Loading…
Fetal ultrasound estimated weight and correlation to Brazilian newborn weight
To compare the best fetal weight formula with different biometric tables on the weight of Brazilian newborns. This observational study has tested the performance of different common fetal weight formulas and biometric tables. Weight estimates were performed by the methods of Warsof . (1977), Shepard...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of ultrasonography 2020-01, Vol.20 (81), p.106-110 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c554t-6db3e779a9880dc44aa6d9d41fe1b717e7fa32ec47a3f70f0b33d3486b3fac513 |
|---|---|
| cites | |
| container_end_page | 110 |
| container_issue | 81 |
| container_start_page | 106 |
| container_title | Journal of ultrasonography |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | Galluzzo, Roberto Noya Trapani, Alberto Werner, Heron de Sá, Renato Augusto Moreira Xikota, João Carlos Araujo, Edward de Souza Pires, Maria Marlene |
| description | To compare the best fetal weight formula with different biometric tables on the weight of Brazilian newborns.
This observational study has tested the performance of different common fetal weight formulas and biometric tables. Weight estimates were performed by the methods of Warsof
. (1977), Shepard
. (1982), Hadlock
. (1985), Furlan
. (2012) and Stirnemann
. (2017). The biometric tables selected were the following: Snijders and Nicolaides (1994), Hadlock
. (1984), Papageorghiou
. (2014) and Kiserud
. (2016) and correlated to Pedreira
. (2011) database, which was considered the gold standard. Statistical analyses were performed using the mean relative error, average absolute error and the Pearson correlation coefficient (r).
The best r was found when using the Snijders and Nicolaides (1994) biometric table with weight formula by Stirnemann
. (2017). The average relative error was lower when using weight formula by Shepard
. (1982) with biometric tables by Snijders and Nicolaides (1994), Papageorghiou
. (2014) or Kiserud
. (2016). On average, absolute error, the lowest r was obtained for the Furlan
. (2012) weight formula and the Papageorghiou
. (2014) biometric table.
The best correlation was found for biometric table by Snijders and Nicolaides (1994) and fetal weight formula calculation for the estimation of Brazilian newborn weight by Stirnemann
. (2017). |
| doi_str_mv | 10.15557/jou.2020.0017 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7182ea1756584904aabde355c52ed9f5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A634039566</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7182ea1756584904aabde355c52ed9f5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A634039566</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c554t-6db3e779a9880dc44aa6d9d41fe1b717e7fa32ec47a3f70f0b33d3486b3fac513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUs9rFDEYHUSxpfbqecCLl1nzO5ODQi1WKxUvFryFb5Jvpllmk5qZ6VL_erPdxVIoOSS8vPfy-PKq6i0lKyql1B_WaVkxwsiKEKpfVMdMSNoQTX6_LGfSiqYVRBxVp9O0JoWipFCMva6OOFPEGCWOqx8XOMNYL-OcYUpL9DVOc9jAjL7eYhhu5hoK6FLOOMIcUqznVH_O8DeMAWIdcdulHA_cN9WrHsYJTw_7SXV98eXX-bfm6ufXy_Ozq8ZJKeZG-Y6j1gZM2xLvhABQ3nhBe6Sdphp1D5yhExp4r0lPOs49F63qeA9OUn5SXe59fYK1vc0lcL63CYJ9AFIeLOQ5uBGtpi1DoFoq2QpDylOdRy6lkwy96WXx-rT3ul26DXqHsYxifGL69CaGGzukO6sFMVKaYvD-YJDTn6WMz27C5HAcIWJaJssENZoKTne53-2pA5RoIfapOLod3Z4pLgg3UqnCWj3DKsvjJrgUsQ8Ff07gcpqmjP3_9JTYh6bY7-na7ppid00pgo97wRbGGbPHIS_35WBLoXIsP_coLMijsHSKUqL4P4Xqw1w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2419714311</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fetal ultrasound estimated weight and correlation to Brazilian newborn weight</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Galluzzo, Roberto Noya ; Trapani, Alberto ; Werner, Heron ; de Sá, Renato Augusto Moreira ; Xikota, João Carlos ; Araujo, Edward ; de Souza Pires, Maria Marlene</creator><creatorcontrib>Galluzzo, Roberto Noya ; Trapani, Alberto ; Werner, Heron ; de Sá, Renato Augusto Moreira ; Xikota, João Carlos ; Araujo, Edward ; de Souza Pires, Maria Marlene ; Department of Obstetrics, Paulista School of Medicine – Federal University of São Paulo (EPM-UNIFESP), São Paulo-SP, Brazil ; Department of Maternal and Child, Fluminense Federal University (UFF), Niteroi-RJ, Brazil ; Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC) Florianopolis-SC, Brazil ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC) Florianopolis-SC, Brazil ; Department of Radiology, Clínica de Diagnóstico por Imagem (CDPI), Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the best fetal weight formula with different biometric tables on the weight of Brazilian newborns.
This observational study has tested the performance of different common fetal weight formulas and biometric tables. Weight estimates were performed by the methods of Warsof
. (1977), Shepard
. (1982), Hadlock
. (1985), Furlan
. (2012) and Stirnemann
. (2017). The biometric tables selected were the following: Snijders and Nicolaides (1994), Hadlock
. (1984), Papageorghiou
. (2014) and Kiserud
. (2016) and correlated to Pedreira
. (2011) database, which was considered the gold standard. Statistical analyses were performed using the mean relative error, average absolute error and the Pearson correlation coefficient (r).
The best r was found when using the Snijders and Nicolaides (1994) biometric table with weight formula by Stirnemann
. (2017). The average relative error was lower when using weight formula by Shepard
. (1982) with biometric tables by Snijders and Nicolaides (1994), Papageorghiou
. (2014) or Kiserud
. (2016). On average, absolute error, the lowest r was obtained for the Furlan
. (2012) weight formula and the Papageorghiou
. (2014) biometric table.
The best correlation was found for biometric table by Snijders and Nicolaides (1994) and fetal weight formula calculation for the estimation of Brazilian newborn weight by Stirnemann
. (2017).</description><identifier>ISSN: 2084-8404</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2451-070X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15557/jou.2020.0017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32609964</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sciendo</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Brazilian newborn weight ; fetal weight biometric table ; fetal weight formula ; Medicine ; Newborn infants ; ultrasound measurement</subject><ispartof>Journal of ultrasonography, 2020-01, Vol.20 (81), p.106-110</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Exeley Inc.</rights><rights>Polish Ultrasound Society 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c554t-6db3e779a9880dc44aa6d9d41fe1b717e7fa32ec47a3f70f0b33d3486b3fac513</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7409559/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7409559/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Galluzzo, Roberto Noya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trapani, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Heron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Sá, Renato Augusto Moreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xikota, João Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Souza Pires, Maria Marlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Obstetrics, Paulista School of Medicine – Federal University of São Paulo (EPM-UNIFESP), São Paulo-SP, Brazil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Maternal and Child, Fluminense Federal University (UFF), Niteroi-RJ, Brazil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC) Florianopolis-SC, Brazil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC) Florianopolis-SC, Brazil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Radiology, Clínica de Diagnóstico por Imagem (CDPI), Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil</creatorcontrib><title>Fetal ultrasound estimated weight and correlation to Brazilian newborn weight</title><title>Journal of ultrasonography</title><description>To compare the best fetal weight formula with different biometric tables on the weight of Brazilian newborns.
This observational study has tested the performance of different common fetal weight formulas and biometric tables. Weight estimates were performed by the methods of Warsof
. (1977), Shepard
. (1982), Hadlock
. (1985), Furlan
. (2012) and Stirnemann
. (2017). The biometric tables selected were the following: Snijders and Nicolaides (1994), Hadlock
. (1984), Papageorghiou
. (2014) and Kiserud
. (2016) and correlated to Pedreira
. (2011) database, which was considered the gold standard. Statistical analyses were performed using the mean relative error, average absolute error and the Pearson correlation coefficient (r).
The best r was found when using the Snijders and Nicolaides (1994) biometric table with weight formula by Stirnemann
. (2017). The average relative error was lower when using weight formula by Shepard
. (1982) with biometric tables by Snijders and Nicolaides (1994), Papageorghiou
. (2014) or Kiserud
. (2016). On average, absolute error, the lowest r was obtained for the Furlan
. (2012) weight formula and the Papageorghiou
. (2014) biometric table.
The best correlation was found for biometric table by Snijders and Nicolaides (1994) and fetal weight formula calculation for the estimation of Brazilian newborn weight by Stirnemann
. (2017).</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Brazilian newborn weight</subject><subject>fetal weight biometric table</subject><subject>fetal weight formula</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Newborn infants</subject><subject>ultrasound measurement</subject><issn>2084-8404</issn><issn>2451-070X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUs9rFDEYHUSxpfbqecCLl1nzO5ODQi1WKxUvFryFb5Jvpllmk5qZ6VL_erPdxVIoOSS8vPfy-PKq6i0lKyql1B_WaVkxwsiKEKpfVMdMSNoQTX6_LGfSiqYVRBxVp9O0JoWipFCMva6OOFPEGCWOqx8XOMNYL-OcYUpL9DVOc9jAjL7eYhhu5hoK6FLOOMIcUqznVH_O8DeMAWIdcdulHA_cN9WrHsYJTw_7SXV98eXX-bfm6ufXy_Ozq8ZJKeZG-Y6j1gZM2xLvhABQ3nhBe6Sdphp1D5yhExp4r0lPOs49F63qeA9OUn5SXe59fYK1vc0lcL63CYJ9AFIeLOQ5uBGtpi1DoFoq2QpDylOdRy6lkwy96WXx-rT3ul26DXqHsYxifGL69CaGGzukO6sFMVKaYvD-YJDTn6WMz27C5HAcIWJaJssENZoKTne53-2pA5RoIfapOLod3Z4pLgg3UqnCWj3DKsvjJrgUsQ8Ff07gcpqmjP3_9JTYh6bY7-na7ppid00pgo97wRbGGbPHIS_35WBLoXIsP_coLMijsHSKUqL4P4Xqw1w</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Galluzzo, Roberto Noya</creator><creator>Trapani, Alberto</creator><creator>Werner, Heron</creator><creator>de Sá, Renato Augusto Moreira</creator><creator>Xikota, João Carlos</creator><creator>Araujo, Edward</creator><creator>de Souza Pires, Maria Marlene</creator><general>Sciendo</general><general>Exeley Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Fetal ultrasound estimated weight and correlation to Brazilian newborn weight</title><author>Galluzzo, Roberto Noya ; Trapani, Alberto ; Werner, Heron ; de Sá, Renato Augusto Moreira ; Xikota, João Carlos ; Araujo, Edward ; de Souza Pires, Maria Marlene</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c554t-6db3e779a9880dc44aa6d9d41fe1b717e7fa32ec47a3f70f0b33d3486b3fac513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Brazilian newborn weight</topic><topic>fetal weight biometric table</topic><topic>fetal weight formula</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Newborn infants</topic><topic>ultrasound measurement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Galluzzo, Roberto Noya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trapani, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Heron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Sá, Renato Augusto Moreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xikota, João Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Souza Pires, Maria Marlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Obstetrics, Paulista School of Medicine – Federal University of São Paulo (EPM-UNIFESP), São Paulo-SP, Brazil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Maternal and Child, Fluminense Federal University (UFF), Niteroi-RJ, Brazil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC) Florianopolis-SC, Brazil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC) Florianopolis-SC, Brazil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Radiology, Clínica de Diagnóstico por Imagem (CDPI), Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of ultrasonography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Galluzzo, Roberto Noya</au><au>Trapani, Alberto</au><au>Werner, Heron</au><au>de Sá, Renato Augusto Moreira</au><au>Xikota, João Carlos</au><au>Araujo, Edward</au><au>de Souza Pires, Maria Marlene</au><aucorp>Department of Obstetrics, Paulista School of Medicine – Federal University of São Paulo (EPM-UNIFESP), São Paulo-SP, Brazil</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Maternal and Child, Fluminense Federal University (UFF), Niteroi-RJ, Brazil</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC) Florianopolis-SC, Brazil</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC) Florianopolis-SC, Brazil</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Radiology, Clínica de Diagnóstico por Imagem (CDPI), Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fetal ultrasound estimated weight and correlation to Brazilian newborn weight</atitle><jtitle>Journal of ultrasonography</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>81</issue><spage>106</spage><epage>110</epage><pages>106-110</pages><issn>2084-8404</issn><eissn>2451-070X</eissn><abstract>To compare the best fetal weight formula with different biometric tables on the weight of Brazilian newborns.
This observational study has tested the performance of different common fetal weight formulas and biometric tables. Weight estimates were performed by the methods of Warsof
. (1977), Shepard
. (1982), Hadlock
. (1985), Furlan
. (2012) and Stirnemann
. (2017). The biometric tables selected were the following: Snijders and Nicolaides (1994), Hadlock
. (1984), Papageorghiou
. (2014) and Kiserud
. (2016) and correlated to Pedreira
. (2011) database, which was considered the gold standard. Statistical analyses were performed using the mean relative error, average absolute error and the Pearson correlation coefficient (r).
The best r was found when using the Snijders and Nicolaides (1994) biometric table with weight formula by Stirnemann
. (2017). The average relative error was lower when using weight formula by Shepard
. (1982) with biometric tables by Snijders and Nicolaides (1994), Papageorghiou
. (2014) or Kiserud
. (2016). On average, absolute error, the lowest r was obtained for the Furlan
. (2012) weight formula and the Papageorghiou
. (2014) biometric table.
The best correlation was found for biometric table by Snijders and Nicolaides (1994) and fetal weight formula calculation for the estimation of Brazilian newborn weight by Stirnemann
. (2017).</abstract><pub>Sciendo</pub><pmid>32609964</pmid><doi>10.15557/jou.2020.0017</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2084-8404 |
| ispartof | Journal of ultrasonography, 2020-01, Vol.20 (81), p.106-110 |
| issn | 2084-8404 2451-070X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7182ea1756584904aabde355c52ed9f5 |
| source | PubMed Central |
| subjects | Analysis Brazilian newborn weight fetal weight biometric table fetal weight formula Medicine Newborn infants ultrasound measurement |
| title | Fetal ultrasound estimated weight and correlation to Brazilian newborn weight |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A24%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fetal%20ultrasound%20estimated%20weight%20and%20correlation%20to%20Brazilian%20newborn%20weight&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20ultrasonography&rft.au=Galluzzo,%20Roberto%20Noya&rft.aucorp=Department%20of%20Obstetrics,%20Paulista%20School%20of%20Medicine%20%E2%80%93%20Federal%20University%20of%20S%C3%A3o%20Paulo%20(EPM-UNIFESP),%20S%C3%A3o%20Paulo-SP,%20Brazil&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=81&rft.spage=106&rft.epage=110&rft.pages=106-110&rft.issn=2084-8404&rft.eissn=2451-070X&rft_id=info:doi/10.15557/jou.2020.0017&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA634039566%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c554t-6db3e779a9880dc44aa6d9d41fe1b717e7fa32ec47a3f70f0b33d3486b3fac513%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2419714311&rft_id=info:pmid/32609964&rft_galeid=A634039566&rfr_iscdi=true |