Loading…

The anesthetic approach to repeated cesarean sections: A prospective cohort study

Each repeat cesarean section (CS) potentially adds surgical complexity. The determination of appropriate anesthesia strategy to meet the surgical challenge is of crucial importance for the maternal and neonatal outcome. This prospective cohort study was conducted from 1-Jan-2021 to 31-Dec-2021 at a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X 2024-06, Vol.22, p.100301, Article 100301
Main Authors: Weinstein, Jacob, Muhalwes, Rasha, Ronenson, Alexander, Halpern, Stephen H., Grisaru-Granovsky, Sorina, Akawi, Tamer, Gozal, Yaacov, Shatalin, Daniel, Ioscovich, Alexander
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-cd92e4452ecd231cb998229546aba44adb50a260a2075fba047f97f9e836d8363
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 100301
container_title European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X
container_volume 22
creator Weinstein, Jacob
Muhalwes, Rasha
Ronenson, Alexander
Halpern, Stephen H.
Grisaru-Granovsky, Sorina
Akawi, Tamer
Gozal, Yaacov
Shatalin, Daniel
Ioscovich, Alexander
description Each repeat cesarean section (CS) potentially adds surgical complexity. The determination of appropriate anesthesia strategy to meet the surgical challenge is of crucial importance for the maternal and neonatal outcome. This prospective cohort study was conducted from 1-Jan-2021 to 31-Dec-2021 at a single large obstetric centre of all repeat CS. We compared the characteristics and the appropriateness of the anesthesia techniques for low-order repeat CS (LOR-CS) (1 or 2 previous CS) and high order repat CS (HOR-CS) group (3 or more repeat CS). During the study period, 1057 parturients met the study entry criteria, with 821 parturients in the LOR-CS group and 236 parturients in the HOR-CS group. The use of spinal anesthesia was more common for HOR-CS 84.3%. Overall surgical time varied between LOR-CS (38 min, 29–49) and HOR-CS (42 min, 31–57) (p = 0.004). The rate of moderate and severe adhesions was relatively high in HOR-CS and the duration of overall surgical time for cases with mild adhesions was 38 min (29–48), for moderate adhesions was 44 min (34.8–56.5), and for severe adhesions was 56 min (44.8–74.3). There was no significant difference in the Estimated Blood Loss (EBL) between LOR-CS and HOR-CS, with values of 653 ± 292 ml vs. 660 ± 285 ml, respectively. Our data indicate that spinal anesthesia, standard monitoring and regular anesthetic setup are safe and suitable for the majority of HOR-CS, except in cases with high suspicion of placental accreta spectrum.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.eurox.2024.100301
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7042f3aa8fb14b3dab12c58cb132b1de</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2590161324000218</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7042f3aa8fb14b3dab12c58cb132b1de</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3081293309</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-cd92e4452ecd231cb998229546aba44adb50a260a2075fba047f97f9e836d8363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UV1rFTEQXUSxpfYXCJJHX-41k2S_BJFS_CgURKjPYZLMdnPZu1mT3Yv99-Z2a2lfhAyZTM6cSc4pirfAt8Ch-rDb0hLDn63gQuUKlxxeFKeibPkGKpAvn-QnxXlKO865gAaaCl4XJ7LlALysToufNz0xHCnNPc3eMpymGND2bA4s0kQ4k2OWEkbCkSWysw9j-sguWMal6Xg-ELOhD3FmaV7c3ZviVYdDovOH_az49fXLzeX3zfWPb1eXF9cbq-pq3ljXClKqFGSdkGBN2zZCtKWq0KBS6EzJUVQ5eF12BrmquzYvamTlcsiz4mrldQF3eop-j_FOB_T6vhDircaYvzSQrrkSnURsOgPKSIcGhC0ba0AKA44y1-eVa1rMnpylcY44PCN9fjP6Xt-GgwYQqgalMsP7B4YYfi9ZTr33ydIwZG3DkrTkDYhWSt5mqFyhNiuYInWPc4Dro7l6p-_N1Udz9Wpu7nr39ImPPf-szIBPK4Cy6AdPUSfrabTkfMw2ZVX8fwf8BbP5t4U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3081293309</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The anesthetic approach to repeated cesarean sections: A prospective cohort study</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Weinstein, Jacob ; Muhalwes, Rasha ; Ronenson, Alexander ; Halpern, Stephen H. ; Grisaru-Granovsky, Sorina ; Akawi, Tamer ; Gozal, Yaacov ; Shatalin, Daniel ; Ioscovich, Alexander</creator><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Jacob ; Muhalwes, Rasha ; Ronenson, Alexander ; Halpern, Stephen H. ; Grisaru-Granovsky, Sorina ; Akawi, Tamer ; Gozal, Yaacov ; Shatalin, Daniel ; Ioscovich, Alexander</creatorcontrib><description>Each repeat cesarean section (CS) potentially adds surgical complexity. The determination of appropriate anesthesia strategy to meet the surgical challenge is of crucial importance for the maternal and neonatal outcome. This prospective cohort study was conducted from 1-Jan-2021 to 31-Dec-2021 at a single large obstetric centre of all repeat CS. We compared the characteristics and the appropriateness of the anesthesia techniques for low-order repeat CS (LOR-CS) (1 or 2 previous CS) and high order repat CS (HOR-CS) group (3 or more repeat CS). During the study period, 1057 parturients met the study entry criteria, with 821 parturients in the LOR-CS group and 236 parturients in the HOR-CS group. The use of spinal anesthesia was more common for HOR-CS 84.3%. Overall surgical time varied between LOR-CS (38 min, 29–49) and HOR-CS (42 min, 31–57) (p = 0.004). The rate of moderate and severe adhesions was relatively high in HOR-CS and the duration of overall surgical time for cases with mild adhesions was 38 min (29–48), for moderate adhesions was 44 min (34.8–56.5), and for severe adhesions was 56 min (44.8–74.3). There was no significant difference in the Estimated Blood Loss (EBL) between LOR-CS and HOR-CS, with values of 653 ± 292 ml vs. 660 ± 285 ml, respectively. Our data indicate that spinal anesthesia, standard monitoring and regular anesthetic setup are safe and suitable for the majority of HOR-CS, except in cases with high suspicion of placental accreta spectrum.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2590-1613</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2590-1613</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eurox.2024.100301</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39011056</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Complications ; Obstetric anesthesia ; Obstetrics and Maternal Fetal Medicine ; Repeat cesarean section ; Spinal anesthesia</subject><ispartof>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2024-06, Vol.22, p.100301, Article 100301</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>2024 The Authors.</rights><rights>2024 The Authors 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-cd92e4452ecd231cb998229546aba44adb50a260a2075fba047f97f9e836d8363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11247144/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590161324000218$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3536,27901,27902,45756,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39011056$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muhalwes, Rasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ronenson, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halpern, Stephen H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grisaru-Granovsky, Sorina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akawi, Tamer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gozal, Yaacov</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shatalin, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ioscovich, Alexander</creatorcontrib><title>The anesthetic approach to repeated cesarean sections: A prospective cohort study</title><title>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology: X</title><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X</addtitle><description>Each repeat cesarean section (CS) potentially adds surgical complexity. The determination of appropriate anesthesia strategy to meet the surgical challenge is of crucial importance for the maternal and neonatal outcome. This prospective cohort study was conducted from 1-Jan-2021 to 31-Dec-2021 at a single large obstetric centre of all repeat CS. We compared the characteristics and the appropriateness of the anesthesia techniques for low-order repeat CS (LOR-CS) (1 or 2 previous CS) and high order repat CS (HOR-CS) group (3 or more repeat CS). During the study period, 1057 parturients met the study entry criteria, with 821 parturients in the LOR-CS group and 236 parturients in the HOR-CS group. The use of spinal anesthesia was more common for HOR-CS 84.3%. Overall surgical time varied between LOR-CS (38 min, 29–49) and HOR-CS (42 min, 31–57) (p = 0.004). The rate of moderate and severe adhesions was relatively high in HOR-CS and the duration of overall surgical time for cases with mild adhesions was 38 min (29–48), for moderate adhesions was 44 min (34.8–56.5), and for severe adhesions was 56 min (44.8–74.3). There was no significant difference in the Estimated Blood Loss (EBL) between LOR-CS and HOR-CS, with values of 653 ± 292 ml vs. 660 ± 285 ml, respectively. Our data indicate that spinal anesthesia, standard monitoring and regular anesthetic setup are safe and suitable for the majority of HOR-CS, except in cases with high suspicion of placental accreta spectrum.</description><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Obstetric anesthesia</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Maternal Fetal Medicine</subject><subject>Repeat cesarean section</subject><subject>Spinal anesthesia</subject><issn>2590-1613</issn><issn>2590-1613</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UV1rFTEQXUSxpfYXCJJHX-41k2S_BJFS_CgURKjPYZLMdnPZu1mT3Yv99-Z2a2lfhAyZTM6cSc4pirfAt8Ch-rDb0hLDn63gQuUKlxxeFKeibPkGKpAvn-QnxXlKO865gAaaCl4XJ7LlALysToufNz0xHCnNPc3eMpymGND2bA4s0kQ4k2OWEkbCkSWysw9j-sguWMal6Xg-ELOhD3FmaV7c3ZviVYdDovOH_az49fXLzeX3zfWPb1eXF9cbq-pq3ljXClKqFGSdkGBN2zZCtKWq0KBS6EzJUVQ5eF12BrmquzYvamTlcsiz4mrldQF3eop-j_FOB_T6vhDircaYvzSQrrkSnURsOgPKSIcGhC0ba0AKA44y1-eVa1rMnpylcY44PCN9fjP6Xt-GgwYQqgalMsP7B4YYfi9ZTr33ydIwZG3DkrTkDYhWSt5mqFyhNiuYInWPc4Dro7l6p-_N1Udz9Wpu7nr39ImPPf-szIBPK4Cy6AdPUSfrabTkfMw2ZVX8fwf8BbP5t4U</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Weinstein, Jacob</creator><creator>Muhalwes, Rasha</creator><creator>Ronenson, Alexander</creator><creator>Halpern, Stephen H.</creator><creator>Grisaru-Granovsky, Sorina</creator><creator>Akawi, Tamer</creator><creator>Gozal, Yaacov</creator><creator>Shatalin, Daniel</creator><creator>Ioscovich, Alexander</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>The anesthetic approach to repeated cesarean sections: A prospective cohort study</title><author>Weinstein, Jacob ; Muhalwes, Rasha ; Ronenson, Alexander ; Halpern, Stephen H. ; Grisaru-Granovsky, Sorina ; Akawi, Tamer ; Gozal, Yaacov ; Shatalin, Daniel ; Ioscovich, Alexander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-cd92e4452ecd231cb998229546aba44adb50a260a2075fba047f97f9e836d8363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Obstetric anesthesia</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Maternal Fetal Medicine</topic><topic>Repeat cesarean section</topic><topic>Spinal anesthesia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muhalwes, Rasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ronenson, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halpern, Stephen H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grisaru-Granovsky, Sorina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akawi, Tamer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gozal, Yaacov</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shatalin, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ioscovich, Alexander</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology: X</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weinstein, Jacob</au><au>Muhalwes, Rasha</au><au>Ronenson, Alexander</au><au>Halpern, Stephen H.</au><au>Grisaru-Granovsky, Sorina</au><au>Akawi, Tamer</au><au>Gozal, Yaacov</au><au>Shatalin, Daniel</au><au>Ioscovich, Alexander</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The anesthetic approach to repeated cesarean sections: A prospective cohort study</atitle><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology: X</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X</addtitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>22</volume><spage>100301</spage><pages>100301-</pages><artnum>100301</artnum><issn>2590-1613</issn><eissn>2590-1613</eissn><abstract>Each repeat cesarean section (CS) potentially adds surgical complexity. The determination of appropriate anesthesia strategy to meet the surgical challenge is of crucial importance for the maternal and neonatal outcome. This prospective cohort study was conducted from 1-Jan-2021 to 31-Dec-2021 at a single large obstetric centre of all repeat CS. We compared the characteristics and the appropriateness of the anesthesia techniques for low-order repeat CS (LOR-CS) (1 or 2 previous CS) and high order repat CS (HOR-CS) group (3 or more repeat CS). During the study period, 1057 parturients met the study entry criteria, with 821 parturients in the LOR-CS group and 236 parturients in the HOR-CS group. The use of spinal anesthesia was more common for HOR-CS 84.3%. Overall surgical time varied between LOR-CS (38 min, 29–49) and HOR-CS (42 min, 31–57) (p = 0.004). The rate of moderate and severe adhesions was relatively high in HOR-CS and the duration of overall surgical time for cases with mild adhesions was 38 min (29–48), for moderate adhesions was 44 min (34.8–56.5), and for severe adhesions was 56 min (44.8–74.3). There was no significant difference in the Estimated Blood Loss (EBL) between LOR-CS and HOR-CS, with values of 653 ± 292 ml vs. 660 ± 285 ml, respectively. Our data indicate that spinal anesthesia, standard monitoring and regular anesthetic setup are safe and suitable for the majority of HOR-CS, except in cases with high suspicion of placental accreta spectrum.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>39011056</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.eurox.2024.100301</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2590-1613
ispartof European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2024-06, Vol.22, p.100301, Article 100301
issn 2590-1613
2590-1613
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7042f3aa8fb14b3dab12c58cb132b1de
source Open Access: PubMed Central; ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Complications
Obstetric anesthesia
Obstetrics and Maternal Fetal Medicine
Repeat cesarean section
Spinal anesthesia
title The anesthetic approach to repeated cesarean sections: A prospective cohort study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T08%3A16%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20anesthetic%20approach%20to%20repeated%20cesarean%20sections:%20A%20prospective%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology%20and%20reproductive%20biology:%20X&rft.au=Weinstein,%20Jacob&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=22&rft.spage=100301&rft.pages=100301-&rft.artnum=100301&rft.issn=2590-1613&rft.eissn=2590-1613&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eurox.2024.100301&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3081293309%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-cd92e4452ecd231cb998229546aba44adb50a260a2075fba047f97f9e836d8363%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3081293309&rft_id=info:pmid/39011056&rfr_iscdi=true