Loading…

Characteristics, Prognosis, and Prediction Model of Heart Failure Patients in Intensive Care Units Based on Preserved, Mildly Reduced, and Reduced Ejection Fraction

Heart failure (HF) patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are rather poorly studied based on varying left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) classification. Characteristics and prognosis of patients in ICUs with HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), HF with reduced ejection fraction...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 2023-06, Vol.24 (6), p.165
Main Authors: Tao, Fang, Wang, Wenguang, Yang, Hongmei, Han, Xiaoyu, Wang, Xun, Dai, Yuhan, Zhu, Aihong, Han, Yue, Guo, Pan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 165
container_title Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
container_volume 24
creator Tao, Fang
Wang, Wenguang
Yang, Hongmei
Han, Xiaoyu
Wang, Xun
Dai, Yuhan
Zhu, Aihong
Han, Yue
Guo, Pan
description Heart failure (HF) patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are rather poorly studied based on varying left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) classification. Characteristics and prognosis of patients in ICUs with HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) require further clarification. Data involving clinical information and 4-year follow-up records of HF patients were extracted and integrated from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database. Tests were carried out to identity differences among these three HF subtypes. Prognostic analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional-hazards regression modeling. To develop a novel prediction nomogram, forward selection was used as the best-fit model. Prognostic heterogeneity of the subgroups prespecified by stratification factors in pairwise comparisons was presented using forest plots. A total of 4150 patients were enrolled in this study. HFmrEF had the lowest all-cause mortality rate during the 4-year follow-up, which was significantly different from HFrEF and HFpEF (Log-Rank 0.001). The Cox proportional-hazards regression model also showed that a comparison of HFrEF versus HFmrEF indicated a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.76 (95% CI 0.61-0.94, = 0.011) and HFrEF versus HFpEF indicated a HR 0.93 (95% CI 0.82-1.07, = 0.307). Following a multivariable analysis, 13 factors were confirmed as independent. A new nomogram was established and quantified with a concordance index (C-index) of 0.70 (95% CI 0.67-0.73), and the internal validation indicated the accuracy of the model. Stratification factors such as a history of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and comorbidity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) induced prognostic heterogeneity among the three subtypes. Clinical characteristics and prognosis significantly varied among the three subtypes of HF patients in ICUs, with HFmrEF patients achieving the best prognosis. The novel prediction model, tailored for this population, showed a satisfying prediction ability.
doi_str_mv 10.31083/j.rcm2406165
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_72e0e854ebe54bc09758c78ec641c38b</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_72e0e854ebe54bc09758c78ec641c38b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3086064104</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-2e943f50fc067dd8d38077487595e73f8ee2ff9414bfdc6d9ef19175c8ef5cf83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkk1v1DAQhiMEoqVw5Ip85NAUO7YT54ToqktXakWF6Nly7PHWUdYutrNS_w8_FG93Ke3J8_HqeWesqaqPBJ9RggX9Mp5FvWkYbknLX1XHhFNct5zj18_io-pdSiPGtOGCvq2OaI-7jjN8XP1Z3KmodIboUnY6naKbGNY-JFdC5U1JwTidXfDoOhiYULDoElTMaKncNEdANyo78Dkh59HKZ_DJbQEtVGndelfq5yqBQQVQWAniFswpunaTmR7QTzCz3uU7q0OCLkbYGy53k5XgffXGqinBh8N7Ut0uL34tLuurH99Xi29XtWYE57qBnlHLsdW47YwRhoqyJhMd7zl01AqAxtqeETZYo1vTgyU96bgWYLm2gp5Uqz3XBDXK--g2Kj7IoJx8LIS4lmVxpyeQXQMYBGcwAGeDxn3Hhe4E6JYRTcVQWF_3rPt52IDR5Yeiml5AX3a8u5PrsJWENIXR4kL4fCDE8HuGlOXGJQ3TpDyEOUmKRYuLFLMirfdSHUNKEeyTD8Hy8UzkKP-fSdF_ej7ck_rfXdC_2s27vQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3086064104</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characteristics, Prognosis, and Prediction Model of Heart Failure Patients in Intensive Care Units Based on Preserved, Mildly Reduced, and Reduced Ejection Fraction</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Tao, Fang ; Wang, Wenguang ; Yang, Hongmei ; Han, Xiaoyu ; Wang, Xun ; Dai, Yuhan ; Zhu, Aihong ; Han, Yue ; Guo, Pan</creator><creatorcontrib>Tao, Fang ; Wang, Wenguang ; Yang, Hongmei ; Han, Xiaoyu ; Wang, Xun ; Dai, Yuhan ; Zhu, Aihong ; Han, Yue ; Guo, Pan</creatorcontrib><description>Heart failure (HF) patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are rather poorly studied based on varying left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) classification. Characteristics and prognosis of patients in ICUs with HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) require further clarification. Data involving clinical information and 4-year follow-up records of HF patients were extracted and integrated from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database. Tests were carried out to identity differences among these three HF subtypes. Prognostic analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional-hazards regression modeling. To develop a novel prediction nomogram, forward selection was used as the best-fit model. Prognostic heterogeneity of the subgroups prespecified by stratification factors in pairwise comparisons was presented using forest plots. A total of 4150 patients were enrolled in this study. HFmrEF had the lowest all-cause mortality rate during the 4-year follow-up, which was significantly different from HFrEF and HFpEF (Log-Rank 0.001). The Cox proportional-hazards regression model also showed that a comparison of HFrEF versus HFmrEF indicated a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.76 (95% CI 0.61-0.94, = 0.011) and HFrEF versus HFpEF indicated a HR 0.93 (95% CI 0.82-1.07, = 0.307). Following a multivariable analysis, 13 factors were confirmed as independent. A new nomogram was established and quantified with a concordance index (C-index) of 0.70 (95% CI 0.67-0.73), and the internal validation indicated the accuracy of the model. Stratification factors such as a history of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and comorbidity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) induced prognostic heterogeneity among the three subtypes. Clinical characteristics and prognosis significantly varied among the three subtypes of HF patients in ICUs, with HFmrEF patients achieving the best prognosis. The novel prediction model, tailored for this population, showed a satisfying prediction ability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1530-6550</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2153-8174</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-6550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2406165</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39077540</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: IMR Press</publisher><subject>ejection fraction ; follow-up ; heart failure ; icu ; Original Research ; prediction model ; survival</subject><ispartof>Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2023-06, Vol.24 (6), p.165</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11264160/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11264160/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39077540$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tao, Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wenguang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Hongmei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Xiaoyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, Yuhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Aihong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Pan</creatorcontrib><title>Characteristics, Prognosis, and Prediction Model of Heart Failure Patients in Intensive Care Units Based on Preserved, Mildly Reduced, and Reduced Ejection Fraction</title><title>Reviews in cardiovascular medicine</title><addtitle>Rev Cardiovasc Med</addtitle><description>Heart failure (HF) patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are rather poorly studied based on varying left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) classification. Characteristics and prognosis of patients in ICUs with HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) require further clarification. Data involving clinical information and 4-year follow-up records of HF patients were extracted and integrated from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database. Tests were carried out to identity differences among these three HF subtypes. Prognostic analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional-hazards regression modeling. To develop a novel prediction nomogram, forward selection was used as the best-fit model. Prognostic heterogeneity of the subgroups prespecified by stratification factors in pairwise comparisons was presented using forest plots. A total of 4150 patients were enrolled in this study. HFmrEF had the lowest all-cause mortality rate during the 4-year follow-up, which was significantly different from HFrEF and HFpEF (Log-Rank 0.001). The Cox proportional-hazards regression model also showed that a comparison of HFrEF versus HFmrEF indicated a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.76 (95% CI 0.61-0.94, = 0.011) and HFrEF versus HFpEF indicated a HR 0.93 (95% CI 0.82-1.07, = 0.307). Following a multivariable analysis, 13 factors were confirmed as independent. A new nomogram was established and quantified with a concordance index (C-index) of 0.70 (95% CI 0.67-0.73), and the internal validation indicated the accuracy of the model. Stratification factors such as a history of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and comorbidity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) induced prognostic heterogeneity among the three subtypes. Clinical characteristics and prognosis significantly varied among the three subtypes of HF patients in ICUs, with HFmrEF patients achieving the best prognosis. The novel prediction model, tailored for this population, showed a satisfying prediction ability.</description><subject>ejection fraction</subject><subject>follow-up</subject><subject>heart failure</subject><subject>icu</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>prediction model</subject><subject>survival</subject><issn>1530-6550</issn><issn>2153-8174</issn><issn>1530-6550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkk1v1DAQhiMEoqVw5Ip85NAUO7YT54ToqktXakWF6Nly7PHWUdYutrNS_w8_FG93Ke3J8_HqeWesqaqPBJ9RggX9Mp5FvWkYbknLX1XHhFNct5zj18_io-pdSiPGtOGCvq2OaI-7jjN8XP1Z3KmodIboUnY6naKbGNY-JFdC5U1JwTidXfDoOhiYULDoElTMaKncNEdANyo78Dkh59HKZ_DJbQEtVGndelfq5yqBQQVQWAniFswpunaTmR7QTzCz3uU7q0OCLkbYGy53k5XgffXGqinBh8N7Ut0uL34tLuurH99Xi29XtWYE57qBnlHLsdW47YwRhoqyJhMd7zl01AqAxtqeETZYo1vTgyU96bgWYLm2gp5Uqz3XBDXK--g2Kj7IoJx8LIS4lmVxpyeQXQMYBGcwAGeDxn3Hhe4E6JYRTcVQWF_3rPt52IDR5Yeiml5AX3a8u5PrsJWENIXR4kL4fCDE8HuGlOXGJQ3TpDyEOUmKRYuLFLMirfdSHUNKEeyTD8Hy8UzkKP-fSdF_ej7ck_rfXdC_2s27vQ</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Tao, Fang</creator><creator>Wang, Wenguang</creator><creator>Yang, Hongmei</creator><creator>Han, Xiaoyu</creator><creator>Wang, Xun</creator><creator>Dai, Yuhan</creator><creator>Zhu, Aihong</creator><creator>Han, Yue</creator><creator>Guo, Pan</creator><general>IMR Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Characteristics, Prognosis, and Prediction Model of Heart Failure Patients in Intensive Care Units Based on Preserved, Mildly Reduced, and Reduced Ejection Fraction</title><author>Tao, Fang ; Wang, Wenguang ; Yang, Hongmei ; Han, Xiaoyu ; Wang, Xun ; Dai, Yuhan ; Zhu, Aihong ; Han, Yue ; Guo, Pan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-2e943f50fc067dd8d38077487595e73f8ee2ff9414bfdc6d9ef19175c8ef5cf83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>ejection fraction</topic><topic>follow-up</topic><topic>heart failure</topic><topic>icu</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>prediction model</topic><topic>survival</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tao, Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wenguang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Hongmei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Xiaoyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, Yuhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Aihong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Pan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Reviews in cardiovascular medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tao, Fang</au><au>Wang, Wenguang</au><au>Yang, Hongmei</au><au>Han, Xiaoyu</au><au>Wang, Xun</au><au>Dai, Yuhan</au><au>Zhu, Aihong</au><au>Han, Yue</au><au>Guo, Pan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characteristics, Prognosis, and Prediction Model of Heart Failure Patients in Intensive Care Units Based on Preserved, Mildly Reduced, and Reduced Ejection Fraction</atitle><jtitle>Reviews in cardiovascular medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Cardiovasc Med</addtitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>165</spage><pages>165-</pages><issn>1530-6550</issn><issn>2153-8174</issn><eissn>1530-6550</eissn><abstract>Heart failure (HF) patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are rather poorly studied based on varying left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) classification. Characteristics and prognosis of patients in ICUs with HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) require further clarification. Data involving clinical information and 4-year follow-up records of HF patients were extracted and integrated from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database. Tests were carried out to identity differences among these three HF subtypes. Prognostic analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional-hazards regression modeling. To develop a novel prediction nomogram, forward selection was used as the best-fit model. Prognostic heterogeneity of the subgroups prespecified by stratification factors in pairwise comparisons was presented using forest plots. A total of 4150 patients were enrolled in this study. HFmrEF had the lowest all-cause mortality rate during the 4-year follow-up, which was significantly different from HFrEF and HFpEF (Log-Rank 0.001). The Cox proportional-hazards regression model also showed that a comparison of HFrEF versus HFmrEF indicated a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.76 (95% CI 0.61-0.94, = 0.011) and HFrEF versus HFpEF indicated a HR 0.93 (95% CI 0.82-1.07, = 0.307). Following a multivariable analysis, 13 factors were confirmed as independent. A new nomogram was established and quantified with a concordance index (C-index) of 0.70 (95% CI 0.67-0.73), and the internal validation indicated the accuracy of the model. Stratification factors such as a history of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and comorbidity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) induced prognostic heterogeneity among the three subtypes. Clinical characteristics and prognosis significantly varied among the three subtypes of HF patients in ICUs, with HFmrEF patients achieving the best prognosis. The novel prediction model, tailored for this population, showed a satisfying prediction ability.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>IMR Press</pub><pmid>39077540</pmid><doi>10.31083/j.rcm2406165</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1530-6550
ispartof Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2023-06, Vol.24 (6), p.165
issn 1530-6550
2153-8174
1530-6550
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_72e0e854ebe54bc09758c78ec641c38b
source PubMed Central
subjects ejection fraction
follow-up
heart failure
icu
Original Research
prediction model
survival
title Characteristics, Prognosis, and Prediction Model of Heart Failure Patients in Intensive Care Units Based on Preserved, Mildly Reduced, and Reduced Ejection Fraction
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T07%3A01%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characteristics,%20Prognosis,%20and%20Prediction%20Model%20of%20Heart%20Failure%20Patients%20in%20Intensive%20Care%20Units%20Based%20on%20Preserved,%20Mildly%20Reduced,%20and%20Reduced%20Ejection%20Fraction&rft.jtitle=Reviews%20in%20cardiovascular%20medicine&rft.au=Tao,%20Fang&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=165&rft.pages=165-&rft.issn=1530-6550&rft.eissn=1530-6550&rft_id=info:doi/10.31083/j.rcm2406165&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3086064104%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-2e943f50fc067dd8d38077487595e73f8ee2ff9414bfdc6d9ef19175c8ef5cf83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3086064104&rft_id=info:pmid/39077540&rfr_iscdi=true