Loading…

Weed control in corn and weed sample size for growth evaluations

The objectives of this study were to evaluate baby corn yield, green corn yield, and grain yield in corn cultivar BM 3061, with weed control achieved via a combination of hoeing and intercropping with gliricidia, and determine how sample size influences weed growth evaluation accuracy. A randomized...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Planta daninha 2014-03, Vol.32 (1), p.51-59
Main Authors: Tavella, L.B., Silva, P.S.L., Oliveira, V.R., Fernandes, P.L.O., Sousa, R.P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The objectives of this study were to evaluate baby corn yield, green corn yield, and grain yield in corn cultivar BM 3061, with weed control achieved via a combination of hoeing and intercropping with gliricidia, and determine how sample size influences weed growth evaluation accuracy. A randomized block design with ten replicates was used. The cultivar was submitted to the following treatments: A = hoeings at 20 and 40 days after corn sowing (DACS), B = hoeing at 20 DACS + gliricidia sowing after hoeing, C = gliricidia sowing together with corn sowing + hoeing at 40 DACS, D = gliricidia sowing together with corn sowing, and E = no hoeing. Gliricidia was sown at a density of 30 viable seeds m-2. After harvesting the mature ears, the area of each plot was divided into eight sampling units measuring 1.2 m² each to evaluate weed growth (above-ground dry biomass). Treatment A provided the highest baby corn, green corn, and grain yields. Treatment B did not differ from treatment A with respect to the yield values for the three products, and was equivalent to treatment C for green corn yield, but was superior to C with regard to baby corn weight and grain yield. Treatments D and E provided similar yields and were inferior to the other treatments. Therefore, treatment B is a promising one. The relation between coefficient of experimental variation (CV) and sample size (S) to evaluate growth of the above-ground part of the weeds was given by the equation CV = 37.57 S-0.15, i.e., CV decreased as S increased. The optimal sample size indicated by this equation was 4.3 m². O presente trabalho teve como objetivos avaliar os rendimentos de minimilho, de milho-verde e de grãos da cultivar BM 3061, com o controle de plantas daninhas feito pela combinação de capinas + consorciação com gliricídia, e verificar como o tamanho da amostra influencia a precisão da avaliação do crescimento das plantas daninhas. Utilizou-se o delineamento de blocos casualizados com dez repetições. O cultivar foi submetido aos tratamentos: A = capinas aos 20 e 40 dias após a semeadura do milho (DASM); B = capina aos 20 DASM + semeadura de gliricídia após a capina; C = semeadura de gliricídia por ocasião da semeadura do milho + capina aos 40 DASM; D = semeadura da gliricídia por ocasião da semeadura do milho; e E = sem capinas. A gliricídia foi semeada na densidade de 30 sementes viáveis por m². Após a colheita das espigas maduras, a área da parcela foi dividida em oito unidades amostrais de 1,2 m²,
ISSN:0100-8358
1806-9681
0100-8358
DOI:10.1590/S0100-83582014000100006