Loading…

Developing a consensus statement for psychosocial support in active surveillance for prostate cancer

Purpose Our objective was to prioritise the psychosocial support needs of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer and to develop a consensus statement to provide guidance on best practice psychosocial support for men choosing active surveillance and their families. Subjects and methods We und...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BJUI compass 2023-01, Vol.4 (1), p.104-113
Main Authors: Beckmann, Kerri, Cahill, Declan, Brown, Christian, Van Hemelrijck, Mieke, Kinsella, Netty
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4125-1ecdff2763b7bdc253af7d7436c975da07e9b1ccc8c4f57fdeab00d2703168043
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4125-1ecdff2763b7bdc253af7d7436c975da07e9b1ccc8c4f57fdeab00d2703168043
container_end_page 113
container_issue 1
container_start_page 104
container_title BJUI compass
container_volume 4
creator Beckmann, Kerri
Cahill, Declan
Brown, Christian
Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
Kinsella, Netty
description Purpose Our objective was to prioritise the psychosocial support needs of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer and to develop a consensus statement to provide guidance on best practice psychosocial support for men choosing active surveillance and their families. Subjects and methods We undertook a patient and public involvement Delphi process over two rounds, informed by qualitative data and a comprehensive literature review, to prioritise the information and support needs of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer. Two panels were surveyed, a patient/carer panel (n = 55) and a health care provider panel (n = 114). Based on the findings of the Delphi surveys, an expert active surveillance discussion group developed a consensus statement to guide best practice. Results Patients and health care professionals differed slightly in their ideas concerning priorities for active surveillance psychosocial support. Broadly, agreed priority areas included ‐patients being involved in decision‐making, continuity of care, more streamlined access to health care teams, improved understanding of the risk of prostate cancer progression and information and support provided through both health care professionals and peers. Based on the identified priorities, the expert discussion group agreed on 22 consensus statements for best practice in psychosocial care for active surveillance in respect of (1) principles of an active surveillance programme; (2) structure of consultations; (3) content of information and support; and (4) delivery of information. Conclusion This consensus statement provides a framework for patient‐focused psychosocial support, which, if adopted, should increase uptake and adherence to active surveillance among men with prostate cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bco2.155
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7162d95ee5b0463382ed7b89cd4e3a22</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7162d95ee5b0463382ed7b89cd4e3a22</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2890702627</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4125-1ecdff2763b7bdc253af7d7436c975da07e9b1ccc8c4f57fdeab00d2703168043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1rFTEYhQex2FIL_gIJuHEzNR-Tj1nqtWqh0E1dh8ybd2oucydjMnPl_vtmemsVwVXC4eEhJ6eq3jB6ySjlHzqI_JJJ-aI648qYupFcvfzrflpd5LylBRVMaEFfVadCSdVKas4q_xn3OMQpjPfEEYhjxjEvmeTZzbjDcSZ9TGTKB_gRc4TgBpKXaYppJmEkDuawx5KkPYZhcCPgkU_xUUBgjdLr6qR3Q8aLp_O8-v7l6m7zrb65_Xq9-XhTQ8O4rBmC73uuleh054FL4XrtdSMUtFp6RzW2HQMAA00vde_RdZR6rqlgytBGnFfXR6-PbmunFHYuHWx0wT4GMd1bl-YAA1rNFPetRJQdbZQQhqPXnWnBNygc58X1_ugqXX4umGe7CxlwLYlxyZZraYTUTLOCvvsH3cYljaWp5aalmnLF9R8hlM_JCfvnBzJq1yHtOqQtQxb07ZNw6Xbon8HfsxWgPgK_woCH_4rsp80tX4UPGmmnRA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2890702627</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Developing a consensus statement for psychosocial support in active surveillance for prostate cancer</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Wiley Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Beckmann, Kerri ; Cahill, Declan ; Brown, Christian ; Van Hemelrijck, Mieke ; Kinsella, Netty</creator><creatorcontrib>Beckmann, Kerri ; Cahill, Declan ; Brown, Christian ; Van Hemelrijck, Mieke ; Kinsella, Netty</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Our objective was to prioritise the psychosocial support needs of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer and to develop a consensus statement to provide guidance on best practice psychosocial support for men choosing active surveillance and their families. Subjects and methods We undertook a patient and public involvement Delphi process over two rounds, informed by qualitative data and a comprehensive literature review, to prioritise the information and support needs of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer. Two panels were surveyed, a patient/carer panel (n = 55) and a health care provider panel (n = 114). Based on the findings of the Delphi surveys, an expert active surveillance discussion group developed a consensus statement to guide best practice. Results Patients and health care professionals differed slightly in their ideas concerning priorities for active surveillance psychosocial support. Broadly, agreed priority areas included ‐patients being involved in decision‐making, continuity of care, more streamlined access to health care teams, improved understanding of the risk of prostate cancer progression and information and support provided through both health care professionals and peers. Based on the identified priorities, the expert discussion group agreed on 22 consensus statements for best practice in psychosocial care for active surveillance in respect of (1) principles of an active surveillance programme; (2) structure of consultations; (3) content of information and support; and (4) delivery of information. Conclusion This consensus statement provides a framework for patient‐focused psychosocial support, which, if adopted, should increase uptake and adherence to active surveillance among men with prostate cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2688-4526</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2688-4526</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bco2.155</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36569508</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>active surveillance ; consensus statement ; Decision making ; Delphi method ; Delphi study ; Literature reviews ; Medical personnel ; Patient education ; Preferences ; Prostate cancer ; prostatic neoplasms ; psychosocial support systems ; Surveillance ; Systematic review ; Urology</subject><ispartof>BJUI compass, 2023-01, Vol.4 (1), p.104-113</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company.</rights><rights>2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4125-1ecdff2763b7bdc253af7d7436c975da07e9b1ccc8c4f57fdeab00d2703168043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4125-1ecdff2763b7bdc253af7d7436c975da07e9b1ccc8c4f57fdeab00d2703168043</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7317-0858 ; 0000-0002-9798-1479</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2890702627/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2890702627?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11561,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,46051,46475,74897</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36569508$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beckmann, Kerri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cahill, Declan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Hemelrijck, Mieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinsella, Netty</creatorcontrib><title>Developing a consensus statement for psychosocial support in active surveillance for prostate cancer</title><title>BJUI compass</title><addtitle>BJUI Compass</addtitle><description>Purpose Our objective was to prioritise the psychosocial support needs of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer and to develop a consensus statement to provide guidance on best practice psychosocial support for men choosing active surveillance and their families. Subjects and methods We undertook a patient and public involvement Delphi process over two rounds, informed by qualitative data and a comprehensive literature review, to prioritise the information and support needs of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer. Two panels were surveyed, a patient/carer panel (n = 55) and a health care provider panel (n = 114). Based on the findings of the Delphi surveys, an expert active surveillance discussion group developed a consensus statement to guide best practice. Results Patients and health care professionals differed slightly in their ideas concerning priorities for active surveillance psychosocial support. Broadly, agreed priority areas included ‐patients being involved in decision‐making, continuity of care, more streamlined access to health care teams, improved understanding of the risk of prostate cancer progression and information and support provided through both health care professionals and peers. Based on the identified priorities, the expert discussion group agreed on 22 consensus statements for best practice in psychosocial care for active surveillance in respect of (1) principles of an active surveillance programme; (2) structure of consultations; (3) content of information and support; and (4) delivery of information. Conclusion This consensus statement provides a framework for patient‐focused psychosocial support, which, if adopted, should increase uptake and adherence to active surveillance among men with prostate cancer.</description><subject>active surveillance</subject><subject>consensus statement</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Delphi method</subject><subject>Delphi study</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Patient education</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>prostatic neoplasms</subject><subject>psychosocial support systems</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>2688-4526</issn><issn>2688-4526</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1rFTEYhQex2FIL_gIJuHEzNR-Tj1nqtWqh0E1dh8ybd2oucydjMnPl_vtmemsVwVXC4eEhJ6eq3jB6ySjlHzqI_JJJ-aI648qYupFcvfzrflpd5LylBRVMaEFfVadCSdVKas4q_xn3OMQpjPfEEYhjxjEvmeTZzbjDcSZ9TGTKB_gRc4TgBpKXaYppJmEkDuawx5KkPYZhcCPgkU_xUUBgjdLr6qR3Q8aLp_O8-v7l6m7zrb65_Xq9-XhTQ8O4rBmC73uuleh054FL4XrtdSMUtFp6RzW2HQMAA00vde_RdZR6rqlgytBGnFfXR6-PbmunFHYuHWx0wT4GMd1bl-YAA1rNFPetRJQdbZQQhqPXnWnBNygc58X1_ugqXX4umGe7CxlwLYlxyZZraYTUTLOCvvsH3cYljaWp5aalmnLF9R8hlM_JCfvnBzJq1yHtOqQtQxb07ZNw6Xbon8HfsxWgPgK_woCH_4rsp80tX4UPGmmnRA</recordid><startdate>202301</startdate><enddate>202301</enddate><creator>Beckmann, Kerri</creator><creator>Cahill, Declan</creator><creator>Brown, Christian</creator><creator>Van Hemelrijck, Mieke</creator><creator>Kinsella, Netty</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7317-0858</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9798-1479</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202301</creationdate><title>Developing a consensus statement for psychosocial support in active surveillance for prostate cancer</title><author>Beckmann, Kerri ; Cahill, Declan ; Brown, Christian ; Van Hemelrijck, Mieke ; Kinsella, Netty</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4125-1ecdff2763b7bdc253af7d7436c975da07e9b1ccc8c4f57fdeab00d2703168043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>active surveillance</topic><topic>consensus statement</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Delphi method</topic><topic>Delphi study</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Patient education</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>prostatic neoplasms</topic><topic>psychosocial support systems</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beckmann, Kerri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cahill, Declan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Hemelrijck, Mieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinsella, Netty</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Archive</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BJUI compass</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beckmann, Kerri</au><au>Cahill, Declan</au><au>Brown, Christian</au><au>Van Hemelrijck, Mieke</au><au>Kinsella, Netty</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Developing a consensus statement for psychosocial support in active surveillance for prostate cancer</atitle><jtitle>BJUI compass</jtitle><addtitle>BJUI Compass</addtitle><date>2023-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>104</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>104-113</pages><issn>2688-4526</issn><eissn>2688-4526</eissn><abstract>Purpose Our objective was to prioritise the psychosocial support needs of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer and to develop a consensus statement to provide guidance on best practice psychosocial support for men choosing active surveillance and their families. Subjects and methods We undertook a patient and public involvement Delphi process over two rounds, informed by qualitative data and a comprehensive literature review, to prioritise the information and support needs of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer. Two panels were surveyed, a patient/carer panel (n = 55) and a health care provider panel (n = 114). Based on the findings of the Delphi surveys, an expert active surveillance discussion group developed a consensus statement to guide best practice. Results Patients and health care professionals differed slightly in their ideas concerning priorities for active surveillance psychosocial support. Broadly, agreed priority areas included ‐patients being involved in decision‐making, continuity of care, more streamlined access to health care teams, improved understanding of the risk of prostate cancer progression and information and support provided through both health care professionals and peers. Based on the identified priorities, the expert discussion group agreed on 22 consensus statements for best practice in psychosocial care for active surveillance in respect of (1) principles of an active surveillance programme; (2) structure of consultations; (3) content of information and support; and (4) delivery of information. Conclusion This consensus statement provides a framework for patient‐focused psychosocial support, which, if adopted, should increase uptake and adherence to active surveillance among men with prostate cancer.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>36569508</pmid><doi>10.1002/bco2.155</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7317-0858</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9798-1479</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2688-4526
ispartof BJUI compass, 2023-01, Vol.4 (1), p.104-113
issn 2688-4526
2688-4526
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7162d95ee5b0463382ed7b89cd4e3a22
source Publicly Available Content Database; Wiley Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects active surveillance
consensus statement
Decision making
Delphi method
Delphi study
Literature reviews
Medical personnel
Patient education
Preferences
Prostate cancer
prostatic neoplasms
psychosocial support systems
Surveillance
Systematic review
Urology
title Developing a consensus statement for psychosocial support in active surveillance for prostate cancer
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T16%3A14%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Developing%20a%20consensus%20statement%20for%20psychosocial%20support%20in%20active%20surveillance%20for%20prostate%20cancer&rft.jtitle=BJUI%20compass&rft.au=Beckmann,%20Kerri&rft.date=2023-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=104&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=104-113&rft.issn=2688-4526&rft.eissn=2688-4526&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bco2.155&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2890702627%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4125-1ecdff2763b7bdc253af7d7436c975da07e9b1ccc8c4f57fdeab00d2703168043%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2890702627&rft_id=info:pmid/36569508&rfr_iscdi=true