Loading…
18F-FDG PET/CT response in a phase 1/2 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer
Background Positron emission tomography (PET) is poised to become a useful imaging modality in staging and evaluating therapeutic responses in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). This analysis from a phase 1/2 study examined the utility of early PET imaging in patients with mPC treated...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cancer imaging 2017-08, Vol.17 (1), p.23-23, Article 23 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4135-7347e3151bf40b1f397e2913b2e7d9c523ab7f1d4cc5070706eb40c1490c24b63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4135-7347e3151bf40b1f397e2913b2e7d9c523ab7f1d4cc5070706eb40c1490c24b63 |
container_end_page | 23 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 23 |
container_title | Cancer imaging |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Korn, Ronald L. Von Hoff, Daniel D. Borad, Mitesh J. Renschler, Markus F. McGovern, Desmond Curtis Bay, R. Ramanathan, Ramesh K. |
description | Background Positron emission tomography (PET) is poised to become a useful imaging modality in staging and evaluating therapeutic responses in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). This analysis from a phase 1/2 study examined the utility of early PET imaging in patients with mPC treated with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. Methods Tumors were measured by [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (CT) in patients who received nab-paclitaxel 100 (n = 13), 125 (n = 38), or 150 (n = 1) mg/m2 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Lesion metabolic activity was evaluated at baseline and 6 and 12 weeks postbaseline. Results Fifty-two patients had baseline and ≥1 follow-up PET scan. The median maximum standardized uptake values per pancreatic lesion in the nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 and 125 mg/m2 cohorts were 5.1 and 6.5, respectively. Among patients who had a metabolic response by PET, those who received nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 had a 4-month survival advantage over those who received 100 mg/m2. All patients in the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort experienced an early complete metabolic response (CMR; 34%) or partial metabolic response (PMR; 66%). In the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort, investigator-assessed objective response rates were 77% and 44% among patients with a CMR and PMR, respectively, with no correlation between PET and CT response (Spearman r s = 0.22; P = 0.193). Patients in the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort with a CMR experienced a significantly longer overall survival vs those with a PMR (median, 23.0 vs 11.2 months; P = 0.011), and a significant correlation was found between best percentage change in tumor burden by PET and survival: for each 1% decrease in PET score, the risk of death decreased by 2%. Conclusions The majority of primary pancreatic tumors and their metastases were PET avid, and PET effectively measured changes in tumor metabolic activity at 6 and 12 weeks. These results support the antitumor activity of nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 for treating mPC and the utility of PET for measuring treatment response. Treatment response by PET analysis may be considered when evaluating investigational agents in mPC. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s40644-017-0125-5 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_716747d98fa044a3b00ee009aff4ab2a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A511226737</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_716747d98fa044a3b00ee009aff4ab2a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A511226737</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4135-7347e3151bf40b1f397e2913b2e7d9c523ab7f1d4cc5070706eb40c1490c24b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-AO8Cgngz3XzNZOZGKGu3Fgp6sV6HM5mT3SyzyZjMlPrvzXaLdkVCyMnJc96chLco3jN6yVhTL5KktZQlZSpPXpXVi-KcSUVLJQR9-Sw-K96ktKOUt02rXhdnvFFKCtGcF541q3L15YZ8v14vlmsSMY3BJyTOEyDjFnLIFpxM0cFAgiUeunIEM7gJHnAg4zAnssG9yfvOeSQ2RAL9PXiDPRnzEhEmZ4g5ZOLb4pWFIeG7p_Wi-LG6Xi-_lnffbm6XV3elkUxUuWepULCKdVbSjlnRKuQtEx1H1bem4gI6ZVkvjamoyqPGTlLDZEsNl10tLorbo24fYKfH6PYQf-kATj8mQtxoiLmtAbVitZJZtbFApQTRUYpIaQvWSug4ZK3PR61x7vbYG_RThOFE9PTEu63ehHtdVVJUDc0Cn54EYvg5Y5r03iWDwwAew5w0a3ldN6ylLKMf_kF3YY4-f9UjxaWQov5LbSA_wHkb8r3mIKqvKsY4r5VQmbr8D5VHj3tngkfrcv6k4OOzgi3CMG1TGObJZUecguwImhhSimj_fAaj-uBMfXSmzs7UB2fqSvwGhabPwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1926243436</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>18F-FDG PET/CT response in a phase 1/2 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><creator>Korn, Ronald L. ; Von Hoff, Daniel D. ; Borad, Mitesh J. ; Renschler, Markus F. ; McGovern, Desmond ; Curtis Bay, R. ; Ramanathan, Ramesh K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Korn, Ronald L. ; Von Hoff, Daniel D. ; Borad, Mitesh J. ; Renschler, Markus F. ; McGovern, Desmond ; Curtis Bay, R. ; Ramanathan, Ramesh K.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Positron emission tomography (PET) is poised to become a useful imaging modality in staging and evaluating therapeutic responses in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). This analysis from a phase 1/2 study examined the utility of early PET imaging in patients with mPC treated with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. Methods Tumors were measured by [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (CT) in patients who received nab-paclitaxel 100 (n = 13), 125 (n = 38), or 150 (n = 1) mg/m2 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Lesion metabolic activity was evaluated at baseline and 6 and 12 weeks postbaseline. Results Fifty-two patients had baseline and ≥1 follow-up PET scan. The median maximum standardized uptake values per pancreatic lesion in the nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 and 125 mg/m2 cohorts were 5.1 and 6.5, respectively. Among patients who had a metabolic response by PET, those who received nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 had a 4-month survival advantage over those who received 100 mg/m2. All patients in the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort experienced an early complete metabolic response (CMR; 34%) or partial metabolic response (PMR; 66%). In the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort, investigator-assessed objective response rates were 77% and 44% among patients with a CMR and PMR, respectively, with no correlation between PET and CT response (Spearman r s = 0.22; P = 0.193). Patients in the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort with a CMR experienced a significantly longer overall survival vs those with a PMR (median, 23.0 vs 11.2 months; P = 0.011), and a significant correlation was found between best percentage change in tumor burden by PET and survival: for each 1% decrease in PET score, the risk of death decreased by 2%. Conclusions The majority of primary pancreatic tumors and their metastases were PET avid, and PET effectively measured changes in tumor metabolic activity at 6 and 12 weeks. These results support the antitumor activity of nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 for treating mPC and the utility of PET for measuring treatment response. Treatment response by PET analysis may be considered when evaluating investigational agents in mPC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-7330</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1740-5025</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-7330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s40644-017-0125-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28774338</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Anticancer properties ; Cancer ; Care and treatment ; Computed tomography ; Correlation ; Diagnosis ; FDA approval ; Gemcitabine ; Lung cancer ; Measurement methods ; Medical imaging ; Metabolism ; Metastasis ; nab-Paclitaxel ; Paclitaxel ; Pancreatic cancer ; Patient outcomes ; Patients ; PET imaging ; Phase 1/2 clinical trial ; Positron emission ; Positron emission tomography ; Survival ; Tomography ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cancer imaging, 2017-08, Vol.17 (1), p.23-23, Article 23</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2017</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4135-7347e3151bf40b1f397e2913b2e7d9c523ab7f1d4cc5070706eb40c1490c24b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4135-7347e3151bf40b1f397e2913b2e7d9c523ab7f1d4cc5070706eb40c1490c24b63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5543580/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1926243436?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Korn, Ronald L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Von Hoff, Daniel D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borad, Mitesh J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renschler, Markus F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGovern, Desmond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curtis Bay, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramanathan, Ramesh K.</creatorcontrib><title>18F-FDG PET/CT response in a phase 1/2 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer</title><title>Cancer imaging</title><description>Background Positron emission tomography (PET) is poised to become a useful imaging modality in staging and evaluating therapeutic responses in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). This analysis from a phase 1/2 study examined the utility of early PET imaging in patients with mPC treated with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. Methods Tumors were measured by [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (CT) in patients who received nab-paclitaxel 100 (n = 13), 125 (n = 38), or 150 (n = 1) mg/m2 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Lesion metabolic activity was evaluated at baseline and 6 and 12 weeks postbaseline. Results Fifty-two patients had baseline and ≥1 follow-up PET scan. The median maximum standardized uptake values per pancreatic lesion in the nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 and 125 mg/m2 cohorts were 5.1 and 6.5, respectively. Among patients who had a metabolic response by PET, those who received nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 had a 4-month survival advantage over those who received 100 mg/m2. All patients in the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort experienced an early complete metabolic response (CMR; 34%) or partial metabolic response (PMR; 66%). In the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort, investigator-assessed objective response rates were 77% and 44% among patients with a CMR and PMR, respectively, with no correlation between PET and CT response (Spearman r s = 0.22; P = 0.193). Patients in the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort with a CMR experienced a significantly longer overall survival vs those with a PMR (median, 23.0 vs 11.2 months; P = 0.011), and a significant correlation was found between best percentage change in tumor burden by PET and survival: for each 1% decrease in PET score, the risk of death decreased by 2%. Conclusions The majority of primary pancreatic tumors and their metastases were PET avid, and PET effectively measured changes in tumor metabolic activity at 6 and 12 weeks. These results support the antitumor activity of nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 for treating mPC and the utility of PET for measuring treatment response. Treatment response by PET analysis may be considered when evaluating investigational agents in mPC.</description><subject>Anticancer properties</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>FDA approval</subject><subject>Gemcitabine</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Measurement methods</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>nab-Paclitaxel</subject><subject>Paclitaxel</subject><subject>Pancreatic cancer</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>PET imaging</subject><subject>Phase 1/2 clinical trial</subject><subject>Positron emission</subject><subject>Positron emission tomography</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1470-7330</issn><issn>1740-5025</issn><issn>1470-7330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-AO8Cgngz3XzNZOZGKGu3Fgp6sV6HM5mT3SyzyZjMlPrvzXaLdkVCyMnJc96chLco3jN6yVhTL5KktZQlZSpPXpXVi-KcSUVLJQR9-Sw-K96ktKOUt02rXhdnvFFKCtGcF541q3L15YZ8v14vlmsSMY3BJyTOEyDjFnLIFpxM0cFAgiUeunIEM7gJHnAg4zAnssG9yfvOeSQ2RAL9PXiDPRnzEhEmZ4g5ZOLb4pWFIeG7p_Wi-LG6Xi-_lnffbm6XV3elkUxUuWepULCKdVbSjlnRKuQtEx1H1bem4gI6ZVkvjamoyqPGTlLDZEsNl10tLorbo24fYKfH6PYQf-kATj8mQtxoiLmtAbVitZJZtbFApQTRUYpIaQvWSug4ZK3PR61x7vbYG_RThOFE9PTEu63ehHtdVVJUDc0Cn54EYvg5Y5r03iWDwwAew5w0a3ldN6ylLKMf_kF3YY4-f9UjxaWQov5LbSA_wHkb8r3mIKqvKsY4r5VQmbr8D5VHj3tngkfrcv6k4OOzgi3CMG1TGObJZUecguwImhhSimj_fAaj-uBMfXSmzs7UB2fqSvwGhabPwA</recordid><startdate>20170803</startdate><enddate>20170803</enddate><creator>Korn, Ronald L.</creator><creator>Von Hoff, Daniel D.</creator><creator>Borad, Mitesh J.</creator><creator>Renschler, Markus F.</creator><creator>McGovern, Desmond</creator><creator>Curtis Bay, R.</creator><creator>Ramanathan, Ramesh K.</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170803</creationdate><title>18F-FDG PET/CT response in a phase 1/2 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer</title><author>Korn, Ronald L. ; Von Hoff, Daniel D. ; Borad, Mitesh J. ; Renschler, Markus F. ; McGovern, Desmond ; Curtis Bay, R. ; Ramanathan, Ramesh K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4135-7347e3151bf40b1f397e2913b2e7d9c523ab7f1d4cc5070706eb40c1490c24b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Anticancer properties</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>FDA approval</topic><topic>Gemcitabine</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Measurement methods</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>nab-Paclitaxel</topic><topic>Paclitaxel</topic><topic>Pancreatic cancer</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>PET imaging</topic><topic>Phase 1/2 clinical trial</topic><topic>Positron emission</topic><topic>Positron emission tomography</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Korn, Ronald L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Von Hoff, Daniel D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borad, Mitesh J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renschler, Markus F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGovern, Desmond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curtis Bay, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramanathan, Ramesh K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Cancer imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Korn, Ronald L.</au><au>Von Hoff, Daniel D.</au><au>Borad, Mitesh J.</au><au>Renschler, Markus F.</au><au>McGovern, Desmond</au><au>Curtis Bay, R.</au><au>Ramanathan, Ramesh K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>18F-FDG PET/CT response in a phase 1/2 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer</atitle><jtitle>Cancer imaging</jtitle><date>2017-08-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>23-23</pages><artnum>23</artnum><issn>1470-7330</issn><issn>1740-5025</issn><eissn>1470-7330</eissn><abstract>Background Positron emission tomography (PET) is poised to become a useful imaging modality in staging and evaluating therapeutic responses in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). This analysis from a phase 1/2 study examined the utility of early PET imaging in patients with mPC treated with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. Methods Tumors were measured by [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (CT) in patients who received nab-paclitaxel 100 (n = 13), 125 (n = 38), or 150 (n = 1) mg/m2 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Lesion metabolic activity was evaluated at baseline and 6 and 12 weeks postbaseline. Results Fifty-two patients had baseline and ≥1 follow-up PET scan. The median maximum standardized uptake values per pancreatic lesion in the nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 and 125 mg/m2 cohorts were 5.1 and 6.5, respectively. Among patients who had a metabolic response by PET, those who received nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 had a 4-month survival advantage over those who received 100 mg/m2. All patients in the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort experienced an early complete metabolic response (CMR; 34%) or partial metabolic response (PMR; 66%). In the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort, investigator-assessed objective response rates were 77% and 44% among patients with a CMR and PMR, respectively, with no correlation between PET and CT response (Spearman r s = 0.22; P = 0.193). Patients in the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort with a CMR experienced a significantly longer overall survival vs those with a PMR (median, 23.0 vs 11.2 months; P = 0.011), and a significant correlation was found between best percentage change in tumor burden by PET and survival: for each 1% decrease in PET score, the risk of death decreased by 2%. Conclusions The majority of primary pancreatic tumors and their metastases were PET avid, and PET effectively measured changes in tumor metabolic activity at 6 and 12 weeks. These results support the antitumor activity of nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 for treating mPC and the utility of PET for measuring treatment response. Treatment response by PET analysis may be considered when evaluating investigational agents in mPC.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>28774338</pmid><doi>10.1186/s40644-017-0125-5</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1470-7330 |
ispartof | Cancer imaging, 2017-08, Vol.17 (1), p.23-23, Article 23 |
issn | 1470-7330 1740-5025 1470-7330 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_716747d98fa044a3b00ee009aff4ab2a |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central(OpenAccess) |
subjects | Anticancer properties Cancer Care and treatment Computed tomography Correlation Diagnosis FDA approval Gemcitabine Lung cancer Measurement methods Medical imaging Metabolism Metastasis nab-Paclitaxel Paclitaxel Pancreatic cancer Patient outcomes Patients PET imaging Phase 1/2 clinical trial Positron emission Positron emission tomography Survival Tomography Tumors |
title | 18F-FDG PET/CT response in a phase 1/2 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T19%3A45%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=18F-FDG%20PET/CT%20response%20in%20a%20phase%201/2%20trial%20of%20nab-paclitaxel%20plus%20gemcitabine%20for%20advanced%20pancreatic%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20imaging&rft.au=Korn,%20Ronald%20L.&rft.date=2017-08-03&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=23-23&rft.artnum=23&rft.issn=1470-7330&rft.eissn=1470-7330&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s40644-017-0125-5&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA511226737%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4135-7347e3151bf40b1f397e2913b2e7d9c523ab7f1d4cc5070706eb40c1490c24b63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1926243436&rft_id=info:pmid/28774338&rft_galeid=A511226737&rfr_iscdi=true |