Loading…
Colonic bacterial diversity and dysbiosis in active microscopic colitis as compared to chronic diarrhoea and healthy controls: effect of polyethylene glycol after bowel lavage for colonoscopy
Background Most microbiota studies in microscopic colitis patients are performed after diagnostic colonoscopy without considering the potential effect of colonic lavage. Patients may achieve clinical remission after colonoscopy and it is unknown whether lavage-induced changes play a role. Aim To ass...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC gastroenterology 2022-06, Vol.22 (1), p.1-320, Article 320 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-a9e6aec03e17fa8f387f771ae0a174a362d4044501bb6fea17b8708f7ad4f5293 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-a9e6aec03e17fa8f387f771ae0a174a362d4044501bb6fea17b8708f7ad4f5293 |
container_end_page | 320 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | BMC gastroenterology |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Batista, Lissette Robles, Virginia Manichanh, Chaysavanh Ruiz, Laura Guagnozzi, Danila Pinsach, Ferran Guarner, Francisco Fernández-Bañares, Fernando |
description | Background Most microbiota studies in microscopic colitis patients are performed after diagnostic colonoscopy without considering the potential effect of colonic lavage. Patients may achieve clinical remission after colonoscopy and it is unknown whether lavage-induced changes play a role. Aim To assess the effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG) colonic lavage on clinical remission rate, microbial diversity, microbial dysbiosis index and specific microbial changes in patients with active microscopic colitis as compared to other diarrhoeal diseases and healthy controls. Methods Fifty-five consecutive patients presenting chronic watery diarrhoea and 12 healthy controls were included. Faecal samples were collected three days before and 30 days after PEG in patients and controls for microbiome analysis. Results Clinical remission was observed in 53% of microscopic colitis patients, and in 32% of non-microscopic colitis patients (p = 0.16). Considering patients with persisting diarrhoea after colonoscopy, 71% of non-microscopic colitis patients had bile acid diarrhoea. Baseline Shannon Index was lower in diarrhoea groups than in healthy controls (p = 0.0025); there were no differences between microscopic colitis, bile-acid diarrhoea and functional diarrhoea. The microbial dysbiosis index was significantly higher in microscopic colitis than in bile acid diarrhoea plus functional diarrhoea (p = 0.0095), but no bacterial species showed a significantly different relative abundance among the diarrheal groups. Conclusions Dysbiosis is a feature in active microscopic colitis, but loss of microbial diversity was similar in all diarrheal groups, suggesting that faecal microbial changes are not due to microscopic colitis itself but associated with stool form. A considerable number of microscopic colitis patients achieved clinical remission after colonoscopy, but we were unable to demonstrate related PEG-induced changes in faecal microbiome. Keywords: Microscopic colitis, Dysbiosis, Faecal microbiome, Polyethylene glycol |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12876-022-02392-w |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6fdd16ce882242b687c7f66c53457de8</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A708566909</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6fdd16ce882242b687c7f66c53457de8</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A708566909</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-a9e6aec03e17fa8f387f771ae0a174a362d4044501bb6fea17b8708f7ad4f5293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk2LFDEQhhtR3HX1D3gKePEyaz66k24PwrL4sbDgRcFbqE5XZjJkOmPSM0v_uv1r1sws6oo0oUPVW0-lireqXgt-KUSr3xUhW6MXXEo6qpOLuyfVuaiNWEjFfzz9635WvShlzbkwrVTPqzPVGF13SpxX99cppjE41oObMAeIbAh7zCVMM4NxYMNc-pBKKCyMjDSUZJvgcioubanOpRgmykKh62YLGQc2JeZW-YgdAuS8SghH2AohTquZlOOUUyzvGXqPbmLJs22KM1Iy4ohsGWcCM_D0JtanO4wswh6WyHzKh55pPD5gflk98xALvnr4X1TfP338dv1lcfv188311e3C1YZPC-hQAzquUBgPrVet8cYIQA7C1KC0HGpe1w0Xfa89UrBvDW-9gaH2jezURXVz4g4J1nabwwbybBMEewykvLSQp-AiWu2HQWiHbStlLXvdGme81q5RdWMGbIn14cTa7voNDg5pGRAfQR9nxrCyy7S3nVSt1IoAbx8AOf3cYZnsJhSHMcKIaVes1NS60VrVJH3zj3SddnmkVZGqEzSx4c0f1RJogDD6RH3dAWqvaA2E6vhhB5f_UdE3IDkijegDxR8VyFPBwS4lo_89o-D2YGF7srAlC9ujhe2d-gXb1OeG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2691450705</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Colonic bacterial diversity and dysbiosis in active microscopic colitis as compared to chronic diarrhoea and healthy controls: effect of polyethylene glycol after bowel lavage for colonoscopy</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Batista, Lissette ; Robles, Virginia ; Manichanh, Chaysavanh ; Ruiz, Laura ; Guagnozzi, Danila ; Pinsach, Ferran ; Guarner, Francisco ; Fernández-Bañares, Fernando</creator><creatorcontrib>Batista, Lissette ; Robles, Virginia ; Manichanh, Chaysavanh ; Ruiz, Laura ; Guagnozzi, Danila ; Pinsach, Ferran ; Guarner, Francisco ; Fernández-Bañares, Fernando</creatorcontrib><description>Background Most microbiota studies in microscopic colitis patients are performed after diagnostic colonoscopy without considering the potential effect of colonic lavage. Patients may achieve clinical remission after colonoscopy and it is unknown whether lavage-induced changes play a role. Aim To assess the effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG) colonic lavage on clinical remission rate, microbial diversity, microbial dysbiosis index and specific microbial changes in patients with active microscopic colitis as compared to other diarrhoeal diseases and healthy controls. Methods Fifty-five consecutive patients presenting chronic watery diarrhoea and 12 healthy controls were included. Faecal samples were collected three days before and 30 days after PEG in patients and controls for microbiome analysis. Results Clinical remission was observed in 53% of microscopic colitis patients, and in 32% of non-microscopic colitis patients (p = 0.16). Considering patients with persisting diarrhoea after colonoscopy, 71% of non-microscopic colitis patients had bile acid diarrhoea. Baseline Shannon Index was lower in diarrhoea groups than in healthy controls (p = 0.0025); there were no differences between microscopic colitis, bile-acid diarrhoea and functional diarrhoea. The microbial dysbiosis index was significantly higher in microscopic colitis than in bile acid diarrhoea plus functional diarrhoea (p = 0.0095), but no bacterial species showed a significantly different relative abundance among the diarrheal groups. Conclusions Dysbiosis is a feature in active microscopic colitis, but loss of microbial diversity was similar in all diarrheal groups, suggesting that faecal microbial changes are not due to microscopic colitis itself but associated with stool form. A considerable number of microscopic colitis patients achieved clinical remission after colonoscopy, but we were unable to demonstrate related PEG-induced changes in faecal microbiome. Keywords: Microscopic colitis, Dysbiosis, Faecal microbiome, Polyethylene glycol</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-230X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-230X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02392-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35764931</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Colitis ; Colon ; Colonoscopy ; Diagnosis ; Diarrhea ; Dosage and administration ; Dysbacteriosis ; Dysbiosis ; Evaluation ; Faecal microbiome ; Feces ; Forecasts and trends ; Gastroenterology ; Inflammatory bowel disease ; Irritable bowel syndrome ; Lavage ; Methods ; Microbiomes ; Microbiota ; Microscopic colitis ; Patients ; Polyethylene glycol ; Remission ; Remission (Medicine)</subject><ispartof>BMC gastroenterology, 2022-06, Vol.22 (1), p.1-320, Article 320</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-a9e6aec03e17fa8f387f771ae0a174a362d4044501bb6fea17b8708f7ad4f5293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-a9e6aec03e17fa8f387f771ae0a174a362d4044501bb6fea17b8708f7ad4f5293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238263/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2691450705?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Batista, Lissette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robles, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manichanh, Chaysavanh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guagnozzi, Danila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinsach, Ferran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guarner, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Bañares, Fernando</creatorcontrib><title>Colonic bacterial diversity and dysbiosis in active microscopic colitis as compared to chronic diarrhoea and healthy controls: effect of polyethylene glycol after bowel lavage for colonoscopy</title><title>BMC gastroenterology</title><description>Background Most microbiota studies in microscopic colitis patients are performed after diagnostic colonoscopy without considering the potential effect of colonic lavage. Patients may achieve clinical remission after colonoscopy and it is unknown whether lavage-induced changes play a role. Aim To assess the effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG) colonic lavage on clinical remission rate, microbial diversity, microbial dysbiosis index and specific microbial changes in patients with active microscopic colitis as compared to other diarrhoeal diseases and healthy controls. Methods Fifty-five consecutive patients presenting chronic watery diarrhoea and 12 healthy controls were included. Faecal samples were collected three days before and 30 days after PEG in patients and controls for microbiome analysis. Results Clinical remission was observed in 53% of microscopic colitis patients, and in 32% of non-microscopic colitis patients (p = 0.16). Considering patients with persisting diarrhoea after colonoscopy, 71% of non-microscopic colitis patients had bile acid diarrhoea. Baseline Shannon Index was lower in diarrhoea groups than in healthy controls (p = 0.0025); there were no differences between microscopic colitis, bile-acid diarrhoea and functional diarrhoea. The microbial dysbiosis index was significantly higher in microscopic colitis than in bile acid diarrhoea plus functional diarrhoea (p = 0.0095), but no bacterial species showed a significantly different relative abundance among the diarrheal groups. Conclusions Dysbiosis is a feature in active microscopic colitis, but loss of microbial diversity was similar in all diarrheal groups, suggesting that faecal microbial changes are not due to microscopic colitis itself but associated with stool form. A considerable number of microscopic colitis patients achieved clinical remission after colonoscopy, but we were unable to demonstrate related PEG-induced changes in faecal microbiome. Keywords: Microscopic colitis, Dysbiosis, Faecal microbiome, Polyethylene glycol</description><subject>Colitis</subject><subject>Colon</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diarrhea</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Dysbacteriosis</subject><subject>Dysbiosis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Faecal microbiome</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Forecasts and trends</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Inflammatory bowel disease</subject><subject>Irritable bowel syndrome</subject><subject>Lavage</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Microbiomes</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Microscopic colitis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Polyethylene glycol</subject><subject>Remission</subject><subject>Remission (Medicine)</subject><issn>1471-230X</issn><issn>1471-230X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk2LFDEQhhtR3HX1D3gKePEyaz66k24PwrL4sbDgRcFbqE5XZjJkOmPSM0v_uv1r1sws6oo0oUPVW0-lireqXgt-KUSr3xUhW6MXXEo6qpOLuyfVuaiNWEjFfzz9635WvShlzbkwrVTPqzPVGF13SpxX99cppjE41oObMAeIbAh7zCVMM4NxYMNc-pBKKCyMjDSUZJvgcioubanOpRgmykKh62YLGQc2JeZW-YgdAuS8SghH2AohTquZlOOUUyzvGXqPbmLJs22KM1Iy4ohsGWcCM_D0JtanO4wswh6WyHzKh55pPD5gflk98xALvnr4X1TfP338dv1lcfv188311e3C1YZPC-hQAzquUBgPrVet8cYIQA7C1KC0HGpe1w0Xfa89UrBvDW-9gaH2jezURXVz4g4J1nabwwbybBMEewykvLSQp-AiWu2HQWiHbStlLXvdGme81q5RdWMGbIn14cTa7voNDg5pGRAfQR9nxrCyy7S3nVSt1IoAbx8AOf3cYZnsJhSHMcKIaVes1NS60VrVJH3zj3SddnmkVZGqEzSx4c0f1RJogDD6RH3dAWqvaA2E6vhhB5f_UdE3IDkijegDxR8VyFPBwS4lo_89o-D2YGF7srAlC9ujhe2d-gXb1OeG</recordid><startdate>20220628</startdate><enddate>20220628</enddate><creator>Batista, Lissette</creator><creator>Robles, Virginia</creator><creator>Manichanh, Chaysavanh</creator><creator>Ruiz, Laura</creator><creator>Guagnozzi, Danila</creator><creator>Pinsach, Ferran</creator><creator>Guarner, Francisco</creator><creator>Fernández-Bañares, Fernando</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220628</creationdate><title>Colonic bacterial diversity and dysbiosis in active microscopic colitis as compared to chronic diarrhoea and healthy controls: effect of polyethylene glycol after bowel lavage for colonoscopy</title><author>Batista, Lissette ; Robles, Virginia ; Manichanh, Chaysavanh ; Ruiz, Laura ; Guagnozzi, Danila ; Pinsach, Ferran ; Guarner, Francisco ; Fernández-Bañares, Fernando</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-a9e6aec03e17fa8f387f771ae0a174a362d4044501bb6fea17b8708f7ad4f5293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Colitis</topic><topic>Colon</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diarrhea</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Dysbacteriosis</topic><topic>Dysbiosis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Faecal microbiome</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Forecasts and trends</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Inflammatory bowel disease</topic><topic>Irritable bowel syndrome</topic><topic>Lavage</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Microbiomes</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Microscopic colitis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Polyethylene glycol</topic><topic>Remission</topic><topic>Remission (Medicine)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Batista, Lissette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robles, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manichanh, Chaysavanh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guagnozzi, Danila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinsach, Ferran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guarner, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Bañares, Fernando</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health & Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC gastroenterology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Batista, Lissette</au><au>Robles, Virginia</au><au>Manichanh, Chaysavanh</au><au>Ruiz, Laura</au><au>Guagnozzi, Danila</au><au>Pinsach, Ferran</au><au>Guarner, Francisco</au><au>Fernández-Bañares, Fernando</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Colonic bacterial diversity and dysbiosis in active microscopic colitis as compared to chronic diarrhoea and healthy controls: effect of polyethylene glycol after bowel lavage for colonoscopy</atitle><jtitle>BMC gastroenterology</jtitle><date>2022-06-28</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>320</epage><pages>1-320</pages><artnum>320</artnum><issn>1471-230X</issn><eissn>1471-230X</eissn><abstract>Background Most microbiota studies in microscopic colitis patients are performed after diagnostic colonoscopy without considering the potential effect of colonic lavage. Patients may achieve clinical remission after colonoscopy and it is unknown whether lavage-induced changes play a role. Aim To assess the effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG) colonic lavage on clinical remission rate, microbial diversity, microbial dysbiosis index and specific microbial changes in patients with active microscopic colitis as compared to other diarrhoeal diseases and healthy controls. Methods Fifty-five consecutive patients presenting chronic watery diarrhoea and 12 healthy controls were included. Faecal samples were collected three days before and 30 days after PEG in patients and controls for microbiome analysis. Results Clinical remission was observed in 53% of microscopic colitis patients, and in 32% of non-microscopic colitis patients (p = 0.16). Considering patients with persisting diarrhoea after colonoscopy, 71% of non-microscopic colitis patients had bile acid diarrhoea. Baseline Shannon Index was lower in diarrhoea groups than in healthy controls (p = 0.0025); there were no differences between microscopic colitis, bile-acid diarrhoea and functional diarrhoea. The microbial dysbiosis index was significantly higher in microscopic colitis than in bile acid diarrhoea plus functional diarrhoea (p = 0.0095), but no bacterial species showed a significantly different relative abundance among the diarrheal groups. Conclusions Dysbiosis is a feature in active microscopic colitis, but loss of microbial diversity was similar in all diarrheal groups, suggesting that faecal microbial changes are not due to microscopic colitis itself but associated with stool form. A considerable number of microscopic colitis patients achieved clinical remission after colonoscopy, but we were unable to demonstrate related PEG-induced changes in faecal microbiome. Keywords: Microscopic colitis, Dysbiosis, Faecal microbiome, Polyethylene glycol</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>35764931</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12876-022-02392-w</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-230X |
ispartof | BMC gastroenterology, 2022-06, Vol.22 (1), p.1-320, Article 320 |
issn | 1471-230X 1471-230X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6fdd16ce882242b687c7f66c53457de8 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) |
subjects | Colitis Colon Colonoscopy Diagnosis Diarrhea Dosage and administration Dysbacteriosis Dysbiosis Evaluation Faecal microbiome Feces Forecasts and trends Gastroenterology Inflammatory bowel disease Irritable bowel syndrome Lavage Methods Microbiomes Microbiota Microscopic colitis Patients Polyethylene glycol Remission Remission (Medicine) |
title | Colonic bacterial diversity and dysbiosis in active microscopic colitis as compared to chronic diarrhoea and healthy controls: effect of polyethylene glycol after bowel lavage for colonoscopy |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T10%3A54%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Colonic%20bacterial%20diversity%20and%20dysbiosis%20in%20active%20microscopic%20colitis%20as%20compared%20to%20chronic%20diarrhoea%20and%20healthy%20controls:%20effect%20of%20polyethylene%20glycol%20after%20bowel%20lavage%20for%20colonoscopy&rft.jtitle=BMC%20gastroenterology&rft.au=Batista,%20Lissette&rft.date=2022-06-28&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=320&rft.pages=1-320&rft.artnum=320&rft.issn=1471-230X&rft.eissn=1471-230X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12876-022-02392-w&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA708566909%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-a9e6aec03e17fa8f387f771ae0a174a362d4044501bb6fea17b8708f7ad4f5293%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2691450705&rft_id=info:pmid/35764931&rft_galeid=A708566909&rfr_iscdi=true |