Picturing Organisms and Their Environments: Interaction, Transaction, and Constitution Loops

Changing conceptions of the relation between organisms and their environments make up a crucial chapter in the history of psychology. This may be approached by a comparative study of how schematic diagrams portray this relation. Diagrams drive the communication and the teaching of ideas, the sedimen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in psychology 2020-07, Vol.11, p.1912-1912
Main Author: Di Paolo, Ezequiel A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
constitution
diagrams
interaction
organism–environment relation
Psychology
schematic representation
transaction
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-39559cab7a92c30ca6bb98c267a7879b8531ff89b8293a157adca0303f06c1a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-39559cab7a92c30ca6bb98c267a7879b8531ff89b8293a157adca0303f06c1a3
container_end_page 1912
container_issue
container_start_page 1912
container_title Frontiers in psychology
container_volume 11
creator Di Paolo, Ezequiel A.
description Changing conceptions of the relation between organisms and their environments make up a crucial chapter in the history of psychology. This may be approached by a comparative study of how schematic diagrams portray this relation. Diagrams drive the communication and the teaching of ideas, the sedimentation of epistemic norms and methods of analysis, and in some cases the articulation of novel concepts through pictographic variants. Through a sampling of schematic representations, I offer a concise comparison of how different authors, with different interests and motivations, have portrayed important aspects of the organism–environment relation. I compare example diagrams according to the features they underscore (or omit) and group them into classes that emphasize interaction, transaction, and constitution loops.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01912
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_72a2ee1546ad4ee9865ab9fb824bab65</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_72a2ee1546ad4ee9865ab9fb824bab65</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2437842737</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-39559cab7a92c30ca6bb98c267a7879b8531ff89b8293a157adca0303f06c1a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1rGzEQxUVpaUKae4977KF29LX66KFQTNoYDOnBx4KY1Wo3CruSK2kD-e8r22lpdNHM6L3fIB5CHwleM6b0zXDIz-OaYorXmGhC36BLIgRfESzV2__qC3Sd8yOuh1ctpu_RBaOKVwe5RL9-eluW5MPY3KcRgs9zbiD0zf7B-dTchiefYphdKPlLsw3FJbDFx_C52ScI-W9zdGxiyMWX5ThpdjEe8gf0boApu-uX-wrtv9_uN3er3f2P7ebbbmU502XFdNtqC50ETS3DFkTXaWWpkCCV1J1qGRkGVQuqGZBWQm8BM8wGLCwBdoW2Z2wf4dEckp8hPZsI3pwGMY0GUvF2ckZSoM6RlgvouXNaiRY6PVQy76ATbWV9PbMOSze73taPJ5heQV-_BP9gxvhkJMdCCFwBn14AKf5eXC5m9tm6aYLg4pIN5UwqTiWTVYrPUptizskN_9YQbI4Rm1PE5hixOUXM_gD95psD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2437842737</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Picturing Organisms and Their Environments: Interaction, Transaction, and Constitution Loops</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Di Paolo, Ezequiel A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Di Paolo, Ezequiel A.</creatorcontrib><description>Changing conceptions of the relation between organisms and their environments make up a crucial chapter in the history of psychology. This may be approached by a comparative study of how schematic diagrams portray this relation. Diagrams drive the communication and the teaching of ideas, the sedimentation of epistemic norms and methods of analysis, and in some cases the articulation of novel concepts through pictographic variants. Through a sampling of schematic representations, I offer a concise comparison of how different authors, with different interests and motivations, have portrayed important aspects of the organism–environment relation. I compare example diagrams according to the features they underscore (or omit) and group them into classes that emphasize interaction, transaction, and constitution loops.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01912</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32849121</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>constitution ; diagrams ; interaction ; organism–environment relation ; Psychology ; schematic representation ; transaction</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in psychology, 2020-07, Vol.11, p.1912-1912</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 Di Paolo. 2020 Di Paolo</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-39559cab7a92c30ca6bb98c267a7879b8531ff89b8293a157adca0303f06c1a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-39559cab7a92c30ca6bb98c267a7879b8531ff89b8293a157adca0303f06c1a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406660/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406660/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Di Paolo, Ezequiel A.</creatorcontrib><title>Picturing Organisms and Their Environments: Interaction, Transaction, and Constitution Loops</title><title>Frontiers in psychology</title><description>Changing conceptions of the relation between organisms and their environments make up a crucial chapter in the history of psychology. This may be approached by a comparative study of how schematic diagrams portray this relation. Diagrams drive the communication and the teaching of ideas, the sedimentation of epistemic norms and methods of analysis, and in some cases the articulation of novel concepts through pictographic variants. Through a sampling of schematic representations, I offer a concise comparison of how different authors, with different interests and motivations, have portrayed important aspects of the organism–environment relation. I compare example diagrams according to the features they underscore (or omit) and group them into classes that emphasize interaction, transaction, and constitution loops.</description><subject>constitution</subject><subject>diagrams</subject><subject>interaction</subject><subject>organism–environment relation</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>schematic representation</subject><subject>transaction</subject><issn>1664-1078</issn><issn>1664-1078</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1rGzEQxUVpaUKae4977KF29LX66KFQTNoYDOnBx4KY1Wo3CruSK2kD-e8r22lpdNHM6L3fIB5CHwleM6b0zXDIz-OaYorXmGhC36BLIgRfESzV2__qC3Sd8yOuh1ctpu_RBaOKVwe5RL9-eluW5MPY3KcRgs9zbiD0zf7B-dTchiefYphdKPlLsw3FJbDFx_C52ScI-W9zdGxiyMWX5ThpdjEe8gf0boApu-uX-wrtv9_uN3er3f2P7ebbbmU502XFdNtqC50ETS3DFkTXaWWpkCCV1J1qGRkGVQuqGZBWQm8BM8wGLCwBdoW2Z2wf4dEckp8hPZsI3pwGMY0GUvF2ckZSoM6RlgvouXNaiRY6PVQy76ATbWV9PbMOSze73taPJ5heQV-_BP9gxvhkJMdCCFwBn14AKf5eXC5m9tm6aYLg4pIN5UwqTiWTVYrPUptizskN_9YQbI4Rm1PE5hixOUXM_gD95psD</recordid><startdate>20200730</startdate><enddate>20200730</enddate><creator>Di Paolo, Ezequiel A.</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200730</creationdate><title>Picturing Organisms and Their Environments: Interaction, Transaction, and Constitution Loops</title><author>Di Paolo, Ezequiel A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-39559cab7a92c30ca6bb98c267a7879b8531ff89b8293a157adca0303f06c1a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>constitution</topic><topic>diagrams</topic><topic>interaction</topic><topic>organism–environment relation</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>schematic representation</topic><topic>transaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Di Paolo, Ezequiel A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Di Paolo, Ezequiel A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Picturing Organisms and Their Environments: Interaction, Transaction, and Constitution Loops</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle><date>2020-07-30</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>11</volume><spage>1912</spage><epage>1912</epage><pages>1912-1912</pages><issn>1664-1078</issn><eissn>1664-1078</eissn><abstract>Changing conceptions of the relation between organisms and their environments make up a crucial chapter in the history of psychology. This may be approached by a comparative study of how schematic diagrams portray this relation. Diagrams drive the communication and the teaching of ideas, the sedimentation of epistemic norms and methods of analysis, and in some cases the articulation of novel concepts through pictographic variants. Through a sampling of schematic representations, I offer a concise comparison of how different authors, with different interests and motivations, have portrayed important aspects of the organism–environment relation. I compare example diagrams according to the features they underscore (or omit) and group them into classes that emphasize interaction, transaction, and constitution loops.</abstract><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>32849121</pmid><doi>10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01912</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-1078
ispartof Frontiers in psychology, 2020-07, Vol.11, p.1912-1912
issn 1664-1078
1664-1078
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_72a2ee1546ad4ee9865ab9fb824bab65
source PubMed Central
subjects constitution
diagrams
interaction
organism–environment relation
Psychology
schematic representation
transaction
title Picturing Organisms and Their Environments: Interaction, Transaction, and Constitution Loops
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T13%3A54%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Picturing%20Organisms%20and%20Their%20Environments:%20Interaction,%20Transaction,%20and%20Constitution%20Loops&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20psychology&rft.au=Di%20Paolo,%20Ezequiel%20A.&rft.date=2020-07-30&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=1912&rft.epage=1912&rft.pages=1912-1912&rft.issn=1664-1078&rft.eissn=1664-1078&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01912&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2437842737%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-39559cab7a92c30ca6bb98c267a7879b8531ff89b8293a157adca0303f06c1a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2437842737&rft_id=info:pmid/32849121&rfr_iscdi=true