Loading…

High-Titer Rheumatoid Factor is Associated with Worse Clinical Outcomes and Higher Needs for Advanced Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis Under Real-Life Conditions

Introduction Rheumatoid factor (RF) plays an important role in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) pathophysiology, yet the differential effects of varying RF titers remain understudied. We evaluated associations between different RF titers and clinical outcomes in long-standing RA. Methods This multicenter,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Rheumatology and therapy. 2025-02, Vol.12 (1), p.123-136
Main Authors: Oliveira, Victor Davi R. S., Reis, Ana Paula M. G., Brenol, Claiton V., Pereira, Ivânio A., Bonfiglioli, Karina R., Pereira, Letícia R., Bértolo, Manoel B., de Fátima L. C. Sauma, Maria, Guimarães, Maria Fernanda B. R., Louzada-Júnior, Paulo, Giorgi, Rina D. N., Radominski, Sebastião C., Mota, Licia Maria H., Albuquerque, Cleandro P., Castelar-Pinheiro, Geraldo R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction Rheumatoid factor (RF) plays an important role in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) pathophysiology, yet the differential effects of varying RF titers remain understudied. We evaluated associations between different RF titers and clinical outcomes in long-standing RA. Methods This multicenter, cross-sectional study included adults meeting ACR/EULAR (2010) criteria for RA. Circulating RF titers and clinical-epidemiological characteristics were evaluated. Bivariate (Student’s t and chi-squared tests) tests and multiple logistic and linear regression analyses were conducted. Results We included 1097 participants; 78.7% had positive RF, with high titers (≥ 3 × the upper limit of normality) in 56.2%. Negative vs. low-positive RF groups performed similarly concerning all clinical outcomes, being subsequently aggregated as "non-high" RF group. High RF titers (compared to "non-high") were associated with tobacco use (odds ratio, OR [95% confidence interval, CI]: 2.04 [1.35, 3.08]; p  
ISSN:2198-6576
2198-6584
DOI:10.1007/s40744-024-00730-w