In Situ Airtightness Measurement Using Compressed Air Flow Characteristics

The airtightness of a building has a significant impact on energy savings, structural longevity, and indoor air quality for occupants. Therefore, it is essential to accurately measure the airtightness of buildings, though the widely used fan pressurization method suffers from several shortcomings. F...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energies (Basel) 2023-10, Vol.16 (19), p.6975
Main Authors: Han, Seolyee, Jeong, Hakgeun, Lee, Jinsook, Kim, Jonghun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accuracy
Air leakage
airtightness
blower door
building envelope
Buildings
Compressed air
Cooling
Energy consumption
Experimental methods
Indoor air quality
leakage measurement
Reproducibility
Research methodology
transient method
Windows & doors
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The airtightness of a building has a significant impact on energy savings, structural longevity, and indoor air quality for occupants. Therefore, it is essential to accurately measure the airtightness of buildings, though the widely used fan pressurization method suffers from several shortcomings. For this reason, transient methods have recently emerged to assess airtightness by monitoring pressure changes over time, but studies using transient methods in this field are rare. In this study, we selected three representative buildings to conduct field tests to verify the practical applicability of the improved transient method. To verify the results of the transient method, we conducted a comparison experiment with the blower door test: a widely used measurement method. When measuring the effective leakage area, the average standard deviation of the transient method was 0.903 cm2, which was much smaller than the blower door test result of 1.488 cm2. In addition, the recorded standard errors ranged from 0.197 cm2 to 0.816 cm2 for the transient method and from 0.269 cm2 to 1.801 cm2 for the blower door test. Notably, the transitional method was more reproducible than the blower door test while showing similar accuracy. Given these results, it is expected that the improved transitional method can be used to evaluate airtightness performance in the field.
ISSN:1996-1073
1996-1073
DOI:10.3390/en16196975