Loading…

18F-FDG PET/CT response in a phase 1/2 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer

Background Positron emission tomography (PET) is poised to become a useful imaging modality in staging and evaluating therapeutic responses in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). This analysis from a phase 1/2 study examined the utility of early PET imaging in patients with mPC treated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancer imaging 2017-08, Vol.17 (1), p.23-23, Article 23
Main Authors: Korn, Ronald L., Von Hoff, Daniel D., Borad, Mitesh J., Renschler, Markus F., McGovern, Desmond, Curtis Bay, R., Ramanathan, Ramesh K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4135-7347e3151bf40b1f397e2913b2e7d9c523ab7f1d4cc5070706eb40c1490c24b63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4135-7347e3151bf40b1f397e2913b2e7d9c523ab7f1d4cc5070706eb40c1490c24b63
container_end_page 23
container_issue 1
container_start_page 23
container_title Cancer imaging
container_volume 17
creator Korn, Ronald L.
Von Hoff, Daniel D.
Borad, Mitesh J.
Renschler, Markus F.
McGovern, Desmond
Curtis Bay, R.
Ramanathan, Ramesh K.
description Background Positron emission tomography (PET) is poised to become a useful imaging modality in staging and evaluating therapeutic responses in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). This analysis from a phase 1/2 study examined the utility of early PET imaging in patients with mPC treated with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. Methods Tumors were measured by [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (CT) in patients who received nab-paclitaxel 100 (n = 13), 125 (n = 38), or 150 (n = 1) mg/m2 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Lesion metabolic activity was evaluated at baseline and 6 and 12 weeks postbaseline. Results Fifty-two patients had baseline and ≥1 follow-up PET scan. The median maximum standardized uptake values per pancreatic lesion in the nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 and 125 mg/m2 cohorts were 5.1 and 6.5, respectively. Among patients who had a metabolic response by PET, those who received nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 had a 4-month survival advantage over those who received 100 mg/m2. All patients in the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort experienced an early complete metabolic response (CMR; 34%) or partial metabolic response (PMR; 66%). In the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort, investigator-assessed objective response rates were 77% and 44% among patients with a CMR and PMR, respectively, with no correlation between PET and CT response (Spearman r s = 0.22; P = 0.193). Patients in the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort with a CMR experienced a significantly longer overall survival vs those with a PMR (median, 23.0 vs 11.2 months; P = 0.011), and a significant correlation was found between best percentage change in tumor burden by PET and survival: for each 1% decrease in PET score, the risk of death decreased by 2%. Conclusions The majority of primary pancreatic tumors and their metastases were PET avid, and PET effectively measured changes in tumor metabolic activity at 6 and 12 weeks. These results support the antitumor activity of nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 for treating mPC and the utility of PET for measuring treatment response. Treatment response by PET analysis may be considered when evaluating investigational agents in mPC.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s40644-017-0125-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_716747d98fa044a3b00ee009aff4ab2a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A511226737</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_716747d98fa044a3b00ee009aff4ab2a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A511226737</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4135-7347e3151bf40b1f397e2913b2e7d9c523ab7f1d4cc5070706eb40c1490c24b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-AO8Cgngz3XzNZOZGKGu3Fgp6sV6HM5mT3SyzyZjMlPrvzXaLdkVCyMnJc96chLco3jN6yVhTL5KktZQlZSpPXpXVi-KcSUVLJQR9-Sw-K96ktKOUt02rXhdnvFFKCtGcF541q3L15YZ8v14vlmsSMY3BJyTOEyDjFnLIFpxM0cFAgiUeunIEM7gJHnAg4zAnssG9yfvOeSQ2RAL9PXiDPRnzEhEmZ4g5ZOLb4pWFIeG7p_Wi-LG6Xi-_lnffbm6XV3elkUxUuWepULCKdVbSjlnRKuQtEx1H1bem4gI6ZVkvjamoyqPGTlLDZEsNl10tLorbo24fYKfH6PYQf-kATj8mQtxoiLmtAbVitZJZtbFApQTRUYpIaQvWSug4ZK3PR61x7vbYG_RThOFE9PTEu63ehHtdVVJUDc0Cn54EYvg5Y5r03iWDwwAew5w0a3ldN6ylLKMf_kF3YY4-f9UjxaWQov5LbSA_wHkb8r3mIKqvKsY4r5VQmbr8D5VHj3tngkfrcv6k4OOzgi3CMG1TGObJZUecguwImhhSimj_fAaj-uBMfXSmzs7UB2fqSvwGhabPwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1926243436</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>18F-FDG PET/CT response in a phase 1/2 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><creator>Korn, Ronald L. ; Von Hoff, Daniel D. ; Borad, Mitesh J. ; Renschler, Markus F. ; McGovern, Desmond ; Curtis Bay, R. ; Ramanathan, Ramesh K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Korn, Ronald L. ; Von Hoff, Daniel D. ; Borad, Mitesh J. ; Renschler, Markus F. ; McGovern, Desmond ; Curtis Bay, R. ; Ramanathan, Ramesh K.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Positron emission tomography (PET) is poised to become a useful imaging modality in staging and evaluating therapeutic responses in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). This analysis from a phase 1/2 study examined the utility of early PET imaging in patients with mPC treated with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. Methods Tumors were measured by [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (CT) in patients who received nab-paclitaxel 100 (n = 13), 125 (n = 38), or 150 (n = 1) mg/m2 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Lesion metabolic activity was evaluated at baseline and 6 and 12 weeks postbaseline. Results Fifty-two patients had baseline and ≥1 follow-up PET scan. The median maximum standardized uptake values per pancreatic lesion in the nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 and 125 mg/m2 cohorts were 5.1 and 6.5, respectively. Among patients who had a metabolic response by PET, those who received nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 had a 4-month survival advantage over those who received 100 mg/m2. All patients in the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort experienced an early complete metabolic response (CMR; 34%) or partial metabolic response (PMR; 66%). In the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort, investigator-assessed objective response rates were 77% and 44% among patients with a CMR and PMR, respectively, with no correlation between PET and CT response (Spearman r s = 0.22; P = 0.193). Patients in the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort with a CMR experienced a significantly longer overall survival vs those with a PMR (median, 23.0 vs 11.2 months; P = 0.011), and a significant correlation was found between best percentage change in tumor burden by PET and survival: for each 1% decrease in PET score, the risk of death decreased by 2%. Conclusions The majority of primary pancreatic tumors and their metastases were PET avid, and PET effectively measured changes in tumor metabolic activity at 6 and 12 weeks. These results support the antitumor activity of nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 for treating mPC and the utility of PET for measuring treatment response. Treatment response by PET analysis may be considered when evaluating investigational agents in mPC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-7330</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1740-5025</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-7330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s40644-017-0125-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28774338</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Anticancer properties ; Cancer ; Care and treatment ; Computed tomography ; Correlation ; Diagnosis ; FDA approval ; Gemcitabine ; Lung cancer ; Measurement methods ; Medical imaging ; Metabolism ; Metastasis ; nab-Paclitaxel ; Paclitaxel ; Pancreatic cancer ; Patient outcomes ; Patients ; PET imaging ; Phase 1/2 clinical trial ; Positron emission ; Positron emission tomography ; Survival ; Tomography ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cancer imaging, 2017-08, Vol.17 (1), p.23-23, Article 23</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2017</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4135-7347e3151bf40b1f397e2913b2e7d9c523ab7f1d4cc5070706eb40c1490c24b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4135-7347e3151bf40b1f397e2913b2e7d9c523ab7f1d4cc5070706eb40c1490c24b63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5543580/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1926243436?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Korn, Ronald L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Von Hoff, Daniel D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borad, Mitesh J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renschler, Markus F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGovern, Desmond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curtis Bay, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramanathan, Ramesh K.</creatorcontrib><title>18F-FDG PET/CT response in a phase 1/2 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer</title><title>Cancer imaging</title><description>Background Positron emission tomography (PET) is poised to become a useful imaging modality in staging and evaluating therapeutic responses in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). This analysis from a phase 1/2 study examined the utility of early PET imaging in patients with mPC treated with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. Methods Tumors were measured by [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (CT) in patients who received nab-paclitaxel 100 (n = 13), 125 (n = 38), or 150 (n = 1) mg/m2 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Lesion metabolic activity was evaluated at baseline and 6 and 12 weeks postbaseline. Results Fifty-two patients had baseline and ≥1 follow-up PET scan. The median maximum standardized uptake values per pancreatic lesion in the nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 and 125 mg/m2 cohorts were 5.1 and 6.5, respectively. Among patients who had a metabolic response by PET, those who received nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 had a 4-month survival advantage over those who received 100 mg/m2. All patients in the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort experienced an early complete metabolic response (CMR; 34%) or partial metabolic response (PMR; 66%). In the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort, investigator-assessed objective response rates were 77% and 44% among patients with a CMR and PMR, respectively, with no correlation between PET and CT response (Spearman r s = 0.22; P = 0.193). Patients in the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort with a CMR experienced a significantly longer overall survival vs those with a PMR (median, 23.0 vs 11.2 months; P = 0.011), and a significant correlation was found between best percentage change in tumor burden by PET and survival: for each 1% decrease in PET score, the risk of death decreased by 2%. Conclusions The majority of primary pancreatic tumors and their metastases were PET avid, and PET effectively measured changes in tumor metabolic activity at 6 and 12 weeks. These results support the antitumor activity of nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 for treating mPC and the utility of PET for measuring treatment response. Treatment response by PET analysis may be considered when evaluating investigational agents in mPC.</description><subject>Anticancer properties</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>FDA approval</subject><subject>Gemcitabine</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Measurement methods</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>nab-Paclitaxel</subject><subject>Paclitaxel</subject><subject>Pancreatic cancer</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>PET imaging</subject><subject>Phase 1/2 clinical trial</subject><subject>Positron emission</subject><subject>Positron emission tomography</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1470-7330</issn><issn>1740-5025</issn><issn>1470-7330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-AO8Cgngz3XzNZOZGKGu3Fgp6sV6HM5mT3SyzyZjMlPrvzXaLdkVCyMnJc96chLco3jN6yVhTL5KktZQlZSpPXpXVi-KcSUVLJQR9-Sw-K96ktKOUt02rXhdnvFFKCtGcF541q3L15YZ8v14vlmsSMY3BJyTOEyDjFnLIFpxM0cFAgiUeunIEM7gJHnAg4zAnssG9yfvOeSQ2RAL9PXiDPRnzEhEmZ4g5ZOLb4pWFIeG7p_Wi-LG6Xi-_lnffbm6XV3elkUxUuWepULCKdVbSjlnRKuQtEx1H1bem4gI6ZVkvjamoyqPGTlLDZEsNl10tLorbo24fYKfH6PYQf-kATj8mQtxoiLmtAbVitZJZtbFApQTRUYpIaQvWSug4ZK3PR61x7vbYG_RThOFE9PTEu63ehHtdVVJUDc0Cn54EYvg5Y5r03iWDwwAew5w0a3ldN6ylLKMf_kF3YY4-f9UjxaWQov5LbSA_wHkb8r3mIKqvKsY4r5VQmbr8D5VHj3tngkfrcv6k4OOzgi3CMG1TGObJZUecguwImhhSimj_fAaj-uBMfXSmzs7UB2fqSvwGhabPwA</recordid><startdate>20170803</startdate><enddate>20170803</enddate><creator>Korn, Ronald L.</creator><creator>Von Hoff, Daniel D.</creator><creator>Borad, Mitesh J.</creator><creator>Renschler, Markus F.</creator><creator>McGovern, Desmond</creator><creator>Curtis Bay, R.</creator><creator>Ramanathan, Ramesh K.</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170803</creationdate><title>18F-FDG PET/CT response in a phase 1/2 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer</title><author>Korn, Ronald L. ; Von Hoff, Daniel D. ; Borad, Mitesh J. ; Renschler, Markus F. ; McGovern, Desmond ; Curtis Bay, R. ; Ramanathan, Ramesh K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4135-7347e3151bf40b1f397e2913b2e7d9c523ab7f1d4cc5070706eb40c1490c24b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Anticancer properties</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>FDA approval</topic><topic>Gemcitabine</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Measurement methods</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>nab-Paclitaxel</topic><topic>Paclitaxel</topic><topic>Pancreatic cancer</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>PET imaging</topic><topic>Phase 1/2 clinical trial</topic><topic>Positron emission</topic><topic>Positron emission tomography</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Korn, Ronald L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Von Hoff, Daniel D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borad, Mitesh J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renschler, Markus F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGovern, Desmond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curtis Bay, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramanathan, Ramesh K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Cancer imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Korn, Ronald L.</au><au>Von Hoff, Daniel D.</au><au>Borad, Mitesh J.</au><au>Renschler, Markus F.</au><au>McGovern, Desmond</au><au>Curtis Bay, R.</au><au>Ramanathan, Ramesh K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>18F-FDG PET/CT response in a phase 1/2 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer</atitle><jtitle>Cancer imaging</jtitle><date>2017-08-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>23-23</pages><artnum>23</artnum><issn>1470-7330</issn><issn>1740-5025</issn><eissn>1470-7330</eissn><abstract>Background Positron emission tomography (PET) is poised to become a useful imaging modality in staging and evaluating therapeutic responses in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). This analysis from a phase 1/2 study examined the utility of early PET imaging in patients with mPC treated with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. Methods Tumors were measured by [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (CT) in patients who received nab-paclitaxel 100 (n = 13), 125 (n = 38), or 150 (n = 1) mg/m2 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Lesion metabolic activity was evaluated at baseline and 6 and 12 weeks postbaseline. Results Fifty-two patients had baseline and ≥1 follow-up PET scan. The median maximum standardized uptake values per pancreatic lesion in the nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 and 125 mg/m2 cohorts were 5.1 and 6.5, respectively. Among patients who had a metabolic response by PET, those who received nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 had a 4-month survival advantage over those who received 100 mg/m2. All patients in the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort experienced an early complete metabolic response (CMR; 34%) or partial metabolic response (PMR; 66%). In the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort, investigator-assessed objective response rates were 77% and 44% among patients with a CMR and PMR, respectively, with no correlation between PET and CT response (Spearman r s = 0.22; P = 0.193). Patients in the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort with a CMR experienced a significantly longer overall survival vs those with a PMR (median, 23.0 vs 11.2 months; P = 0.011), and a significant correlation was found between best percentage change in tumor burden by PET and survival: for each 1% decrease in PET score, the risk of death decreased by 2%. Conclusions The majority of primary pancreatic tumors and their metastases were PET avid, and PET effectively measured changes in tumor metabolic activity at 6 and 12 weeks. These results support the antitumor activity of nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 for treating mPC and the utility of PET for measuring treatment response. Treatment response by PET analysis may be considered when evaluating investigational agents in mPC.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>28774338</pmid><doi>10.1186/s40644-017-0125-5</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1470-7330
ispartof Cancer imaging, 2017-08, Vol.17 (1), p.23-23, Article 23
issn 1470-7330
1740-5025
1470-7330
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_716747d98fa044a3b00ee009aff4ab2a
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central(OpenAccess)
subjects Anticancer properties
Cancer
Care and treatment
Computed tomography
Correlation
Diagnosis
FDA approval
Gemcitabine
Lung cancer
Measurement methods
Medical imaging
Metabolism
Metastasis
nab-Paclitaxel
Paclitaxel
Pancreatic cancer
Patient outcomes
Patients
PET imaging
Phase 1/2 clinical trial
Positron emission
Positron emission tomography
Survival
Tomography
Tumors
title 18F-FDG PET/CT response in a phase 1/2 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T19%3A45%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=18F-FDG%20PET/CT%20response%20in%20a%20phase%201/2%20trial%20of%20nab-paclitaxel%20plus%20gemcitabine%20for%20advanced%20pancreatic%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20imaging&rft.au=Korn,%20Ronald%20L.&rft.date=2017-08-03&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=23-23&rft.artnum=23&rft.issn=1470-7330&rft.eissn=1470-7330&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s40644-017-0125-5&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA511226737%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4135-7347e3151bf40b1f397e2913b2e7d9c523ab7f1d4cc5070706eb40c1490c24b63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1926243436&rft_id=info:pmid/28774338&rft_galeid=A511226737&rfr_iscdi=true