Australian men (RR for period effect, from 1.47 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41, 1.53] to 0.79 [95% CI 0.75, 0.84]; RR for cohort effect, from 2.56 [95% CI 2.44, 2.68] to 0.36 [95% CI 0.11, 1.18]) and Chinese women (RR for period effect, from 1.06 [95% CI 1.01, 1.11] to 0.85 [95% CI 0.82, 0.89]; RR for cohort effect, from 0.71 [95% CI 0.65, 0.78] to 0.51 [95% CI 0.26, 1.03]) during the study period and birth cohort. The LCM in Chinese population aged 65 to 79 and Australian women aged 75 to 79 increased. Smoking and particulate matter (PM) contributed most to LCM in China, while smoking and occupational carcinogens contributed most in Australia. Decreasing period and cohort risks for LCM attributable to smoking and PM were more remarkable in Australia than in China. The LCM attributable to occupational carcinogens was higher in Australia than in China, particularly for those aged 60 to 79. Vigorous tobacco and PM control, which brought a substantial decline in LCM in Australia, may help reduce LCM in China. Australia should highlight LC prevention among people with occupational exposure. Chinese aged ≥ 65 and Australian women aged ≥ 75 should be the priorities for LC interventions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41598-022-12483-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6f7584a1dd2c40f8afdb599434b7335a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6f7584a1dd2c40f8afdb599434b7335a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2667790146</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-8ac066b4a1c7509b202b2cd676091d6bfb83582effa1429bdbf86121a39271ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks9rFDEUxwdRbKn9BzxIwIuXqfk9yUVYlqqFghe9CSE_Z7PMTtZkRtj-9WZ32tp6MJeE9z75vryXb9O8RfAKQSI-FoqYFC3EuEWYCtLevWjOMaSsxQTjl0_OZ81lKVtYF8OSIvm6OSOMCSkZO29-rnrf7n2OybU2bVKegB71cCixgBTAMI89sHq0PoNdTeohTgcQR7DexFFX1IHVXKZc4xqEnHYASQnBlACGSL5pXgU9FH95v180Pz5ff19_bW-_fblZr25byyicWqEt5NxQjWzHoDQYYoOt4x2HEjlughGECexD0IhiaZwJgiOMNJG4Q96Si-Zm0XVJb9U-x53OB5V0VKdAyr3SeYp28IqHjolayTlsKQxCB2eYlJRQ0xHCdNX6tGjtZ7Pzzvrx2N0z0eeZMW5Un34riY4Th1Xgw71ATr9mXya1i8X6YdCjT3NRmPOukxBRXtH3_6DbNOc6_hPFOyQ4oZXCC2VzKiX78PgYBNXRC2rxgqpeUCcvqLt66d3TNh6vPPx8BcgClJoae5__1v6P7B9qUr3-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2666718634</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Age-period-cohort analysis of lung cancer mortality in China and Australia from 1990 to 2019</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Wang, Ning ; Xu, Zhiwei ; Lui, Chi-Wai ; Wang, Baohua ; Hu, Wenbiao ; Wu, Jing</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ning ; Xu, Zhiwei ; Lui, Chi-Wai ; Wang, Baohua ; Hu, Wenbiao ; Wu, Jing</creatorcontrib><description>Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer death in China and Australia, the countries with different socioenvironmental contexts in the Western Pacific Region. Comparing the age-period-cohort effect on LC mortality (LCM) between the two countries can help plan interventions and draw lessons for countries in the region. We collected LCM estimates between 1990 and 2019 from the GBD 2019. Age-period-cohort modelling was applied to compute the net drift, local drift, cross-sectional age curve, longitudinal age curve, and the rate ratios (RRs) of period and cohort. China had a higher LC age-standardized mortality rate than Australia in 2019 (men: 58.10 [95% uncertainty interval (UI): 46.53, 70.89]
vs.
30.13 [95% UI: 27.88, 32.31]/100,000 population; women: 22.86 [95% UI: 18.52, 27.52]
vs.
17.80 [95% UI: 15.93, 19.34]/100,000 population). Period and cohort effects on LCM improved more markedly among Australian men (RR for period effect, from 1.47 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41, 1.53] to 0.79 [95% CI 0.75, 0.84]; RR for cohort effect, from 2.56 [95% CI 2.44, 2.68] to 0.36 [95% CI 0.11, 1.18]) and Chinese women (RR for period effect, from 1.06 [95% CI 1.01, 1.11] to 0.85 [95% CI 0.82, 0.89]; RR for cohort effect, from 0.71 [95% CI 0.65, 0.78] to 0.51 [95% CI 0.26, 1.03]) during the study period and birth cohort. The LCM in Chinese population aged 65 to 79 and Australian women aged 75 to 79 increased. Smoking and particulate matter (PM) contributed most to LCM in China, while smoking and occupational carcinogens contributed most in Australia. Decreasing period and cohort risks for LCM attributable to smoking and PM were more remarkable in Australia than in China. The LCM attributable to occupational carcinogens was higher in Australia than in China, particularly for those aged 60 to 79. Vigorous tobacco and PM control, which brought a substantial decline in LCM in Australia, may help reduce LCM in China. Australia should highlight LC prevention among people with occupational exposure. Chinese aged ≥ 65 and Australian women aged ≥ 75 should be the priorities for LC interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12483-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35589955</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/67/1612 ; 631/67/2324 ; 692/699/67 ; Age ; Carcinogens ; Cohort analysis ; Drift ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Lung cancer ; Mortality ; multidisciplinary ; Occupational exposure ; Particulate matter ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Smoking</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2022-05, Vol.12 (1), p.8410-8410, Article 8410</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-8ac066b4a1c7509b202b2cd676091d6bfb83582effa1429bdbf86121a39271ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-8ac066b4a1c7509b202b2cd676091d6bfb83582effa1429bdbf86121a39271ec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2666718634/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2666718634?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,25734,27905,27906,36993,36994,44571,53772,53774,74875</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35589955$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Zhiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lui, Chi-Wai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Baohua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Wenbiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jing</creatorcontrib><title>Age-period-cohort analysis of lung cancer mortality in China and Australia from 1990 to 2019</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer death in China and Australia, the countries with different socioenvironmental contexts in the Western Pacific Region. Comparing the age-period-cohort effect on LC mortality (LCM) between the two countries can help plan interventions and draw lessons for countries in the region. We collected LCM estimates between 1990 and 2019 from the GBD 2019. Age-period-cohort modelling was applied to compute the net drift, local drift, cross-sectional age curve, longitudinal age curve, and the rate ratios (RRs) of period and cohort. China had a higher LC age-standardized mortality rate than Australia in 2019 (men: 58.10 [95% uncertainty interval (UI): 46.53, 70.89]
vs.
30.13 [95% UI: 27.88, 32.31]/100,000 population; women: 22.86 [95% UI: 18.52, 27.52]
vs.
17.80 [95% UI: 15.93, 19.34]/100,000 population). Period and cohort effects on LCM improved more markedly among Australian men (RR for period effect, from 1.47 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41, 1.53] to 0.79 [95% CI 0.75, 0.84]; RR for cohort effect, from 2.56 [95% CI 2.44, 2.68] to 0.36 [95% CI 0.11, 1.18]) and Chinese women (RR for period effect, from 1.06 [95% CI 1.01, 1.11] to 0.85 [95% CI 0.82, 0.89]; RR for cohort effect, from 0.71 [95% CI 0.65, 0.78] to 0.51 [95% CI 0.26, 1.03]) during the study period and birth cohort. The LCM in Chinese population aged 65 to 79 and Australian women aged 75 to 79 increased. Smoking and particulate matter (PM) contributed most to LCM in China, while smoking and occupational carcinogens contributed most in Australia. Decreasing period and cohort risks for LCM attributable to smoking and PM were more remarkable in Australia than in China. The LCM attributable to occupational carcinogens was higher in Australia than in China, particularly for those aged 60 to 79. Vigorous tobacco and PM control, which brought a substantial decline in LCM in Australia, may help reduce LCM in China. Australia should highlight LC prevention among people with occupational exposure. Chinese aged ≥ 65 and Australian women aged ≥ 75 should be the priorities for LC interventions.</description><subject>631/67/1612</subject><subject>631/67/2324</subject><subject>692/699/67</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Carcinogens</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Drift</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Occupational exposure</subject><subject>Particulate matter</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks9rFDEUxwdRbKn9BzxIwIuXqfk9yUVYlqqFghe9CSE_Z7PMTtZkRtj-9WZ32tp6MJeE9z75vryXb9O8RfAKQSI-FoqYFC3EuEWYCtLevWjOMaSsxQTjl0_OZ81lKVtYF8OSIvm6OSOMCSkZO29-rnrf7n2OybU2bVKegB71cCixgBTAMI89sHq0PoNdTeohTgcQR7DexFFX1IHVXKZc4xqEnHYASQnBlACGSL5pXgU9FH95v180Pz5ff19_bW-_fblZr25byyicWqEt5NxQjWzHoDQYYoOt4x2HEjlughGECexD0IhiaZwJgiOMNJG4Q96Si-Zm0XVJb9U-x53OB5V0VKdAyr3SeYp28IqHjolayTlsKQxCB2eYlJRQ0xHCdNX6tGjtZ7Pzzvrx2N0z0eeZMW5Un34riY4Th1Xgw71ATr9mXya1i8X6YdCjT3NRmPOukxBRXtH3_6DbNOc6_hPFOyQ4oZXCC2VzKiX78PgYBNXRC2rxgqpeUCcvqLt66d3TNh6vPPx8BcgClJoae5__1v6P7B9qUr3-</recordid><startdate>20220519</startdate><enddate>20220519</enddate><creator>Wang, Ning</creator><creator>Xu, Zhiwei</creator><creator>Lui, Chi-Wai</creator><creator>Wang, Baohua</creator><creator>Hu, Wenbiao</creator><creator>Wu, Jing</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><general>Nature Portfolio</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220519</creationdate><title>Age-period-cohort analysis of lung cancer mortality in China and Australia from 1990 to 2019</title><author>Wang, Ning ; Xu, Zhiwei ; Lui, Chi-Wai ; Wang, Baohua ; Hu, Wenbiao ; Wu, Jing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-8ac066b4a1c7509b202b2cd676091d6bfb83582effa1429bdbf86121a39271ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>631/67/1612</topic><topic>631/67/2324</topic><topic>692/699/67</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Carcinogens</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Drift</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Occupational exposure</topic><topic>Particulate matter</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Zhiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lui, Chi-Wai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Baohua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Wenbiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jing</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Ning</au><au>Xu, Zhiwei</au><au>Lui, Chi-Wai</au><au>Wang, Baohua</au><au>Hu, Wenbiao</au><au>Wu, Jing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Age-period-cohort analysis of lung cancer mortality in China and Australia from 1990 to 2019</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2022-05-19</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>8410</spage><epage>8410</epage><pages>8410-8410</pages><artnum>8410</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer death in China and Australia, the countries with different socioenvironmental contexts in the Western Pacific Region. Comparing the age-period-cohort effect on LC mortality (LCM) between the two countries can help plan interventions and draw lessons for countries in the region. We collected LCM estimates between 1990 and 2019 from the GBD 2019. Age-period-cohort modelling was applied to compute the net drift, local drift, cross-sectional age curve, longitudinal age curve, and the rate ratios (RRs) of period and cohort. China had a higher LC age-standardized mortality rate than Australia in 2019 (men: 58.10 [95% uncertainty interval (UI): 46.53, 70.89]
vs.
30.13 [95% UI: 27.88, 32.31]/100,000 population; women: 22.86 [95% UI: 18.52, 27.52]
vs.
17.80 [95% UI: 15.93, 19.34]/100,000 population). Period and cohort effects on LCM improved more markedly among Australian men (RR for period effect, from 1.47 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41, 1.53] to 0.79 [95% CI 0.75, 0.84]; RR for cohort effect, from 2.56 [95% CI 2.44, 2.68] to 0.36 [95% CI 0.11, 1.18]) and Chinese women (RR for period effect, from 1.06 [95% CI 1.01, 1.11] to 0.85 [95% CI 0.82, 0.89]; RR for cohort effect, from 0.71 [95% CI 0.65, 0.78] to 0.51 [95% CI 0.26, 1.03]) during the study period and birth cohort. The LCM in Chinese population aged 65 to 79 and Australian women aged 75 to 79 increased. Smoking and particulate matter (PM) contributed most to LCM in China, while smoking and occupational carcinogens contributed most in Australia. Decreasing period and cohort risks for LCM attributable to smoking and PM were more remarkable in Australia than in China. The LCM attributable to occupational carcinogens was higher in Australia than in China, particularly for those aged 60 to 79. Vigorous tobacco and PM control, which brought a substantial decline in LCM in Australia, may help reduce LCM in China. Australia should highlight LC prevention among people with occupational exposure. Chinese aged ≥ 65 and Australian women aged ≥ 75 should be the priorities for LC interventions.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>35589955</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-022-12483-z</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-2322 |
ispartof | Scientific reports, 2022-05, Vol.12 (1), p.8410-8410, Article 8410 |
issn | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6f7584a1dd2c40f8afdb599434b7335a |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access); PubMed Central; Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access |
subjects | 631/67/1612 631/67/2324 692/699/67 Age Carcinogens Cohort analysis Drift Humanities and Social Sciences Lung cancer Mortality multidisciplinary Occupational exposure Particulate matter Science Science (multidisciplinary) Smoking |
title | Age-period-cohort analysis of lung cancer mortality in China and Australia from 1990 to 2019 |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T19%3A56%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Age-period-cohort%20analysis%20of%20lung%20cancer%20mortality%20in%20China%20and%20Australia%20from%201990%20to%202019&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Wang,%20Ning&rft.date=2022-05-19&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=8410&rft.epage=8410&rft.pages=8410-8410&rft.artnum=8410&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-022-12483-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2667790146%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-8ac066b4a1c7509b202b2cd676091d6bfb83582effa1429bdbf86121a39271ec3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2666718634&rft_id=info:pmid/35589955&rfr_iscdi=true |