Loading…
The Coldness of Forgetting: OOO in Philosophy, Archaeology, and History
This article begins by addressing a critique of my book Immaterialism by the archaeologists Þóra Pétursdóttirr and Bjørnar Olsen in their 2018 article “Theory Adrift.” As they see it, I restrict myself in Immaterialism to available historical documentation on the Dutch East India Company (VOC), and...
Saved in:
Published in: | Open Philosophy 2019-09, Vol.2 (1), p.270-279 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-14774c7d5a44c800dba1ac7d390c862ea13a4c1a03e38ebf2a2cffe25ddd59273 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-14774c7d5a44c800dba1ac7d390c862ea13a4c1a03e38ebf2a2cffe25ddd59273 |
container_end_page | 279 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 270 |
container_title | Open Philosophy |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Harman, Graham |
description | This article begins by addressing a critique of my book
Immaterialism
by the archaeologists Þóra Pétursdóttirr and Bjørnar Olsen in their 2018 article “Theory Adrift.” As they see it, I restrict myself in
Immaterialism
to available historical documentation on the Dutch East India Company (VOC), and they wonder how my account might have changed if I had discussed more typical archaeological examples instead: wrecked and sunken ships, released ballast, deserted harbors, distributed goods, and derelict fortresses. In response, I argue that my account was not therefore non-archaeological, since ruins are the topic of archaeology only by accident: the real subject of the discipline is what Marshall McLuhan describes as “cold media,” in the sense that they are low in information. McLuhan’s distinction between hot and cold media is shown to be surprisingly analogous to Aristotle’s difference between continua and discrete substances, and some consequences are drawn from this analogy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1515/opphil-2019-0023 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>doaj_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_70b2bfd7040444c69980b817124edf15</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_70b2bfd7040444c69980b817124edf15</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_70b2bfd7040444c69980b817124edf15</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-14774c7d5a44c800dba1ac7d390c862ea13a4c1a03e38ebf2a2cffe25ddd59273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMtOwzAQRS0EEhV0z9IfQGD8qh12VUUfUqWwKGvL8aNJFeLIzqZ_T0oRYjVzR6Mzo4PQE4EXIoh4jcPQtF1BgZQFAGU3aEYFZ4VSUtz-6-_RPOcTTCtKLEoqZmhzaDxexc71PmccA17HdPTj2PbHN1xVFW57_DGxY45Dc37Gy2Qb42MXj1MwvcPbNo8xnR_RXTBd9vPf-oA-1--H1bbYV5vdarkvLAcxFoRLya10wnBuFYCrDTFTZiVYtaDeEGa4JQaYZ8rXgRpqQ_BUOOdESSV7QLsr10Vz0kNqv0w662ha_TOYntcmja3tvJZQ0zo4CRz4dG1RlgpqRSSh3LtAxMSCK8ummHPy4Y9HQF-86qtXffGqL17ZN32ra48</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Coldness of Forgetting: OOO in Philosophy, Archaeology, and History</title><source>德古意特开放获取电子期刊</source><creator>Harman, Graham</creator><creatorcontrib>Harman, Graham</creatorcontrib><description>This article begins by addressing a critique of my book
Immaterialism
by the archaeologists Þóra Pétursdóttirr and Bjørnar Olsen in their 2018 article “Theory Adrift.” As they see it, I restrict myself in
Immaterialism
to available historical documentation on the Dutch East India Company (VOC), and they wonder how my account might have changed if I had discussed more typical archaeological examples instead: wrecked and sunken ships, released ballast, deserted harbors, distributed goods, and derelict fortresses. In response, I argue that my account was not therefore non-archaeological, since ruins are the topic of archaeology only by accident: the real subject of the discipline is what Marshall McLuhan describes as “cold media,” in the sense that they are low in information. McLuhan’s distinction between hot and cold media is shown to be surprisingly analogous to Aristotle’s difference between continua and discrete substances, and some consequences are drawn from this analogy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2543-8875</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2543-8875</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/opphil-2019-0023</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>De Gruyter</publisher><subject>actor-network theory ; archaeology ; bjørnar olsen ; bruno latour ; dutch east india company ; graham harman ; hot and cold media ; marshall mcluhan ; object-oriented ontology ; þóra pétursdóttirr</subject><ispartof>Open Philosophy, 2019-09, Vol.2 (1), p.270-279</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-14774c7d5a44c800dba1ac7d390c862ea13a4c1a03e38ebf2a2cffe25ddd59273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-14774c7d5a44c800dba1ac7d390c862ea13a4c1a03e38ebf2a2cffe25ddd59273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harman, Graham</creatorcontrib><title>The Coldness of Forgetting: OOO in Philosophy, Archaeology, and History</title><title>Open Philosophy</title><description>This article begins by addressing a critique of my book
Immaterialism
by the archaeologists Þóra Pétursdóttirr and Bjørnar Olsen in their 2018 article “Theory Adrift.” As they see it, I restrict myself in
Immaterialism
to available historical documentation on the Dutch East India Company (VOC), and they wonder how my account might have changed if I had discussed more typical archaeological examples instead: wrecked and sunken ships, released ballast, deserted harbors, distributed goods, and derelict fortresses. In response, I argue that my account was not therefore non-archaeological, since ruins are the topic of archaeology only by accident: the real subject of the discipline is what Marshall McLuhan describes as “cold media,” in the sense that they are low in information. McLuhan’s distinction between hot and cold media is shown to be surprisingly analogous to Aristotle’s difference between continua and discrete substances, and some consequences are drawn from this analogy.</description><subject>actor-network theory</subject><subject>archaeology</subject><subject>bjørnar olsen</subject><subject>bruno latour</subject><subject>dutch east india company</subject><subject>graham harman</subject><subject>hot and cold media</subject><subject>marshall mcluhan</subject><subject>object-oriented ontology</subject><subject>þóra pétursdóttirr</subject><issn>2543-8875</issn><issn>2543-8875</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMtOwzAQRS0EEhV0z9IfQGD8qh12VUUfUqWwKGvL8aNJFeLIzqZ_T0oRYjVzR6Mzo4PQE4EXIoh4jcPQtF1BgZQFAGU3aEYFZ4VSUtz-6-_RPOcTTCtKLEoqZmhzaDxexc71PmccA17HdPTj2PbHN1xVFW57_DGxY45Dc37Gy2Qb42MXj1MwvcPbNo8xnR_RXTBd9vPf-oA-1--H1bbYV5vdarkvLAcxFoRLya10wnBuFYCrDTFTZiVYtaDeEGa4JQaYZ8rXgRpqQ_BUOOdESSV7QLsr10Vz0kNqv0w662ha_TOYntcmja3tvJZQ0zo4CRz4dG1RlgpqRSSh3LtAxMSCK8ummHPy4Y9HQF-86qtXffGqL17ZN32ra48</recordid><startdate>20190913</startdate><enddate>20190913</enddate><creator>Harman, Graham</creator><general>De Gruyter</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190913</creationdate><title>The Coldness of Forgetting: OOO in Philosophy, Archaeology, and History</title><author>Harman, Graham</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-14774c7d5a44c800dba1ac7d390c862ea13a4c1a03e38ebf2a2cffe25ddd59273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>actor-network theory</topic><topic>archaeology</topic><topic>bjørnar olsen</topic><topic>bruno latour</topic><topic>dutch east india company</topic><topic>graham harman</topic><topic>hot and cold media</topic><topic>marshall mcluhan</topic><topic>object-oriented ontology</topic><topic>þóra pétursdóttirr</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harman, Graham</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Open Philosophy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harman, Graham</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Coldness of Forgetting: OOO in Philosophy, Archaeology, and History</atitle><jtitle>Open Philosophy</jtitle><date>2019-09-13</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>270</spage><epage>279</epage><pages>270-279</pages><issn>2543-8875</issn><eissn>2543-8875</eissn><abstract>This article begins by addressing a critique of my book
Immaterialism
by the archaeologists Þóra Pétursdóttirr and Bjørnar Olsen in their 2018 article “Theory Adrift.” As they see it, I restrict myself in
Immaterialism
to available historical documentation on the Dutch East India Company (VOC), and they wonder how my account might have changed if I had discussed more typical archaeological examples instead: wrecked and sunken ships, released ballast, deserted harbors, distributed goods, and derelict fortresses. In response, I argue that my account was not therefore non-archaeological, since ruins are the topic of archaeology only by accident: the real subject of the discipline is what Marshall McLuhan describes as “cold media,” in the sense that they are low in information. McLuhan’s distinction between hot and cold media is shown to be surprisingly analogous to Aristotle’s difference between continua and discrete substances, and some consequences are drawn from this analogy.</abstract><pub>De Gruyter</pub><doi>10.1515/opphil-2019-0023</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2543-8875 |
ispartof | Open Philosophy, 2019-09, Vol.2 (1), p.270-279 |
issn | 2543-8875 2543-8875 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_70b2bfd7040444c69980b817124edf15 |
source | 德古意特开放获取电子期刊 |
subjects | actor-network theory archaeology bjørnar olsen bruno latour dutch east india company graham harman hot and cold media marshall mcluhan object-oriented ontology þóra pétursdóttirr |
title | The Coldness of Forgetting: OOO in Philosophy, Archaeology, and History |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T09%3A04%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Coldness%20of%20Forgetting:%20OOO%20in%20Philosophy,%20Archaeology,%20and%20History&rft.jtitle=Open%20Philosophy&rft.au=Harman,%20Graham&rft.date=2019-09-13&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=270&rft.epage=279&rft.pages=270-279&rft.issn=2543-8875&rft.eissn=2543-8875&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/opphil-2019-0023&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj_cross%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_70b2bfd7040444c69980b817124edf15%3C/doaj_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-14774c7d5a44c800dba1ac7d390c862ea13a4c1a03e38ebf2a2cffe25ddd59273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |