Gait and dynamic pedobarographic analyses in hallux rigidus patients treated with Keller’s arthroplasty, arthrodesis or cheilectomy 22 years after surgery

• Published in: PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) CA), 2023-11, Vol.11, p.e16296-e16296, Article e16296
• Main Authors: de Bot, Robin, Stevens, Jasper, Smeets, Thijs, Witlox, Adhiambo, Beertema, Wieske, Hendrickx, Roel, Meijer, Kenneth, Schotanus, Martijn
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Arthritis; Arthrodesis; Arthroplasty; Care and treatment; Clinical outcomes; Feet; Fitness equipment; Foot diseases; Gait; Hallux rigidus; Homeopathy; Joint surgery; Keller’s arthroplasty; Materia medica and therapeutics; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Osteoarthritis; Pain; Patient satisfaction; Patient-reported outcome; Patients; Pedobarographic analysis; Pressure distribution; Pressure time integral; Software; Surgery; Therapeutics; Walking
• ISSN: 2167-8359; 2167-8359
• DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16296

Background Keller's arthroplasty, arthrodesis and cheilectomy are well-known surgical interventions for hallux rigidus. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of these surgical interventions on gait, plantar pressure distribution and clinical outcome in patients treated for hallux rigidus 22 years after surgery. Methods Spatio-temporal gait parameters and plantar pressure distribution, determined as pressure time integrals (PTIs) and peak pressures (PPs), were analyzed using a 7-foot tone analysis model. Patient-reported outcome was assessed using the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ). Of the 73 patients (89 feet) from the original study, 27 patients (33 feet) and 13 healthy controls (26 feet) were available for evaluation 22 years after hallux rigidus surgery. Results Spatio-temporal gait parameters were comparable between all groups and were in line with healthy controls (P0.05). No differences (P0.05) in PTIs and PPs were found in the seven plantar zones between groups and as compared to healthy controls. MOXFQ scores in all domains (walking/standing, range 21.4-24.1; pain, range 16.5-22.2 and social interaction, range 23.8-35.4) were not clinically and statistically different (P0.05) between the three different surgical interventions. Conclusion These results suggest no long-term functional and biomechanical differences after these surgical interventions for hallux rigidus correction. The interventions seem to be appropriate treatment options for a selective group of patients with symptomatic hallux rigidus.