Loading…

Colonic bacterial diversity and dysbiosis in active microscopic colitis as compared to chronic diarrhoea and healthy controls: effect of polyethylene glycol after bowel lavage for colonoscopy

Background Most microbiota studies in microscopic colitis patients are performed after diagnostic colonoscopy without considering the potential effect of colonic lavage. Patients may achieve clinical remission after colonoscopy and it is unknown whether lavage-induced changes play a role. Aim To ass...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC gastroenterology 2022-06, Vol.22 (1), p.1-320, Article 320
Main Authors: Batista, Lissette, Robles, Virginia, Manichanh, Chaysavanh, Ruiz, Laura, Guagnozzi, Danila, Pinsach, Ferran, Guarner, Francisco, Fernández-Bañares, Fernando
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-a9e6aec03e17fa8f387f771ae0a174a362d4044501bb6fea17b8708f7ad4f5293
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-a9e6aec03e17fa8f387f771ae0a174a362d4044501bb6fea17b8708f7ad4f5293
container_end_page 320
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title BMC gastroenterology
container_volume 22
creator Batista, Lissette
Robles, Virginia
Manichanh, Chaysavanh
Ruiz, Laura
Guagnozzi, Danila
Pinsach, Ferran
Guarner, Francisco
Fernández-Bañares, Fernando
description Background Most microbiota studies in microscopic colitis patients are performed after diagnostic colonoscopy without considering the potential effect of colonic lavage. Patients may achieve clinical remission after colonoscopy and it is unknown whether lavage-induced changes play a role. Aim To assess the effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG) colonic lavage on clinical remission rate, microbial diversity, microbial dysbiosis index and specific microbial changes in patients with active microscopic colitis as compared to other diarrhoeal diseases and healthy controls. Methods Fifty-five consecutive patients presenting chronic watery diarrhoea and 12 healthy controls were included. Faecal samples were collected three days before and 30 days after PEG in patients and controls for microbiome analysis. Results Clinical remission was observed in 53% of microscopic colitis patients, and in 32% of non-microscopic colitis patients (p = 0.16). Considering patients with persisting diarrhoea after colonoscopy, 71% of non-microscopic colitis patients had bile acid diarrhoea. Baseline Shannon Index was lower in diarrhoea groups than in healthy controls (p = 0.0025); there were no differences between microscopic colitis, bile-acid diarrhoea and functional diarrhoea. The microbial dysbiosis index was significantly higher in microscopic colitis than in bile acid diarrhoea plus functional diarrhoea (p = 0.0095), but no bacterial species showed a significantly different relative abundance among the diarrheal groups. Conclusions Dysbiosis is a feature in active microscopic colitis, but loss of microbial diversity was similar in all diarrheal groups, suggesting that faecal microbial changes are not due to microscopic colitis itself but associated with stool form. A considerable number of microscopic colitis patients achieved clinical remission after colonoscopy, but we were unable to demonstrate related PEG-induced changes in faecal microbiome. Keywords: Microscopic colitis, Dysbiosis, Faecal microbiome, Polyethylene glycol
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12876-022-02392-w
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6fdd16ce882242b687c7f66c53457de8</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A708566909</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6fdd16ce882242b687c7f66c53457de8</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A708566909</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-a9e6aec03e17fa8f387f771ae0a174a362d4044501bb6fea17b8708f7ad4f5293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk2LFDEQhhtR3HX1D3gKePEyaz66k24PwrL4sbDgRcFbqE5XZjJkOmPSM0v_uv1r1sws6oo0oUPVW0-lireqXgt-KUSr3xUhW6MXXEo6qpOLuyfVuaiNWEjFfzz9635WvShlzbkwrVTPqzPVGF13SpxX99cppjE41oObMAeIbAh7zCVMM4NxYMNc-pBKKCyMjDSUZJvgcioubanOpRgmykKh62YLGQc2JeZW-YgdAuS8SghH2AohTquZlOOUUyzvGXqPbmLJs22KM1Iy4ohsGWcCM_D0JtanO4wswh6WyHzKh55pPD5gflk98xALvnr4X1TfP338dv1lcfv188311e3C1YZPC-hQAzquUBgPrVet8cYIQA7C1KC0HGpe1w0Xfa89UrBvDW-9gaH2jezURXVz4g4J1nabwwbybBMEewykvLSQp-AiWu2HQWiHbStlLXvdGme81q5RdWMGbIn14cTa7voNDg5pGRAfQR9nxrCyy7S3nVSt1IoAbx8AOf3cYZnsJhSHMcKIaVes1NS60VrVJH3zj3SddnmkVZGqEzSx4c0f1RJogDD6RH3dAWqvaA2E6vhhB5f_UdE3IDkijegDxR8VyFPBwS4lo_89o-D2YGF7srAlC9ujhe2d-gXb1OeG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2691450705</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Colonic bacterial diversity and dysbiosis in active microscopic colitis as compared to chronic diarrhoea and healthy controls: effect of polyethylene glycol after bowel lavage for colonoscopy</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Batista, Lissette ; Robles, Virginia ; Manichanh, Chaysavanh ; Ruiz, Laura ; Guagnozzi, Danila ; Pinsach, Ferran ; Guarner, Francisco ; Fernández-Bañares, Fernando</creator><creatorcontrib>Batista, Lissette ; Robles, Virginia ; Manichanh, Chaysavanh ; Ruiz, Laura ; Guagnozzi, Danila ; Pinsach, Ferran ; Guarner, Francisco ; Fernández-Bañares, Fernando</creatorcontrib><description>Background Most microbiota studies in microscopic colitis patients are performed after diagnostic colonoscopy without considering the potential effect of colonic lavage. Patients may achieve clinical remission after colonoscopy and it is unknown whether lavage-induced changes play a role. Aim To assess the effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG) colonic lavage on clinical remission rate, microbial diversity, microbial dysbiosis index and specific microbial changes in patients with active microscopic colitis as compared to other diarrhoeal diseases and healthy controls. Methods Fifty-five consecutive patients presenting chronic watery diarrhoea and 12 healthy controls were included. Faecal samples were collected three days before and 30 days after PEG in patients and controls for microbiome analysis. Results Clinical remission was observed in 53% of microscopic colitis patients, and in 32% of non-microscopic colitis patients (p = 0.16). Considering patients with persisting diarrhoea after colonoscopy, 71% of non-microscopic colitis patients had bile acid diarrhoea. Baseline Shannon Index was lower in diarrhoea groups than in healthy controls (p = 0.0025); there were no differences between microscopic colitis, bile-acid diarrhoea and functional diarrhoea. The microbial dysbiosis index was significantly higher in microscopic colitis than in bile acid diarrhoea plus functional diarrhoea (p = 0.0095), but no bacterial species showed a significantly different relative abundance among the diarrheal groups. Conclusions Dysbiosis is a feature in active microscopic colitis, but loss of microbial diversity was similar in all diarrheal groups, suggesting that faecal microbial changes are not due to microscopic colitis itself but associated with stool form. A considerable number of microscopic colitis patients achieved clinical remission after colonoscopy, but we were unable to demonstrate related PEG-induced changes in faecal microbiome. Keywords: Microscopic colitis, Dysbiosis, Faecal microbiome, Polyethylene glycol</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-230X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-230X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02392-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35764931</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Colitis ; Colon ; Colonoscopy ; Diagnosis ; Diarrhea ; Dosage and administration ; Dysbacteriosis ; Dysbiosis ; Evaluation ; Faecal microbiome ; Feces ; Forecasts and trends ; Gastroenterology ; Inflammatory bowel disease ; Irritable bowel syndrome ; Lavage ; Methods ; Microbiomes ; Microbiota ; Microscopic colitis ; Patients ; Polyethylene glycol ; Remission ; Remission (Medicine)</subject><ispartof>BMC gastroenterology, 2022-06, Vol.22 (1), p.1-320, Article 320</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-a9e6aec03e17fa8f387f771ae0a174a362d4044501bb6fea17b8708f7ad4f5293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-a9e6aec03e17fa8f387f771ae0a174a362d4044501bb6fea17b8708f7ad4f5293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238263/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2691450705?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Batista, Lissette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robles, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manichanh, Chaysavanh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guagnozzi, Danila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinsach, Ferran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guarner, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Bañares, Fernando</creatorcontrib><title>Colonic bacterial diversity and dysbiosis in active microscopic colitis as compared to chronic diarrhoea and healthy controls: effect of polyethylene glycol after bowel lavage for colonoscopy</title><title>BMC gastroenterology</title><description>Background Most microbiota studies in microscopic colitis patients are performed after diagnostic colonoscopy without considering the potential effect of colonic lavage. Patients may achieve clinical remission after colonoscopy and it is unknown whether lavage-induced changes play a role. Aim To assess the effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG) colonic lavage on clinical remission rate, microbial diversity, microbial dysbiosis index and specific microbial changes in patients with active microscopic colitis as compared to other diarrhoeal diseases and healthy controls. Methods Fifty-five consecutive patients presenting chronic watery diarrhoea and 12 healthy controls were included. Faecal samples were collected three days before and 30 days after PEG in patients and controls for microbiome analysis. Results Clinical remission was observed in 53% of microscopic colitis patients, and in 32% of non-microscopic colitis patients (p = 0.16). Considering patients with persisting diarrhoea after colonoscopy, 71% of non-microscopic colitis patients had bile acid diarrhoea. Baseline Shannon Index was lower in diarrhoea groups than in healthy controls (p = 0.0025); there were no differences between microscopic colitis, bile-acid diarrhoea and functional diarrhoea. The microbial dysbiosis index was significantly higher in microscopic colitis than in bile acid diarrhoea plus functional diarrhoea (p = 0.0095), but no bacterial species showed a significantly different relative abundance among the diarrheal groups. Conclusions Dysbiosis is a feature in active microscopic colitis, but loss of microbial diversity was similar in all diarrheal groups, suggesting that faecal microbial changes are not due to microscopic colitis itself but associated with stool form. A considerable number of microscopic colitis patients achieved clinical remission after colonoscopy, but we were unable to demonstrate related PEG-induced changes in faecal microbiome. Keywords: Microscopic colitis, Dysbiosis, Faecal microbiome, Polyethylene glycol</description><subject>Colitis</subject><subject>Colon</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diarrhea</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Dysbacteriosis</subject><subject>Dysbiosis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Faecal microbiome</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Forecasts and trends</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Inflammatory bowel disease</subject><subject>Irritable bowel syndrome</subject><subject>Lavage</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Microbiomes</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Microscopic colitis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Polyethylene glycol</subject><subject>Remission</subject><subject>Remission (Medicine)</subject><issn>1471-230X</issn><issn>1471-230X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk2LFDEQhhtR3HX1D3gKePEyaz66k24PwrL4sbDgRcFbqE5XZjJkOmPSM0v_uv1r1sws6oo0oUPVW0-lireqXgt-KUSr3xUhW6MXXEo6qpOLuyfVuaiNWEjFfzz9635WvShlzbkwrVTPqzPVGF13SpxX99cppjE41oObMAeIbAh7zCVMM4NxYMNc-pBKKCyMjDSUZJvgcioubanOpRgmykKh62YLGQc2JeZW-YgdAuS8SghH2AohTquZlOOUUyzvGXqPbmLJs22KM1Iy4ohsGWcCM_D0JtanO4wswh6WyHzKh55pPD5gflk98xALvnr4X1TfP338dv1lcfv188311e3C1YZPC-hQAzquUBgPrVet8cYIQA7C1KC0HGpe1w0Xfa89UrBvDW-9gaH2jezURXVz4g4J1nabwwbybBMEewykvLSQp-AiWu2HQWiHbStlLXvdGme81q5RdWMGbIn14cTa7voNDg5pGRAfQR9nxrCyy7S3nVSt1IoAbx8AOf3cYZnsJhSHMcKIaVes1NS60VrVJH3zj3SddnmkVZGqEzSx4c0f1RJogDD6RH3dAWqvaA2E6vhhB5f_UdE3IDkijegDxR8VyFPBwS4lo_89o-D2YGF7srAlC9ujhe2d-gXb1OeG</recordid><startdate>20220628</startdate><enddate>20220628</enddate><creator>Batista, Lissette</creator><creator>Robles, Virginia</creator><creator>Manichanh, Chaysavanh</creator><creator>Ruiz, Laura</creator><creator>Guagnozzi, Danila</creator><creator>Pinsach, Ferran</creator><creator>Guarner, Francisco</creator><creator>Fernández-Bañares, Fernando</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220628</creationdate><title>Colonic bacterial diversity and dysbiosis in active microscopic colitis as compared to chronic diarrhoea and healthy controls: effect of polyethylene glycol after bowel lavage for colonoscopy</title><author>Batista, Lissette ; Robles, Virginia ; Manichanh, Chaysavanh ; Ruiz, Laura ; Guagnozzi, Danila ; Pinsach, Ferran ; Guarner, Francisco ; Fernández-Bañares, Fernando</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-a9e6aec03e17fa8f387f771ae0a174a362d4044501bb6fea17b8708f7ad4f5293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Colitis</topic><topic>Colon</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diarrhea</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Dysbacteriosis</topic><topic>Dysbiosis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Faecal microbiome</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Forecasts and trends</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Inflammatory bowel disease</topic><topic>Irritable bowel syndrome</topic><topic>Lavage</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Microbiomes</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Microscopic colitis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Polyethylene glycol</topic><topic>Remission</topic><topic>Remission (Medicine)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Batista, Lissette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robles, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manichanh, Chaysavanh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guagnozzi, Danila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinsach, Ferran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guarner, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Bañares, Fernando</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health &amp; Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC gastroenterology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Batista, Lissette</au><au>Robles, Virginia</au><au>Manichanh, Chaysavanh</au><au>Ruiz, Laura</au><au>Guagnozzi, Danila</au><au>Pinsach, Ferran</au><au>Guarner, Francisco</au><au>Fernández-Bañares, Fernando</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Colonic bacterial diversity and dysbiosis in active microscopic colitis as compared to chronic diarrhoea and healthy controls: effect of polyethylene glycol after bowel lavage for colonoscopy</atitle><jtitle>BMC gastroenterology</jtitle><date>2022-06-28</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>320</epage><pages>1-320</pages><artnum>320</artnum><issn>1471-230X</issn><eissn>1471-230X</eissn><abstract>Background Most microbiota studies in microscopic colitis patients are performed after diagnostic colonoscopy without considering the potential effect of colonic lavage. Patients may achieve clinical remission after colonoscopy and it is unknown whether lavage-induced changes play a role. Aim To assess the effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG) colonic lavage on clinical remission rate, microbial diversity, microbial dysbiosis index and specific microbial changes in patients with active microscopic colitis as compared to other diarrhoeal diseases and healthy controls. Methods Fifty-five consecutive patients presenting chronic watery diarrhoea and 12 healthy controls were included. Faecal samples were collected three days before and 30 days after PEG in patients and controls for microbiome analysis. Results Clinical remission was observed in 53% of microscopic colitis patients, and in 32% of non-microscopic colitis patients (p = 0.16). Considering patients with persisting diarrhoea after colonoscopy, 71% of non-microscopic colitis patients had bile acid diarrhoea. Baseline Shannon Index was lower in diarrhoea groups than in healthy controls (p = 0.0025); there were no differences between microscopic colitis, bile-acid diarrhoea and functional diarrhoea. The microbial dysbiosis index was significantly higher in microscopic colitis than in bile acid diarrhoea plus functional diarrhoea (p = 0.0095), but no bacterial species showed a significantly different relative abundance among the diarrheal groups. Conclusions Dysbiosis is a feature in active microscopic colitis, but loss of microbial diversity was similar in all diarrheal groups, suggesting that faecal microbial changes are not due to microscopic colitis itself but associated with stool form. A considerable number of microscopic colitis patients achieved clinical remission after colonoscopy, but we were unable to demonstrate related PEG-induced changes in faecal microbiome. Keywords: Microscopic colitis, Dysbiosis, Faecal microbiome, Polyethylene glycol</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>35764931</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12876-022-02392-w</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-230X
ispartof BMC gastroenterology, 2022-06, Vol.22 (1), p.1-320, Article 320
issn 1471-230X
1471-230X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6fdd16ce882242b687c7f66c53457de8
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)
subjects Colitis
Colon
Colonoscopy
Diagnosis
Diarrhea
Dosage and administration
Dysbacteriosis
Dysbiosis
Evaluation
Faecal microbiome
Feces
Forecasts and trends
Gastroenterology
Inflammatory bowel disease
Irritable bowel syndrome
Lavage
Methods
Microbiomes
Microbiota
Microscopic colitis
Patients
Polyethylene glycol
Remission
Remission (Medicine)
title Colonic bacterial diversity and dysbiosis in active microscopic colitis as compared to chronic diarrhoea and healthy controls: effect of polyethylene glycol after bowel lavage for colonoscopy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T10%3A54%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Colonic%20bacterial%20diversity%20and%20dysbiosis%20in%20active%20microscopic%20colitis%20as%20compared%20to%20chronic%20diarrhoea%20and%20healthy%20controls:%20effect%20of%20polyethylene%20glycol%20after%20bowel%20lavage%20for%20colonoscopy&rft.jtitle=BMC%20gastroenterology&rft.au=Batista,%20Lissette&rft.date=2022-06-28&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=320&rft.pages=1-320&rft.artnum=320&rft.issn=1471-230X&rft.eissn=1471-230X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12876-022-02392-w&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA708566909%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-a9e6aec03e17fa8f387f771ae0a174a362d4044501bb6fea17b8708f7ad4f5293%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2691450705&rft_id=info:pmid/35764931&rft_galeid=A708566909&rfr_iscdi=true