Knowledge, attitudes and experiences of self-harm and suicide in low-income and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review

• Published in: BMJ open 2021-06, Vol.11 (6), p.e041645-e041645
• Main Authors: McPhillips, Rebecca, Nafees, Sadia, Elahi, Anam, Batool, Saqba, Krishna, Murali, Krayer, Anne, Huxley, Peter, Chaudhry, Nasim, Robinson, Catherine
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Attitudes; Developing Countries; Global Health; Health care industry; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Humans; Income; Knowledge; Literature reviews; Low income groups; Mental health; Public health; Research Design; Self destructive behavior; Self-Injurious Behavior - epidemiology; suicide & self-harm; Suicide prevention; Suicides & suicide attempts; Systematic review; Systematic Reviews as Topic
• ISSN: 2044-6055; 2044-6055
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041645

IntroductionOver 800 000 people die due to suicide each year and suicide presents a huge psychological, economic and social burden for individuals, communities and countries as a whole. Low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) are disproportionately affected by suicide. The strongest risk factor for suicide is a previous suicide attempt, and other types of self-harm have been found to be robust predictors of suicidal behaviour. An approach that brings together multiple sectors, including education, labour, business, law, politics and the media is crucial to tackling suicide and self-harm. The WHO highlights that evaluations of the knowledge and attitudes that priority groups, not only healthcare staff, have of mental health and suicidal behaviour are key to suicide prevention strategies. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the knowledge, attitudes and experiences different stakeholders in LMICs have of self-harm and suicide.Methods and analysisMEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, BNI, Social Sciences and Cochrane Library will be searched. Reviewers working independently of each other will screen search results, select studies for inclusion, extract and check extracted data, and rate the quality of the studies using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology and Critical Appraisals Skills Programme checklists. In anticipation of heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis of quantitative studies will be provided and metaethnography will be used to synthesise qualitative studies.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required. A report will be provided for the funding body, and the systematic review will be submitted for publication in a high-impact, peer-reviewed, open access journal. Results will also be disseminated at conferences, seminars, congresses and symposia, and to relevant stakeholders.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019135323.