Loading…
Australian net (1950s–1990) soil organic carbon erosion: implications for CO2 emission and land–atmosphere modelling
The debate remains unresolved about soil erosion substantially offsetting fossil fuel emissions and acting as an important source or sink of CO2. There is little historical land use and management context to this debate, which is central to Australia's recent past of European settlement, agricu...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biogeosciences 2014-01, Vol.11 (18), p.5235-5244 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 5244 |
container_issue | 18 |
container_start_page | 5235 |
container_title | Biogeosciences |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Chappell, A Webb, N. P Viscarra Rossel, R. A Bui, E |
description | The debate remains unresolved about soil erosion substantially offsetting fossil fuel emissions and acting as an important source or sink of CO2. There is little historical land use and management context to this debate, which is central to Australia's recent past of European settlement, agricultural expansion and agriculturally induced soil erosion. We use "catchmen" scale (25 km2) estimates of 137Cs-derived net (1950s–1990) soil redistribution of all processes (wind, water and tillage) to calculate the net soil organic carbon (SOC) redistribution across Australia. We approximate the selective removal of SOC at net eroding locations and SOC enrichment of transported sediment and net depositional locations. We map net (1950s–1990) SOC redistribution across Australia and estimate erosion by all processes to be 4 Tg SOC yr-1, which represents a loss of 2% of the total carbon stock (0–10 cm) of Australia. Assuming this net SOC loss is mineralised, the flux (15 TgCO2-equivalents yr-1) represents an omitted 12% of CO2-equivalent emissions from all carbon pools in Australia. Although a small source of uncertainty in the Australian carbon budget, the mass flux interacts with energy and water fluxes, and its omission from land surface models likely creates more uncertainty than has been previously recognized. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5194/bg-11-5235-2014 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_72cb6077e4144c88981fdcebadd0122d</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_72cb6077e4144c88981fdcebadd0122d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3450242771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d301t-d792a7ae8d5d94c3020a3d7ee5ffe4b0210851df96146de8ef607bf449f300893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UbuOFDEQHCGQOA5iQiyRQDDQ7dfYZKcVj5NOugAutnrG9uLVzHixZyXI-Af-kC_BsAREJP2sKnWpu-4pwiuFVr4e9z1ir7hQPQeU97oLHLjuJRp7_5_6Yfeo1gOAMGDURff16lS3QnOila1hYy_QKqg_v_9Aa-ElqznNLJc9rWliE5UxryyUXFNe37C0HOc00daaymIubHfLWVhS_b1mtHo2t9C0aFtyPX4OJbAl-zDPad0_7h5Emmt48jdfdnfv3n7afehvbt9f765uei8At94PltNAwXjlrZwEcCDhhxBUjEGOwLHZQB-tRql9MCFqGMYopY0CwFhx2V2fdX2mgzuWtFD55jIl92fQvDkqW5rm4AY-jY09BIlSTsZYg9FPYSTvATn3Tev5WetY8pdTqJs75FNZ2_kOtRZWNCL_L0rpQUmNqBvq2RkVKTval1Td3cf2OAXQvmcGEL8AYVON1Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1567546116</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Australian net (1950s–1990) soil organic carbon erosion: implications for CO2 emission and land–atmosphere modelling</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Chappell, A ; Webb, N. P ; Viscarra Rossel, R. A ; Bui, E</creator><creatorcontrib>Chappell, A ; Webb, N. P ; Viscarra Rossel, R. A ; Bui, E</creatorcontrib><description>The debate remains unresolved about soil erosion substantially offsetting fossil fuel emissions and acting as an important source or sink of CO2. There is little historical land use and management context to this debate, which is central to Australia's recent past of European settlement, agricultural expansion and agriculturally induced soil erosion. We use "catchmen" scale (25 km2) estimates of 137Cs-derived net (1950s–1990) soil redistribution of all processes (wind, water and tillage) to calculate the net soil organic carbon (SOC) redistribution across Australia. We approximate the selective removal of SOC at net eroding locations and SOC enrichment of transported sediment and net depositional locations. We map net (1950s–1990) SOC redistribution across Australia and estimate erosion by all processes to be 4 Tg SOC yr-1, which represents a loss of 2% of the total carbon stock (0–10 cm) of Australia. Assuming this net SOC loss is mineralised, the flux (15 TgCO2-equivalents yr-1) represents an omitted 12% of CO2-equivalent emissions from all carbon pools in Australia. Although a small source of uncertainty in the Australian carbon budget, the mass flux interacts with energy and water fluxes, and its omission from land surface models likely creates more uncertainty than has been previously recognized.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1726-4189</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1726-4170</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1726-4189</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5194/bg-11-5235-2014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Katlenburg-Lindau: Copernicus GmbH</publisher><subject>carbon ; carbon dioxide ; energy ; fossil fuels ; greenhouse gas emissions ; sediment deposition ; sediment transport ; sediments ; soil ; soil erosion ; soil organic carbon ; soil-atmosphere interactions ; tillage ; uncertainty ; wind</subject><ispartof>Biogeosciences, 2014-01, Vol.11 (18), p.5235-5244</ispartof><rights>Copyright Copernicus GmbH 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1567546116/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1567546116?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,2096,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chappell, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, N. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viscarra Rossel, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bui, E</creatorcontrib><title>Australian net (1950s–1990) soil organic carbon erosion: implications for CO2 emission and land–atmosphere modelling</title><title>Biogeosciences</title><description>The debate remains unresolved about soil erosion substantially offsetting fossil fuel emissions and acting as an important source or sink of CO2. There is little historical land use and management context to this debate, which is central to Australia's recent past of European settlement, agricultural expansion and agriculturally induced soil erosion. We use "catchmen" scale (25 km2) estimates of 137Cs-derived net (1950s–1990) soil redistribution of all processes (wind, water and tillage) to calculate the net soil organic carbon (SOC) redistribution across Australia. We approximate the selective removal of SOC at net eroding locations and SOC enrichment of transported sediment and net depositional locations. We map net (1950s–1990) SOC redistribution across Australia and estimate erosion by all processes to be 4 Tg SOC yr-1, which represents a loss of 2% of the total carbon stock (0–10 cm) of Australia. Assuming this net SOC loss is mineralised, the flux (15 TgCO2-equivalents yr-1) represents an omitted 12% of CO2-equivalent emissions from all carbon pools in Australia. Although a small source of uncertainty in the Australian carbon budget, the mass flux interacts with energy and water fluxes, and its omission from land surface models likely creates more uncertainty than has been previously recognized.</description><subject>carbon</subject><subject>carbon dioxide</subject><subject>energy</subject><subject>fossil fuels</subject><subject>greenhouse gas emissions</subject><subject>sediment deposition</subject><subject>sediment transport</subject><subject>sediments</subject><subject>soil</subject><subject>soil erosion</subject><subject>soil organic carbon</subject><subject>soil-atmosphere interactions</subject><subject>tillage</subject><subject>uncertainty</subject><subject>wind</subject><issn>1726-4189</issn><issn>1726-4170</issn><issn>1726-4189</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UbuOFDEQHCGQOA5iQiyRQDDQ7dfYZKcVj5NOugAutnrG9uLVzHixZyXI-Af-kC_BsAREJP2sKnWpu-4pwiuFVr4e9z1ir7hQPQeU97oLHLjuJRp7_5_6Yfeo1gOAMGDURff16lS3QnOila1hYy_QKqg_v_9Aa-ElqznNLJc9rWliE5UxryyUXFNe37C0HOc00daaymIubHfLWVhS_b1mtHo2t9C0aFtyPX4OJbAl-zDPad0_7h5Emmt48jdfdnfv3n7afehvbt9f765uei8At94PltNAwXjlrZwEcCDhhxBUjEGOwLHZQB-tRql9MCFqGMYopY0CwFhx2V2fdX2mgzuWtFD55jIl92fQvDkqW5rm4AY-jY09BIlSTsZYg9FPYSTvATn3Tev5WetY8pdTqJs75FNZ2_kOtRZWNCL_L0rpQUmNqBvq2RkVKTval1Td3cf2OAXQvmcGEL8AYVON1Q</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Chappell, A</creator><creator>Webb, N. P</creator><creator>Viscarra Rossel, R. A</creator><creator>Bui, E</creator><general>Copernicus GmbH</general><general>Copernicus Publications</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Australian net (1950s–1990) soil organic carbon erosion: implications for CO2 emission and land–atmosphere modelling</title><author>Chappell, A ; Webb, N. P ; Viscarra Rossel, R. A ; Bui, E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d301t-d792a7ae8d5d94c3020a3d7ee5ffe4b0210851df96146de8ef607bf449f300893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>carbon</topic><topic>carbon dioxide</topic><topic>energy</topic><topic>fossil fuels</topic><topic>greenhouse gas emissions</topic><topic>sediment deposition</topic><topic>sediment transport</topic><topic>sediments</topic><topic>soil</topic><topic>soil erosion</topic><topic>soil organic carbon</topic><topic>soil-atmosphere interactions</topic><topic>tillage</topic><topic>uncertainty</topic><topic>wind</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chappell, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, N. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viscarra Rossel, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bui, E</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture & Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Biogeosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chappell, A</au><au>Webb, N. P</au><au>Viscarra Rossel, R. A</au><au>Bui, E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Australian net (1950s–1990) soil organic carbon erosion: implications for CO2 emission and land–atmosphere modelling</atitle><jtitle>Biogeosciences</jtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>5235</spage><epage>5244</epage><pages>5235-5244</pages><issn>1726-4189</issn><issn>1726-4170</issn><eissn>1726-4189</eissn><abstract>The debate remains unresolved about soil erosion substantially offsetting fossil fuel emissions and acting as an important source or sink of CO2. There is little historical land use and management context to this debate, which is central to Australia's recent past of European settlement, agricultural expansion and agriculturally induced soil erosion. We use "catchmen" scale (25 km2) estimates of 137Cs-derived net (1950s–1990) soil redistribution of all processes (wind, water and tillage) to calculate the net soil organic carbon (SOC) redistribution across Australia. We approximate the selective removal of SOC at net eroding locations and SOC enrichment of transported sediment and net depositional locations. We map net (1950s–1990) SOC redistribution across Australia and estimate erosion by all processes to be 4 Tg SOC yr-1, which represents a loss of 2% of the total carbon stock (0–10 cm) of Australia. Assuming this net SOC loss is mineralised, the flux (15 TgCO2-equivalents yr-1) represents an omitted 12% of CO2-equivalent emissions from all carbon pools in Australia. Although a small source of uncertainty in the Australian carbon budget, the mass flux interacts with energy and water fluxes, and its omission from land surface models likely creates more uncertainty than has been previously recognized.</abstract><cop>Katlenburg-Lindau</cop><pub>Copernicus GmbH</pub><doi>10.5194/bg-11-5235-2014</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1726-4189 |
ispartof | Biogeosciences, 2014-01, Vol.11 (18), p.5235-5244 |
issn | 1726-4189 1726-4170 1726-4189 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_72cb6077e4144c88981fdcebadd0122d |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
subjects | carbon carbon dioxide energy fossil fuels greenhouse gas emissions sediment deposition sediment transport sediments soil soil erosion soil organic carbon soil-atmosphere interactions tillage uncertainty wind |
title | Australian net (1950s–1990) soil organic carbon erosion: implications for CO2 emission and land–atmosphere modelling |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T07%3A45%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Australian%20net%20(1950s%E2%80%931990)%20soil%20organic%20carbon%20erosion:%20implications%20for%20CO2%20emission%20and%20land%E2%80%93atmosphere%20modelling&rft.jtitle=Biogeosciences&rft.au=Chappell,%20A&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=5235&rft.epage=5244&rft.pages=5235-5244&rft.issn=1726-4189&rft.eissn=1726-4189&rft_id=info:doi/10.5194/bg-11-5235-2014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3450242771%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d301t-d792a7ae8d5d94c3020a3d7ee5ffe4b0210851df96146de8ef607bf449f300893%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1567546116&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |