Loading…

The Coldness of Forgetting: OOO in Philosophy, Archaeology, and History

This article begins by addressing a critique of my book Immaterialism by the archaeologists Þóra Pétursdóttirr and Bjørnar Olsen in their 2018 article “Theory Adrift.” As they see it, I restrict myself in Immaterialism to available historical documentation on the Dutch East India Company (VOC), and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Open Philosophy 2019-09, Vol.2 (1), p.270-279
Main Author: Harman, Graham
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-14774c7d5a44c800dba1ac7d390c862ea13a4c1a03e38ebf2a2cffe25ddd59273
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-14774c7d5a44c800dba1ac7d390c862ea13a4c1a03e38ebf2a2cffe25ddd59273
container_end_page 279
container_issue 1
container_start_page 270
container_title Open Philosophy
container_volume 2
creator Harman, Graham
description This article begins by addressing a critique of my book Immaterialism by the archaeologists Þóra Pétursdóttirr and Bjørnar Olsen in their 2018 article “Theory Adrift.” As they see it, I restrict myself in Immaterialism to available historical documentation on the Dutch East India Company (VOC), and they wonder how my account might have changed if I had discussed more typical archaeological examples instead: wrecked and sunken ships, released ballast, deserted harbors, distributed goods, and derelict fortresses. In response, I argue that my account was not therefore non-archaeological, since ruins are the topic of archaeology only by accident: the real subject of the discipline is what Marshall McLuhan describes as “cold media,” in the sense that they are low in information. McLuhan’s distinction between hot and cold media is shown to be surprisingly analogous to Aristotle’s difference between continua and discrete substances, and some consequences are drawn from this analogy.
doi_str_mv 10.1515/opphil-2019-0023
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_70b2bfd7040444c69980b817124edf15</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_70b2bfd7040444c69980b817124edf15</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_70b2bfd7040444c69980b817124edf15</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-14774c7d5a44c800dba1ac7d390c862ea13a4c1a03e38ebf2a2cffe25ddd59273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMtOwzAQRS0EEhV0z9IfQGD8qh12VUUfUqWwKGvL8aNJFeLIzqZ_T0oRYjVzR6Mzo4PQE4EXIoh4jcPQtF1BgZQFAGU3aEYFZ4VSUtz-6-_RPOcTTCtKLEoqZmhzaDxexc71PmccA17HdPTj2PbHN1xVFW57_DGxY45Dc37Gy2Qb42MXj1MwvcPbNo8xnR_RXTBd9vPf-oA-1--H1bbYV5vdarkvLAcxFoRLya10wnBuFYCrDTFTZiVYtaDeEGa4JQaYZ8rXgRpqQ_BUOOdESSV7QLsr10Vz0kNqv0w662ha_TOYntcmja3tvJZQ0zo4CRz4dG1RlgpqRSSh3LtAxMSCK8ummHPy4Y9HQF-86qtXffGqL17ZN32ra48</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Coldness of Forgetting: OOO in Philosophy, Archaeology, and History</title><source>德古意特开放获取电子期刊</source><creator>Harman, Graham</creator><creatorcontrib>Harman, Graham</creatorcontrib><description>This article begins by addressing a critique of my book Immaterialism by the archaeologists Þóra Pétursdóttirr and Bjørnar Olsen in their 2018 article “Theory Adrift.” As they see it, I restrict myself in Immaterialism to available historical documentation on the Dutch East India Company (VOC), and they wonder how my account might have changed if I had discussed more typical archaeological examples instead: wrecked and sunken ships, released ballast, deserted harbors, distributed goods, and derelict fortresses. In response, I argue that my account was not therefore non-archaeological, since ruins are the topic of archaeology only by accident: the real subject of the discipline is what Marshall McLuhan describes as “cold media,” in the sense that they are low in information. McLuhan’s distinction between hot and cold media is shown to be surprisingly analogous to Aristotle’s difference between continua and discrete substances, and some consequences are drawn from this analogy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2543-8875</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2543-8875</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/opphil-2019-0023</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>De Gruyter</publisher><subject>actor-network theory ; archaeology ; bjørnar olsen ; bruno latour ; dutch east india company ; graham harman ; hot and cold media ; marshall mcluhan ; object-oriented ontology ; þóra pétursdóttirr</subject><ispartof>Open Philosophy, 2019-09, Vol.2 (1), p.270-279</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-14774c7d5a44c800dba1ac7d390c862ea13a4c1a03e38ebf2a2cffe25ddd59273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-14774c7d5a44c800dba1ac7d390c862ea13a4c1a03e38ebf2a2cffe25ddd59273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harman, Graham</creatorcontrib><title>The Coldness of Forgetting: OOO in Philosophy, Archaeology, and History</title><title>Open Philosophy</title><description>This article begins by addressing a critique of my book Immaterialism by the archaeologists Þóra Pétursdóttirr and Bjørnar Olsen in their 2018 article “Theory Adrift.” As they see it, I restrict myself in Immaterialism to available historical documentation on the Dutch East India Company (VOC), and they wonder how my account might have changed if I had discussed more typical archaeological examples instead: wrecked and sunken ships, released ballast, deserted harbors, distributed goods, and derelict fortresses. In response, I argue that my account was not therefore non-archaeological, since ruins are the topic of archaeology only by accident: the real subject of the discipline is what Marshall McLuhan describes as “cold media,” in the sense that they are low in information. McLuhan’s distinction between hot and cold media is shown to be surprisingly analogous to Aristotle’s difference between continua and discrete substances, and some consequences are drawn from this analogy.</description><subject>actor-network theory</subject><subject>archaeology</subject><subject>bjørnar olsen</subject><subject>bruno latour</subject><subject>dutch east india company</subject><subject>graham harman</subject><subject>hot and cold media</subject><subject>marshall mcluhan</subject><subject>object-oriented ontology</subject><subject>þóra pétursdóttirr</subject><issn>2543-8875</issn><issn>2543-8875</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMtOwzAQRS0EEhV0z9IfQGD8qh12VUUfUqWwKGvL8aNJFeLIzqZ_T0oRYjVzR6Mzo4PQE4EXIoh4jcPQtF1BgZQFAGU3aEYFZ4VSUtz-6-_RPOcTTCtKLEoqZmhzaDxexc71PmccA17HdPTj2PbHN1xVFW57_DGxY45Dc37Gy2Qb42MXj1MwvcPbNo8xnR_RXTBd9vPf-oA-1--H1bbYV5vdarkvLAcxFoRLya10wnBuFYCrDTFTZiVYtaDeEGa4JQaYZ8rXgRpqQ_BUOOdESSV7QLsr10Vz0kNqv0w662ha_TOYntcmja3tvJZQ0zo4CRz4dG1RlgpqRSSh3LtAxMSCK8ummHPy4Y9HQF-86qtXffGqL17ZN32ra48</recordid><startdate>20190913</startdate><enddate>20190913</enddate><creator>Harman, Graham</creator><general>De Gruyter</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190913</creationdate><title>The Coldness of Forgetting: OOO in Philosophy, Archaeology, and History</title><author>Harman, Graham</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-14774c7d5a44c800dba1ac7d390c862ea13a4c1a03e38ebf2a2cffe25ddd59273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>actor-network theory</topic><topic>archaeology</topic><topic>bjørnar olsen</topic><topic>bruno latour</topic><topic>dutch east india company</topic><topic>graham harman</topic><topic>hot and cold media</topic><topic>marshall mcluhan</topic><topic>object-oriented ontology</topic><topic>þóra pétursdóttirr</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harman, Graham</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Open Philosophy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harman, Graham</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Coldness of Forgetting: OOO in Philosophy, Archaeology, and History</atitle><jtitle>Open Philosophy</jtitle><date>2019-09-13</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>270</spage><epage>279</epage><pages>270-279</pages><issn>2543-8875</issn><eissn>2543-8875</eissn><abstract>This article begins by addressing a critique of my book Immaterialism by the archaeologists Þóra Pétursdóttirr and Bjørnar Olsen in their 2018 article “Theory Adrift.” As they see it, I restrict myself in Immaterialism to available historical documentation on the Dutch East India Company (VOC), and they wonder how my account might have changed if I had discussed more typical archaeological examples instead: wrecked and sunken ships, released ballast, deserted harbors, distributed goods, and derelict fortresses. In response, I argue that my account was not therefore non-archaeological, since ruins are the topic of archaeology only by accident: the real subject of the discipline is what Marshall McLuhan describes as “cold media,” in the sense that they are low in information. McLuhan’s distinction between hot and cold media is shown to be surprisingly analogous to Aristotle’s difference between continua and discrete substances, and some consequences are drawn from this analogy.</abstract><pub>De Gruyter</pub><doi>10.1515/opphil-2019-0023</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2543-8875
ispartof Open Philosophy, 2019-09, Vol.2 (1), p.270-279
issn 2543-8875
2543-8875
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_70b2bfd7040444c69980b817124edf15
source 德古意特开放获取电子期刊
subjects actor-network theory
archaeology
bjørnar olsen
bruno latour
dutch east india company
graham harman
hot and cold media
marshall mcluhan
object-oriented ontology
þóra pétursdóttirr
title The Coldness of Forgetting: OOO in Philosophy, Archaeology, and History
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T09%3A04%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Coldness%20of%20Forgetting:%20OOO%20in%20Philosophy,%20Archaeology,%20and%20History&rft.jtitle=Open%20Philosophy&rft.au=Harman,%20Graham&rft.date=2019-09-13&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=270&rft.epage=279&rft.pages=270-279&rft.issn=2543-8875&rft.eissn=2543-8875&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/opphil-2019-0023&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj_cross%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_70b2bfd7040444c69980b817124edf15%3C/doaj_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-14774c7d5a44c800dba1ac7d390c862ea13a4c1a03e38ebf2a2cffe25ddd59273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true